U.S., Chinese warships come dangerously close
The guided missile cruiser USS Cowpens steams through the Philippine Sea on Nov. 10, 2012.
December 13th, 2013
03:25 PM ET

U.S., Chinese warships come dangerously close

By Barbara Starr

A confrontation between the U.S. and Chinese navies led to a tense moment in the South China Sea, CNN has learned.

The incident last Friday, which was resolved peacefully, was the latest sign of Chinese military aggression in international waters and airspace.

A U.S. Navy warship was forced to come to a sudden stop when a Chinese military ship crossed dangerously close in what sources described as a deliberate maneuver.

No weapons were fired and the incident was resolved.

A senior U.S. Navy official described it as a highly unusual encounter because the Chinese ship came so close to the American vessel, the USS Cowpens, a guided missile cruiser.

Several U.S. military officials confirmed details of the incident, which has just come to light.

The Cowpens was in international waters when one ship from a group of Chinese Navy vessels headed toward it. The Chinese ship failed to stop, even after being warned by radio from the Cowpens that it was getting too close.

According to the Navy official, the Cowpens commanding officer issued orders for an "all stop" when the Chinese ship was less than 500 yards off its bow.

"It is unusual to have to take evasive action at sea to avoid a collision," the official said.

While naval vessels often come close as they are observing each other, the United States sees this incident as one that could have led to a collision because of the time and distance it takes for an American warship to stop.

soundoff (193 Responses)
  1. AlGore LIes

    Weeelll...shoot!!! Chiner is a-ways over yonder..
    Why american ships have to be a messin' those waters when they should 'git on over here??

    December 18, 2013 at 4:36 pm | Reply
  2. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    There is a big differece between: 'I would be defending myself' & the correction: 'I would not be defending myself'...if the Correction was sensored (in this case it was not but in others it has been) the meaning is lost a weekness is precived and further attacks may or maynot be wagged (in this case not but in others it has been). BYE...

    December 18, 2013 at 3:50 pm | Reply
  3. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Correction: As you can see: If my response was sensored/edited (as it often is) I would not be defending myself in this very real place/enviroment. THIS IS “IT” RIGHT BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES…

    December 18, 2013 at 3:44 pm | Reply
    • murf

      God you are ignorant.

      December 18, 2013 at 8:54 pm | Reply
  4. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    As you can see: If my response was sensored/edited (as it often is) I would be defending myself in this very real place/enviroment. THIS IS "IT" RIGHT BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES...

    December 18, 2013 at 3:42 pm | Reply
  5. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Using the press & media/radio.

    December 18, 2013 at 3:38 pm | Reply
  6. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    FACT: the NSA/Military always lables any precived opposition as "mentaly ill" and goes to great lenghths to "sell it" too would be Citizens.

    December 18, 2013 at 3:37 pm | Reply
    • gstranyord

      dude, learn how to spell. Are you in 5th grade?

      December 19, 2013 at 5:13 am | Reply
  7. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    THIS IS ALSO BULLYING: "clarity is the word
    December 18th, 2013 3:25 pm ET

    Clarity? It would be best for you to get back on your medication."

    December 18, 2013 at 3:34 pm | Reply
  8. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Correction: EXAMPLE OF LABLE MAKING: a Military tactic: "clarity is the word
    December 18th, 2013 3:25 pm ET

    Clarity? It would be best for you to get back on your medication."

    December 18, 2013 at 3:32 pm | Reply
  9. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    example of labling: "clarity is the word
    December 18th, 2013 3:25 pm ET

    Clarity? It would be best for you to get back on your medication.".

    December 18, 2013 at 3:30 pm | Reply
  10. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Look at it this way: if F. Scott. Fitgerald was sensored you would not know of F. Scott Fitgerald & certianly you would never know his work in other-words a complete loss. Now if baby Jesus was sensored by the NSA would Christianity exist...answer: NO.

    December 18, 2013 at 3:28 pm | Reply
  11. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    You see: this: ""Wars are won by winning & losing." quote: the digital p.r.o.p.h.e.t..(-N-.-S.-.-A.-). " had too be rewritten by a person/s too post but it is not/no-longer the same thing that was origanaly written & posted but sensored. Because a person was sensored by a person right here right now just minutes ago the World & U.S. is a far different place.

    December 18, 2013 at 3:23 pm | Reply
  12. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    "Wars are won by winning & losing." quote: the digital p.r.o.p.h.e.t..(-N-.-S.-.-A.-).

    December 18, 2013 at 3:16 pm | Reply
  13. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    How does this happen: it happens when you try too or do partake in "Your" Goverment...this is the Obama experience...but it did not start with him. So how is it going too end all things considered...Ans. good luck with that one fellow slave...

    December 18, 2013 at 3:11 pm | Reply
    • clarity is the word

      Clarity? It would be best for you to get back on your medication.

      December 18, 2013 at 3:25 pm | Reply
  14. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Liken "it" too having a privet library with books some you have written being selectivly taken/replaced/edited/modified/stollen/manipulated...consider the truth is in that library but now its not and when you want too go into your own personal too "WORK" you find nothing "real" too even work with.

    December 18, 2013 at 3:06 pm | Reply
  15. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    NOW YOU ARE PROBABLY ASKING YOURSELF WHY HERE WHY NOW "THIS" IS THE WRONG PLACE. THE TRUTH IS "IT" IS HAPPENING IN NO SMALL WAY BECAUSE OF SENSORSHIP.

    December 18, 2013 at 3:00 pm | Reply
  16. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Correction: Now what does this have too do with Obama and the Military he is comander and chief of…Ans: everything & or nothing.

    December 18, 2013 at 2:57 pm | Reply
  17. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Now what does this have too do with Obama and the Military he is comander and chief of...Ans: everything or nothing.

    December 18, 2013 at 2:54 pm | Reply
  18. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Cause and effect...it is real...it is true...

    December 18, 2013 at 2:49 pm | Reply
  19. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Right now many things that are real are being sensored including my own personal property is being manipulated and the would be data is actualy being stollen and the result: my life is in no small way being ruined.

    December 18, 2013 at 2:48 pm | Reply
  20. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    my gift or the gift of the sensor/s you can see.

    December 18, 2013 at 2:43 pm | Reply
  21. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    in this case it could lead too death (in theroy) as it has happened before historicly...by the way I knew this exact sensorship senerio would happen...HERE IT IS RIGHT BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES...

    December 18, 2013 at 2:42 pm | Reply
  22. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    sensorship is in full effect now.

    December 18, 2013 at 2:38 pm | Reply
  23. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Spell/mistype the word profit & interchange the meaning: Prophet now sensor the response in explination to any would be response of a person who may or may not be anything remarkable...a person who may or maynot deconstruct what may or maynot have been written and then messure the reaction...did someone somewhere die as a result of sensorship...the answer is yes. i.e. sensorship kills people...

    December 18, 2013 at 2:33 pm | Reply
  24. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    What could happen...one can only imagine...the reality is something does happen as it always does somewhat predictably.

    December 18, 2013 at 2:23 pm | Reply
  25. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Now there is a difference between in context and out of context like there is a direct and dangerious reality created through Censorship e.g. "Wars are won with small arms" (out of context) VS. "Wars are fought with and Won with small arms." (in context)-you see any third party may or maynot respond in kind too the out of Context quote/statement (this is a reality created in no small way to censorship found in and around the internet)...

    December 18, 2013 at 2:20 pm | Reply
  26. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    it might be universaly understood that terrorist acts are defined by personal carryed weapons...how do you defend that with nukes...that depends on other organizational realitys...e.g. Pakistan uses nukes to support Terrorism and terrorists both those terrorists opperate across the Globe & Space...

    December 18, 2013 at 2:10 pm | Reply
  27. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Cops do not carry nukes as such...what do they carry...well that depends on where you are at and who you are...and that may or may not change...it can ofcourse but how would it change...with nukes or without nukes and at what level...remembering the rule: that no one is ever responsable for anything ever...

    December 18, 2013 at 2:04 pm | Reply
  28. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    Through the misinformation used by Militant Blacks in the U.S. logicaly Whites are African Americans...but of course they are not.

    December 18, 2013 at 1:34 pm | Reply
  29. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    did you know that African Americans are not from Africa so much as they were from Haiti (the Country) and Africa is a Continent where brown people are also from...

    December 18, 2013 at 1:29 pm | Reply
  30. Njyrhg Fertyk.

    "wars are won by small arms… no. ever heard of world war 2, in which we used nuclear bombs to end and win the war." Well if what you say is true then why not get rid of all small arms...

    December 18, 2013 at 1:19 pm | Reply
  31. Ljhfdgy Utrfyuy

    The great digital prophet (-N-S-A) wrote: "There is little Justice too be found within or.".

    December 17, 2013 at 12:41 pm | Reply
  32. B.Poster

    I meant China's control of the Panama Canal and the vast influence that Russia and China have in the nations of Central and South America contribute to the ability of Russia and China to shut down the US economy and crush it militarily. Part of the post was not well written. Apologize for the confusion.

    December 16, 2013 at 11:05 pm | Reply
    • George patton

      My apologies to you too, B.Poster. I mistook you for an enlightened poster here. Thanks for straightening me out. Anyone with half a brain knows that neither Russia nor China can get their ships anywhere near the Panama canal. We practically own the Pacific Ocean, not Russia or China. These countries have all they can do just to defend themselves!!!

      December 17, 2013 at 8:42 am | Reply
  33. Ljhfdgy Utrfyuy

    Lies all lies...I bet the Military is going to waste more taxpayer dollars too lose more not less.

    December 16, 2013 at 11:43 am | Reply
  34. sparks2000

    Chinese military aggression?seriously?we were hanging out near their aircraft carrier.were we planning on sending a card and some balloons?

    December 16, 2013 at 11:14 am | Reply
    • nick

      It was in international waters. Neither your daddy or your Chinese step uncle owns it. BTW, just look at the map of Chinese claim or its territorial waters in the South China Sea. It is the most ludicrous childish bully like claim I have seen. If given a chance they would claim your backyard swimming pool too.

      December 16, 2013 at 1:28 pm | Reply
      • George patton

        Spoken like a true, lame brained Tea Partier, nick. We're the ones who have naval vessels on the Pacific, the India Ocean, the Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. Does China? Of course not!!! Their only ships are never far from their homeland, much unlike ours!

        December 16, 2013 at 3:15 pm |
      • James

        How whould like to see a Chinese ship come to California coast in the internation water to check on carrier group from SD?

        December 16, 2013 at 4:51 pm |
      • General Sherman

        Like that's ever going to happen, James. On the other hand, we don't need to own the whole Pacific Ocean nor do we need any ships in either the Indian Ocean nor the Mediterranean Sea as George already stated above. Our military forces are way oversized and that's what's draining our economy! Let's get real!

        December 16, 2013 at 6:11 pm |
      • nick is equal to moron squared

        So nick, what do you think of this scenario? Your mom is walking on the staircases in a public place (say Macy's), a guy stalks her and takes pictures under her skirt and take pictures of her boobs. Then your mom ask him stop doing that, and this guy says: "this is a public place, everybody can be here and take pictures (i.e. everybody has freedom of navigation here) ! " And this guy goes further, telling your mom:" You are being too aggressive and you are bullying ! And you need to adopt to international norms." Are you gonna agree with this guy?

        In case you agree with this guy, now imaging this happens in the public street right next to your mom's house (which is more analogous to this incident), do you still agree with him?

        It seems some knuckle heads just can't understand (or just refuse to acknowledge) you can't do anything you like simply because you are at a public place (or international water/ air space). Politicians and some media should abandon this kind of hooligan mentality (double standard is too soft a phrase) if they still want to occupy the moral high ground and sell democracy and other better parts of american values to other countries.

        December 17, 2013 at 1:42 am |
      • nick

        Due, my mom would castrate that guy on the spot with a chopstick, if she can locate that shriveled little yellow noodle.

        December 17, 2013 at 3:18 am |
      • murf

        Gorge, be reasonable for about 30 seconds.
        If Bush tried to claim the entire south Atlantic, pretty much just because, you would be saying the same thing as Nick.
        They are claiming ALL international waters all the way to Indonesia. A claim that is against ALL international laws, that NOBODY recognizes, including the UN but especially their neighbors. Who by the way are our long standing allies and important trading partners.
        The incident took place in international waters, according every international law known. We can cruise our ships any where we want just like they can off the coast of California in international waters.Iran sent a frigate to the Caribbean this year. Didn't hear about It? That is because we didn't act stupid and try to ram them.)
        In doing so they did violate international maritime navigation laws. Shadowing each other is nothing new, and is perfectly legal.

        (

        December 18, 2013 at 8:06 pm |
      • AlGore LIes

        I CANNOT SEE THE COAST OF CHINER FROM MY BACK YARD. SO I WILL NOT GIVE IT FURTHER THOUGHT.
        WORRYING ABOUT THINGS THAT HAVE NOT HAPPENED IS THE DEFINITION OF FEAR.
        MEDDLING HALF WAY ACROSS THE WORLD IN OTHER PEOPLE'S BUSINESS IS THE UNFORTUNATE AMERICAN WAY THAT PERPETUALLY KEEPS THIS COUNTRY IN DEBT AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SICK, INDEBTED, IGNORANT AND ENLISTED.

        December 19, 2013 at 11:09 am |
    • The Truth

      Read the article, the U.S. vessel was in international waters, so both ships are bound by the international rules for safe navigation. As a former Merchant Marine and Naval Officer I now the rules. U.S. carriers are routinely tracked closely by foreign navies and there is nothing we can do about it, they are within their rights to be there, by the bye so are we. We do have an escort shadow the vessel and the task force may at times try to out run it, but we never intentionaly put them or us into a collision situation.

      This was a tactic of the Soviet Navy back in the day. They would try to block us away and sometimes intentionally hit our vessels and try to blame us. Guess China found that playbook.

      I also saw the but, but, but we have vessels off their coast lame arguement from someone. Its international waters, tough. There are foreign vessels off our coast right now doing the same thing.

      December 18, 2013 at 10:37 am | Reply
  35. Ned

    Too bad the US mothballed all four Iowa class battleships. Had it been an Iowa battleship that Chinese ship was about to crossed into, two things would have happened – nothing says "STOP" like a 15 inch gun at close range or "Yeah right" – a ship that size is going to be able to stop in time, to not slice your ship in half and notice it did so.

    All this tactic shows is that our ships should prepare to be better armed for close quarters combat, as Chinese military vessels appear to have a "kamikazi" streak in them. And seriously, forget about stealth, just put bigger and better guns on US warships.

    December 16, 2013 at 10:53 am | Reply
    • James

      It sure must be nice living in a universe where your supposedly adult views on international relations are less realistic than a gi joe cartoon.

      December 17, 2013 at 7:41 am | Reply
    • sawolf

      Those Naval Rifles fire a 16" round.

      December 17, 2013 at 1:34 pm | Reply
  36. sandy

    why are countries fighting for small piece of lands. There are people around the world who does not have proper meal cloths and shelter over their head and super powers fight to show their muscle. times have changed to a very great extent from second world war. one aggressive move a nuclear war and the effect will be seen world wide. so guys donot fight please

    December 16, 2013 at 9:28 am | Reply
    • JoeO

      China seems to have been late to realize the great riches in the seas surrounding the various islands in dispute: so old claims, long-forgotten, have been given a new lift. In other words, China was asleep at the switch, and now is trying to claw back lost territory.

      December 16, 2013 at 10:58 am | Reply
    • Dave0943

      Sandy,
      What you say is sad but true. Many people are starving in the United States and China, including children. These people will never come first. The big guys on the block need to be able to flex muscles. One of these days a situation like this one in the article will go wrong and that will start a world of sh-t.

      December 16, 2013 at 5:11 pm | Reply
    • fookinGod

      were you born last night?

      December 16, 2013 at 10:23 pm | Reply
  37. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    sensorship is in full effect now.

    December 15, 2013 at 3:14 pm | Reply
  38. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    beings

    December 15, 2013 at 3:13 pm | Reply
  39. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    human

    December 15, 2013 at 3:12 pm | Reply
  40. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    superior

    December 15, 2013 at 3:12 pm | Reply
  41. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    are

    December 15, 2013 at 3:11 pm | Reply
  42. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    j a pan

    December 15, 2013 at 3:11 pm | Reply
  43. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    and when was the US Civil War over boys and girls...

    December 15, 2013 at 1:04 pm | Reply
  44. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    I can do anything...you cannot...

    December 15, 2013 at 1:03 pm | Reply
  45. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    The US started after the US Civil War...

    December 15, 2013 at 1:02 pm | Reply
  46. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    Never was called a liar too my face ever before...so where is the disconnect you Military Backstabers...

    December 15, 2013 at 1:01 pm | Reply
  47. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    the lie of the year was 100% correct.

    December 15, 2013 at 12:56 pm | Reply
  48. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    MAYBE I DID WRITE IT...NOW THATS SOMTHING...

    December 15, 2013 at 12:54 pm | Reply
  49. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    You see in the U.S. this is the past present and future garbage in garbage out...nice work...your overpaid...

    December 15, 2013 at 12:53 pm | Reply
  50. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    Did you see the lie of the year 2013. I helped write that...

    December 15, 2013 at 12:51 pm | Reply
  51. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    TO CHINA: PLEASE SAVE THE U.S. FROM THE U.S. MILITARY.

    December 15, 2013 at 12:48 pm | Reply
  52. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    All real/imaginary US economists should be sensored...

    December 15, 2013 at 12:47 pm | Reply
  53. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    .

    December 15, 2013 at 12:42 pm | Reply
  54. Jryuiryu Jfhkfhk

    Sensorship is in full effect now...

    December 15, 2013 at 12:41 pm | Reply
  55. George patton

    China is a friend of nobody and never will be, hit them next time. only way to keep them away.

    December 15, 2013 at 12:22 pm | Reply
    • George patton

      Good grief, Phunnie boy. I suppose that you'll be taking up for the J apanese next, won't you?

      December 15, 2013 at 1:02 pm | Reply
    • B.Poster

      While China may be a friend of no one, the US has even less friends right now. Furthermore I'm not sure it would be wise to "hit" them. China is bigger and stronger than the US is right now and it has Russia to back it up if need be. Russia is also bigger and stronger than the US is right now. Additionally the US depends upon China for much of the manufactured goods that make it go. It's unwise to anger one's main supplier when one has no other options. As such, the best approach is probably to acknowledge the superior position of China in this region and get out as soon as possible. A "pivot" to this part of the globe was a foolish idea whose time has long passed. Had this actually resulted in a shooting incident, the American battle ship would have been sunk, any American ship attempting to assist would have been sunk as well, the Chinese battle ship would have emerged unscathed, and the world have rushed to condemn the US for unnecessarily provoking the Chinese. Essentially the American crew and ship live only because the Chinese chose to allow them to do so. The American military and the American government got played and seem to be to foolish to understand that. It's far better and saner to redeploy to positions that make sense for America's national defense needs than it is to try and risk a fight with China. That is a fight that America cannot win and furthermore America depends upon China for much of the manufactured goods that it needs to operate. Basic common sense suggests that one does not take steps that would anger their main supplier when there are no other real alternatives. The only constructive role in this that American war ships might be able to play would be acting in ways to ensure the shipping lanes remain open. Since America's main supplier is China, this might mean siding with the Chinese in order to ensure these shipments continue, however, the Chinese are fully capable of handling that so there really seems no constructive role for the US in this. Of course steps will want to be taken by the Americans to wean themselves off of dependence on others such as the Chinese but that is the current situation. Only with an honest assessment of America's current situation can American policy makers craft intelligent policies. Right now such an honest assessment seems to be lacking.

      December 16, 2013 at 3:31 pm | Reply
      • George patton

        Good posting, B.Poster. Thank you.

        December 16, 2013 at 4:05 pm |
      • Golem

        Wrong. The U.S. is much stronger than the Chinese or Russians never mind that the Chinese and Russians hate each other.

        December 16, 2013 at 5:59 pm |
      • fookinGod

        if china and russia is bigger or better than US then tell me why their citizens are dying to flee their country and seek refuge in the states.

        December 16, 2013 at 10:26 pm |
      • B.Poster

        Golem: While it may be true that Russia and China distrust one another, given their recent cooperation of late it seems incorrect to suggest they "hate" each other. Actually the BRICS consisting of Russia, China, Brazil, India, and South Africa is now the most powerful cohesive and cohesive alliance of nation states operating along with their other allies. This alliance is far more cohesive and capable than any thing the "West" has to offer. It's far superior to any thing that NATO or any thing else America and it's allies can muster. This combined with China's control of the vital control and the numerous allies that Russia and China have in the South and Central America mean China and it's allies can currently shut down the US economy and crush it militarily at will and their is not a thing America can do about it. While shutting down the US economy would have a short term adverse affect on China it is not as severe as what America would suffer.

        You may be asking why don't Russia or China acting either alone or individually simply do this? As I think it was Napoleon who once said to paraphrase it makes no sense to interfere with an enemy who is destroying themselves. It's likely far easier for them to simply wait while America implodes due to foolish social, economic, and foreign policy actions.

        fookingod: Russian and Chinese citizens are not dying to seek refuge in the US. You phrase this a question of "why", since it is not happening, the premise posed by the question is false, a bit like saying why is hot at the South Pole? The chief problem the US has with uncontrolled immigration is along the border with Mexico. Mexico is attempting to relocate large numbers of its citizens to the US in order to regain lands lost in the Mexican-American war as well as Texas. The US government is either to foolish or to blinded by ideology to understand that.

        As for immigration to the US from Russia and China in general, this probably does still happen to a degree. Some come here for economic opportunities, to gain certain knowledge that they can take back to their homelands to use against America to undermine it, and perhaps some to be with family already here. That has been part of the special nature of America for centuries. Immigration is likely a good thing but the nation currently has uncontrolled immigration and the system is a complete mess. The best approach here is likely a ten year moratorium on all immigration to give the authorities breathing space to address the problems in the system. While this is being worked on, the nation could look into guest worker programs such as what other nations use. The point being it would be unethical to disallow someone an opportunity who is beneficial to the nation, who will not adversely affect those already here, and lacks genuine opportunities in their home country. The current situation where immigration is uncontrolled, at least on the southern border, the nation to the south is at best moderately hostile, and the surrounding nations are heavily influenced by enemies of America such immigration policies are unsustainable at best and very likely foolhardy.

        December 16, 2013 at 10:59 pm |
      • Dweller

        Iraq thought they were bigger and badder too...NOT! lol....

        December 16, 2013 at 11:20 pm |
      • murf

        Welcome to Fantasy Island!
        Oh I am sorry you were serious!
        My bad.

        December 18, 2013 at 8:50 pm |
  56. sgsdfgsdfgewrqwerqweyututuutty24242424

    BUENO PARECE QUE LOS ENFERMOS MENTALES DE ESPANA POR MAL ADMINISTRADORES NECESITABAN DINERO SEGUN LAS AUDITORIAS.

    SE REVISARON LAS BASES DE DATOS Y CONSIGUIERON A ALGUNOS SUJETOS DE ESTUDIO.

    SEGUN ALGUNAS INFORMAICONES PARTE DE DATOS SON ENVIADOS PARA DESARROLLOS EN CENTROS DE COLICIN DE PARTICULAS PARA SER MENOS EXPLICITOS.

    BIEN MIRA PEDASO DE PERRA SARNOSA GODA QUE ESTAS INVOLUCIONANDO POR RATERA DEJA DE ESTAR VENDIENDO ESPANOLES PARA GANAR DINERO MARICA BASURA NARCOTRAFICANTE.

    LAS UNIVERSIDADES LATINO AMERICANAS NO TE VAN A REGALAR EL NOMBRE BASURA LADRONA DILE A LOS PRINCIPITOS ENFERMOS MENTALES QUE DEJEN DE PEDIRTE LA MESADA Y DE ESTAR MANIPULANDO ARTISTAS PARA TENER CON ELLAS TAMBIEN LES DAS DE COMER A TUS COMANSALES CARNE HUMANA PEDASO DE BASURA SERIAL NO DIGO ESTAS INVOLUCIONANDO GENTICAMENTE VIOLA CALLEGERAS.

    LA PRGUNTA CIENTIFICA DE HOY LOS DESARROLLOS EN FISICA SON CREADOS EN QUE PAIS?.

    CUALES SON LAS CUENTAS SUIZAS DONDE ESTAS DEPOSITANDO EL DINERO VIOLA HABITANTES HONESTOS.

    TAMBIÉN LAS HAY EN ALEMANIA Y POR QUE EL BANCO DE ITALIA CON ALGUNOS RELIGIOSOS NO TIENEN DINERO.
    TYTUTTTTUTTTYYTUTYTY

    December 15, 2013 at 11:28 am | Reply
    • fookinGod

      cayote

      December 16, 2013 at 10:26 pm | Reply
  57. Scott

    I am waiting for an Arab Muslim to write a ridiculous rant on Muhammed and how he went to the Moon. 3,,,2,,,1,,,

    December 15, 2013 at 10:42 am | Reply
  58. JHGJHGJGGJJ554465

    ERTWERT23452345 dice:

    14 diciembre, 2013 a las 21:14

    OK COMENZAMOS.

    ENFERMA MENTAL BASURA PERRA ELEGIDA POR LA NSA POR ANDAR COGIENDOTE A CUALQUIER PUTA BASURA COMO LAS DOS NEGRAS PERRAS BURRAS QUE PARIO LA PUTA DROGADICTA MICHELL OBAMA, TE ESTAMOS ORDENANDO PEDASO DE MARICO NARCOTRAFICANTES IMBESIL QUE NO LE PAGUES MAS A LOS ENFERMOS NAZIS QUE LES DISTES EL PRESUPUESTO PARA COMPRAR LA COMPUTADORA PARA VIGILANCIA SATELITAL.

    TE ESTAMOS ORDENANDO CONGRESISTA COGE PERRA VIOLADOR DE NINAS POR QUE SABEMOS QUE EL MARICO BUSH Y BILLINGER SE REUNEN PARA PAGAR PUTICAS JOVENES CUANDO NO ESTAS CON LA PUTA DE TU ESPOSA.

    LAS COMPUTADORCITAS ESTAN EN NY CALIFORNIA Y WASHINTOS, HEY PEDASO DE MARICO CONGRESISTA PAGANOS NUESTRO DINERO POR ROBO DE INFORMACION BIOLOGICA.

    DEMANDA AL CONGRESO NORTE AMERICANO, TRIBUNALES DE LA UNION EUROPEA AMERICA POR CRIMENES Y ASESINATOS MASIVOS EN LATINO AMERICA.

    AÑO

    PRESIDENTES DEL TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LA UE A LOS QUE NO LES RECONOCEMOS LA ELECCIÓN POR HABER SIDO MANIPULADA.

    PRESIDENTE DEL
    SENADO
    JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., VP, (DEM.)
    DESDE EL 20 DE ENERO DE 2009
    PRESIDENTE PRO
    TEMPORE
    PATRICK LEAHY, (DEM.)
    DESDE EL 17 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2012
    LÍDER DE LA MAYORÍA
    HARRY M. REID, (DEM.)
    DESDE EL 4 DE ENERO DE 2007
    LÍDER DE LA MINORÍA
    A. MITCHELL MCCONNELL JR., (REP.)
    DESDE EL 4 DE ENERO DE 2007

    ELEANOR SHARPSTON (REINO UNIDO).
    JÁN MAZÁK (ESLOVAQUIA).
    JULIANE KOKOTT (ALEMANIA).
    NIILO JÄÄSKINEN (FINLANDIA).
    PAOLO MENGOZZI (ITALIA).
    PEDRO CRUZ VILLALÓN (ESPAÑA).
    VERICA TRSTENJAK (ESLOVENIA).
    YVES BOT (FRANCIA).

    LA INVESTIGACION DETERMINO QUE ESTOS CRIMINALES ESTAN PERMITIENDO VIOLACIONES, NARCOTRAFICO, ROBO CON USO DE DERECHO CANONICO, VOLACIONES DE MUJERES.

    USO DE NANOTECNOLOGIA PARAMANIPULACION HUMANA.

    EXIGIMOS LA RESPUESTA DEL FBI SOBRE LA DENUNCIA HECHA A ESTOS JUECES.

    EN 10 MINUTOSUTILIZAREMOS EL OTRO METODO PARA COMPROBACION CRIMINALISTICA.

    SABEMOS CUAL ES LA METODOLOGIA PSICOLOGICA QUE BIENE YA QUE NO VAN A RESPONDER POR QUE LA PENA ES LA MUERTE.
    Y EL FBI EUROPOL E INTERPOL SON COMPLICES.

    PARECE QUE HAY QUE RECORDARLES QUE TENEMOS 13.000 DENUNCIAS EN TODOS LOS CONTINENTES DEL MUNDO.

    QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQpgiorg.blog.comQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ

    December 14, 2013 at 10:25 pm | Reply
    • fookinGod

      santa banana conio

      December 16, 2013 at 10:27 pm | Reply
  59. JHGJHGJGGJJ554465

    UNA PREGUNTA CNN POR QUE NOSOTROS UTILIZAMOS LEAVING A TRACE Y RESOLVIMOS TODOS LOS CRÍMENES DE LA HISTORIA DE LA HUMANIDAD.

    Y EL FBI INVESTIGA A ASESINOS WITH OUT A TRACE Y DESCUBRE UNO QUE OTRO CRIMINAL.

    SABEMOS QUE EXISTE PROGRAMACIÓN HUMANA Y MANIPULACIÓN EN TODO EL MUNDO.

    PUDIESE SER QUE LOS ACTOS TERRORISTAS SON PLANIFICADOS.

    QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQpgiorg.blog.comQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
    RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

    December 14, 2013 at 10:21 pm | Reply
  60. JHGJHGJGGJJ554465

    DEMANDA AL CONGRESO NORTE AMERICANO, TRIBUNALES DE LA UNION EUROPEA AMERICA POR CRIMENES Y ASESINATOS MASIVOS EN LATINO AMERICA.

    AÑO

    PRESIDENTES DEL TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LA UE A LOS QUE NO LES RECONOCEMOS LA ELECCIÓN POR HABER SIDO MANIPULADA.

    PRESIDENTE DEL
    SENADO
    JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., VP, (DEM.)
    DESDE EL 20 DE ENERO DE 2009
    PRESIDENTE PRO
    TEMPORE
    PATRICK LEAHY, (DEM.)
    DESDE EL 17 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2012
    LÍDER DE LA MAYORÍA
    HARRY M. REID, (DEM.)
    DESDE EL 4 DE ENERO DE 2007
    LÍDER DE LA MINORÍA
    A. MITCHELL MCCONNELL JR., (REP.)
    DESDE EL 4 DE ENERO DE 2007

    ELEANOR SHARPSTON (REINO UNIDO).
    JÁN MAZÁK (ESLOVAQUIA).
    JULIANE KOKOTT (ALEMANIA).
    NIILO JÄÄSKINEN (FINLANDIA).
    PAOLO MENGOZZI (ITALIA).
    PEDRO CRUZ VILLALÓN (ESPAÑA).
    VERICA TRSTENJAK (ESLOVENIA).
    YVES BOT (FRANCIA).

    LA INVESTIGACION DETERMINO QUE ESTOS CRIMINALES ESTAN PERMITIENDO VIOLACIONES, NARCOTRAFICO, ROBO CON USO DE DERECHO CANONICO, VOLACIONES DE MUJERES.

    USO DE NANOTECNOLOGIA PARAMANIPULACION HUMANA.

    EXIGIMOS LA RESPUESTA DEL FBI SOBRE LA DENUNCIA HECHA A ESTOS JUECES.

    EN 10 MINUTOSUTILIZAREMOS EL OTRO METODO PARA COMPROBACION CRIMINALISTICA.

    SABEMOS CUAL ES LA METODOLOGIA PSICOLOGICA QUE BIENE YA QUE NO VAN A RESPONDER POR QUE LA PENA ES LA MUERTE.
    Y EL FBI EUROPOL E INTERPOL SON COMPLICES.

    PARECE QUE HAY QUE RECORDARLES QUE TENEMOS 13.000 DENUNCIAS EN TODOS LOS CONTINENTES DEL MUNDO.

    QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQpgiorg.blog.comQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ

    December 14, 2013 at 10:00 pm | Reply
  61. sgsdfgsdfgewrqwerqweyututuutty24242424

    LA PRÓXIMA METODOLOGÍA NO LE VA A GUSTAR SR ANDERSON PERO ES NECESARIA.

    PARA DETERMINAR LAS CUENTAS BANCARIAS EN EUROPA DE POLÍTICOS EN LA QUE SE DEPOSITA ORO Y CAPITAL PROVENIENTE DE ESTUDIOS DE LA RAZA HUMANA.

    SE REALIZARA EN CONTRA DE FISCALES Y JUECES NORTE AMERICANOS DURARA 5 DIAS.

    LES GUSTE O NO.

    NUESTRA INVESTIGACIÓN ES CIENTÍFICA Y ACTIVIDADES CRIMINALES DE ESTE TIPO SON INACEPTABLES.
    WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

    December 14, 2013 at 5:23 pm | Reply
  62. sgsdfgsdfgewrqwerqweyututuutty

    LA DENUNCIA INTERNACIONAL A LOS POLÍTICOS INCLUYE DEMANDAS POR ROBO DE INFORMACIÓN BIOLÓGICA PROYECTOS TEORÍAS EN EXTREMO COMPLEJA INVALUABLES DESDE EL PUNTO DE VISTA DE MATERIAL INTELECTUAL.

    POR ESTA RAZÓN CONTINUAREMOS UTILIZANDO LA METODOLOGÍA DE COMPROBACIÓN INCLUYENDO TODO EL MATERIAL PARA COMPROBAR LOS CRIMENES.
    YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

    December 14, 2013 at 5:04 pm | Reply
  63. George patton

    damn we missed the perfect opportunity to teach them a lesson not to mess around with world superpower. don't let them walk away next time without paying the price guys!!!

    December 14, 2013 at 5:00 pm | Reply
    • meyo

      hahah you know what the call is next time.. Shoot until it either moves out of the way or it sinks! 🙂

      December 14, 2013 at 6:46 pm | Reply
    • George patton

      Good grief Phunnie boy, aren't you ashamed of displaying all that "affluenza" of yours on this website? I only wish that you'd quit vomiting out your ignorance over China under my good name as it is starting to embarrass me!!!

      December 14, 2013 at 8:51 pm | Reply
  64. sgsdfgsdfgewrqwerqwe

    QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQpgiorg.blog.comQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ

    December 14, 2013 at 4:52 pm | Reply
  65. sgsdfgsdfgewrqwerqwe

    BY FEDERAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAWS HAVE PAST 3 DAYS OF THE NEW METHOD IN WHICH THE FBI INTERPOL AND EUROPOL HAVE DUE TO MAKE PUBLIC COMPLAINTS EXPLANATION A NORTH AMERICAN POLITICAL AND OTHER COUNTRIES WHICH INVOLVE IN genocidal complicity FBI CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AMONG MANY CRIMES.

    EXPLANATIONS TO MAKE NO COMPLAINTS OR CLAIMS ARE PUBLICLY ASSUME THESE ARE CRIMES BY RECOGNIZING THAT ARE ACCUSED.
    BREACHED ALL PERIODS OF RESEARCH PRESENTATION OF DEFENSE ARGUMENTS.
    RESEARCH DOWN.
    TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

    December 14, 2013 at 4:49 pm | Reply
  66. Portland tony

    Well, there's a lot of off topic rhetoric here, but the topic was "warships coming close to each other". Both nations confront each other in these "Wargames" to learn the air and sea tactics, electronic surveillance capabilities, and general abilities of the other side. We used to carry on with similar exercises with the USSR. Bottom line: both sides can evaluate the other militarily by these "confrontations". This is just military training!

    December 14, 2013 at 2:19 pm | Reply
  67. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    "So with all this being said, I, an American citizen, do declare anything that comes out your mouth ignorant and insanely false….idiot!" THATS ODD PEOPLE TELL ME I AM SMART AND A GENIUS AND WHAT I SAY IS TRUE/CORRECT BECAUSE I SAID IT...YOU SEE THIS IS REALITY...IT IS YOUR REALITY...YOU ARE JUST IN DENIAL & TALKING ABOUT YOURSELF WHEN YOU SAY: "declare anything that comes out your mouth ignorant and insanely false….idiot!"...

    December 14, 2013 at 2:11 pm | Reply
  68. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    "SO China’s technology is behind." IT DOES NOT MATTER BECASUE WARS ARE WON AND LOST WITH SMALL ARMS AND ORGANIZING NEATHER OF WHICH YOU ARE WILLING TO DO OR CAPABLE OF DOING AND STILL WIN.

    December 14, 2013 at 2:05 pm | Reply
    • Josh R.

      wars are won by small arms... no. ever heard of world war 2, in which we used nuclear bombs to end and win the war.

      December 18, 2013 at 10:08 am | Reply
  69. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    "The United States have been to the moon countless times." YES YOU CAN COUNT AND SO CAN CHINA BETTER THAN YOU OR ANYONE ELSE IN THE US THAT IS NOT A ILLEGAL ALIAN ...

    December 14, 2013 at 2:01 pm | Reply
  70. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    "China has just now got a probe to the moon." Uhm how many of those parts were made in the US...the US cannot go to the Moon without Chinse parts...

    December 14, 2013 at 1:58 pm | Reply
  71. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    "The United States has a far superior military." SO GREAT THEY GAVE (LET TAKE) ALL OF THE KILLING TOYS TOO THE ENEMY...The US can't even build their killer toys without China...

    December 14, 2013 at 1:54 pm | Reply
  72. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    "Third, China couldn’t afford a war with the United States" someone above stated ' the price of American goods will go up as soon as China builds their Military up'...light bulb going off for you yet...

    December 14, 2013 at 1:50 pm | Reply
  73. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    China cannot lose the US Military will never allow it...

    December 14, 2013 at 1:46 pm | Reply
  74. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    "America has won many conflicts without help." that's right did not WIN WARS...at least you agree...light bulb going off for you yet.

    December 14, 2013 at 1:44 pm | Reply
  75. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    The US Military cannot even protect itself...

    December 14, 2013 at 1:41 pm | Reply
  76. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    not long after korea war was started China invaded th US at the request of Israel...ever hear of Nixon...

    December 14, 2013 at 1:26 pm | Reply
  77. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    Ever hear of a "Slope"...

    December 14, 2013 at 1:24 pm | Reply
  78. Tjhgdvb Gdghjjh

    "How about the war between North Korean and South Korean in 1950s? Do I need to mention Vietnam?" Lost both did not win eather both lost too China...

    December 14, 2013 at 1:22 pm | Reply
  79. Nate

    China can win greatly or lose greatly. Their population can give them power, but also a weakness. You need to support and feed 1.3 billion people constantly or they will turn amongst themselves and implode.

    December 14, 2013 at 1:21 pm | Reply
  80. GG Allin

    "China is getting more confident and more aggressive with each passing year." YEP...AND THAT IS EXACTLY HOW THE MILITARY SET IT UP...THE CHINESE WILL MARCH ON YOUR COMMON GRAVE AFTER YOU GET SPRINKLED IN IT OR SHOVELED IN IT AND THEN SPRINKLED ON...OH WELL...NO ONE IN AMERICA IS EVER RESPONSABLE FOR ANYTHING...

    December 14, 2013 at 12:19 pm | Reply
  81. GG Allin

    THERE WAS NO COLD WAR AND AMERICA DID NOT WIN IT...

    December 14, 2013 at 12:14 pm | Reply
  82. GG Allin

    AMERICA HAS NEVER WON EVEN A SINGLE WAR ON ITS OWN... ONLY LOSE AT EVERYTHING...

    December 14, 2013 at 12:12 pm | Reply
    • RIchard Fowler

      First of all, you have no life. Second, America has won many conflicts without help. Third, China couldn't afford a war with the United States both strategically and financially. The United States has a far superior military. China has just now got a probe to the moon. The United States have been to the moon countless times. SO China's technology is behind. So with all this being said, I, an American citizen, do declare anything that comes out your mouth ignorant and insanely false....idiot!

      December 14, 2013 at 1:28 pm | Reply
      • Mark Rushing

        China could win a war with the U.S., provided we launch a military drive deep into their heartland like the J apanese did in 1937 and fought a long and protracted war there. The Chinese will sustain huge losses but will literally bleed us white in the process and our economy will collapse. This is precisely why getting rid of nuclear weapons is such a terrible idea!

        December 14, 2013 at 1:49 pm |
  83. GG Allin

    AMERICAN CAN NOT DO ANYTHING RIGHT THERE IS NO AMERICA SO WHY EVEN HAVE A MILITARY THAT CANT EVEN BEAT DIRT PEOPLE...

    December 14, 2013 at 12:08 pm | Reply
  84. Guest

    China is getting more confident and more aggressive with each passing year. What a perfect time to cut retirement benefits for service members. The military trained me to speak Mandarin Chinese but I'm not going to wait around to see what promise gets broken next. Hope China doesn't do anything drastic while they train my replacement. Best of luck!

    December 14, 2013 at 9:29 am | Reply
    • Jack Hollis

      The Chinese do have reason to fear us, Guest. We've been aggressive almost since we gained our independence from Great Britain in 1783, starting with the subjugation of Indians in the Northwest Territory(Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Michigan) and then there was the Mexican-American War(1846-1848). Need I say more?

      December 14, 2013 at 11:42 am | Reply
      • Marsiss

        How about the war between North Korean and South Korean in 1950s? Do I need to mention Vietnam?

        December 14, 2013 at 1:10 pm |
      • Jack Hollis

        In fact Marsiss, China had very little to do with the war in Vietnam except to sell small arms to the Vietnamese in their struggle for national unity which both Germany and Italy had to do 100 years earlier for the very same reason. As for Korea, China only got involved to keep the UN forces off their border on the Yalu River. They well remembered that the J apanese also had troops on the Yalu in 1937 from where they invaded China proper!

        December 14, 2013 at 1:19 pm |
      • Scott

        @Hollis; Let's not forget to mention the death toll of the Cherokee Nation when the U.S. government forced these people to walk from the North Carolina territory to the Kansas area.

        December 15, 2013 at 10:45 am |
      • Jack Hollis

        Thank you, Scott. Point well taken. Then again, remember the Mexican-American War(1846-1848) when we stripped Mexico of half it's territory? Now the same thing is going on in the Middle East today!

        December 15, 2013 at 12:59 pm |
  85. Poltergist

    China is testing the US authority over this territory. They are going to keep doing so increasingly in the future. I fail to understand the United States grand strategy in this. Trade with China, make them rich, give them manufacturing skills and resources so that they can build a military to challenge yours in the future, while all you get in return is cheap goods that will only bring a few corporations short term profits.

    While I'm sure the money looks great right now I can't help but think 10-30 years down the line that one day China is going to be the power base and we'll just be a has-been country like Britain after it lost it's empire. And it's going to be because our greed gave them that power.

    December 14, 2013 at 4:24 am | Reply
    • Poltergist

      And something tells if they gather sufficient technology and built a powerful enough military, the cost of their "cheap" goods would increase dramatically.

      December 14, 2013 at 4:47 am | Reply
    • northstar

      spot-on.

      December 14, 2013 at 10:16 am | Reply
    • Kelvin

      You say " I fail to understand the United States grand strategy in this. Trade with China, make them rich, give them manufacturing skills and resources so that they can build a military to challenge yours in the future, while all you get in return is cheap goods that will only bring a few corporations short term profits." We trade with China because the people(you and I) want cheap goods. If you haven't noticed, most things we own are made in china. If the Chinese didn't make such cheap goods the Walmarts and targets would cease to exist, goods would be way too expensive, and we wouldn't have an emerging economy in china that one day will buy our expensive goods and services. So don't fear trade with china. Trade makes everyone better.

      December 14, 2013 at 10:50 am | Reply
      • Joe

        " we wouldn't have an emerging economy in china that one day will buy our expensive goods and services."
        You can't be serious.....The Chinese are the ones manufacturing our expensive goods,our manufacturing base has been decimated by all these free trade agreements. If you want to call enriching one percenters while flushing the rest of of America down the toilet "making everyone better" ,have at it. But please don't try selling that notion to the many unemployed,underemployed and broken families across our nation.

        December 14, 2013 at 11:19 am |
    • meyo

      time to bring them down to what they used to be 😉

      December 14, 2013 at 6:50 pm | Reply
  86. Random

    So guys, we have china playing chicken with us, Russia warning us they will nuke us, nk slaying kim's uncle, the list goes on. What we need to do is speak with Russia, as Putin is by far the most reasonable , rational actor on the stage. Negate chance of issue with them and reach common understanding. At this point i think we would like them to aid syria in resolving their terrorist problem. At this point we really have nothing to grasp to to try to talk them out of it. Our guys are safe according to the news. Somewhere in there is an agreement with Russia about Syria reforming and having talks between the legitimate unhappy syrians , and the government, in exchange for support with their ongoing mission to restore stability to syria while encouraging reform . Button syria up. Putin won't back down but it seems he has proven if you goto the table with an open mind he can be relied on. Forced communication (read spying) got us threw the cold war. Lets see if we can learn from that and just communicate now and work together. Aside from taking pot shots at us Putin has been reasonable to work with. More so than anyone we have worked with in a long time (islamic militias etc).
    It seems likely China is going to push this until something happens. There will need to be something to discourage conflict. I see that possibility above.

    December 14, 2013 at 1:55 am | Reply
    • northstar

      Random: dead-on target. The Us has had a very difficult time coming to grips with the end of the Cold War which is odd since we came out of it the victor.

      December 14, 2013 at 10:18 am | Reply
      • guest

        don't be a tool. the cold war is still on. just because they say it's not, doesn't mean it's not.

        December 14, 2013 at 11:16 am |
  87. Mopery

    You have no idea what you're talking about.

    December 13, 2013 at 10:56 pm | Reply
  88. Bubba

    China's might, is like that of ghetto thugs, who can cause harm, but cannot survive real military might. France is more of a threat than China.

    December 13, 2013 at 9:49 pm | Reply
    • abby

      You can place USA instead of China in your comment, and it would work perfectly. E.G. Vietnam War.

      December 14, 2013 at 5:12 am | Reply
  89. Stoner

    Don't under estimate the US NAVY , ITS THE BEST, touch our navy china and there won't be a china....

    December 13, 2013 at 8:57 pm | Reply
    • Mopery

      Yeah, but there wouldn't be an America either.

      December 13, 2013 at 10:56 pm | Reply
    • glennrobert

      On an other site. U.S.S. Cowpens 63 is one of five cruisers that the Navy wants to mothball. (?)

      December 13, 2013 at 11:42 pm | Reply
  90. glennrobert

    Make a serious mistake and China will not have a navy! This could lead to a face off with nuclear weapons. This could lead to no winners world wide. A nuclear war cannot be won, only lost!

    December 13, 2013 at 5:31 pm | Reply
    • George patton

      Quite true glennrobert, quite true indeed! Well said.

      December 13, 2013 at 7:13 pm | Reply
  91. George patton

    Let's all hope and pray that none of our naval commanders ever develop a case of "affluenza" and decide to attack a Chinese naval ship in the Western Pacific. This will in the long run be quite disastrous for both countries. Remember folks, we're not facing the same China today as we did 100 years ago when it was beaten by J apan in the Sino-J apanese War(1894-95)!

    December 13, 2013 at 4:47 pm | Reply
    • malaysian

      u r 100% right. china today is not what was 100 years ago no longer refer as sick man of asia.

      December 13, 2013 at 11:46 pm | Reply
    • George patton

      If you did not know Phunnie boy we own China.

      December 14, 2013 at 5:02 pm | Reply
      • George patton

        Wrong, Phunnie boy. China is still an independent nation and it helped us during WW2 by pinning down thousands upon thousands of J apanese troops who otherwise may have overwhelmed our troops in the Pacific. Just don't let all that "affluenza" go to your head!!!

        December 14, 2013 at 8:47 pm |
  92. Must

    Must have had a chink in their navigation system.

    December 13, 2013 at 4:36 pm | Reply
    • Raymond

      racist go to hell

      December 14, 2013 at 1:21 am | Reply
  93. guest4321

    Chinese Naval Greatness (shortest book in the world) .... These guys have been a coastal navy their entire history... clearly they have no clue about international rules of the road at sea... Just clueless. And if this becomes a pattern, we will need to start reefing some of this floating trash before we bump into it.

    December 13, 2013 at 4:34 pm | Reply
    • coolair

      Please read the article carefully. Our Navy officers apparently think the Chinese maneuver was deliberate and they knew what they were doing. So, calling them hostile is fine but please don't call them floating trash. Let's not kidding ourselves. Also, our warship was following their carrier fleet in South China sea (international water). They apparently got upset or shy for being watched so closely. That's all. Imagine what would happen if someone dares to get so close to our George Washington.

      December 13, 2013 at 5:36 pm | Reply
    • George patton

      Another ignorant comment from another vacant headed Tea Partier above. Aren't you ashamed of yourself, guest4321? I'd be, if I were you!

      December 13, 2013 at 7:16 pm | Reply
1 2

Leave a Reply to Kjhfd Gjgfd


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.