Kerry warns NATO on potential use of chemical weapons in Syria
April 23rd, 2013
06:11 PM ET

Kerry warns NATO on potential use of chemical weapons in Syria

By Elise Labott

Brussels, Belgium (CNN) - U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry urged NATO members on Tuesday to prepare for the possible use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime, while Russia's foreign minister accused the West of politicizing the search for such weapons, comparing it to the hunt for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Though NATO has flatly ruled out military intervention, Kerry told foreign ministers meeting in Brussels, Belgium, that "moving forward, we should consider NATO's role as it relates to the Syrian crisis."

In his first address to NATO since taking office in February, Kerry noted that ongoing contingency planning for Syria was "an appropriate undertaking for the alliance."

"We should also carefully and collectively consider how NATO is prepared to respond to protect its members from a Syrian threat, including any potential chemical weapons threat," Kerry said, according to prepared remarks.

His remarks came amid heightened concern about the possible use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime. Britain and France have said there is reason to suspect that President Bashar al-Assad has used such weapons and have asked the U.N. to investigate.

On Tuesday, a senior Israeli official claimed evidence of chemical weapons use by Syria, but Kerry said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not confirm the allegation in a phone call earlier in the day. He said the U.S. could not confirm that chemical weapons were used in Syria, an act President Obama had said would be a "red line" and a "game changer" for more robust U.S. action.

NATO remains conflicted about the two-year civil war, which the U.N. estimates has killed more than 70,000 people. While members are concerned about the mounting causalities, millions of refugees and the potential for a wider regional spillover, they are loath to become embroiled in another Middle Eastern conflict.

After the meeting, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen noted that "the situation in Syria has dramatically deteriorated" and "continues to pose a threat to regional stability."

He said the alliance is "extremely concerned about the use of ballistic missiles in Syria and the possible use of chemical weapons."

He said NATO has not been asked to intervene but suggested that it could be drawn further into the crisis to address spillover into its backyard.

"There is no call for NATO to play a role, but if these challenges remain unaddressed, they could directly affect our own security," he said. "So we will continue to remain extremely vigilant."

Turkey, a NATO member, borders Syria and would be the ally most at risk from a Syrian attack. NATO has deployed Patriot missile batteries in Turkey.

The NATO ministers also met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who warned that reports of chemical weapons in Syria must be carefully investigated to avoid a repetition of the "Iraqi scenario" in which unconfirmed allegations that the regime of Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction were the basis for the U.S.-led invasion.

He accused Western nations of trying to "politicize the issue" and broadening the investigation. Experts were supposed to be sent to Syria to study the possible use of chemical weapons in Aleppo; instead, Lavrov said, investigators demanded access to all facilities in Syria and the right to interview all Syrian citizens.

"I believe that is too much," he said.

Kerry said the Obama administration is "looking at every option that could possibly end the violence and usher in a political transition" as spelled out in the "Geneva communique," a plan proposed last year for negotiations between members of the opposition and the Syrian regime. The U.S., Russia and European and Middle Eastern nations have all signed on to the plan.

Although he acknowledged a "difference of opinion" between Russia and the U.S. with respect to how al-Assad might leave Syria, he said that Moscow and Washington were on the same page in believing that al-Assad's ouster "may either be inevitable or necessary" for a political solution.

Lavrov said Russia is committed to a political solution but mentioned no progress in his talks with NATO or in a closed-door meeting with Kerry.

Kerry and Lavrov also talked about U.S. plans for deploying a missile defense system in Europe. Lavrov said Russia was studying a new U.S. proposal to redesign the system but said Moscow wanted "guarantees" that the shield was targeting missile threats from countries like Iran and North Korea and not intended to deter Russia's capability.

The NATO ministers also discussed how to support Afghanistan after 2014, when NATO forces shift from a combat to support role. Afghan President Hamid Karzai joined the talks.

On Wednesday, Kerry will host a meeting with Afghan and Pakistani leaders, including Karzai and Pakistani Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani.

soundoff (18 Responses)

    Best view i have ever seen !

    June 15, 2021 at 7:02 pm | Reply
  2. Reggie Henfling

    Utterly composed written content, Really enjoyed looking through.

    January 28, 2021 at 10:12 pm | Reply
  3. helenecha

    If Obama Administration believes that it will be the time for Afghan people to build its country after 2014, why is there a need to ask NATO for help? If Obama Administration believes that Afghan will not become the haven of the terrorists, why did officers and soldiers of the US and NATO troops die of the attacks while training Afghanistan troops?

    April 25, 2013 at 3:11 am | Reply
    • wjmccartan

      It's all politics, helenecha. The right-wing thugs in Washington plan to rule Afghanistan by proxy, that is, to use indigenous Afghan troops under the command of U.S. military officers to carry out their orders.

      April 25, 2013 at 9:13 am | Reply
  4. rightospeak

    We heard this song before. More censorship by the media to mold the public opinion for more war crimes ?

    April 24, 2013 at 9:40 pm | Reply
    • wjmccartan

      Thank you, rightospeak. I couldn't have put it better!

      April 25, 2013 at 9:10 am | Reply
  5. George Patton-2

    In the first place, there is no absolute proof that the Assad regime has any plans to use chemical weapons. Even if there was, neither the U.S. nor any of it's crony NATO allies have any business whatsoever jumping into Syria's civil war!!!

    April 24, 2013 at 5:49 pm | Reply
    • StanCalif

      CNN "Breaking news headlines" today – US has evidence chemical weapons used. . .
      BBC reports: "Secretary Chuck Hagel has said American intelligence believes "to some degree of varying confidence" that Syria has used chemical weapons."
      "Varying confidence" assured the world Iraq had WMDs!!! Come on "press", get the quotes correct!!!

      April 25, 2013 at 11:49 am | Reply
  6. helenecha

    There're some facts made feel confused.

    Russia accused Western nations of trying to "politicize the issue. What did it mean when Russia supported al-Assad regime in the first place?

    Moscow and Washington were on the same page in believing that al-Assad's ouster may either be inevitable or necessary for a political solution. Is the cease-fire situation on the ground?

    April 24, 2013 at 2:08 pm | Reply
  7. Mike

    Once again the Obama administration chooses to change the definition of chemical weapons. The chlorine gas we know was used in Syria was just a "corrosive agent." The mustard gas found in Iraq was just a "blistering agent." The sarin gas will probably be called an "industrial accident." Now Israel will know Obama is a typical crooked lying Chicago politican, who will never have their back.

    April 24, 2013 at 10:36 am | Reply
    • BigShiz

      4 more years. Bit ch

      April 24, 2013 at 11:33 am | Reply
  8. StanCalif

    Don't trust Israel!!! Their ultimate goal is to get the US to attack Iran for them! Spread rumors about Syria using chemical weapons??? Nothing confirmed, just more "talk" from Israel! Don't trust Israel!!! Any US intervention in Syria means ultimate conflict with Iran! This is Israel's goal. Such a back stabbing "ally"!

    April 24, 2013 at 8:33 am | Reply
  9. MR Carey

    Canadians are ready Mr Kerry. You can count on us neighbor!

    April 23, 2013 at 8:57 pm | Reply
    • massoud

      get on a plane and go over there no ones stopping you best of luck canuck

      April 24, 2013 at 1:32 am | Reply

Leave a Reply to wjmccartan


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.