U.S.-Venezuela relations likely to remain tense after Chavez
March 6th, 2013
06:10 PM ET

U.S.-Venezuela relations likely to remain tense after Chavez

By Elise Labott

Ever since he called former President George W. Bush "the devil" in a speech to the United Nations, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez had been America's boogeyman to the South. Will his death brings the promise of a diplomatic thaw between United States and Venezuela?

Not likely.

In announcing Chavez's death on Tuesday, his anointed heir, Vice President Nicolas Maduro, accused the United States of a conspiracy to kill Chavez and expelled two American military members working in the U.S. Embassy in Caracas.

After categorically denying the charges, the White House issued a curt, three-line statement about Chavez's death, stripped of any condolences for the leader many Venezuelans revered but with whom Washington's relations were icy at best.

While President Barack Obama signaled support for the Venezuelan people and called for a "constructive relationship" with the government, the statement said the United States "remains committed to policies that promote democratic principles, the rule of law, and respect for human rights."

Assistant Secretary of State Roberta Jacobson, the State Department's top official for the region, later offered condolences and said the United States "stands ready to support Venezuela" during this difficult moment in its history.

Republican lawmakers were far more confrontational. U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said he hoped Chavez's death "provides an opportunity for a new chapter in U.S.-Venezuelan relations," while Rep. Ed Royce, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, called Chavez "a tyrant who forced the people of Venezuela to live in fear."

"His death dents the alliance of anti-U.S. leftist leaders in South America," Royce said in a statement. "Good riddance to this dictator."

The United States viewed Chavez's leftist revolution as a destabilizing force and an obstacle to progress in the region, accusing him of eroding democracy in the country and denouncing his alliance with some of Washington's main enemies, including Cuba and Iran.

For his part, Chavez accused Washington of pursuing imperialist policies. The two countries have been operating without ambassadors in each country since a diplomatic spat in 2010, and the tit-for-tat expelling of ambassadors over charges of spying has continued ever since.

Washington had been planning for Chavez's death. In late November, when it was already known that Chavez was gravely ill, Jacobson called Maduro, and U.S. officials say Washington has proposed a roadmap on how the two nations could improve ties.

There is no shortage of issues of mutual interest for the U.S. and Venezuela on which the countries could cooperate.

The Obama administration wants to renew cooperation on counternarcotics and combating terrorism, both of which were once-productive efforts that no longer exist. Washington would also like to restart cooperation on economic issues, particularly on energy, given that Venezuela is a major oil-producing nation that remains a major supplier to the United States.

But in the words of one senior official, the outreach to Caracas has been a "rocky road." Talks have been short on substance and never left U.S. officials with the feeling Venezuela was interested in mending fences.

Maduro's first news conference, a good portion of which was devoted to railing against the United States, was not very encouraging. As he prepares to stand in upcoming elections to replace Chavez, Maduro's anti-American rhetoric is dismissed in the United States as political jockeying to shore up his political base.

This tried-and-true method of using America as straw man worked for Chavez, which is why U.S. officials acknowledge that the campaign season not be the best time to break new ground or expect tangible progress. Officials say they will continue to speak out in favor of a more productive relationship between the two countries, but the ball, officials say, is firmly in Venezuela's court.

"The opportunities are not there yet for the U.S. to engage" says Carl Meacham of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "For the next month or so, Maduro has to show he is even more Chavez than Chavez was. That means he is going to be more anti-American, more anti-capitalist, more anti-systemic. As far as a rapprochement, I don't see it coming anytime soon."

How Venezuela conducts those elections will be a major test. For years Washington had accused Chavez and his supporters of abusing the electoral system by intimidating opposition and controlling the media during his 14-year rule. Now, the United States has made clear it expects a free and fair election in accordance with Venezuela's Constitution and charters.

While Venezuela's relationship with the United States revolved around Chavez, it is unlikely his death will dramatically affect ties in the near term. If, as expected, Maduro wins the presidency, the new boss will likely be the same as the old one.

"Chavez's supporters and their Chavismo ideological movement were dealt a blow with the death of their charismatic leader, but his ministers have been preparing for this transition, and the challenge to all sides will be measured in weeks and months, not days" said Dan Restrepo, who served as an adviser to Obama at the National Security Council during his first term.

With crime at an all-time high, continued drug-trafficking and a faltering oil sector, Meacham says the new Venezuelan government will be looking inward for the foreseeable future.

"The U.S. doesn't want to be in a situation where it is viewed at all as getting involved in domestic affairs of Venezuela," he says. "If Maduro wins, he will be trying to keep the focus on domestic issues, and that could put the resolve of Chavismo to the test. And that could mean the hardest days between the U.S. and Venezuela is not behind us, but ahead of us."

While the ability for the United States to shape a post-Chavez Venezuela may be limited, U.S. officials hope Chavez's death presents some political space for the political opposition, which until now has had problems uniting. The challenge for Washington is to try and seize the opening to engage with Venezuela's current leaders while trying to develop the opposition and help usher in new era of Venezuelan politics that doesn't revolve around one man.

Roger Noriega, a former assistant secretary for Western Hemisphere affairs under former President George W. Bush, says the United States should not engage Venezuela until its leaders demonstrate they will respect the constitution and implement democratic reforms.

"We should defend the right of Venezuelans to struggle democratically to reclaim control of their country and its future," Noriega wrote in a blog for the American Enterprise Institute.

A key indicator of how the U.S. will proceed will be who is sent to Chavez's funeral, which is likely to be full of left-leaning, anti-American leaders. In the absence of an ambassador, sending a low-level embassy official suggests the United States is still looking to the past, while sending a senior delegation from Washington could signal an opening for Venezuela to seize.

soundoff (27 Responses)
  1. penny skateboards online store

    Helloit is a woderful post
    penny skateboards online store http://www.pennyskateboardsale.com

    April 17, 2015 at 1:42 am | Reply
  2. custom penny skateboards

    HiThat is a good post
    custom penny skateboards http://www.pennyskateboardsale.com

    April 17, 2015 at 1:22 am | Reply
  3. boogiebutt


    November 21, 2013 at 1:11 pm | Reply
  4. Alex279

    Frankly, regardless of what one things about Chavez policies, the is a natural leader and is very bright personality. As far as demonization of him by US media this is internal US mental problem and should be treated accordingly, i.e., disregarded.

    It is up to People of Venezuela to decide about Chavez legacy. Whatever choices them made already and will made in future it is their right, and US has no business and no moral standing to interfere with.

    As for the pundits speculating about Venezuela after Chavez, they are like vultures circling above dead body. The Having no morality and no respect for human dignity, they are too quick to close in.

    March 7, 2013 at 10:00 pm | Reply
  5. MCPearl

    Just Because Chavez is dead,doesn't mean they will be willing to establish better diplomatic ties. His men are still and power and the country holds key relations with America "Enemies"

    March 7, 2013 at 1:19 pm | Reply
  6. Epsilon

    It is time for the United States to open relations with Venezuela and many other countries in Central and South America. The region has made great progress over the last few years while the US has turned its attention to Iraq and Afghanistan; it's now time for America to turn its sights back toward developing hemispheric relations. An interesting story at International Policy Digest reflects the moderating of Venezuela's policies in the near future: http://www.internationalpolicydigest.org/2013/03/05/venezuelas-more-moderate-future-after-hugo-chavez/

    March 7, 2013 at 1:30 am | Reply
    • auguste

      its time for us to mind our own business and take care of relations here in US first?

      this is not an ideological battle between left vs right, GOP vs Dems, Statism vs liberty, socialism vs free markets. This is ethnic warfare against white people.

      Why are hostile globalist elite supporting Israel as a Jewish ethnostate with Jewish only immigration, but turning white majority Europe, North America into a multi-ethnic multi-cultural Gulag with dystopian non-White colonization?

      Why do gullible Whites kowtow to hostile Jewish elite, who maim White soldiers in bankrupting wars, infiltrate and subvert our central banks and intelligence agencies, indoctrinate us in classrooms and mass media, impose trillions in debt, and plunder our wages?

      East Asia is 99% yellow. Africa is 99% Black. West Asia is 99% Brown. But 3rd world colonizers are annihilating Whites, just as Chinese colonizers are annihilating Tibet. This is the endgame.

      "Native" Americans are not native. They invaded from East Asia. Whites were not the only slave owners, imperialists. Muslims, Jews, China, India, Mayans, Africans all are guilty of slavery, imperialism. Whites were victims of Arab, Jewish, Turk, African, Mongol imperialism, slavery.

      Gullible Whites should reject suicidal anti-White Jewish ideologies like libertarianism, feminism, liberalism, socialism. White people should reject venomous smears of racism, collectivism.

      Love to all, hatred to no one, but White people must unite and organize to advance their families, their fertility, their interests. Reading list:

      March 7, 2013 at 7:42 am | Reply
  7. massoud

    After Obama is impeached maybe he could get Venezuelan citizenship and be their Socialist Dictator he would love the power for his ego and he would fulfill his lifelong dream of being a Tyrannical leader.

    March 6, 2013 at 11:31 pm | Reply
    • rk

      You are a faaackin idiot.

      March 7, 2013 at 12:28 pm | Reply
      • massoud

        You are effin punk

        March 8, 2013 at 12:35 pm |
  8. 1371usmc

    Wow here is a big who cares???? good ridence and have fun rotting in hell

    March 6, 2013 at 8:24 pm | Reply
  9. press inside

    Reblogged this on press-inside.

    March 6, 2013 at 6:22 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.