Defense companies see cuts coming even with a budget deal
December 3rd, 2012
06:28 PM ET

Defense companies see cuts coming even with a budget deal

By Jennifer Rizzo

Defense company executives conceded on Monday that their industry would likely see billions more in cuts even if Congress reaches a deal to avoid the fiscal cliff.

"We need to stop believing or pretending that there is a scenario out there that offers no defense cuts," said David Langstaff, president and chief executive of TASC, Inc. "The question is whether we make them responsibly or irresponsibly."

The automatic cuts, referred to as sequestration, are set to go into effect on January 2 if the White House and Congress cannot agree on where $1 trillion in federal savings over the next decade should come from.

The Pentagon's budget would be axed by $500 billion over that time. That would be on top of a similar cut the Pentagon is already committed to achieving.

Langstaff discussed the threat of the looming budget cuts at the National Press Club along with three other defense industry executives: Wes Bush, CEO of Northrop Grumman; David Hess, president of Pratt & Whitney; and Dawne Hickton, CEO of RTI Metals.

The executives would not put a number on the kind of cut the industry could sustain, but said the political uncertainty around congressional negotiations to avoid the most difficult scenario is worse for business.

"The real alternative to automatic defense spending cuts under sequestration is not an indefinite extension of defense spending at current levels," Langstaff said. "The real alternative is a process of strategically targeted, phased and predictable defense spending cuts."

The group sent a letter signed by more than 130 defense industry executives to President Barack Obama and congressional leaders urging them to find a way to avoid sequestration with less than a month to act.

"We urge you and Congress to join together on immediate, bipartisan action to avert the upcoming "fiscal cliff," the letter stated. "No more pressing issue remains on the national agenda this year."

Post by:
Filed under: Budget • Congress • Defense Spending • Pentagon • White House
soundoff (6 Responses)
  1. zortilo nrel

    I've been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this blog. Thank you, I’ll try and check back more often. How frequently you update your site?

    March 21, 2021 at 2:30 pm | Reply
  2. Hahahahahahahaha

    Who needs health care when we can have a brand new air craft carrier!!!!!!! Hahahahahahahhaha

    December 4, 2012 at 8:58 am | Reply
  3. Jeff

    Idiocy breeds stupidity and morons. You must have smoked to too much weed, and it retarded your brain.

    December 4, 2012 at 5:18 am | Reply
  4. UncSamwntsU

    George Patton, what a Chinese CCP troll. Are you glad no more advaced erapons you would love to steal will be available? Don't worry, the US military is still more than 30 years more advanced than the Chinese. Any battle would be swift, severe and brutal. I for one want your ignorant and arrogant country to make a mistake and get whoopoed by the only super power. BTW-Tell your govt to stop begging for advanced weapon sales. It will never happen, and it reaffirms to us and the world how pathetic and far behind your country is...Btw-we love the fake f35...hahaha

    December 4, 2012 at 3:56 am | Reply
  5. George Patton

    This is what this country needs in order to stop all of these useless and unnecessary wars which only gets millions maimed and killed year after year overseas only to fatten up the bank accounts of the war profiteers and enhance the political careers of the right-wing politicians in Washington. This absurdity needs to end once and for all but unfortunately, very few agree or even care!!!

    December 4, 2012 at 12:21 am | Reply
    • Jeff

      Idiocy breeds stupidity and morons. You must have smoked to too much weed, and it retarded your brain.

      December 4, 2012 at 5:19 am | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.