Official: Changes to Benghazi talking points made by intel community
US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice on State of the Union on September 16
November 19th, 2012
07:32 PM ET

Official: Changes to Benghazi talking points made by intel community

By Pam Benson

The intelligence community - not the White House, State Department or Justice Department - was responsible for the substantive changes made to the talking points distributed for government officials who spoke publicly about the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, the spokesman for the director of national intelligence said Monday.

The unclassified talking points on Libya, developed several days after the the deadly attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, were not substantively changed by any agency outside of the intelligence community, according to the spokesman, Shawn Turner.

Republican criticism of the talking points intensified last Friday following a closed door hearing with former CIA Director David Petraeus.

Rep. Peter King, R-New York, told reporters after the hearing that the original talking parts drafted by the CIA had been changed and it was unclear who was responsible.

"The original talking points were much more specific about al Qaeda involvement and yet final ones just said indications of extremists," King said.

The September 11 attack resulted in the death of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

The unclassified talking points were first developed by the CIA at the request of the House Intelligence Committee, whose members wanted to know what they could say publicly about the Benghazi attack.

Benghazi talking points omitted link to al Qaeda

The initial version included information linking individuals involved in the attack to al Qaeda, according to a senior U.S. official familiar with the drafting of the talking points. But when the document was sent to the rest of the intelligence community for review, there was a decision to change "al Qaeda" to "extremists." The official said the change was made for legitimate intelligence and legal reasons, not for political purposes.

"First, the information about individuals linked to al Qaeda was derived from classified sources," the official said. "Second, when links were so tenuous - as they still are - it makes sense to be cautious before pointing fingers so you don't set off a chain of circular and self-reinforcing assumptions. Third, it is important to be careful not to prejudice a criminal investigation in its early stages."

Some Republican members of Congress suggested the change came from within the Obama administration - from the White House, the Justice Department, or another government agency.

Turner, the spokesman for National Intelligence Director James Clapper, said that was not the case.

"The intelligence community made substantive, analytical changes before the talking points were sent to government agency partners for their feedback," Turner said, referring to the White House, Justice Department, State Department, Pentagon and FBI. "There were no substantive changes made to the talking points after they left the intelligence community," he said.

The House Intelligence Committee was not satisfied with Turner's statement.

"The statement released this evening by the DNI's spokesman regarding how the Intelligence Community's talking points were changed gives a new explanation that differs significantly from information provided in testimony to the Committee last week," said committee spokeswoman Susan Phalen. "Chairman Rogers looks forward to discussing this new explanation with Director Clapper as soon as possible to understand how the DNI reached this conclusion and why leaders of the Intelligence Community testified late last week that they were unaware of who changed the talking points."

The White House on Friday said it made only one change, substituting the word "mission" for "consulate."

The FBI requested a change in language which originally stated the U.S. "knew" Islamic extremists participated in the attack. According to a U.S. intelligence official the wording was changed to "there are indications" Islamic extremists participated.

Obama administration continues explanations on Benghazi decision-making

The drumbeat of criticism began early on with Republicans criticizing the Obama administration for publicly saying the attack grew out of a spontaneous protest against an anti Muslim video on the web even though the Republicans claim the administration knew it was a planned terrorist attack.

The harshest criticism has focused on Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, who used the talking points as the basis for comments she made on Sunday talk shows five days after the attack. During her appearances, Rice said a small number of people came to the mission in reaction to demonstrations occurring in Cairo over the anti-Muslim film, but the Benghazi protest was hijacked by armed extremists. She never mentioned terrorists.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Michigan, said this isn't about parsing words. "There was some policy decisions made based on the narrative that was not consistent with the intelligence that we had. That's my concern," Rogers said last Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Former CIA Director Petraeus told lawmakers last Friday there were multiple streams of intelligence, some that indicated Ansar al Sharia was behind the attack, according to an official with knowledge of the situation. But other intelligence indicated the violence at the Benghazi mission was inspired by protests in Egypt over the anti Muslim video.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, told CNN on Monday that Petraeus explained why the talking points were changed.

"Gen. Petraeus made it clear that that change was made to protect classified sources of information, not to spin it, not to politicize it and it wasn't done at the direction of the white house. That really ought to be the end of it, but it isn't. So we have to continue to go around this merry go round, but at a certain point when all the facts point in a certain direction, we're going to have to accept them as they are and move on," Schiff said.

CNN's Dana Bash contributed to this report.

Post by:
Filed under: Benghazi • Central Intelligence Agency • CIA • Intelligence • Libya • Libya • ODNI • Peter King • Petraeus • Rep. Mike Rogers • Terrorism
soundoff (2,512 Responses)
  1. Prestige Collision Sprinter Repair Mission Viejo

    Hi there! I simply want to offer you a big thumbs up for your great information you have got right here on this post. I am returning to your website for more soon.

    May 17, 2021 at 9:18 am | Reply
  2. Keystone Sprinter Tank Repair Leaking

    You made some decent points there. I looked on the web for additional information about the issue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this site.

    May 17, 2021 at 8:46 am | Reply
  3. 2800 Suspension Repair Sprinter Van

    May 17, 2021 at 8:24 am | Reply
  4. Sprinter Repair Shop Near Me

    I’m amazed, I must say. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both equally educative and entertaining, and without a doubt, you've hit the nail on the head. The problem is something which too few people are speaking intelligently about. Now i'm very happy I came across this in my search for something regarding this.

    May 17, 2021 at 7:35 am | Reply
  5. WvSSJZobgk

    math homework help 2nd grade help with writing a sociology essay essay community service important cv writing service bradford

    May 17, 2021 at 5:22 am | Reply
  6. Luther Twomey

    Have you ever heard of second life (sl for short). It is essentially a video game where you can do anything you want. SL is literally my second life (pun intended lol). If you want to see more you can see these second life authors and blogs

    May 17, 2021 at 5:12 am | Reply
  7. Fiberglass Van Roof Repair

    I have to thank you for the efforts you've put in penning this website. I'm hoping to view the same high-grade content by you later on as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my own, personal site now 😉

    May 17, 2021 at 3:04 am | Reply
  8. Ecu Repair Shop For Sprinter Van

    May 17, 2021 at 2:40 am | Reply
  9. HPWJzvesUS

    thesis order need help starting my essay money can't buy happiness and love essay dissertation uk buy

    May 17, 2021 at 2:32 am | Reply
  10. Sprinter Alignent Repair

    Good post. I learn something totally new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be exciting to read content from other authors and practice something from other web sites.

    May 17, 2021 at 12:09 am | Reply
  11. Sprinter Van Repair Fountain Valley

    Excellent blog post. I definitely appreciate this site. Stick with it!

    May 17, 2021 at 12:07 am | Reply
  12. Maserati Recall

    Your style is unique compared to other folks I've read stuff from. Thank you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark this site.

    May 16, 2021 at 8:01 pm | Reply
  13. 2006 Sprinter Transmion Repair

    I was able to find good info from your blog posts.

    May 16, 2021 at 3:18 pm | Reply
  14. 2007 Sprinter Rear Heater Repair

    Having read this I thought it was extremely enlightening. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this article together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

    May 16, 2021 at 3:02 pm | Reply
  15. Thurman Friedrichs

    I don't know about you all but I love airplanes. I have a friend in highschool that loves airplanes, so here are some airplane related stuff I don't know about you guys but I love airplanes. I had a friend in highschool that loved airplanes, so here are some airplane related stuff

    May 16, 2021 at 2:33 pm | Reply
  16. Sprinter Rust Repair

    I blog frequently and I genuinely thank you for your information. Your article has truly peaked my interest. I'm going to book mark your website and keep checking for new information about once per week. I opted in for your RSS feed too.

    May 16, 2021 at 1:52 pm | Reply
  17. Fashion Styles

    This actually answered my drawback, thank you!

    May 16, 2021 at 9:42 am | Reply
  18. QnfNZVjNFJ

    river thames primary homework help essay writing company listening to music and doing homework electric field homework help

    May 16, 2021 at 8:55 am | Reply
  19. obSSrNBnGu

    help writing essay college application rotc essay help i will pay someone to do my homework elimination homework help

    May 16, 2021 at 8:09 am | Reply
  20. Content Marketing Event

    Hi! I just would like to offer you a big thumbs up for your excellent information you have got right here on this post. I will be returning to your site for more soon.

    May 16, 2021 at 5:43 am | Reply
  21. Google Marketing Business

    Hello! I just wish to offer you a huge thumbs up for your excellent information you've got here on this post. I'll be returning to your site for more soon.

    May 16, 2021 at 3:06 am | Reply
  22. Digital Marketing California

    May 15, 2021 at 10:12 pm | Reply
  23. KyHkbpDdes

    grade 11 math homework help essay on can we buy happiness with money uk coursework help can someone write my paper for me

    May 15, 2021 at 9:35 pm | Reply
  24. Google Marketing Specialist

    May 15, 2021 at 8:40 pm | Reply
  25. Digital Marketing Experts

    May 15, 2021 at 7:47 pm | Reply
  26. uTgaBhzJQR

    anyone used a cv writing service essay on can money buy happiness literature review south african police service school bully essay

    May 15, 2021 at 6:38 pm | Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Leave a Reply to El Flaco


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.