Official: Changes to Benghazi talking points made by intel community
US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice on State of the Union on September 16
November 19th, 2012
07:32 PM ET

Official: Changes to Benghazi talking points made by intel community

By Pam Benson

The intelligence community - not the White House, State Department or Justice Department - was responsible for the substantive changes made to the talking points distributed for government officials who spoke publicly about the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, the spokesman for the director of national intelligence said Monday.

The unclassified talking points on Libya, developed several days after the the deadly attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, were not substantively changed by any agency outside of the intelligence community, according to the spokesman, Shawn Turner.

Republican criticism of the talking points intensified last Friday following a closed door hearing with former CIA Director David Petraeus.

Rep. Peter King, R-New York, told reporters after the hearing that the original talking parts drafted by the CIA had been changed and it was unclear who was responsible.

"The original talking points were much more specific about al Qaeda involvement and yet final ones just said indications of extremists," King said.

The September 11 attack resulted in the death of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

The unclassified talking points were first developed by the CIA at the request of the House Intelligence Committee, whose members wanted to know what they could say publicly about the Benghazi attack.

Benghazi talking points omitted link to al Qaeda

The initial version included information linking individuals involved in the attack to al Qaeda, according to a senior U.S. official familiar with the drafting of the talking points. But when the document was sent to the rest of the intelligence community for review, there was a decision to change "al Qaeda" to "extremists." The official said the change was made for legitimate intelligence and legal reasons, not for political purposes.

"First, the information about individuals linked to al Qaeda was derived from classified sources," the official said. "Second, when links were so tenuous - as they still are - it makes sense to be cautious before pointing fingers so you don't set off a chain of circular and self-reinforcing assumptions. Third, it is important to be careful not to prejudice a criminal investigation in its early stages."

Some Republican members of Congress suggested the change came from within the Obama administration - from the White House, the Justice Department, or another government agency.

Turner, the spokesman for National Intelligence Director James Clapper, said that was not the case.

"The intelligence community made substantive, analytical changes before the talking points were sent to government agency partners for their feedback," Turner said, referring to the White House, Justice Department, State Department, Pentagon and FBI. "There were no substantive changes made to the talking points after they left the intelligence community," he said.

The House Intelligence Committee was not satisfied with Turner's statement.

"The statement released this evening by the DNI's spokesman regarding how the Intelligence Community's talking points were changed gives a new explanation that differs significantly from information provided in testimony to the Committee last week," said committee spokeswoman Susan Phalen. "Chairman Rogers looks forward to discussing this new explanation with Director Clapper as soon as possible to understand how the DNI reached this conclusion and why leaders of the Intelligence Community testified late last week that they were unaware of who changed the talking points."

The White House on Friday said it made only one change, substituting the word "mission" for "consulate."

The FBI requested a change in language which originally stated the U.S. "knew" Islamic extremists participated in the attack. According to a U.S. intelligence official the wording was changed to "there are indications" Islamic extremists participated.

Obama administration continues explanations on Benghazi decision-making

The drumbeat of criticism began early on with Republicans criticizing the Obama administration for publicly saying the attack grew out of a spontaneous protest against an anti Muslim video on the web even though the Republicans claim the administration knew it was a planned terrorist attack.

The harshest criticism has focused on Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, who used the talking points as the basis for comments she made on Sunday talk shows five days after the attack. During her appearances, Rice said a small number of people came to the mission in reaction to demonstrations occurring in Cairo over the anti-Muslim film, but the Benghazi protest was hijacked by armed extremists. She never mentioned terrorists.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Michigan, said this isn't about parsing words. "There was some policy decisions made based on the narrative that was not consistent with the intelligence that we had. That's my concern," Rogers said last Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Former CIA Director Petraeus told lawmakers last Friday there were multiple streams of intelligence, some that indicated Ansar al Sharia was behind the attack, according to an official with knowledge of the situation. But other intelligence indicated the violence at the Benghazi mission was inspired by protests in Egypt over the anti Muslim video.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, told CNN on Monday that Petraeus explained why the talking points were changed.

"Gen. Petraeus made it clear that that change was made to protect classified sources of information, not to spin it, not to politicize it and it wasn't done at the direction of the white house. That really ought to be the end of it, but it isn't. So we have to continue to go around this merry go round, but at a certain point when all the facts point in a certain direction, we're going to have to accept them as they are and move on," Schiff said.

CNN's Dana Bash contributed to this report.

Post by:
Filed under: Benghazi • Central Intelligence Agency • CIA • Intelligence • Libya • Libya • ODNI • Peter King • Petraeus • Rep. Mike Rogers • Terrorism
soundoff (2,806 Responses)
  1. Toyota Cargo Van Repair

    http://www.fortruth.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.commercialrepairshop.com

    June 12, 2021 at 10:06 am | Reply
  2. Dodge Sprinter Repair Shops

    http://www.paulsimonmusic.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=campervanrepairshop.com

    June 12, 2021 at 9:39 am | Reply
  3. Luxury Van Repair Shop Near Me

    https://www.telecom.uu.ru/?a%5B%5D=<a+href=https://sprintervanrepairshop.com/

    June 12, 2021 at 9:14 am | Reply
  4. RV Headlights Orange County

    Hi there! I simply want to give you a big thumbs up for the great info you have here on this post. I will be coming back to your blog for more soon.

    http://www.localmeatmilkeggs.org/facebook.php?URL=https://www.ocrv.pro/

    June 12, 2021 at 9:13 am | Reply
  5. bucket truck troubleshooting

    Spot on with this write-up, I actually feel this site needs a great deal more attention. Iíll probably be back again to read through more, thanks for the information!

    http://deerscores.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=ocrv.info

    June 12, 2021 at 8:03 am | Reply
  6. fleet repair near me

    An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you ought to write more about this issue, it may not be a taboo subject but generally folks don't discuss such issues. To the next! Cheers!!

    http://www.calockemd.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=newrvowners.com

    June 12, 2021 at 12:27 am | Reply
  7. Sprinter Repair Shop

    Pretty! This was an incredibly wonderful post. Thank you for providing this info.

    http://www.everythingweddings.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.campervanrepairshop.com

    June 11, 2021 at 11:47 pm | Reply
  8. Chevy Van Repair

    I enjoy reading an article that will make men and women think. Also, thanks for permitting me to comment!

    http://koromo.co.jp/files/rank.cgi?mode=link&id=1260&url=fleetservicesocrv.com

    June 11, 2021 at 10:15 pm | Reply
  9. Body Damage Shop Near Me

    http://doublespiralllc.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=fleetrepairshops.com

    June 11, 2021 at 10:03 pm | Reply
  10. RV Headlights Los Angeles

    http://kni.pestcontroltechnology.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.ocrv.us/

    June 11, 2021 at 10:03 pm | Reply
  11. near me

    movies

    June 11, 2021 at 4:53 pm | Reply
  12. Jacquelyn Personius

    https://tieba.baidu.com/mo/q/checkurl?url=https://codyc96w6.blogolenta.com/5269915/rumored-buzz-on-rv-body-repair

    June 11, 2021 at 11:17 am | Reply
  13. Beauty Tips

    It抯 actually a nice and helpful piece of info. I am happy that you shared this useful information with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

    https://www.kayswell.com

    June 11, 2021 at 10:48 am | Reply
  14. Tarsha Hildenbrand

    http://riverj70p9.tblogz.com/the-best-side-of-rv-body-shop-15308839

    June 11, 2021 at 10:25 am | Reply
  15. Bobby Weirather

    Iím amazed, I must say. Rarely do I come across a blog thatís both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you've hit the nail on the head. The problem is something which too few men and women are speaking intelligently about. I'm very happy I found this in my hunt for something concerning this.

    https://ditu.google.cn/url?q=http://eduardou26k8.is-blog.com/5633427/a-review-of-mercedes-sprinter-repair

    June 11, 2021 at 10:12 am | Reply
  16. rv repair shops near me

    http://tools.folha.com.br/print?url=http://www.erick3j9h8.blogchaat.com/3492311/not-known-facts-about-rv-repair-shop

    June 11, 2021 at 7:41 am | Reply
  17. Julius Garlits

    http://eduardou26k8.is-blog.com/5696554/the-best-side-of-rv-body-shop

    June 11, 2021 at 3:07 am | Reply
  18. Kirstin Soler

    After looking at a few of the blog posts on your blog, I seriously like your technique of writing a blog. I saved it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back in the near future. Take a look at my web site too and let me know your opinion.

    https://ditu.google.cn/url?q=http://waylonr03w1.blog2news.com/4917867/eye-doctor-an-overview

    June 11, 2021 at 12:33 am | Reply
  19. Dennis Hogsett

    Hello! I could have sworn Iíve visited this web site before but after browsing through a few of the articles I realized itís new to me. Regardless, Iím definitely delighted I found it and Iíll be bookmarking it and checking back often!

    http://images.google.be/url?q=http://remingtony48o0.blog2news.com/4925826/5-simple-statements-about-eyeglasses-exam-explained

    June 11, 2021 at 12:33 am | Reply
  20. Corrine Gazdecki

    Aw, this was an exceptionally nice post. Taking the time and actual effort to create a really good articleÖ but what can I sayÖ I put things off a whole lot and don't seem to get anything done.

    http://www.shinobi.jp/etc/goto.html?http://shaney48q1.uzblog.net/an-unbiased-view-of-rv-roof-repair-near-me-15157861

    June 10, 2021 at 11:42 pm | Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Leave a Reply to M


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.