By Jennifer Rizzo, with reporting from Pam Benson
Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified on Capitol Hill on Friday that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was an act of terrorism committed by al Qaeda-linked militants.
That's according to Rep. Peter King (R-NY), who spoke to reporters after the closed hearing, which lasted an hour and 20 minutes.
The account Petraeus gave was different from the description the Obama administration gave on September 14, King said.
Then, the attack was described as "spontaneous," the result of a protest against an anti-Muslim film that got out of control outside the compound.
Petraeus told lawmakers Friday that he had discussed the possibility of it being a terrorist attack in his initial briefing in September, according to King.
"He had told us that this was a terrorist attack and there were terrorists involved from the start," King said. "I told him, my questions, I had a very different recollection of that (earlier account)," he said. "The clear impression we (lawmakers) were given was that the overwhelming amount of evidence was that it arose out of a spontaneous demonstration and it was not a terrorist attack."
The "spontaneous" adjective was "minimized" during Petraeus' testimony Friday, King said.
The cause of that discrepancy is unclear, King said.
Earlier an official said that Petraeus' aim in testifying was to clear up "a lot of misrepresentations of what he told Congress initially."
The former CIA director was expected to tell the congressional committees that he did develop unclassified talking points in the days after the attack but had had no direct involvement in developing the ones used by Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.
Rice has been under fire for suggesting the attack on the consulate was a spontaneous event spurred by a protest against the anti-Muslim film.
King said the original talking points were much more specific about the involvment of Al Qaeda.
"Final ones just said indications of extremists," King said. "It said indicate even though it was clearly evident to the CIA that there was Al Qaeda involvement."
Questions still remain over the development of the talking points.
“Basically it is still not clear how the final talking points emerged. (Petraeus) said it went through a long process involving many agencies including the Department of Justice, including the State Department and no one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points other than to say the original talking points prepared by the CIA were different from the ones that were finally put out,” said King.
Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee disagreed with King, saying that the talking points did not change.
"The talking points were not changed," Smith said. "The talking points were very basic and straight forward."
Several democrats who were briefed said Petraeus explained the unclassified talking points did not make mention of extremist elements because it was still classified – and could have compromised intelligence sources, CNN's Dana Bash reported.
Smith took part in a separate briefing with the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.
Clapper read to the group the original three talking points used by Ambassador Rice. There was no mention of al Qaeda or Ansar Al Sharia in those points, according to Smith.
"This has become so partisan and so political," he said.
A senior U.S. official told CNN that the talking points were drafted by the CIA and "reflected what it believed at that point in time." The memo was reviewed "CIA leadership and coordinated in the interagency at a senior level," the official said.
The first draft of the CIA unclassified talking points stated there were indications the attack was linked to al Qaeda, but during the interagency process when the talking points were reviewed, al Qaeda was changed to extremists. The official said the change “was not a political decision.”
"The points were not, as has been insinuated by some, edited to minimize the role of extremists, diminish terrorist affiliations, or play down that this was an attack. There were legitimate intelligence and legal issues to consider, as is almost always the case when explaining classified assessments publicly." the official explained. "First, the information about individuals linked to al-Qaeda was derived from classified sources. Second, when links were so tenuous—as they still are—it makes sense to be cautious before pointing fingers so you don’t set off a chain of circular and self-reinforcing assumptions. Third, it is important to be careful not to prejudice a criminal investigation in its early stages.”
The official said the controversy over the word "terrorist" caught the intelligence community by "surprise."
“Most people understand that saying “extremists” were involved in a direct assault on the mission isn’t shying away from the idea of terrorist involvement," the official said. "People assumed that it was apparent in this context that extremists who attack US facilities and kill Americans are, by definition, terrorists. Because of the various elements involved in the attack, the term extremist was meant to capture the range of participants."
The talking points, the senior U.S. official explained, "were a reflection of the understanding at the time that could be provided at an unclassified level. They were preliminary and were never meant to be the final word on the issue."
On who authorized the final version of the talking points, a US intelligence official said, "We're reviewing the coordination trail."
Good post. I learn something totally new and challenging on websites I stumbleupon everyday. It's always interesting to read content from other writers and use a little something from their sites.
This is a topic that is close to my heart... Take care! Exactly where are your contact details though?
Good day! I simply would like to offer you a big thumbs up for the excellent info you have got right here on this post. I am coming back to your site for more soon.
Hello! I just would like to give you a big thumbs up for the excellent info you've got here on this post. I'll be coming back to your web site for more soon.
An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto a co-worker who was conducting a little homework on this. And he in fact bought me dinner because I discovered it for him... lol. So allow me to reword this.... Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending the time to talk about this topic here on your web page.
When I originally left a comment I seem to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on whenever a comment is added I recieve 4 emails with the same comment. Is there an easy method you are able to remove me from that service? Thanks!
Itís difficult to find experienced people for this subject, however, you sound like you know what youíre talking about! Thanks
Major thankies for the blog post.Much thanks again. Want more.
I really like reading an article that can make people think. Also, many thanks for permitting me to comment!
This excellent website really has all of the info I needed about this subject and didnít know who to ask.
Pretty! This was an incredibly wonderful article. Thank you for supplying this info.
This website was... how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I've found something that helped me. Kudos!
Good article! We will be linking to this great content on our website. Keep up the good writing.
Pretty! This has been an incredibly wonderful article. Thank you for supplying this information.
Everything is very open with a precise clarification of the challenges. It was really informative. Your site is very helpful. Thank you for sharing!
This is a topic that is near to my heart... Many thanks! Exactly where are your contact details though?
After looking over a handful of the articles on your blog, I honestly like your way of writing a blog. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back soon. Take a look at my website too and tell me how you feel.
After I initially commented I seem to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now whenever a comment is added I receive four emails with the exact same comment. Perhaps there is a means you can remove me from that service? Kudos!
I could not resist commenting. Very well written!
Oh my goodness! Amazing article dude! Thank you so much, However I am going through problems with your RSS. I donít understand why I am unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody else having similar RSS problems? Anybody who knows the answer can you kindly respond? Thanx!!
I blog quite often and I truly appreciate your information. Your article has really peaked my interest. I am going to book mark your site and keep checking for new information about once a week. I subscribed to your RSS feed too.
Aw, this was a very good post. Finding the time and actual effort to make a very good articleÖ but what can I sayÖ I procrastinate a whole lot and never manage to get anything done.
The next time I read a blog, Hopefully it doesn't disappoint me as much as this particular one. After all, I know it was my choice to read, however I actually believed you'd have something helpful to talk about. All I hear is a bunch of crying about something you could fix if you were not too busy looking for attention.
You made some really good points there. I looked on the internet to learn more about the issue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this web site.
Good information. Lucky me I found your blog by accident (stumbleupon). I have book marked it for later!
You're so interesting! I don't believe I have read through a single thing like that before. So wonderful to find somebody with unique thoughts on this subject matter. Really.. many thanks for starting this up. This web site is one thing that's needed on the internet, someone with some originality!
Everything is very open with a precise clarification of the challenges. It was definitely informative. Your site is extremely helpful. Thank you for sharing!
I wanted to thank you for this excellent read!! I absolutely enjoyed every little bit of it. I've got you bookmarked to look at new stuff you postÖ
Hi there! This article couldnít be written much better! Reading through this article reminds me of my previous roommate! He always kept preaching about this. I most certainly will forward this article to him. Fairly certain he'll have a great read. Thanks for sharing!
This is a topic which is near to my heart... Cheers! Where are your contact details though?
Very good article. I certainly love this website. Continue the good work!
This site was... how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I've found something which helped me. Appreciate it!
I must thank you for the efforts you've put in writing this site. I'm hoping to check out the same high-grade blog posts from you later on as well. In truth, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my very own blog now 😉
I couldnít resist commenting. Very well written!
Very good blog post. I absolutely appreciate this site. Stick with it!
How do you delete media files with apostrophes from Joomla?
Hi there, I do believe your web site may be having web browser compatibility issues. Whenever I take a look at your website in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in I.E., it's got some overlapping issues. I merely wanted to provide you with a quick heads up! Apart from that, fantastic blog!