October 19th, 2012
02:30 PM ET

Analysis: Five weeks on, confusion and contradictions on Benghazi suspects

By Tim Lister, Chris Lawrence and Paul Cruickshank

Five weeks after terrorists stormed the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, confusion over the nature of the attack, the extent to which it was planned and the identity of the perpetrators seems as pervasive as ever.

The latest in the conflicting reports coming out of the country: the naming of Ahmed Abu Khattala as a suspect in the assault that left four Americans dead.

Abu Khattala was identified in published reports this week as the leader of Ansar al-Sharia, an Islamist group widely suspected to be involved in the consulate attack.

Also: How intelligence understanding of Benghazi changed

Both The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times reported Wednesday that Abu Khattala was at the consulate while the attack was unfolding.

"Witnesses ... have said they saw Mr. Abu Khattala leading the assault," The New York Times reported.

But some sources in Benghazi say they doubt Abu Khattala had such a role, telling CNN that he is neither the leader of Ansar al-Sharia nor currently connected with other jihadist groups.

Two sources in Benghazi contacted by CNN describe Abu Khattala as conservative but not a jihadist. They say they had previously heard nothing about his being a suspect in the attack.

That view was echoed by Hamad Bugrain, a spokesman for the February 17 Brigade, who denied that Abu Khattala led the attack and said he "is no longer active in any military service or in any brigades." February 17th is considered one of the more effective units in Benghazi and intervened to help Americans trapped at the consulate's annex building on the night of the attack.

Bugrain added that Abu Khattala had been connected to Ansar al-Sharia at some point but he now has a "normal lifestyle."

Another source with well-established contacts among Libyan jihadist groups said Abu Khattala had come to prominence during the 2011 Libyan revolution after being freed from Abu Salim prison in Tripoli.

The source said Abu Khattala had a radical reputation as a "takfiri" - a Muslim who accuses other Muslims of being apostates if they don't follow certain aspects of Sharia law. He added that Abu Khattala's former brigade had been suspected in the assassination last year of former Interior Minister Abdelfattah Younis in Benghazi, after he had defected from the Gadhafi regime.

Abu Khattala himself spoke with Reuters in Benghazi on Thursday and said he had heard he was a suspect only through news media.

"These reports say that no one knows where I am and that I am hiding," he told Reuters. "But here I am in the open, sitting in a hotel with you. I'm even going to pick up my sister's kids from school soon."

He denied being a leader of Ansar al-Sharia but said he was friendly with the group and knew its members. He also acknowledged going to the consulate the night of the attack after receiving a phone call about the assault, but told Reuters: "Just because someone is there doesn't mean they were behind it."

"I arrived at the scene just like the others did - to see what was happening," he told Reuters.

Abu Khattala gave the same account to New York Times correspondent David Kirkpatrick, who told CNN Friday: "He said he was on the scene but arrived after the shooting had already begun and was just basically trying to break up a traffic jam." (Watch the interview)

But Kirkpatrick said he did not think Abu Khattala's account was particularly convincing.

Lack of central authority an obstacle for investigators

One of the problems investigators face is the lack of central authority in Libya, where security relies upon various militia that co-exist uneasily. Additionally, many senior members of the security services - especially in Benghazi - have been assassinated in recent months.

The rampant insecurity in Benghazi is repeatedly referenced in roughly 160 pages of diplomatic traffic released Friday by the U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa.

They include one cable sent from the consulate just a week before the attack that reports: "An hour-long gun battle broke out between local police and militia forces August 28 ... demonstrating the very delicate dynamic among the city's official and unofficial security forces."

Kirkpatrick, who spoke to CNN from Benghazi, said Libya doesn't "have much of an army or police force ... so I think (Abu Khattala) feels a certain amount of impunity walking around the streets of Benghazi."

In several cases of politically motivated violence, suspects have been detained and questioned before being released "for lack of evidence." Few prosecutions have occurred.

When asked by CNN Friday if the United States has a good idea of where the leadership of Ansar al-Shariah is, a U.S. official said the current thinking is that the group is concentrated east of Benghazi.

Libyan officials say that dozens of militants who previously had compounds in and around the eastern town of Derna had recently sought refuge in the forests and ravines behind the coastal town of Susa, which lies between Derna and Benghazi.

Earlier this month, three Libyan policemen were killed in an attack on their checkpoint at Susa that was blamed on Islamist radicals.

Asked about the intelligence-gathering process in Benghazi, the U.S. official said: "We obviously don't have boots on the ground," but he did suggest that U.S. agencies are working with Libyans to gather information.

Was al Qaeda involved?

U.S. and Libyan authorities are also investigating whether al Qaeda's affiliate in North Africa - al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) - had a role in the Benghazi attack.

Several days after the assault, the president of Libya's Parliament, Mohammed al Magarief, asserted that U.S. intelligence had intercepted communications between elements of AQIM and Ansar al-Sharia.

Neither U.S. nor Libyan officials have given further details.

Since the fall of Gadhafi, experts believe AQIM has tried to expand its operations northwards into Libya from its sub-Saharan strongholds. Sources briefed by Western intelligence told CNN that last year two senior AQIM figures made trips to Libya to explore the possibility of cooperation with local Libyan Jihadist groups, secure weapons supplies and scout out possible locations for training facilities.

One of those operatives, Mohktar Belmokhtar, an Algerian founding member of AQIM, spent several months in Libya and traveled up to Libya's northern coast, according to the source.

The other, Abdelhamid Abou Zeid – whose reported execution of Western hostages has cemented a reputation for extreme brutality - made several trips to Libya in 2011, according to the source.

Both men are now believed to be in northern Mali, which has become the epicenter of AQIM operations after jihadist groups took control of much of the region this year.

soundoff (326 Responses)
  1. スーパーコピー 口コミ 30代

    激安ブランド 直営店
    エルメス(バッグ、時計) シャネル(バッグ、時計)
    Christian Dior(バッグ、小物) COACH(バッグ)
    グッチ(バッグ、小物) ROLEX(時計)
    オメガ(時計) IWC(時計)

    September 27, 2018 at 7:14 am | Reply
  2. michael kors mk5076

    michael kors shoes canada michael kors bags uk michael kors suede boots http://www.texas-voice.com/mk/?michaelsbagswallet=8 michael kors berkley sandal michael kors outlet purses michael kors accessories michael kors sweater dress http://www.texas-voice.com/mk/?michaelsbagswallet=108 michael kors sequin wristlet michael kors wallet clutch michael kors heels michael kors plus size coats http://www.texas-voice.com/mk/?michaelsbagswallet=58 purple michael kors handbag michael kors satchels michael kors chronograph michael michael kors leather jacket http://www.texas-voice.com/mk/?michaelsbagswallet=158 michael kors gift card michael kors carla sandal michael kors store michael kors crossover bag http://www.texas-voice.com/mk/?michaelsbagswallet=33 michael kors sample sale michael kors black flats michael kors las vegas michael kors keychains http://www.texas-voice.com/mk/?michaelsbagswallet=133 michael kors coupon code 2014 michael kors designer michael kors pink bag michael kors bromley boots http://www.texas-voice.com/mk/?michaelsbagswallet=83 michael kors handbags for less michael kors discount purses cheap michael kors wallets michael kors perfume uk http://www.texas-voice.com/mk/?michaelsbagswallet=183 michael kors iphone cases
    michael kors mk5076 http://www.texas-voice.com/mk/?michaelsbagswallet=135

    October 6, 2014 at 8:41 pm | Reply
  3. breaking news

    Thanks for your blog post. I would love to say that the health insurance brokerage also works for the benefit of the coordinators of your group insurance policy. The health agent is given a directory of benefits needed by an individual or a group coordinator. Exactly what a broker may is try to find individuals or perhaps coordinators which will best fit those needs. Then he offers his referrals and if the two of you agree, the actual broker formulates a legal contract between the 2 parties. breaking news http://cnn?84739

    February 7, 2013 at 3:24 am | Reply
  4. jimcolyer

    Obama has failed. He has no record. Unemployment remains high, and the war still goes on in Afghanistan. 6 trillion has been added to the national debt. Obama takes responsibility for nothing. He is still blaming Bush. He lies. He ignores "Fast and Furious" and has lied about the murder of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi, claiming it was the result of a video when, in fact, it was a well-planned act of terror. In no way has Obama merited reelection. The only "hope and change" now comes with getting this joker out of the White House.

    October 21, 2012 at 4:12 pm | Reply
    • duckforcover

      Obama has no record? Where have you been? bin Laden is dead. We are out of Iraq. There is a viable plan to leave Afghanistan. How is it you know what Obama is doing about the embasy attack? Rush is leading you around by the nose. Try thinking for yourself.

      October 22, 2012 at 11:50 am | Reply
    • tims

      Osama is dead al quida is alive GM is alive so whats he going to due his seconds term bail gm out again

      October 26, 2012 at 5:07 pm | Reply


    October 21, 2012 at 3:29 pm | Reply
  6. clb2012now

    Obama did not call Benghazi terrorism. The rose garden speech was about the video with a splice tacked on about "acts of terror" in general. The "video did it" meme was continued by the administration for over 8 days to include Obama's speech to the UN, Susan Rice's 5 plus appearances arranged by the whitehouse on the Sunday shows, and Crowley's outright collusion with the Obama campaign.

    How much of the Obama's proliferation of the "video" brought the attention of the IMAMs and was the cause of the subsequent riots among the Muslims that weekend? Where was Obama's outrage on September 12th of an attack, no matter the reason, on Americans and American soil? Why did Obama not defend American's right to freedom of speech? If the investigation was on going, how could the administration even say video was the cause? As Obama said, we will get those who did it and the FBI can't get to the scene for three weeks; the actions don't meet the words!

    October 21, 2012 at 3:04 pm | Reply
    • Howard

      Americans deserve leaders who tell the truth ... not leaders who lie, and cover up ... with the help of a biased media ... in a desperate attempt to get reelected, and hold onto power. Add this to a crumbling economy ... and, it becomes obvious that Obama, Biden, all the unelected czars and bureaucratic appointees ... and, the biased media need to be replaced ASAP. Save America ... Elect Romney & Ryan on November 6th !!!

      October 21, 2012 at 3:16 pm | Reply
  7. Floodgate

    Will Anderson Cooper revisit this issue? His "reporting" was sort of one sided last week.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm | Reply
  8. rightospeak

    Who knows. Just like 9/11. All about oil. Bengazi-oil ?Gore Vidal in his book " Dreaming War-Blood for oil and the Bush -Cheney Junta" describes how they were ready and planning to attack Afganistan prior to 9/11 so they could build a pipeline from Caspian Sea to Karachi. So they orchestrated 9/11 to justify bigger military spending and imperial grabs.Just like a child asking her daddy "are we going to fight to get our oil under their sand ?" . Now you may get the picture.That is not what the Imperial Press have been telling us, but it is more to the Truth. Personally. in view of our mess at home , I would call all these ventures TREASON.

    October 21, 2012 at 11:11 am | Reply
    • Howard

      HEY !!! Snap out of it !!! Bush hasn't been in the White House for 4 YEARS !!! ... but, Obama has ... and, during the last 4 years, Obama has nearly destroyed out economy ... and, is currently lying and covering up the truth. Your blind devotion to 'Dear Leader' ... your Fuhrer, is touching ... but it's time for you to leave the Obama cult. Obama was given a chance ... and, in the past 4 years, he has nearly destroyed America. NOW, it's time for Barack and Michelle to abdicate their throne, so Mitt Romney can begin repairing the excessive damage caused by Obama's terrible policies. Good bye Barack, Michelle, Nancy, Harry, Jarret, and Axelrod, and all the unelected czars ... and, GOOD RIDDANCE TO YOU ALL ... I'm sure you all will find another way to pick the pockets of hard working Americans !!!

      October 21, 2012 at 3:22 pm | Reply
  9. GG

    The focus of who was behind the attack is certainly important, but what concerns me even more are the reports that there were indications an attack was brewing, yet the State Department did nothing to increase security at these high risk locations, and it cost 4 lives. The rules of engagement in these volatile countries where there is no stable government to protect our embassies should be made clear. If you breach the wall, you will be shot. A contingent of Marines with ample munitions to BRING IT should have been dispatched before this ever happened. "When four Americans are killed it;s certainly not optimal" Barack Hussein Obama.

    October 21, 2012 at 10:50 am | Reply
  10. NorCalMojo

    We'll find out after the election if Romney wins. As long as Obama is in office, it's not going to be reported.

    October 21, 2012 at 10:27 am | Reply
  11. Dave

    Syria is behind it.

    October 21, 2012 at 9:52 am | Reply
  12. Alfredo

    The attack had nothing to do with the US or Israel. Syria did it. Assad is turning Syria into rubble killing much of the population, now his killing machine is overflowing into Lebanon and Turkey. Iran and Hezbollah support his sectarian murder. Arabs/Persians are very good at killing one another , they don't need any outside assistance. That's the one thing they're good at....

    October 21, 2012 at 9:04 am | Reply
  13. SugarCube

    Obama's 9/11 terror attack has been an unmitigated disaster. Monday's debate should be precious.

    October 21, 2012 at 8:40 am | Reply
    • GG

      Certainly not optimal

      October 21, 2012 at 10:42 am | Reply
    • Puzzled

      Trying to second guess those with more information than we do is very dangerous. It is easier for a contender to make all sorts of claims and accusations because the burden of leadership is not on his shoulders. Why are Republicans and their supporters pushing the administration to divulge to the world what may have been their strategy. The fact is the loss of American lives was extremely unfortunate. But was that due to negligence on the part of the administration? Is this incident proportionate to the misleading statement about WMD of the previous administration? Are the implications and consequences anyway, potentially, the same? Obviously not. In an era of rocket propelled grenades, car bombs, suicide bombers and a consulate located in the midst of active enemy territory, more security personnel, most likely, would have led to greater casualties and would not necessarily guarantee that the ambassador would have survived. A responsible government cannot act on the reports of correspondents alone.The latter do not possess the same wide overview as the intelligence community does. The administration just have to do things the right way and that means rationally and methodically.

      October 21, 2012 at 10:52 am | Reply
      • kendrick1

        Why did Obama see fit to diveulge to the world our military strategy (using the term loosely) years before it is supposed to happen that the U.S. would be pulling out of Afghanistan in 2014?

        I suppose we little guys don't understand the BIG picture the way you do –why the denial by the president to accede to the pleas of four Americans at the outpost of Benghazi , and allow them to be maimed, murdered, and dragged through the streets from United States of America territrory there!

        The president gave more attention toBig Bird and "binders" than to that disgraceful debacle!

        October 21, 2012 at 1:53 pm |
  14. jrod

    It was that silly movie producer that made that terrible movie, CNN and this administration both said so.

    October 21, 2012 at 8:36 am | Reply
  15. aqil m. imdad

    GOOGLE::::911missinglinks:::: israel is no friend of USA...

    October 21, 2012 at 8:31 am | Reply
    • SugarCube

      Saw your ignorant post the last 10 times.

      October 21, 2012 at 8:37 am | Reply
  16. SugarKube

    The Libya terror attack has been an unmitigated disaster for Obama.

    October 21, 2012 at 8:28 am | Reply
    • aleffindavs

      Hey Guy,
      Why are you such a complete puto? You are on every article posting the same idiocy.do you have anyone who likes you?

      October 21, 2012 at 10:44 am | Reply
  17. aqil m. imdad

    GOOGLE USS LIBERTY.... israel is no friend of USA.

    October 21, 2012 at 8:28 am | Reply
  18. aqil m. imdad

    America PLEASE wake up. israel is a cancer.

    October 21, 2012 at 8:27 am | Reply
    • Backgammon

      And you Sir are either from Palistine or just a simpleton

      October 21, 2012 at 5:03 pm | Reply
  19. Blaster34

    When something goes right in this administration, they take the credit as they should. However, when something goes wrong, as in Libya, they always, always blame the messenger, or anyone other than the administration, in this case the CIA and other intel sources.

    October 21, 2012 at 7:32 am | Reply
    • Taskmaster

      Bush got bad intel on Iraq and the liberals blame HIM. Now it looks like Obama is blaming the C.I.A. and other intel sources for the screw up in Libya. It's OK for Obama to rely on his intel sources but damn Bush for doing the same thing?Of course Obama will never admit that to anything he can lie out of.

      October 21, 2012 at 8:12 am | Reply
  20. snowdogg

    The exact nature of the "situation" at time of attack and subsequent events are still unfolding. It didn't help that the American investigative team was stiff-armed by the Libyan government for 3 weeks.

    October 21, 2012 at 6:24 am | Reply
  21. jonny

    In their zeal to get Obama and Clinton, who removed Ambassador Stevens diary from Benghazi after he died, shared it around the CNN newsroom and read it before returning it to the family? CNN did. When this is all said and done, I bet that's the only real crime committed here, tampering with evidence. Its also pretty unethical.

    October 21, 2012 at 3:03 am | Reply
  22. 2/8

    The U.S. tends to tick a lot of people off.....so I'm guessing at this point it could have been anyone.

    October 21, 2012 at 3:02 am | Reply
    • Taskmaster

      It was Muslim terrorist. Not just anyone.

      October 21, 2012 at 8:14 am | Reply
      • aqil m. imdad


        October 21, 2012 at 8:25 am |
  23. mmi16

    There isn't enough tin foil in the world to cover all these thoughts – both left & right. What a total bunch of goofs!

    October 21, 2012 at 12:28 am | Reply
    • Brad76

      Tell us more oh wise one! What is the meaning of life? Surely you must have the answer!

      October 21, 2012 at 12:31 am | Reply
  24. gagged in usa

    probably israel to make obama look bad before the election, or propaganda to get us into another war. remember from the War Made Easy movie that they start wars on false information? banksters probably.

    October 20, 2012 at 11:09 pm | Reply
    • gagged in usa

      the central banks make money off of wars. and the war profiteers. so...we would have to align the money properly to get the results that we want. our whole system is out of whack.

      October 20, 2012 at 11:12 pm | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      Anything to win an election.

      October 20, 2012 at 11:28 pm | Reply
    • dave

      no one has to make obama look bad ! it comes naturally! Great to see cnn give its warped view on the attack since it took them weeks to acknowledge it even happened!

      October 21, 2012 at 7:11 am | Reply
    • Taskmaster

      Try to take the heat off Obama by blaming Israel. Harry S. Truman another democrat had a sign on his desk in the oval office "The Buck Stops Here." Obama should have one reading 'The Buck Is PASSED Here.

      October 21, 2012 at 8:20 am | Reply
  25. Brad76

    I think this deserves further investigation, I don't think this was a traditional "terrorist attack". Whomever did this did so with some kind of an agenda in mind. Yeah I know, first thought in someones head when they hear something like that is "tinfoil hat", but this a bit different. There are other powers in the world who hate the USA and the west. This just strikes me as a calculated geopolitical based attack, just too many coincidences.

    October 20, 2012 at 10:25 pm | Reply
  26. Judy Reinhardt

    "Get the transcript, Candy." Now, you think the public believes you are capable of presenting information on Benghazi??? Please. You don't get to choose when you are truthful with us and when you are not!

    October 20, 2012 at 9:25 pm | Reply
    • Murphy

      Once a liar, always a liar Candy. I wouldn't believe you or trust anything you say. Good post, Judy.

      October 20, 2012 at 10:12 pm | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      Anything to win an election. She sold herself.

      October 20, 2012 at 11:30 pm | Reply
  27. Brad

    Loss of 4 American lives in Libya is sad - this was a tragedy. However, if you are looking for gross incompetence and negligence, recall Beirut in 1983 when an old fool fell asleep at the steering wheel and let 241 Americans die in Beirut barracks.

    October 20, 2012 at 9:13 pm | Reply
    • snowdogg

      So right on!

      October 21, 2012 at 6:20 am | Reply
    • Taskmaster

      Bring up anything from the past to defend an incompetent glory seeker that cares nothing about the people of that work for him or the people he is supposed to serve

      October 21, 2012 at 8:27 am | Reply
  28. Homer10

    Both sides are right. The terrorists were looking for an opportunity, and the protest gave them the opportunity they were looking for. Either way it doesn't make any difference in the outcome.

    October 20, 2012 at 8:55 pm | Reply
    • Murphy

      Videos in realtime do NOT show any protests going on. Cover up, pure and simple.

      October 20, 2012 at 10:13 pm | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      What protest?

      October 20, 2012 at 11:31 pm | Reply
  29. Bayousara

    Ask Mitt Romney who was behind the attacks! He was there!!!!!!

    Actually, Karl Rove will be running the country like he did for George W. Bush. From behind the scenes. If Mitt wins, good luck, fella. You will screw up all the diplomacy (which he doesn't know the definition of) that Hillary and the prez have been working on. BTW, folks, if you have sons or grandsons, you will see conscription into a war with Iran and others in the midEast. So better warn the kids now and show them a map of Canada.

    October 20, 2012 at 8:50 pm | Reply
  30. LiIes NCover-up

    CNN now reports that the terrorist attack and assassinations at the US Embassy in Benghazi had nothing to do with the you-tube video??? They must have been given the OK from their White House superiors.

    When will CNN report the reasons why Obama lied to the American People and the world during his UN speech? Could the reason be his Middle East policies are failing, and he wants to keep the power of the POTUS?

    October 20, 2012 at 8:37 pm | Reply
    • Bayousara

      The attacts in Libya were not involved with that stupid video. It is a coincidence the video was circulating the globe. The attackers have not yet been identified. But maybe Mittens and Paul might know who they were. At Monday's debate (so called) I think the mod should ask Romney who the attackers were.

      October 20, 2012 at 8:52 pm | Reply
    • Oblamo

      Please, these are CNN comments. Before Candy, John King and Erin Burnett go on the air each day, they each have to kiss a picture of OBLAMO's ass and promise to be biased toward all democrats. Fox leans to the right but those 3 should not have their names and the words journalist in the same sentance.

      October 20, 2012 at 9:48 pm | Reply
  31. RF Burns

    I thought this was just an organized protest over that silly video that got out of hand. Wow, am I shocked!

    October 20, 2012 at 8:20 pm | Reply
    • Homer10

      That silly little protest was used by a terrorist group to do a raid. Who cares who is right? They got us, but we will just fly a few more drone attacks to make up for it. They get 4 we get a few hundred.

      October 20, 2012 at 8:59 pm | Reply
  32. BcdErick

    CNN should give up "reporting" on this subject. You folks have been caught so many times desperately trying cover up the incompetence of Obama it is national joke. Millions are laughing at you. CNN has become, over this subject at least, "The Least Trusted Name in News". Give it rest.

    October 20, 2012 at 8:09 pm | Reply
    • Oblamo

      Millions are laughing but based on their ratings, not many are watching. Quit trying to protect Obama and start reporting the news and maybe you may get more viewers.

      October 20, 2012 at 9:52 pm | Reply
    • Here we go again...

      It's too late, CNN. You can try and cover up the incompetency of the Obama White House and his State Department. It's not washing with anyone who has even half a brain at this point.

      October 20, 2012 at 11:19 pm | Reply
      • Don'tknow much about the state department

        The vast majority of the State Department is the same as under the previous President, and will be the same under the next President, whenever that is...

        October 21, 2012 at 12:40 am |
  33. Kamil Zawadzki

    Reblogged this on Outspoken.

    October 20, 2012 at 8:01 pm | Reply
  34. Syd Chaden

    The Obama Administration is investigating who might have been responsible for the attack on the US Consulate in Libya. Their list of suspects includes:
    George Bush, Sarah Palin, Israel, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News. No Muslims are on the list of suspects, because puttijng a Muslim on the list might jeopardize the wonderful relations that the US has with the Muslim World. They won't release any information until after the elections, because that might jeopardize their investigation. Of course, if they did release any information, that might jeopardize their chances for reelection.
    How could anyone not vote for the most transparent presidency in our history?
    Anyone who says that it isn't the most transparent presidency in our history must be a racist!

    October 20, 2012 at 7:58 pm | Reply
  35. rexdogcanadien

    In this culture failure is often seen as an unworthy outcome in any event. If this were so we would still be living in caves, using primitive tools with little or no knowledge of how to progress. It is obvious that man is hardwired to recognize that there is value in failing to achieve most human endeavor. He learned that failure is informative. It is the catalyst for all technological, medical, military, agricultural,etc knowledge. Thus we should avoid using failure as a weapon of punishment.

    October 20, 2012 at 7:53 pm | Reply
  36. Get Real

    Although all of the confusion over who did it is disturbing, this admin looking the other way for 3 months leading up to this tragedy is worse. Stevens warned of the al Qaeda flag being flown over gov bldgs and training facilities. He warned of violence and growing issues. In early June the Brigades(pro al Qaeda) bombed this Embassy and warned that as long as drones fly they will continue. Libyan officials warned about the possibility of attacks. What did we do? Denied that Eastern Lybia had a growing concern. Denied requests for security. Then, above all else, we listened to the attacks for 6 hours and chose to not send in support over supposed clearance concerns. We weren't concerned about clearance in Pakistan but suddenly when american lives are in direct threat we choose to show that concern? Don't let mass media or me or anyone tell you what the arguments of this awful event should be. There were failures everywhere in the timeline and everywhere in the chain of command.

    October 20, 2012 at 7:14 pm | Reply
    • Backgammon

      That is because Obama has a really hard time saying the word Terrorist. Didn't you notice those 13 people killed at Ft. Hood, were work place violence. Many of our military guys can't get payments because Obama can not call it what it is.
      When a Muslim screams Alla Ackbar....pretty sure it is a terrorist.

      October 21, 2012 at 4:17 pm | Reply
  37. LOL!

    I'm begining to feel it was hit men hired by the GoP ..perhaps the Koch Bros.... in an effort to destroy Obama's excellent foreign affairs record.

    October 20, 2012 at 7:10 pm | Reply
    • Allena Westbrook

      You are so right!

      October 20, 2012 at 7:46 pm | Reply
    • RF Burns

      Sure, just like his excellent economic record, right?

      October 20, 2012 at 8:18 pm | Reply
    • Murphy

      Are you really that dumb? Or is it your liberal mouth getting ahead of your brain?

      October 20, 2012 at 10:17 pm | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      Are you nuts?!

      October 20, 2012 at 11:33 pm | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      What a shameful comment! Both side fight dirty to win the election but a comment like this, neither side would be anything but ashamed of. You are a disgrace of an American! Oh, wait, you probably are not American. Even so, how terrible that anyone would say that! Disgusting!

      October 20, 2012 at 11:37 pm | Reply
    • SugarCube

      Obama's 9/11 terror attack has been an unmitigated disaster. Monday's debate should be precious.

      October 21, 2012 at 8:39 am | Reply
  38. John

    Should make for interesting interchange at Monday's debate

    Romney "New reports from Libya suggest that the story wasn't reported correctly by the administration"

    Obama "Even newer reports, which you are privy to state " It wasn't Al Queda, and was just as likely spontaneous as it was pre-planned by a major terrorist group".......You should be ashamed for Lying Mr. Romney, you just receivied this."

    October 20, 2012 at 6:39 pm | Reply
    • EdD

      Then of course Romney can counter with the news reports that al qaeda claimed responsibility on 9/15 while Obama was promoting that a vudeo was to blame. Let me repeat this; al qaeda came out and said they did it.
      "Al-Qaeda says attack on U.S. consulate in Libya ‘revenge’ for death of its 2nd man"
      english dot alarabiya dot net/articles/2012/09/15/238197.html

      October 20, 2012 at 6:43 pm | Reply
  39. Soldier of Fortunes

    Sheeple for People I see...you need to take off the rose colored glasses...the Robpublicans set this up like bowling pins..
    They knew ahead of time the security issues...timed it for 9-11 and Robmoney was the first to make declarations...they have been doing that to the White House since the Black Boy that got his Law Degree at Harvard is now in Charge...
    And they really don't like that...didn't think it would come to pass...been bellowing in their bourbons since...they crucify those they cannot forget or those they cannot stand or both...either way Law Boy is a good pick...Harvard trained...
    He will give us reports and the White Boys of the White House don't like that...they just can't shut him up...lol...GOOD!!!

    October 20, 2012 at 6:11 pm | Reply
    • Allena Westbrook

      I agree with you,strange this person who made this awful film said he was paid $50million from five donors?????film on you tube all hell breaks out people die Romney out speaking before even the President has any facts he's all over this setup setup just saying.

      October 20, 2012 at 7:42 pm | Reply
  40. Captain

    ODD FACT ... the two days before this attack, the News began reporting about new investigations of Bush WH complicity in 9/11, as well as the Silverstein (Israel/Mossad) connection. "Suddenly" this 'attack' happened, and that News disappeared.... don't think these things are planned – think again....

    see youtube - CIA Asset Susan Lindauer Can Now Speak 10 years after 9-11.
    Yeah, Bush WH did it. Lied about everything. More on VeteransToday

    October 20, 2012 at 6:03 pm | Reply
    • Get Real

      Although all of the confusion over who did it is disturbing, this admin looking the other way for 3 months leading up to this tragedy is worse. Stevens warned of the al Qaeda flag being flown over gov bldgs and training facilities. He warned of violence and growing issues. In early June the Brigades(pro al Qaeda) bombed this Embassy and warned that as long as drones fly they will continue. Libyan officials warned about the possibility of attacks. What did we do? Denied that Eastern Lybia had a growing concern. Denied requests for security. Then, above all else, we listened to the attacks for 6 hours and chose to not send in support over supposed clearance concerns. We weren't concerned about clearance in Pakistan but suddenly when american lives are in direct threat we choose to show that concern? People please find out all of the facts. Don't let mass media or me or anyone tell you what the arguments of this awful event should be. There were failures everywhere in the timeline and everywhere in the chain of command.

      October 20, 2012 at 7:12 pm | Reply
  41. cadillacrich

    0BAMA LIED and is now FRIED.

    October 20, 2012 at 5:37 pm | Reply
  42. dd

    Why was there confusion? The Embassy was yelling for security help and describing the deteriorating situation in LIbya as al Qaeda strengthen. The diplomatic letters are clear. Obama and Clinton ignored our Embassy and were neglect in the murders of four Americans. When is the buck going to stop at Obama's White House. Maybe after 100s of news journalists are slaughtered some place; maybe then the NYT may pay attention to the incompetence.

    October 20, 2012 at 5:33 pm | Reply
1 2

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.