Air Force's hypersonic test fails
By Mike Mount
A hypersonic aircraft launched by the Air Force Tuesday spiraled out of control and was destroyed before it could reach its goal of speeding to 4,600 mph, Pentagon officials said Wednesday.
The third test of the X-51A Waverider was launched Tuesday off the California coast from a B-52 modified bomber aircraft and was to fly for 300 seconds, reaching hypersonic speeds of Mach 6, but only flew for 16 seconds, according to the Air Force.
Officials said a problem with a tail fin caused the missile-like vehicle to fly out of control before the main engine could be ignited, leading researchers to destroy it early.
"A fault was identified with one of the cruiser control fins. Once the X-51 separated from the rocket booster, approximately 15 seconds later, the cruiser was not able to maintain control due to the faulty control fin and was lost," said a statement issued by the Air Force.
It's unclear what, if any, information was gleaned from the test. According to the statement, "Program officials will now begin the process of working through a rigorous evaluation to determine the exact cause of all factors at play."
The Air Force plans to go public with details of the failed test in a few weeks, after researchers are able to analyze the data from the flight.
The world's record-breaking airports
"It is unfortunate that a problem with this subsystem caused a termination before we could light the Scramjet engine," said Charlie Brink, X-51A Program Manager for Air Force Research Laboratory. "All our data showed we had created the right conditions for engine ignition and we were very hopeful to meet our test objectives."
The Air Force had four X-51A Waveriders and has tested three. Officials said they do not yet know when or if the fourth Waverider will be tested.
Recommended: Hypersonic flight, what does it mean?
@natlsecuritycnn on Twitter
202920 768990I genuinely enjoy examining on this internet internet site , it has got wonderful posts . 723638
Raúl Lopez
c/ buena15, Otis
Andalucía, 14992
639785105
what is scrapebox reviewsnap unlocked smartphones
Best view i have ever seen !
https://images.google.ca/url?q=https://topphimhot.net
Spot on with this write-up, I actually think this website needs much more attention. I’ll probably be returning to see more, thanks for the advice!
https://extraproxies.com/buy-proxies/2000-proxy-pack/
I like this web blog very much so much great information.
https://dreamproxies.com/tag/high-proxies/
excellent post, very informative. I wonder why the opposite specialists of this sector don't realize this. You must proceed your writing. I'm confident, you have a great readers' base already!
https://extraproxies.com/sent-bitcoin-from-blockchain-to-coinbase-not-showing-up-in-coinbase-wallet/
You made various fine points there. I did a search on the issue and found mainly people will go along with with your blog.
https://dreamproxies.com/
Excellent post. I was checking constantly this blog and I am impressed! Extremely useful info specially the last part 🙂 I care for such info much. I was seeking this certain info for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.
http://www.zortilonrel.com/
I truly appreciate this post. I have been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You've made my day! Thank you again
http://www.zortilonrel.com/
Some truly howling work on behalf of the owner of this web site, perfectly great subject material.
http://www.zortilonrel.com/
Nice post. I learn one thing tougher on totally different blogs everyday. It should at all times be stimulating to learn content from different writers and practice a bit one thing from their store. I’d want to make use of some with the content on my blog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll offer you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.
http://www.zortilonrel.com/
https://www.electricpercolatorcoffeepot.com/10-top-coffee-bloggers/
Hi there, You've done a fantastic job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am sure they'll be benefited from this website.
https://www.electricpercolatorcoffeepot.com/10-top-coffee-bloggers/
9hk44 xxheb 0wqf
Thanks on your marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you're a great author.I will remember to bookmark your blog and will eventually come back in the future. I want to encourage you to continue your great work, have a nice afternoon!
http://www.zortilonrel.com/
My brother recommended I might like this website. He was entirely right. This post truly made my day. You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!
http://www.zortilonrel.com/
I got what you mean ,saved to favorites, very nice website .
http://www.zortilonrel.com/
500000 Scrapebox Blast Live SEO blog Comment Backlinks: https://www.seoclerk.com/Link-Building/842132/500000-Scrapebox-Blast-Live-SEO-blog-Comment-Backlinks
https://www.seoclerk.com/Traffic/840816/1500-USA-Visitors-Daily-For-30-Days-From-Niche-Targeted-Organic-Traffic-From-Google
Earn $300/Day With Our Passive Income System – Best Autopilot income system 2021
https://warriorplus.com/o2/a/s195s/0
I was reading through some of your blog posts on this internet site and I think this internet site is rattling informative! Keep putting up.
https://www.electricpercolatorcoffeepot.com/10-top-coffee-bloggers/
Best Marketing Services – Cheapest on Market. SMM Supreme is the Top 5 Best Social Media Website in the World. Best Quality-Price Ratio on the market with 714,928 orders until now. – Facebook Fan Page Likes for $4.50/1000 – Instagram Followers for $0.78/1000 – Youtube Views: $1.62/1000 – Twitter followers: $2.10/1000 – Paypal Deposit – Bitcoin Deposit – Fast order processing – 1 Hour Delivery (Click on the link in the profile for more details)
https://bit.ly/3iVO2Vh
The apex stock to buy for 2021 range from small-cap diamonds in the rough similar to URBT to dominant emerging stocks. When you have $1,000 to spare currently, the subsequent revolutionary stock could be great for opportunistic long-term investors. Urban TV Network Corp stock character URBT. I needn't know about you, nonetheless after I think of innovation, internet streaming services stocks spring to mind. Over the past decade, we now have witnessed astounding developments in streaming bit rates along with devices which are developed to support those services. We have witnessed major streaming services similar to Disney & Netflix grab market dominance, but this little known corporation URBT. have launched tremendous streaming services URBTPlus Movies + Live TV. I believe this company will undoubtedly secure the urban internet streaming markeplace. The stock market forever has a few surprises in store, as any shareholder in 2020 would attest. URBT has been astonishing having a 500 gain over twelve months. But by and large, the main element experts are considering as they recognize the best stocks to acquire for 2021 is the same element that dominated 2020: Corona Virus. And internet streaming service URBTPlus is responding to the call. So as an shareholder look at Urban Televison Network Corp. stock symbol URBT. #top5investment2121
https://bit.ly/3rqsPI0
Some really wonderful information, Glad I found this.
http://www.vreyrolinomit.com/
Hello! I just now would choose to provide a large thumbs up for any excellent information you have here for this post. We are returning to your blog to get more detailed soon.
http://6dollarmillion.xyz
Transfer from bitcoin to paypal very fast and low cost.
https://exchanger24.org/xchange_btc_to_ppusd/
detectives privados tres cantos
https://www.argadetectives.com/fuenlabrada.html
Employer and managerial control within an organization rests at many levels and has important implications for staff and productivity alike, with control forming the fundamental link between desired outcomes and actual processes. Employers must balance interests such as decreasing wage constraints with a maximization of labour productivity in order to achieve a profitable and productive employment relationship.::
Take care
<http://www.caramoan.co/
Unquestionably consider that which you said. Your favorite justification seemed to be at the web the easiest factor to have in mind of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while other people consider issues that they plainly don't know about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top as neatly as outlined out the whole thing with no need side-effects , folks can take a signal. Will probably be back to ge more. Thank you!
now while i left rose a long while ago i just wann say congratz to the wpotrraal team on your 1 yr annviersy best of luck to u all. by the way that arum castlegear thats an awsome looking castlegear and design
Pretty decent cardsharing vendor, I have updated on to six months' time monthly subscription
Hi there, I discovered your web site by way of Google at the same time as searching for a related topic, your web site came up, it looks great. I have added to favourites|added to my bookmarks.
Soooo. The F-22s aren't fast enough-we need something that will go 4600 mph....Units are struggling due to budget cuts to make sure their people have proper SAFETY equipment but thats not important-–we need to focus on 4600 mph hyper supersonic crap that makes absolutely no sense....quite simple if you ask me
That's just it...it's not simple...so nobody asked you. Just because you don't understand the difference between a manned supersonic aircraft and an unmanned hypersonic missile doesn't mean everyone else is equally dense.
I thought tail fins generally were bad at high mach speeds, they usually cause some flight anomalies. It would be nice to be provided with the design of the fin to determine at what speed the anomaly occurred at, ie. subsonic, supersonic, or transonic speed. My bets are sock waves and wave drag due to improper design, meaning design was based on highly supersonic flight, but didn't fully account for enhanced maneuverability at transonic or subsonic conditions.
Wow, thanks for the input. I guess all the hypersonic specialists in the AIr Force don't know as much as you do about designing tail fins. It must have been dumb luck that they worked for the first two flights, huh? Maybe the wind just blew it the right way and they got lucky...twice. If only you'd offered to give them your boundless knowledge before, you could have saved the taxpayer millions of dollars!!!!
(or maybe, something just broke, and you have no clue what you're talking about. I'm thinking the latter is more likely).
matt you are right next to me in computer apps shut up
How many more days will CNN be reporting this ?? Move on to current new please on your header.
Adrian your threw
Well, you spelled ONE word right out of three. Might want to skip computer class and go back to English. Sigh...
Why is it so bad that it failed?
The numbnuts in the Air Force should get some engineers from NASA that just landed a vehicle on Mars.
Good coment...Makes you wonder...Where does all of our tax dollars go......
Not to your school, apparently.
Landing a vehicle on Mars has been done before, multiple times now, although there were some failures too. Scramjets have not. That's why they are testing. Oh, and NASA doesn't have a perfect record. Consider Apollo 1, Apollo 13, Liberty Bell 7, Gemini 8, Challenger, Columbia, NOAA-19, MCO, Deep Space 2, MPL, SBIRS, Genesis, Hubble (later fixed), Helios, DART, and OCO.
you space-x mf are real dumb
What does Space X have to do with this test?
retractable tail fin anyone, iq 157 and I know what has to be done, pay me half what you pay ur guys please. ps ur stabilizer
is off, ur figuring it for mach 4 speeds not mach 6 which cause increase "water vapour" build up on a certain section(different extreme temp. plus speed ice catch a fin anyone.) Good luck guys
Correction...IQ 15.7
Considering that the flight was lost 15 seconds after launch and BEFORE the scramjet engine could be ignited you are merely speculating, trying to sound knowledgeable, about things that did not happen. Since the vehicle never got anywhere near Mach 1, much less Mach 4, 5 or 6, there is no evidence that you are correct, which is probably why the USAF has not hired you even at the reduced labor rate.
well, it seems that we can figure how the marine life dies during the tests. maybge
After all the big bucks spent on this puppy and it fails because of a faulty tail fin. Give us a break!
just looking at the lack of stabilizing wings it seems obvious this thing would lose increasing amounts of ability once it started wavering. What idiocy. And what would be the use of such a thing? To deliver murderous payloads in the blink of an eye? What? We aren't killing people overseas fast enough?
Thanks for the objective and creditable assessment "michael el".. Mr Aerospace Engineer and Rocket Scientist.
To kill "bad guys" with greater efficiency and speed that are fighting and sometimes killing my fellow servicemembers? ABSOLUTELY...if thats what this project's objective is. Maybe in your spare time, you're also a military affairs journalist with access to some of the details of this project and your speculation is actually creditable.
I'll bet good money you're none of the above and therefore you're "critque" of this project has ZERO relevance...do you enjoy looking foolish?
Hay Trevor. You and your fellow servicemen should not be there in the first place. Wake up.
And where are all of your tax dollars spent??? Or are U in the top 1% like Mittens????
Trevor, I think you are right about Michael el. I have no personal knowledge about this particular project, but my guess is that the X-51A is merely a test bed to prove up the concept and engine design which will probably be enlarged for use on MUCH larger aircraft, not necessarily all of which will be for military purposes. The concepts for hypersonic commercial aircraft that can do transoceanic flights in a few hours have long been on the drawing boards of aeronautical engineers here and abroad.
CRP- "over there in the first place"? Deflection from the topic by taking this very specific issue about possibly giving servicemembers an advantage on the battlefield to save their lives and you turn it into a "political" one? How proud you must be...
It's funny how it's bad for the government to try and spur innovation in the energy industry by providing loans for alternative energy research, the findings of which would be beneficial for all of human kind. But it's ok for the government to spend $100+ million for each vehicle, that will be destroyed (so far 3), to test what is essentially a better missile that would only benefit our military in the near to mid-term future or until our "ENEMIES" develop a similar technology.
You telling me that they would ever be able to fly civilians at mach 6 for commercial purposes?! LMAO!!!
Our priorities are so screwed up it's comical!
Wow, I didn't know that the military "protected and served" itself... If this project produces weapons that benefits me and my fellow servicemembers and gives us an advantage on the battlefield this is a waste? I do really appreciate your support and everything you've done your country...
A least he's not out there killing women and children like your fellow servicemen. Do you feel big when you call in a jdam strick on a family?
CRP- INTENT is huge isn't it? Or do you just assume folks like us do this without discrimination? You have no idea of the ROE and restrictions placed on us to minimize civilian casualities over here pal...continue to call us "baby killers"...the vast majority of the American people have our support, you can continue with your assumptions about what really goes on over here from the safety of your home, we'll continue to defend your right to "mouth off" about things you know nothing about...
Well, LowNtellect, the very idea of hypersonic commercial space travel has already been widely promoted for a couple of decades, and a few wealthy individuals have already been able to experience speeds well beyond Mach 6, so yes, the idea of hypersonic commercial aircraft travel across oceans is very real and reasonable to expect in the near future.
We insert those items on Fridays. If you made a WP puahcrse Last Friday today, you will get your prize this Friday. If after this friday you don't have your prize please let us know via tickets so we can get it straightened out.
I am amazed that they were able to recognize a fault and abort the shot within sixteen seconds. They must have just launched it, focused their eyes on the screen and hit abort. A tail fin problem? You would think they would have gone over that potential and eliminated it after wind tunnel experiments with the form......that seems like negligence and is hard to believe. Same thing with that "lunar lander" that just blew up....I have sympathy for the designers and engineers for both these projects, in light of the Glorious Success of the Mars Curiosity Rover these guys must feel like they have egg all over their faces and they do.....they went off half baked. It shouldn't be allowed, they should be denied funding for future projects and be taken off these ones before they waste more precious time and money....a tail fin problem, and it took all of sixteen seconds in flight to determine that? Have they never heard of Quality Control? NDE testing of welds? Wind tunnel would tell about the fin's aerodynamic form and position, x ray or phased array would have told about the structural integrity of the fin......I don't believe this, not really. I may be just an uneducated old fool but I am observant of the testing that goes on when I am at work and while I know problems arise, this tail fin problem should never have arisen, due to the simple fact that it's a basic component of the flight capability.....how could it be problematic and them not know?
a teleporter wouldn't have any of these problems. sure, people may not rematerialize with all of their limbs and organs in the right place, but we could use Occupy Wall Street protesters as guinea pigs promising to teleport them all over the world each day to whatever the latest, greatest protest that is going on, until we get it right.
Exactly what kind of waves are you guys planning to ride? Electromagnetic waves, by chance?
Another 7.7 million down the drain.( I looked it up)So where's the tea bagger's and their government waste argument?
They were probably waving the flag as it crashed
Because waste due to a lack of oversight or by beaucratic design is something that shouldn't be tolerated...if you can point to where this project has either one of those characteristics let us know...
You are the one who said Lack of oversight and beaucratic design not the poster. Do you even read the comments befor you mouth off?
CRP- when the poster talks about the the Tea Party and alludes to money "down the drain", I'm telling him EXACTLY what their argument is and if he can point to "waste" with this project then do so...what EXACTLY is your point?
Good.
can't we act like North Korea and pretend everything went off without a hitch and we're now super-loaded with hi-tek space gizmos?
yeah, and then we'd be called Russia
Lol! Flew for 16 seconds. You mean fell out of the sky for 16 seconds. Faling is not equal to flying.
It did not fall thy blew it up reread the article
Why can't they just skip this missile stuff and bring back the Teleporter from Star Trek, that was way quicker, easier and didn't use so much fuel. There is the risk that a Klingon could attack you, but I'd rather deal with him than the fin coming off my rocketship at 4,600 miles per hour.
Meanwhile nearly 1 in 4 American children live in poverty; the second worst child poverty rate in the developed world, only slightly better than Romania's, and the United States ranks 49th in infant mortality, slightly ahead of Croatia.
Stopping R&D, like this test that failed is not going to stop poverty. The US spends about 40% of its budget on social programs, maybe better use of the money already allocated or better yet US citizens can get up and do something about it ,adding more money will not solve the problem.
Well, if you're smart, you probably aren't poor. And if you were smart, you'd know better than to have children that you cannot support.
You do the math.
Here are just some of the Federal and California social programs that benefit he poor.
. Medicare
3. Medicaid
4. Medi-Cal
5. Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (Food Stamps)
6. Aid to Dependent Children
7. Foster care
8. CalFresh -$54
9. CalWorks, the state’s welfare to work program.
10. Unemployment compensation
11. K-12 education state funding
12. Section 8 housing
13. Supplemental Security Income/State Supplemental Payment (SSI/SSP
14. Refugee Cash Assistance (RCA)
15. Cash Aid for Families with Children
16. California Food Assistance Program (CFAP)
17. County Medical Services Program
18. Food Stamp Employment and Training Program (FSET)
19. Employment Development Department (EDD)
20. CalWORKS
21. Kin-GAP
22. Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program
23. Emergency Food Assistance Program (EFAP)
24. Emergency Welfare Services' Mass Care and Shelter Program
25. In-Home Care
26. In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
27. Adoptions Assistance Program
28. BabyCal, Breast and Cervical Cancer Programs
29. The Assistance Dog Special Allowance Program
30. The Access for Infants and Mothers (AIM)
31. Healthy Families Program
32. AVID Advancement Via Individual Determination
Okay, I'll play your game. You want to take $140 million (pick any number) from this program and give it to the poor. Right?
Then, we'll have $140 million spent on feeding people unable to feed themselves, or otherwise contribute to the economy. They'll sit around doing nothing...well, other than having kids they can't support. More money we'll need to spend.
In the meantime, you have $140 million worth of salaried people (about 1000 people) unemployed, since you just pulled their funding.
And you've lost incidental benefits from their research.
So, you rob Peter to pay starving Paul, and end up with a starving Peter and two Pauls who need continual feeding. Seems pretty obvious to me that it's a LOSING PROPOSITION!
TJ and Noel – WELL PUT!!!
I guess this won't be the test flight that gets noticed by the Vulcans.....
It's the size of a missle...How it this any help to transportation? or daily life...it's not, it's great for destroying pre-emptive strikes agains the US using ICBM's or maybe other more traditional military hardwares. IDK...does anyone else think this?
We have ICBMs that go faster. If you want to carry more weight, like people or freight, you need to have an air-breathing engine that can go fast. This is an attempted proof of that concept. If it can be made to work, you can scale from there.
It is called R&D , this is how we learn, educate ourselves. The technology my be used in the future to power aircraft, missiles,or spaceships, etc......To learn....
Will this failure effect any of the upcoming 'flight's to the International Fake Station?
http://www.fountainsofthegreatdeep.com/IFS.htm
You have to be in the air for more than 30 seconds to fly from LA to NYC
Tell me how this is an improvement on the X-15 (which was successful and set world speed records) , which was launched form a B-52 decades ago. Are they trying to re-invent the wheel? Sure seems like it to me.
.... way different engine type.
The X-15 was manned and rocket-powered. The X-51 is unmanned and scramjet powered. Different engine technology that has great potential to change how you live.
@Blookerman, the vehicles in test are unmanned. The technology supports crew flights as well. @Tim, the X-15 traveled at maximum speeds of Mach 6. That's the maximum output performance capable of jet engines. The technology used in the new X-51A scramjet engines hold the potential of exceeding speeds of Mach 20 and is more environmentally friendly because it's engines run solely off oxygen instead of carbon based jet fuel.
Uh..no Matt....the scramjet doesn't just run on oxygen.
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/08/14/imagine-flying-from-new-york-to-london-in-under-an-hour/?iref=allsearch
@Huh, unless you have some sort of insider knowledge, I can only go by what's reported. Try paragraph 12. 😉
It uses oxygen from the atmosphere for its engines, as opposed to carrying large fuel tanks that rockets require, making it a more efficient vehicle for military or commercial purposes...... This does not mean " because it's engines run solely off oxygen". Please research a bit more.
Very different type of engine.
Oh great!
It's funny how they try to hype up the mission's targeted flight time of 5 minutes with "300 seconds." Seems like a grossly misappropriation of the peoples tax dollars to destroy the $140 million vehicles after every test flight. The cost of search and recovery efforts can't possibly exceed that of building new ones.
eat your waffles
Um, these kinds of flights are ALWAYS timed in seconds. And for good scientific reasons. If you are recording data by the second, then you measure your flight time in seconds.
This being top secret military technology, probably it is destroyed to ensure that the technology doesn't get out. Whether you think that is a wise use of resources or not, you'll have to take it up with the military planners.
You and I have no clue how many untold millions and billions of taxpayer dollars were spent on military research since (random year) 1935. There is no progress without research and no research without money.
there goes another 140 million dollars down the drain. meanwhile our infrastructure crumbles. Some expensive 16 seconds.
Instead of the Air Force, perhaps NASA should be in charge of projects like this. They seem to have a better record of doing technological things right (and spend less money as well).
NAW! Why do that .. the Air Force wants to keep its' secrets ..not share them with NASA!
Please provide data on this better record and expenses. They both have had successes and failures. Here are some failures for NASA: Apollo 1, Apollo 13, Liberty Bell 7, Gemini 8, Challenger, Columbia, NOAA-19, MCO, Deep Space 2, MPL, SBIRS, Genesis, Hubble (later fixed), Helios, DART, and OCO.
it's primarily dealing with the force of the air, hence "air" force.
anyone going to the grocery store today?
Our rockets always blow up.
UHH, NO, they don't. Spend a little time actually researching a topic before you insert the foot.
Francisco was referring to Italy's rockets....not the USA. Take in the whole picture before reviewing.
You may want to read a book before replying and proving your ignorance.
It's a quote from a book. Google it and learn something.
Hooray! More of tax dollars gone! WOOOO!
Right, because it is much better to not try to advance our defense technology. Good call, Me.
What are we defending, the crumbling infastructure or miserable economy?
Defend against what? We spend more on our defense than the next 25 countries (the vast majority of whom we are allies with) COMBINED.
me = stupid
zon and experienced man – harsh on' ME.' Relax.
Defense spending should be as focused on anti-terro tactics as anything else. And NASA could do what the AF is trying. And by golly, there are times when our armed forces procurement system wastes lots of money...
Seeing as the prototype would have been destroyed regardless, and the purpose was the collection of data, then what we have here is instead of 300 seconds of data, we have 16 seconds of data, with that data, being from a failure, usually much more valuable in the long run than data from a success (as we always learn more from failure than from success).
So it certainly isn't tax dollars "gone". You could think of it as an unforeseen budget overdraft....
Me
don't worry.
the military will just raid the social security trust fund to fund the next hypersonic flight. If that's not good enough they will just cannibalize other programs for funding.
maybe we all can set up a bake sale to fund the next hypersonic USAF flight.
QullVideo on May 19, 2010 Waking up on a cruise is part of the exirnpeece because you never know what the view outside your window will be. Although I can't say any of the place I've been in the Med or Carribean have been as nice as Alaska. It's cold there though, no? I do like the cold
I kissed my way up to VP at a health insurance company. Now I take over $500,000 of your health care dollars for NO VALUE ADDED to your health care. And that’s just me. Now think about how many other VPs, Directors, Managers, etc. are at my company alone. Now multiply that by thousands of others at hundreds of other health insurance companies. From 10 to 25% of your health care dollars go towards administration that adds NO VALUE to your health care. But my company’s PAC dollars will continue to fool you little people into thinking that a single payer system will be bad. Little people like you are so easy to fool. Little people also don’t realize that a single payer system is the ONLY system that would allow little people (as an entire country) to negotiate better health care prices. Little people don’t realize that the Medical Cartels already know that. And that is the reason why the Medical Cartels spend so much PAC money from the hospitals and doctors lobbying against a single payer system. Some little people say that a single payer system would cost you little people more. But if that were true, then wouldn’t the hospitals and doctors WANT that extra money? Yes they would. So why do the Medical Cartels lobby against a single payer system? It’s because the Medical Cartels know it would allow little people to negotiate better health care prices. And that’s what the Medical Cartels are afraid of. Period.
But us big wigs at insurance companies, hospitals, and pharmacy companies don’t ever need to worry about health care no matter what it costs. We get our health care paid for one way or another by you little people. And we get the little people that work at our companies to contribute to our PACs. And us big wigs say it’s to protect the little peoples’ jobs. But in reality it would be in the little peoples’ best interest to NOT contribute to the PAC. Again, little people are so easy to be fooled. I won’t ever have to worry about losing my job with so many little people being brain washed by the Medical Cartels’ PAC money. Not only that, the Medical Cartels’ PAC money is used to elect so many republicans that will never allow a single payer system. Republicans have always fought against any meaningful health care reform. But that’s what our Medical Cartels’ PACs pay them for. Politicians can be bought so easily.
Pretty soon the only people that will be able to afford health care is us big wigs. And that’s the way it should be. We don’t want you little people using up the resources when we need them. And once again, I thank you little people for capping my SS tax at the $106,800 level. Now I only pay 1.3% SS tax and you little people pay 6.2%. Also, thank you for extending my tax breaks. I’m using the extra money on my vacation houses.
Timmy, what are you talking about? This is a story about a crashed test plane.
Your tongue-in-cheek comment is spot-on, and would be funny if it weren't so sadly true. Thanks!
a "little people" person
A little pre-luv stuff just started dripping from my you-know-what
Perhaps the X-51A Waverider would have fared better if its wings were slightly larger than that of a dolphin's dorsal fin.
Its not the size of your wings, its how you use them.
You learn from your mistakes and try again.
I saw this movie where Julianne Moore gave hand to her son
now we know how North Korea feels..
Good thing some Republican congressman secured this contract for his ol' buddy and wasted our tax dollars. Yea Paul Ryan, lets increase military spending some more so that useless contractors can blow some more of our money.
i have come to expect this idiocy from the fringe looney left lib - my only hope is that one day you will wake up
This is technology for the future, research learns from both success and failure. This test program is not really a waste as the F22 is. The F22's radar absorbing paint doesn't like to be exposed to abrasive conditions like desert sand or rain. Yes we bought a fighter that can only be used in clear skies. So lets hope we don't have to fight during April showers.
You should all think about this in the following light. What USA needs is a cheap way to get to space. In space we have minerals and no animals. Which means mining without enviormental costs. We have a sun that shines 100% of the time and is not diluted by the atmosphere. That means nonstop solar power. Space is the solution to much of our planetary problems. We can then create energy without CO2. So everytime you decide to like or dislike a project think about weather it will help us get to space. What I just laid out here is forward thinking and not short term thinking.
You misspelled "whether."
Clearly you have never seen/played Dead Space.
Alright! Made in the USA!
What has your thirld-world dirt farm produced?
This vehicle cost 140 million. For anyone who cares it would have been relatively fuel effecient because most of the fuel would have been oxygen directly out of the atomosphere. The biggest thing that angrys me is that they never had any plan to recover the waverider. They were always planning on having it crash it just crashed prior to firing the engine.
Oxygen is the oxidizer, not a fuel. But yes this was a very fuel efficient Mach 6 vehicle. This test plane was designed to provide flight data, it wasn't feasible to add landing gear and there was no way to slow this bird down enough to land. Also there is the level of security in not wanting this technology to fall into another country's hands in case it landed somewhere it was not supposed to go.
Should have contracted the job to Space-X.. [more] government waste
Magnetism Over Combustion...
I don't know why America with all of its knowledge keeps supporting the CH chainers anyway.
Move Along Please.
#ImJustSaying