Military limiting Guantanamo detainee access to lawyers
August 7th, 2012
06:23 PM ET

Military limiting Guantanamo detainee access to lawyers

By Bill Mears, CNN Supreme Court Producer

The Obama administration has begun limiting the legal rights of terror suspects held at the Guantanamo Bay military prison in Cuba, telling a federal judge Tuesday the government alone should decide when the prisoners deserve regular access to their counsel.

In a 52-page filing, Justice Department lawyers said they have started restricting when Guantanamo prisoners can challenge their detention in a Washington-based federal court. If approved, any relaxing of the rules would be made on a case-by-case basis at the exclusive discretion of military officials, not by the courts.

At issue is whether a Supreme Court decision on detainee rights from 2008 gives federal courts the ultimate power to control so-called "habeas" petitions from foreign combatants in U.S. military custody. Volunteer private lawyers say they deserve regular access to their imprisoned clients, even if there is no active habeas challenge pending in court, or any pending charges.

Under the proposed changes, the Navy base commander at Guantanamo would have sole veto power over attorney access, as well as access to classified material, including information provided directly by the detainees from interrogations.

"The dispute thus before the Court, though important, is quite narrow," said the government in its legal filing. "The only question presented is whether detainees who have neither current nor impending habeas petitions are entitled to" challenge continued access to counsel. "The answer to that question is 'no.'"

The case is before Chief Judge Royce Lamberth. His court has been handling the many appeals filed by the prisoners. There are currently 168 detainees - all male - in the Guantanamo facility, most of whom do not have pending charges. Five Muslim men labeled "high-value detainees" are being prosecuted before a military commission for their alleged leadership roles in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

In the so-called Boumediene ruling in 2008, the high court said "enemy combatants" held overseas in U.S. military custody have a right to a "meaningful review" of their detention in the civilian legal justice system. It would force the government to present evidence and justify keeping the prisoners indefinitely, without charges. But a federal appeals court in Washington has since refused to order the release of any detainee filing a habeas corpus writ, in some cases rejecting such orders from lower-court judges.

The administration has argued it does not seek to restrict lawyers who have an active legal appeal, but that the rights of detainees shrink once they have filed their first habeas challenge. The military says lawyers must now agree to the new conditions in order to have continued access to their clients and to any classified information the military would deem to release.

And lawyers would be prohibited from using any information they gather that might help the prisoners appearing before a Periodic Review Board. PRBs are newly designed panels of military officials to decide whether a Guantanamo inmate should continue to be held, and whether that person is a national security threat. Those boards were put in place by President Barack Obama by executive order, but have not been fully implemented.

"Executive Order 13,567 does not provide detainees who undergo PRB review with a judicially enforceable right to counsel, or any justification for asking the Court to impose a counsel-access regime on the PRB process other than the one developed, per the Order's direction, by the Secretary of Defense," said the government. "As a general matter, executive orders are viewed as management tools for implementing the President's policies, not as legally binding documents that may be enforced against the Executive Branch."

The government said the court's power to intervene was limited, and urged Judge Lamberth to deny the request guaranteeing attorney access. A court hearing is set for August 17 on the legal question.


Post by:
Filed under: Gitmo • Military
soundoff (279 Responses)
  1. Lucas Delprincipe

    March 4, 2021 at 9:40 am | Reply
  2. ClarkClurn

    uezci 0ipno fr48

    March 1, 2021 at 12:06 am | Reply

    Pride And Prejudice Imdb The Kite Runner Rating

    Look at my web blog ... get pdf (

    February 17, 2021 at 4:36 pm | Reply
  4. หวย

    Excellent article. Keep posting such kind of info on your site.
    Im really impressed by it.
    Hello there, You've done a great job. I'll certainly digg it
    and individually recommend to my friends. I'm confident they'll be benefited from this website.

    February 15, 2021 at 12:05 pm | Reply
  5. หวยเด็ด

    Hello this is somewhat of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors
    or if you have to manually code with HTML. I'm starting a blog soon but have no coding skills so I wanted to
    get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be greatly

    February 7, 2021 at 9:23 am | Reply
  6. หวยเด็ด

    Hey there! I understand this is somewhat off-topic however
    I needed to ask. Does running a well-established blog like yours take a
    massive amount work? I am brand new to blogging however I
    do write in my diary daily. I'd like to start a blog so I will be able
    to share my own experience and thoughts online. Please let me
    know if you have any ideas or tips for new aspiring bloggers.
    Appreciate it!

    February 7, 2021 at 1:21 am | Reply
  7. หวยดัง

    I visit daily some web pages and sites to read posts, but this weblog
    presents quality based articles.

    January 30, 2021 at 4:06 am | Reply
  8. เลขอั้น

    Hi to all, how is the whole thing, I think every one is getting more from this website, and your views are nice in favor of new users.

    January 30, 2021 at 3:49 am | Reply
  9. Marty Dupaty

    you are truly a just right webmaster. The website loading speed is incredible. It sort of feels that you're doing any unique trick. In addition, The contents are masterwork. you have performed a excellent task on this subject!

    January 28, 2021 at 10:03 pm | Reply
  10. Jenifer Carioscia

    January 21, 2021 at 2:41 am | Reply
  11. Laurence Borda

    I think this is best for you: Soccer, Football, Highlight, Live Streaming

    January 12, 2021 at 12:25 am | Reply
  12. Kathey Shunnarah

    It is in reality a great and helpful piece of info. I am happy that you shared this useful info with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

    January 11, 2021 at 1:54 am | Reply
  13. Riley Folta

    Just wanna admit that this is very beneficial , Thanks for taking your time to write this.

    January 11, 2021 at 12:41 am | Reply
  14. Debera Desporte

    Regards just for the excellent knowledge right here component web-site, can be found in tiny little ask weblog tv audience. Just who mentioned this excellent provide? . . . .Relationship are mindful, want should be type. That doesn’t be jealous of, but there’s more brag, boastful. It’s not necessarily obnoxious, it is not self-seeking, many years merely angered, this can carries not at all all time high of most errors. Real love ceases to appreciate hateful rejoices utilizing specifics. This method automatically safeguards, ensure you trusts, continually wishes, be sure you perseveres.

    December 20, 2020 at 6:29 pm | Reply
  15. Donette

    You've made some decent points there. I checked on the web for more info about the issue and found most individuals
    will go along with your views on this web site.

    My webpage ... ซื้อหวย

    December 7, 2020 at 4:34 am | Reply
1 2

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.