Review of Fort Hood shooting calls for FBI changes
Army Major Nidal Hasan booking photo
July 6th, 2012
05:02 PM ET

Review of Fort Hood shooting calls for FBI changes

By Carol Cratty

A review of the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage will recommend the FBI make 18 changes in policies and operations, according to a letter by the former FBI director leading the independent review.

The Fort Hood shootings outraged members of Congress when it was learned that the accused shooter, Army Maj. Nidal Hasan, had been communicating with Yemeni cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, an Islamic radical.

In a July 3 letter to a member of Congress, Judge William Webster said he would be handing over his report to FBI Director Robert Mueller within 10 days.

Webster said his report will have 18 "formal recommendations for corrective and enhancing measures on matters ranging from FBI policies and operations to information systems infrastructure, review protocols, and training." But he did not provide any specifics in his letter to Rep. Frank Wolf, a Virginian Republican.

Webster said his report will run more than 150 single-spaced pages, and it resulted from more than 50 formal interviews, meetings and briefings; 10,000 pages of documents; and direct access to FBI computer systems.

Hasan has been charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder in the shootings. The military psychiatrist allegedly shot at fellow soldiers preparing to deploy to Iraq and Afghanistan. His court martial is scheduled to begin August 20; he faces a maximum penalty of death if convicted.

An FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force learned that Hasan was communicating via e-mail with al-Awlaki but decided Hasan was not dangerous.

There were also problems with information-sharing with the military about Hasan's activities, and the Army drew much criticism for continuing to promote Hasan even though his records showed concerns were raised about his adherence to radical views.

Mueller asked Webster to review the Fort Hood shootings. In his letter to Wolf, Webster described the task as "a complex and lengthy assignment."

Webster said he and his team interviewed all members of the FBI and Joint Terrorism Task Forces involved in the matter, and sought outside perspective from experts on Islamic radicalism and counterterrrorism, as well as staff from congressional committees involved with FBI oversight.

Webster told Wolf he expected a public version of his report would be made available once redactions of classified material take place.

Post by:
Filed under: FBI • Nidal Hasan • Security Brief • Terrorism
soundoff (10 Responses)
  1. Willis Bonini

    This was great! I would like you to clean up all this spam though

    June 10, 2021 at 6:41 am | Reply
  2. Audria Uihlein

    This was awesome! I would like you to clean up all this spam though

    June 5, 2021 at 5:35 am | Reply
  3. Zulma Ruest

    This was awesome! I would like you to clean up all this spam though

    June 4, 2021 at 1:50 pm | Reply
  4. Raul Mcmarlin

    You are my breathing in, I have few web logs and often run out from post :). "The soul that is within me no man can degrade." by Frederick Douglas.

    January 21, 2021 at 4:15 am | Reply
  5. Garland Ketterl

    I just added this weblog to my google reader, great stuff. Cannot get enough!

    January 12, 2021 at 1:55 am | Reply
  6. Charlsie Carrousal

    You could definitely see your skills within the paintings you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to mention how they believe. Always go after your heart.

    January 10, 2021 at 11:19 pm | Reply
  7. SFC (Ret) Paul B. Davis

    Maj. Nidal Hasan should been charged with terrorism as well. He was a conspiritor working with Anwar al-Awlaki and Al Queda in Yemen. The soldiers who were wounded and dead deserve to have their injuries and deaths acknowledged as coming from a terrorist combatant. Thes individuals should be awarded a Purple Heart for their wounds and deaths at his hands.

    It is only because of the Politically Correct administration that we do not cal the the incident a Terrorist Attack much like Army personnel are no longer allowed to talk about a Global War on Terrorism.

    This policy is totally abhorrent to thinking individuals.

    July 9, 2012 at 12:20 pm | Reply
  8. Aaron Chaney

    Romney vs. Frankenstein (Obama)

    Put simply, better the devil you don't know. Vote Romney.

    July 9, 2012 at 11:45 am | Reply
  9. infidel84

    No, you think?

    July 7, 2012 at 6:35 pm | Reply
  10. infidel83

    What people fail to realise is that we gather so much information its almost impossible to sort and distribute it in any kind of meaningful manner. What we ned is a more efficient way to deal with the info we have gathered and a better way to get that info to the people who need to know it.

    July 7, 2012 at 9:26 am | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.