Russia and NATO still at odds over missile shield
President Obama and Russian President Medvedev meet in Prague in April 2010 just before they signed the New START treaty, a pact that would cut each country's nuclear arsenal.
May 2nd, 2012
05:47 PM ET

Russia and NATO still at odds over missile shield

By Mike Mount

The United States does not expect an agreement with Russia this year to settle a dispute about a U.S.-backed plan to place an anti-ballistic missile shield in countries around Europe, according to the senior U.S. government officials leading a U.S. delegation to a missile defense conference in Moscow this week.

The admission comes just over a month after President Barack Obama unknowingly spoke into an open microphone to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev saying he would have "more flexibility" to negotiate on missile defense after the U.S. elections.

The U.S. officials now openly acknowledge there will be no agreement this year.

Speaking to reporters on the phone from Russia on Wednesday, Ellen Tauscher, the U.S. special envoy for strategic stability and missile defense, and Madelyn Creedon, assistant secretary of defense for global and strategic affairs, said because the United States is in an election year and Russia is just coming out of one, there is too much uncertainty for there to be an agreement.

"I think it's pretty clear that this is a year in which we are not going to achieve any sort of a breakthrough, and President Obama and President Medvedev agreed to let the technical experts to do the work of better understanding our respective decisions," Tauscher said.

The two are in Moscow to attend a missile defense conference hosted by the Russian Ministry of Defense, where the United States plans to again make its case to Russia.

Russia has long said early warning missile detection radars and anti-ballistic missiles would undermine its strategic nuclear deterrent, but the United States has maintained that the system is not designed to target Russian nuclear missiles but a ballistic missile threat from the Middle East, such as Iran.

The United States and NATO have been in discussions with the Russians, explaining how the system will work and trying to alleviate their worries about the system, according to Tauscher. Russia has also been invited to be a part of the shield because the missile threat from the Middle East could involve them as well, according to Tauscher and Creedon.

"The system we are deploying in Europe to defend our European allies and the United States against a Middle East threat is not oriented against Russia, We feel very confident that it would be a game changer," Creedon said alluding to an improvement in relations between the two countries if Russia did agree to the missile shield deployment.

But missile defense and NATO experts say Russia has long considered NATO a national security threat and has been making excuses for years to try to stall the missile shield's deployment.

"The Russians have been uncomfortable with the whole endeavor and (are) not keen to see it go forward in an alliance context," said Damon Wilson, executive vice president of the Atlantic Council and a former special assistant to the president on the National Security Council.

"At the end of the day, they (Russia) will only come around to negotiate a deal with NATO when this is absolutely inevitable," Wilson said.

Russia has also proposed a legally binding agreement for the United States to sign that would hold NATO to using the anti-missile system for a Middle East ballistic missile threat and not retune it to use against Russian missiles.

"We cannot agree to any limitations on our missile defense deployments," Tauscher said, referring to Russia's proposal.

"We do not want to be limited on our system by Russia that is not even about Russia," according to Wilson.

"Negotiating a legally binding agreement with the Russians that are unilateral where the restrictions are on the U.S. side over a system that is strategically not related to Russia takes you down a very difficult and dangerous policy path," Wilson continued.

An anti-missile radar is already in place in Turkey, and the United States is planning to keep moving forward despite Russian concerns.

"There is nothing that I can imagine that will stop us from making those deployments on time," Tauscher said.

soundoff (235 Responses)
  1. reextHtf

    buy cialis 20 mg cialis long term side effects cialis black box warning

    June 13, 2021 at 10:23 pm | Reply
  2. fipleVed

    which is better cialis or levitra cialis price increase price of cialis at walgreens

    June 13, 2021 at 7:14 pm | Reply
  3. fipleloh

    kupi online cialis cialis viagra levitra young yahoo different doses of cialis

    June 13, 2021 at 3:10 pm | Reply
  4. fipleloh

    how to get cialis online why is cialis not covered by insurance definition cialis

    June 13, 2021 at 8:10 am | Reply
  5. clupsAsd

    cialis lilly 20mg cialis for daily use where can i buy cialis online in australia

    June 13, 2021 at 3:58 am | Reply
  6. reextGtv

    trusted canadian online pharmacies health partners online pharmacy best canada pharmacy online

    June 12, 2021 at 8:23 pm | Reply
  7. reextAni

    buying prescription drugs online canadian pet meds pharmacy definition of prescription drugs

    June 10, 2021 at 6:17 am | Reply
  8. VelmSwa

    brand cialis online pharmacy cialis in las vegas cialis professional 20 lowest price

    June 10, 2021 at 5:43 am | Reply
1 2 3

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.