How restrictive is the night raid deal?
April 9th, 2012
03:42 PM ET

How restrictive is the night raid deal?

Analysis by Adam Levine

The agreement between the U.S. and Afghanistan on night raids raises the question of whether the Afghan government is essentially getting veto authority over U.S. military actions in the war, CNN's Barbara Starr reports.

But a top military spokesman disputed the characterization, saying that the Afghans are the ones putting the missions together and leading them, with intelligence being provided by both the U.S. and Afghanistan.More than 97% of the night operations are combined missions, and almost 40% of night operations are now Afghan-led, according to International Security Forces of Afghanistan data. Since December 2011, all night raids have been Afghan-led, according to Pentagon spokesman Capt. John Kirby, who said the agreement was merely "formalizing" the process.

"They are in lead of all these operations," he said.

Since December, there have been more than 350 operations, according to Kirby, who said that in 270 of those missions, the target of the operation was detained with shots being fired only 31 times.

"This is a very capable force," he said.

Kirby denied that the agreement cedes responsibilities or lets Afghans veto U.S. operations.

"This is not about a veto at all," he said.

"There aren't and haven't been disputes or disagreements about whether or not to develop an operation. It's based on confirmed - as I said, confirmed - intelligence from various sources and means," Kirby told reporters during a teleconference Monday afternoon.  "And when the team has confidence that a target has been identified, they plan and execute that mission accordingly."

The night raid agreement is similar to the protocol agreed to in Iraq in the final years of the war, said CNN military contributor Gen. Spider Marks, who was a senior intelligence officer during Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003.

As intelligence in Iraq was developed and targets were finalized, an Iraqi lawyer attached to Joint Special Operations Command would determine probable cause, Marks explained.

Operations were then approved or denied based on the "veracity and credibility of the intelligence." Among the considerations were access, reliability of the information and the sources, and potential for collateral damage assessments. U.S. military lawyers were always part of this decision-making process.

"Once in play, it worked exceptionally well, very quick decision timeline, full trust between coalition and Iraqis," Marks told Security Clearance. "Intelligence was never in question; it was a sovereignty issue."

Operations can happen without a warrant, though a warrant needs to be pursued afterward.

Kirby insisted that is not something "people are going to take advantage of" routinely.

But there are areas not covered by the agreement. Other NATO countries with troops in Afghanistan are not covered by the agreement, just American forces. In addition, night raids by other entities, including CIA-trained units, are not covered by the agreement, The New York Times reported Monday.

Post by:
Filed under: Afghanistan • ISAF • Karzai • Military
soundoff (32 Responses)
  1. zortilo nrel

    Hey! I just would like to give a huge thumbs up for the good data you've gotten right here on this post. I will be coming again to your blog for more soon.

    March 21, 2021 at 6:27 pm | Reply
  2. Georgette Scherler

    What i do not understood is in reality how you are not actually much more neatly-favored than you may be right now. You're very intelligent. You already know thus significantly relating to this subject, produced me for my part imagine it from numerous varied angles. Its like women and men aren't fascinated unless it's something to do with Girl gaga! Your own stuffs nice. At all times care for it up!

    March 6, 2021 at 3:26 pm | Reply
  3. Earle Besen

    March 4, 2021 at 10:24 am | Reply
  4. vreyrolinomit

    I like this web blog its a master peace ! Glad I noticed this on google .

    February 26, 2021 at 9:42 am | Reply
  5. 500000Scrapebox CommentBacklinks

    500000 Scrapebox Blast Live SEO blog Comment Backlinks:

    February 16, 2021 at 9:58 pm | Reply
  6. vasúti szállítás Kínából Europa-Road Kft.

    Thanks a bunch for sharing this with all of us you actually recognise what you are talking approximately! Bookmarked. Kindly also seek advice from my website =). We could have a link change arrangement between us!

    February 9, 2021 at 3:28 am | Reply
  7. zortilo nrel

    I really like what you guys are up too. This sort of clever work and coverage! Keep up the very good works guys I've added you guys to my personal blogroll.

    February 7, 2021 at 11:04 am | Reply
  8. Sherice Rosenburg

    Earn 1000 a Month With Our Passive Income System – Best Autopilot income system 2021

    February 5, 2021 at 8:12 pm | Reply
  9. Make-money-in auto-pilot-2021

    Get Our Passive Income System – Step 1: Get our ready made niche websites, Step 2: Setup your Paypal account. Step 3: Run our Unlimited Traffic System from 850 sources of traffic (Approximately 35000 views a day guaranteed). Then just wait and earn your income 100 on autopilot. More info:

    January 30, 2021 at 1:15 pm | Reply
  10. Pedro Riesen

    Definitely, what a magnificent blog and illuminating posts, I will bookmark your blog.Best Regards!

    January 28, 2021 at 10:32 pm | Reply
  11. Tommy Seckman

    Social network traffic Facebook likes Twitter Followers Instagram Followers and much more

    January 27, 2021 at 3:34 pm | Reply
  12. Rob Mccollester

    Best Marketing Services – Cheapest on Market. SMM Supreme is the Top 5 Best Social Media Website in the World. Best Quality-Price Ratio on the market with 714,928 orders until now. – Facebook Fan Page Likes for $4.50/1000 – Instagram Followers for $0.78/1000 – Youtube Views: $1.62/1000 – Twitter followers: $2.10/1000 – Paypal Deposit – Bitcoin Deposit – Fast order processing – 1 Hour Delivery (Click on the link in the profile for more details)

    January 27, 2021 at 11:50 am | Reply
  13. Elsie Woolbright

    You were very interesting.. But sadly I didnrrrt accept them much :/ Although I may disagree I still support you as how confident happen to be on your writing lol

    January 12, 2021 at 12:29 am | Reply
  14. make money fast

    Imagine getting hundreds of people flooding your inbox on autopilot, 24/7. Cutting-edge funnel-based app that can generate 100 commissions of up to 900+ dollars DAILY. More details: Click in link in profile

    December 26, 2020 at 2:18 pm | Reply
  15. Alberto Warnock

    Superb blog! I actually adore how it will be quick on my eyes as well as the information can be well written. We’re thinking generate income may be notified whenever a completely new post has been produced. We have bought on your rss feed which really should have the desired effect! Have a pleasant day!

    December 20, 2020 at 6:21 pm | Reply
  16. detectives privados torrejón de ardoz

    detectives privados fuenlabrada

    December 12, 2020 at 1:36 am | Reply
  17. Lovve World

    I love you Laura, I cant live without you.

    April 10, 2012 at 11:21 am | Reply
  18. Ajay

    How dare the Afghan government ask for a veto on the war in Afghanistan?

    April 10, 2012 at 2:59 am | Reply
    • Adam29

      Well because the US is at the age of losing, and this is exactly the excuse they are looking for

      April 10, 2012 at 5:03 am | Reply
    • Gabsernoxiou

      How dare you ask silly questions ?? It is their Country. US is an invader !!

      April 10, 2012 at 6:08 am | Reply
    • Mikey

      How dare they?? Because the Afghan government is the largest criminal syndicate in the world after the Russian mafia. Not to mention that Pakistan have their little tentacles all through the Pashtun belt and inside Kabul. Karzai is a puppet of the Pakistanis and the corrupt Pashtun tribes who support him. I say we just leave Afghanistan and watch as Karzai is treated the same way as Mohammad Najibullah was treated.

      April 10, 2012 at 6:09 am | Reply
    • Banjo

      Ajay has been sarcastic and yet there are those who are taking the question so seriosuly!!! Unless i have been the silly one!!

      April 10, 2012 at 6:51 am | Reply
    • Joop Kaashoek

      The US is a peace loving force. It should pledge not to invade any country any more. Invasions simply do not work out, they create life long resentments. The time has come for the US to pledge not to invade a country. They can always police if needed.

      April 10, 2012 at 9:46 am | Reply
    • Spelunker4Plato

      They dare because two of the most corrupt countries in the world, Mexico and Pakistan, are also two countries with some of the most U.S. american influence.
      Funny how there's so much money to be gained for the weapons and drug industries from certain foreign nations' corruption.

      April 14, 2012 at 1:53 pm | Reply
  19. aroth

    Um, the Afghans *should* have veto power over planned U.S. military actions within Afghanistan. We're not at war with Afghanistan anymore, it's its own sovereign country and fully entitled to decide what level of military involvement they want from the U.S.. I know we like to think of ourselves as "Team America, World Police", but really, we do not have the right or entitlement to go into other peoples' countries and just do whatever we please.

    April 10, 2012 at 2:35 am | Reply
    • rog

      Fine, if it wants the rights as a soverign country then it shouldn't rely on foreign armies to provide security any more.

      April 10, 2012 at 5:31 pm | Reply
  20. James

    Who honestly believes that peace in America or Afghanistan rests on the ability of US soldiers to conduct a few desultory rearguard night actions? I challenge you to find me one US servicemenber who has been to Afghanistan who isnt convinced that things will return to just as they were before arrived the minute we left. It is time to bring US soldiers back from Afghanistan and to let them get on wth their lives, and to treat the few remaining blowhard chickenhawks, both in the miltary and on fox news, with derision and contempt for the damage they continue to cause.

    April 10, 2012 at 1:07 am | Reply
  21. Spelunker4Plato

    Are any of you watching NatGeo TV right now? The world police are really boring me. These green berets, with all their training and all their "patriotism" are out in the middle of nowhere so some guys can film them and the whole thing runs like a boring and slow-paced cop show.
    I'm sick of taxpayer dollars being spent on interrupting foreigners lives just so the weapons industry can make sh–loads of profit by having xtrian crusaders play in the dirt all because the older generation can't look themselves in the mirror and admit that 9/11 was an inside job.

    April 9, 2012 at 4:53 pm | Reply

    As intelligence in Iraq was
    developed and targets were
    finalized, an Iraqi lawyer attached
    to Joint Special Operations
    Command would make a
    determination of probable cause,
    Marks explained.

    April 9, 2012 at 4:43 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.