US open to talking with Iran
January 18th, 2012
02:21 PM ET

US open to talking with Iran

By Adam Levine

A diplomatic solution with Iran is still possible, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said Wednesday.

"We have always expressed a willingness to try do that," Panetta said at a Pentagon briefing. Panetta was responding to a report from Iran that said President Barack Obama had proposed direct talks in a letter passed to Iranian leadership.

Panetta refused to comment about specific communications but said diplomacy is always an option to pursue.

The U.S. recently sent a letter to Iran warning about blocking the Strait of Hormuz, among other communications, CNN reported earlier this week.  The United States has suggested to Iran that the two sides establish a channel of direct communication to ensure miscalculations don't escalate.

The choice to talk is Iran's, said State Department Spokeswoman Victoria Nuland.

"If you, Iran, are prepared to engage seriously and come clean about your nuclear program and demonstrate to the world that you have no military intent," the US is open to engagement, Nuland said.

While diplomacy is an option, Panetta noted that, given threats made by Iran, the US is also willing to respond militarily.

Two U.S. officials told CNN's Elise Labott the letter the Obama administration sent to Iran did not ask for negotiations, it suggested establishing a direct channel of communications to ensure no miscalculations escalate the situation.

The letter, the officials said, reiterated the administration's stance that blocking the Strait of Hormuz would be a "red line" for America. The sources would not say who wrote the letter or to whom it was directly addressed.

Iran's semi-official news agency Fars cited an Iranian lawmaker, Ali Motahari, as quoting from the U.S. letter and saying, "The first part of the letter contains threats and the second part contains an offer for dialogue."

Motahari told Fars that the U.S. letter said closing the Strait of Hormuz would be a "red line" for the United States. Motahari added, "In the letter, Obama has announced readiness for negotiation and the resolution of mutual disagreements," according to Fars.

Officials at the White House, State Department and Pentagon would not comment on the content of the letter at various press conferences on Wednesday. But various officials, including Panetta, noted the administration is open to talking with Iran provided the Iranians disclose the extent of their nuclear program.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said at Wednesday's White House briefing that "there is a path here towards renewed talks and a path here for Iran to pursue if it so chooses, that would allow it to get right with the international community."

But Carney added, "Iran has shown no inclination thus far to make that choice, to make that decision."

The top Republican in the House, Chairman John Boehner, R-OH, criticized any administration effort to talk with Iran, saying on Wednesday it makes America "look weak."

The U.S. is not changing its military posture in the region in response to recent threats from Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz, a key transition point for oil, Panetta said.  He noted that the current US presence of Navy and other military in the region is sufficient, though alternatives are always under consideration for different contingencies.

"We obviously always continue to make preparations to be prepared for any contingency, but we are not making any special steps at this point in order to deal with the situation. Why? Because, frankly, we are fully prepared to deal with that situation now," Panetta said.

Panetta's comments come as Israel's defense minister appeared to push back on the notion that Israel was ready to strike against Iran.

Israel’s Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Wednesday that an Israeli decision on whether to strike Iran’s nuclear program was “very far off”.

Speaking to Israeli Army Radio, Barak would not offer a concrete estimate as to when he believes Iran may develop a nuclear weapon.

The U.S. and Israel recently put off a joint exercise that appeared to be aimed at sending a message to Iran.  Asked at the Pentagon, Panetta said it was to better prepare for the exercise.

Post by:
Filed under: Diplomacy • Iran • Military • Panetta
soundoff (351 Responses)
  1. Art Nouveau

    I'm glad that I've found your site. I'm so delighted by your way of thinking and writing. Have you thought about writing a book?

    February 18, 2012 at 5:53 pm | Reply
  2. ace

    can we send iran a trogin drone with a ca-boom in it ??

    January 19, 2012 at 6:18 pm | Reply
  3. Maybe

    But Towels Heads never listen.

    January 19, 2012 at 9:55 am | Reply
  4. michaelfury

    January 19, 2012 at 7:24 am | Reply
  5. Sayan Majumdar

    United States is actually (sophistically) teasing Iran as more often important declarations seem to be aired by State Department Spokeswoman Victoria Nuland who is of Jewish origin.


    January 19, 2012 at 6:38 am | Reply
    • mamoud

      she is not of jewish origin. She stems from monkee stool. like all u ameerikans. Jewess!!!

      January 19, 2012 at 6:43 am | Reply
      • MN-Soldier

        I am currently about 200 miles from your border. I'm sure we will be seeing you soon. I will take a picture, look into the black circle on my 240B and wait for the flash. Haha!

        January 19, 2012 at 7:42 am |
      • Sayan Majumdar

        @mamoud, are you aware of your own pedigree? After all, your (foul) statements and language do not inspire much confidence.


        January 19, 2012 at 7:44 am |
      • RagMcmuffin

        Hey Mamoud, sir eyeatolite said get back home, for 2000 camels are on top of one of 50 wives you have and threatens to contaminate the Iranian monkey people's race.

        January 19, 2012 at 8:28 am |
    • noble

      It shows the lack of education and knowledge throughout the Islamic faith. Islam was developed from the Jewish and Christian faiths...but of course because some educated Mullah didn't explain or know this, he of course, doesn't either.

      January 20, 2012 at 1:41 am | Reply
  6. Michael

    Iran has been giving the other terrorist EFPs to kill our troops and offering $1,000 dollars for each U. S. Military killed! That is an act of war!

    January 19, 2012 at 2:07 am | Reply
    • mamoud

      I personally will bring a freah pineapple four efery meerilkan hed thut cums forth. Two coconuts iff they r brownish. Hahaha!!!

      January 19, 2012 at 2:48 am | Reply
  7. svann

    Talking to your enemies may not always help, but not talking NEVER helps. And talk is cheap – costs you nothing.

    January 19, 2012 at 2:01 am | Reply
  8. Mahyar

    What the hell is this crap news!!

    Why Americans don't come up and start a war against iran's nuclear facilities and destroy them all? what is wrong with them, come on brave cowboys...

    we are waiting for you for so long time, come on show up your tools, we will show up our tools, lets see who wins.

    there is story about a two wrestlers who used to live in two neighbour cities in iran, they used to have lots of arguments, once the city mayers said lets give them a chance to fight.

    the one from Qom city came with bare chest, just wearing a pair of shorts, the other was from Kashan, who was fully armed one shell in one hand and a sowrd in the other, as the fight started the guy from Qom hold the guy from Kashan by the waist and pushed him to the ground, the fight was over and the Qom was the winner.

    Qom ppl were very happy and Kashan ppl asked the wresler what happened, he replied, you gave me a shell in one hand and a sword in anouther, so how could I fight with my teeth ?

    I see the same story for Americans and Iranians, you rely on your tools, and we rely on ours, so come up lets' see who wins the fight

    Personally I don't like any kind of war, not at all, but sometimes it is inevitable, not only between Iran and US, but also between Iran and Israel.

    January 19, 2012 at 1:29 am | Reply
    • noble

      Always leave it to the Muslims to cite some 1200 year old me, you don't want a war with America. Iran would be a parking lot for Europe and Asia

      January 19, 2012 at 1:38 am | Reply
      • kgmowla

        This war against Islam has been continuing from the time of Prophet Jesus (Peace be upon him) as rulers were Romans/Europeans and this crusade of Europeans never stopped. Rest judgment is in:

        January 19, 2012 at 7:55 am |
      • Mahyar

        Don't you wanna learn somthing Nobel, I just told a nice and peaceful story, well I guess everyone should learn from the past and never do it again

        or they can give it another try in Iran, but be aware that Iraninans are not Arabs who escape the battle field, if you wanna come over here, make sure you are prepared for any possible circumestances which you may face.

        I love history, most of the time I read and study it, recommend it to you too.

        By the way, I not a politician, and have no interest in it to be, but if something happens for my country, I will stay in my country's side, not yours. If you come over to Iran with the peacefull message you are welcome, but if anyone come over here with weapons in their hands, we respond same. Iranians love the complementry stuff, and this a part of that.

        So, you are very welcome to my country, it is up to you, how you wanna get served.

        January 19, 2012 at 11:08 am |
      • Jesus: The Blond Haired, Blue Eyed White Hippy From The Middle East

        Just like Vietnam. Just like Iraq. Just like Afghanistan. Whatever.

        January 20, 2012 at 12:46 am |
    • kgmowla

      This war against Islam nhas been continuing from the time Prophet Jesus (Peace be upon him) as rulers were Romans/Europeans and this crusade of Europeans never stopped. Rest judgment is in:

      January 19, 2012 at 7:52 am | Reply
    • noble

      I will answer both of you...

      First I probably know more about Islam and it's real history than you do...I am speaking the honest truth, not what some Sheik or Mullah has told you. So you can bring it on if you would like. I also probably know more about the true history of the silk road and its impact across the Middle East and Asian regions...

      As to the fight against Islam since Isa's time....Isa in Islam was a prophet. It is understood he was Jewish and that he carried the message of god. It wasn't until Muhammad came along that the "final and true" religion was revealed. So to say there was fighting against Islam in Isa's day is plain wrong. In fact the religion of Islam didn't actually exist yet in any form. Remember Christians, Jews, and Muslims are considered people of the book since all 3 in Islam are considered the messages from God/Allah. But if you want I would be happy to educate you more on how Muhammad actually came up with Islam.

      January 20, 2012 at 12:43 am | Reply
      • Mahyar

        Hey Nobel Nobel Nobel, when some one talks like this, I just realize that person does n't know about any religion.

        Well, I guess you don't have any idea about the goals of religions, so better you go and study, then come back we will talk more after you finished your readings.

        You seem to have heaps of problems in your sub-concious mind, you should go back to the time and find your mental problems, and when you become clear of those wrong mentality then come back to the history and read it again very very carefully.

        you have no idea about the God, his goals and his willingness, tell me what is the goal of your life? you probably wanna get the Nobel Peace Prize with this sort of mind set?!?! but the goal of the life is different, its goal is to grow human morality and behavior. Try to grow and have a big soul instead of having this childhood behavior.

        for everyone's benefit in here, I jus tell you another nice story:

        One upon a time there was a dady hitting his child up in the roof of the house, and he was holidng him just across the edge, as he was doing this, the ppl said the father if you hate him so much just leave him to hit the ground, he replied: "No, never, I am his father, I wanna give him a lesson, I don't wanna him to get hurt".

        Study Nobel, recommend you study the history of all religions specially Islam again and again and again, then read the Bible, Torah and Quran, it gives you a good idea to how to grow and learn.

        I did, I changed, you can do it, and change, don't affraid of this changes, it helps you to grow and find your way of life

        January 20, 2012 at 7:23 am |
      • noble

        First it is Noble....please learn to spell....Second, I have read the bible, the Qur'an (in Arabic and English), and the Torah. I have also read several buddist works, Taoist works, and many other religions of the world. I don't truely follow any one religion because when you actually do study them you see the same stories with the same I personally don't think any are right or wrong. If you would like to discuss religion I would be happy to, instead of you making comments about how I don't understand without evidence of how I don't understand....

        January 21, 2012 at 1:21 am |
      • Mahyar

        Wow, you got it, yes the answer is "Noble"

        here is the last lesson Nobel or Noble : "someone was pointing to the moon, the other was staring at his finger"

        watch the moon Noble

        fix your sub-conscious thoughts about religions, specially Islam, then you find them different, look at them from different point of view, without any contexts

        January 22, 2012 at 1:41 pm |
  9. mr.nobody

    i guess the pentagon knows something about the trip to latinos that we don't know about

    January 19, 2012 at 12:19 am | Reply
    • mamoud

      they know that you are stoopid nothing

      January 19, 2012 at 12:49 am | Reply
    • esoteric

      Here's a notion maybe Iran or China should have ships protecting the panamal canal???! That should make things level

      January 19, 2012 at 1:07 am | Reply
  10. ram

    Iran has the right to have military weapons and use them to defend the state against aggressors in much the same was as France, Britain, Germany, usa, Russia, Israel does. The usa always pick on states that will surpass them in their own spheres of inluence (in their neighborhood) The usa wants to be the number one. One good example, China is doing its own thing, not minding the world's business. Business first. But america instead of setting its eves on the goal of creating a better usa, wants to control the world. Well look, the usa cannot control its senate, house, economy, banks, unemployment, movement of magazines to Guantanamo etc but i wants to be leader. Do you pick a flunkee as a leader...Well america did once in picking a president...dont think that the world will do the same.

    January 19, 2012 at 12:18 am | Reply
  11. noble

    Terrible idea...we should be more harsh on them not softer...we talk with them it is saying we are okay with the nuclear crap...sigh, so disappointed in how soft we have gotten as a country.

    January 19, 2012 at 12:03 am | Reply
    • mlr

      but they are BO's buddies... he just guaranteed the rich oil of the middle-east another 10 years or so of our money with the shutdown of the pipeline...

      January 19, 2012 at 1:19 am | Reply
  12. mamoud

    I am glad that thee Amerikeens r glaad that the Iranians will talk. We will see whether or not we mighty iranians will keel you ameerilkan dogz.u all deserve to die anyways.

    January 18, 2012 at 11:55 pm | Reply
    • noble

      I don't want us to talk...I want us to do what needs to be done. Get the tyrant out of office, show the Iranians the real Islam if that is what they want not the crap they are taught in their schools, and if not....well we could use one less country in the world.

      January 19, 2012 at 12:34 am | Reply
      • Ninoos

        But you are financially broke.

        January 19, 2012 at 12:40 am |
      • mamoud

        indeedyou arefinancially broke.Hahaha!!Wenow have the bombandwewillnot hestitate to destroy u all. DEath to all uselessAmerikans.Broke Stoopidand mostly illiterate. ERxcept for thaat foolZach.

        January 19, 2012 at 12:48 am |
      • noble

        Did an Iranian really just call us illiterate? I am not sure since he can't spell, write, or apparently read what we are writing...sad that many of the Muslims have retarded and distorted their own religion to where they believe the rhetoric their leaders tell me that is uneducated and illiterate.

        January 19, 2012 at 12:53 am |
      • mamoud

        xcuuus mee, but did sum Ameerilkan with a briain of nobody just say that we were ueducated nd illiterate? How abut him, mr nobodycanseehowstupidIamtobetALKINGtoanotherpersonasifhewerereal. Eye cannot think that there is a person who cares as much four Iran as mee. Do not think there is a more stoopid poster then theese wun. Iff theese iss un exampul of how ameerikans are what aaaaan illiterate nation it must bee!!!

        January 19, 2012 at 2:43 am |
      • noble

        Thank you for proving my point Kafir....thank you.

        January 20, 2012 at 1:47 am |
  13. Lee

    "demonstrate to the world that you have no military intent" Perhaps WE should also demonstrate to the world that WE have no military intent. That might be kind of hard considering the threats we make and the actions we've taken in the past.

    January 18, 2012 at 11:42 pm | Reply
  14. James

    ""US open to talking with Iran""–This is another great idea of Obama and Penitia–Now that they have Nuclear capability Iran could care less what we want or do–

    January 18, 2012 at 11:26 pm | Reply
    • Lee

      They don't have nuclear capability. God, I hope ignorance really is bliss.

      January 18, 2012 at 11:40 pm | Reply
  15. Ninoos

    This is a great news. Hope Iran responds positively. This is a great chance. I am praying.

    January 18, 2012 at 11:12 pm | Reply
  16. Iranacockuptheirass

    welp, time for bed. You idiots have once again kept me laughing all night. Going to make popcorn, watch CNN and wait for the war to begin. Damn I wish I were going.

    January 18, 2012 at 10:59 pm | Reply
  17. Pissed off American

    No more wars on Israel's behalf.

    January 18, 2012 at 10:31 pm | Reply
  18. Bubba

    Iran has never, will never be a threat to the US. Why do we need to defend Israel and Saudi Arabia? Are they not big boys who wear big boy pants?

    January 18, 2012 at 10:29 pm | Reply
    • FFFF

      Because we get oil from Saudi... dude, and they are the most stable of the middle eastern opec countries. They actually hate our guts but we need the oil...

      January 18, 2012 at 10:31 pm | Reply
      • Draft Dodger Newt

        We get about 60% from Canada. We bribe the Saudis (and pretty much every other mid-east nation) to play nice with Israel.

        January 18, 2012 at 10:36 pm |
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        AAhh may 40200 camels Jew the brown sand people with shit in drawers

        January 18, 2012 at 10:49 pm |
      • Dan, TX

        You understand the Saudi's support the most extreme Islam that has bred Islamic terrorism right? Our "ally" Saudi Arabia, is a bigger threat to America then Iran. Iran supports terrorism primarily against Israel. Saudi Arabia supports turning the world into an Islamic. They are using the money we give them for oil to kill us and we kiss their feet all the while. We need to eliminate use of oil, period. We can use coal and nuclear and renewables to replace oil (electric cars). Coal can produce electricity to replace the need for oil.

        January 19, 2012 at 12:54 am |
  19. Beerbreak

    Now that we have Iran totally surrounded, we now welcome diplomacy??? I guess some people will never understand until the dollar collapses and banks shut down for good, what being bankrupt means. There is a very real and serious problem right here at home...the middle class is being wiped-out and we just keep funneling money overseas. F**k Iran...let them all blow theirselves up...the US has its own problems... that are only getting worse the more we throw money away.

    January 18, 2012 at 9:56 pm | Reply
    • Iranacockuptheirass

      yes, may 2000 camels jackoff their nukes and implode on themselves.

      January 18, 2012 at 10:30 pm | Reply
    • Dan, TX

      You are ranting. Hard to understand what you are trying to say.

      January 19, 2012 at 12:55 am | Reply
  20. vinny

    What is there to talk about? Stop building nukes, stop supplying Hamas and Hezbollah with rockets to shoot at Israel, and we have absolutely no reason to bother you. Anything short of that, and there is just nothing to say. We have tried with them. They dont listen. Hence the sanctions which are going to just get worse and worse for them until their own people get fed up enough to overthrow the imbeciles holding on to an age old idea that a man in the sky is going to cause an earthquake to wipe out their enemies. You cant argue or debate with stupid.

    January 18, 2012 at 9:45 pm | Reply
  21. wrench

    Panetta what a joke.......We are willing to open talks....LMAO....Here is how they will go....."Comply or die" ....the US government is like the Borg on Star Trek Resistance is fultile.....or like cops comply or die. If the US does not like you, it will spread lies and propagranda until it can mass its unruley herds of citizens to die for the old stars and strips! Iran should realise that the Big Bro is a master at deception, manipulation and misdirection and will somehow manage to brainwash the minions into another war. Creel commision tactics!!!!

    January 18, 2012 at 9:42 pm | Reply
  22. victor

    sand nigggers are stupid yopu can not reason with them panetta is a liberal big time

    January 18, 2012 at 9:35 pm | Reply
    • jack

      You are an idiot .... (.)

      January 18, 2012 at 9:50 pm | Reply
    • Ninoos

      Dear Victor; please report to the nearest Veterinarian hospital as soon as possible. You need to be put down.

      January 19, 2012 at 12:14 am | Reply
  23. Iranacockuptheirass

    Hey Draft is that fatty your smoking you old lady

    January 18, 2012 at 8:58 pm | Reply
    • Draft Dodger Newt

      Why, yes. Yes it is. She is dee-licious.

      January 18, 2012 at 8:59 pm | Reply
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        You are a sorry ass fuckhead. May a 1000 camels shit down your mothers throat while your daddy tongues the anus of an Iranian mule

        January 18, 2012 at 9:03 pm |
      • Draft Dodger Newt

        And why should they have all the fun?

        January 18, 2012 at 9:06 pm |
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        ok, now that was funny

        January 18, 2012 at 9:09 pm |
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        You must help destroy the little brown people that live in the dessert that reek of nucleoitis

        January 18, 2012 at 9:11 pm |
    • wrench

      Yea and he must remember....puff puff pass!!!! Oh thats right we are not a free people to enjoy such activities without worry of oppression by BIG BRO......

      January 18, 2012 at 9:45 pm | Reply
  24. Iranacockuptheirass

    May there be death to a thousand of your camels for not supporting an ass kickin on Iran

    January 18, 2012 at 8:54 pm | Reply
    • Ninoos

      Is you wife f u c k i n g Persians?

      January 19, 2012 at 12:45 am | Reply
  25. Iranacockuptheirass

    Cant wait for camel people to be blown away! LQQKS like real soon I hope. Im making popcorn and watchin CNN just like the other wars..WWWWOOOHHHOOOO!!! Love it man!! LONG LIVE ISRAEL

    January 18, 2012 at 8:52 pm | Reply
    • wrench

      Long live Israel because they are bankrupting the American tax payer!!!!!! 114 billion a year, If the US government was really for the people of the US they would have been spending that on American infrastructure! I hope Israel goes down soon so the US gov can quit extorting money from me to give away to them!!!

      January 18, 2012 at 9:49 pm | Reply
    • Ninoos

      Are you doing drugs?

      January 19, 2012 at 12:46 am | Reply
    • Ninoos

      Relax you moron.

      January 19, 2012 at 12:47 am | Reply
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        AAHH 3 more jealous bastards...May a 1000 camels fly out of yo mama's anal's and land cock side up next to your sisters who are ridding Iranian mules for pleasure my friends.

        January 20, 2012 at 10:25 pm |
  26. upgradde with 2 ds

    the leaders of iran and the us are the same they belive the same things and worship the same things there even in the same social clubs together it called cause and effect same thing been happing for ever they hate the goyim the the top people are all together no matter how much they say they hate eachother

    January 18, 2012 at 8:50 pm | Reply
    • Iranacockuptheirass

      Mya the cock of 10000 camels fill your mouth continuously for 1000 years. You are a retard.

      January 18, 2012 at 9:38 pm | Reply
  27. Iranacockuptheirass

    If your name is bob in herefuckoff

    January 18, 2012 at 8:49 pm | Reply
    • Ninoos

      Are you drunk?

      January 19, 2012 at 12:48 am | Reply
  28. Kelly

    President Obama and his administration aren't weak. They're just not taking the same, warmongering stance that has caused so much hatred against your country throughout the world. He's made it crystal clear that if Iran decides to close the strait, the US will treat that as a cause to respond militarily. At the same time, they're offering Iran a chance to back down and do the right thing. Your country has proven so many times that all stick and no honey just doesn't work. Why do you think your tourists have taking to plastering my flag on their backpacks so they don't get killed when they travel. Do you honestly like slinking around pretending to be Canadian in one breath while you're trumpeting about how mighty the USA is in the other? Your president has done more diplomatically for your country than your last three Republican presidents put together. I just hope you realize it before it's too late.

    Proudly Canadian

    January 18, 2012 at 8:43 pm | Reply
    • Draft Dodger Newt

      Ah, the old Canadian flag on the American backpack cliche, eh? Back to your igloo, honey. Don't eat any bad beaver.

      January 18, 2012 at 9:02 pm | Reply
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        AAhhh, may 15000 camels rid the bad beaver and learn to speak come on A?

        January 18, 2012 at 9:52 pm |
    • Maclean & Maclean

      Ohhhhh, Canadian women they are the shits
      They have no ass, they have no tits
      They'll whack you off with a pair of mitts
      in the North Atlantic Squadron.

      January 18, 2012 at 9:26 pm | Reply
      • E=MC2

        son, go back into the basement and finish your video game. It's time for your to go to bed. Only adults can be up this late. Moron!

        January 18, 2012 at 10:38 pm |
    • E=MC2

      Kelly, I am glad you are proud of your country, but so am I of mine. Canada simply does not have the power or clout to make any difference in the world politic. Because of that, it is very hard to be scrutinized. This is also true of parents. We have responsibilities that often times our kids do not agree with. At times they think we are "mean"and don't understand. Most of the time we due understand and the kid is too young to do so. The U.S. is the super power and with it comes great responsibility. We are damned if we "do" and damned if we "don't". We cannot win, yet we do what we think is best. Do we make mistakes? Sure. Do you ever make mistakes? Yes, a nations mistakes are of much greater consequences, yet the very fact that we have to face these challenges puts the U.S. in often difficult positions. Canada simply does not have to deal with these issues. Not being critical, but it simply is much, MUCH easier to play "arm chair quarterback". The U.S. has done more good for the world than Canada, hands down. Much more for the world than any country in history. Simply a fact. Many disagree, but few do anything themselves. What do you think would happen if the U.S. stepped down and let Canada deal with the Middle East issue? Now, play grow up, not college kid utopian idealist. Remember what happened when Europe wanted to take the lead in negotiating a settlement with Iran over the nuclear issue; Iran stalled, built up their program and brushed Europe to the side. In other words, Europe failed miserably. So, what again can Canada do? Give me some real ideas Einsten, or should I say Lord Chamberlain!

      January 18, 2012 at 10:37 pm | Reply
      • Kelly

        Wow. That's some real proud Americans out there. Good for you. Sadly, you all assumed I'm a woman and began insulting my age and sex. Hilarious. My wife will love that. Now, in case you didn't hear, Canada is the second largest force in Afghanistan right now. We've been fighting along side you in all your wars. You probably wouldn't know that because you're so full of American pride. Or something. Now get over yourselves and learn your cowboy politics is tired and worn out. Do you think Canada is the only country sick of that attitude? In any case, just remember who your biggest partner and staunchest ally is next time you slide around Europe with a maple leaf on your back. Hint – it's not Britain.

        January 18, 2012 at 10:55 pm |
      • Kelly

        And in all fairness, aside from the name calling, E=MC2 had some valid points despite your diminishing all the Canadian achievements over the last century. We're out there every day, losing our lives, frequently in wars you dragged us into. In fact, we currently have the second largest navy in the world and we're sure as heck not paddling around crashing into rocks. It was our ships and our airplanes off the coast of Libya, in case you weren't aware. I could back that up with facts but unfortunately, Wikipedia is blacked out right now. Thank your Republicans for that one.

        January 18, 2012 at 11:47 pm |
      • Draft Dodger Newt

        Kelly, you conniving Canuck. How dare you fool us with your androgynous name. Was it not enough that you took Olympic gold away from us? And whats with this Harper fellow, and his unwavering support for America? Where the hell am I gonna flee to if we ever reinstate the draft? All kidding aside, as much as it pains me to say this, 'E' has a valid point regarding Canada's lack of clout internationally – something to do with your relatively tiny population, I believe.

        January 19, 2012 at 12:41 am |
      • Acidsnow

        To Kelly,
        That will show troop levels and Canada is not the second largest contributor. Having 520 troops is nothing compared to 90,000.

        January 19, 2012 at 2:03 am |
      • Acidsnow

        Some more facts for Kelly. The Canadian Navy is not the second largest in the world and it contributed two naval ships off of Libya along with a couple of patrol boats. And that wasn't a war that the USA dragged Canada in, it's because Canada honored it's U.N. committment to help after voting on Libya. While I'm grateful for Canada's help (or are we helping Canada?) don't let Canadian pride change the facts.

        January 19, 2012 at 2:18 am |
    • esoteric

      Here's a notion maybe Iran or China should have ships protecting the panamal canal???!
      That should make things level

      January 19, 2012 at 1:01 am | Reply
  29. kgmowla

    Peace only will be achived after all foreign forces leave Muslim land, sea and AIR including Persian Gulf.

    January 18, 2012 at 8:42 pm | Reply
    • Chris

      Yea and then what. As Muslims move into other regions as they already have, do those also become Muslim lands? Will Muslims then be asking everyone to leave those places? If your referring specifically to the Middle east , don't hold your breath. As long as there is Oil there every country on the planet will traverse the region.

      January 18, 2012 at 8:51 pm | Reply
      • kgmowla

        Please read the histrory of first invasion of Iraq in 1914 as it is related to destruction of
        1300 years only State in Islam, Caliphate. Rest is in:

        January 18, 2012 at 9:00 pm |
      • vinny

        As long as you take a book written 1000 years ago, and interpret it to mean you need to convert or kill everyone (especially Jews), then we cannot leave that land. Americans dont want to be there. I dont want my government there and I speak for the majority. I just want you to go about your business, leave everyone alone, and sell is your delicious oil at a handsome profit for yourself. Until you guys over there calm down, were stuck there babysitting and making sure you dont build nuclear weapons. Trust me when I tell you, we would rather see the money we spend on war to be used to help our people at home instead. We just cant do that as long as a threat remains that you guys will spread the extremism to our shores

        January 18, 2012 at 9:40 pm |
    • E=MC2

      No, peace will only prevail when the islamofacists are removed from this world. Forgive my bluntness, but may piss be upon allah! You morons are the scourge of this world.

      January 18, 2012 at 10:42 pm | Reply
  30. Nicole

    So, Mr Nice-guy wants to have a conversation with Mr Evil...yes, that is going to go well.

    January 18, 2012 at 8:26 pm | Reply
    • Draft Dodger Newt

      I know! Obama's down right Satanic.

      January 18, 2012 at 9:03 pm | Reply
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        Yes Draft...he is one of them. He wears his camel toe in the rear

        January 18, 2012 at 9:13 pm |
  31. Yahudisubkuttay

    Iran has done NOTHING to US. US will be fighting the dirty war for Israhell. nothing else.

    Time for US to stop changing Israel's dirty diapers.

    January 18, 2012 at 8:13 pm | Reply
    • RetiredSoldier71

      And what good has ANY muslim country done in the last 400 years? What advancements in science, technology, literature? About the only thing we see is suicide bombing, hijackings etc.

      January 18, 2012 at 8:39 pm | Reply
    • Iranacockuptheirass

      Just L@@King at your name makes me want to take a shit

      January 18, 2012 at 8:56 pm | Reply
    • E=MC2

      What a remark! Doing Israel's dirty work. Israel can kick any arab or persians ass; they want. They did so in the arab israeli conflict. Muslims have done NOTHING for this present day world but cause hatred and terrorism. Do you really want that legacy for your "religion"? By the way, PISS be upon Allah!

      January 18, 2012 at 10:45 pm | Reply
  32. Power of Reason

    What is the worst case scenario?
    Iran can block the strait forever. No insurance company will cover any tankers going thru the strait as long as missiles are flying.
    The US get its casus belli, and start bombing not just around the strait. Plus it can bomb all Nuclear sites.
    Bad outcome for both, so unlikely to come unless people lose their minds.

    January 18, 2012 at 7:18 pm | Reply
    • Bob Knippel

      An attempt to shut down international commerce within the Gulf, particularly considering the economic importance of oil to global stability, in conjunction with the sheer volume of oil passed through the strait, is simply not acceptable to a modern world, and Western nations in particular. Iran, at best, might interrupt shipping for a minimal amount of time, at which point, Iran's Navy would be liquidated, as well as Iranian missle launch sites within range of the strait. Implementing an enforced maintenance of a reasonable degree of safety to shipping would effectively result in a no fly zone over Iranian territory within that area.

      January 18, 2012 at 7:53 pm | Reply

    Still think the Stimulus bill was wasteful spending? You be the judge!

    For the past three years the GOP and the Tea Party have stressed fiscal responsibility and a need for less government while accusing the Obama administration of wasteful spending and of inflating the national deficit with passage of the $819 billion stimulus package. (To see what domestic programs the stimulus bill has funded, google "The Stimulus Plan: How to Spend $787 Billion – The New York Times)." Decide for yourself if this bill is wasteful spending.

    So what's the GOP's alternative to President Obama's stimulus bill? Well, their alternative is actually a stimulus bill of their own that they say would have cost $713 billion dollars with approximately $430 billion in tax cuts. Well, with all the upheaval over this administration's stimulus bill, you would have thought a GOP plan would have cost $0.00 dollars. ( To see the GOP's stimulus plan, google Senate offers Alternative Stimulus Plan – Political Hotsheet -CBS News or " the GOP's claim about their jobs plan by Sen. Rand Paul."

    Se. Rand Paul said the GOP's plan would reduce individual and corporate tax cuts and boost employment and create 6.2 million jobs over the next decade. The next decade? Do struggling Americans have that much time to wait for economic relief? Furthermore, when asked if an independent economist had reviewed their stimulus plan, the GOP's answer was no. But don't be so pessimistic because the GOP's plan also cited that with access to Canadian oil and additional energy proposals, they could have generated an additional one million jobs by 2018. By 2018? The GOP must be joking right? I just wonder what Sen. Paul and the GOP have been sniffing on lately.

    And talking about fiscal responsibility, google Research Project "Cost of War" by Brown Universit's Watson Institute for International Studies! The final cost of the illegitimate Iraqi war is tabulated at 3 trillion dollars and the cost of both the Iraqi and Afghan wars are projected to have exceeded 4.4 trillion dollars and by the end of the Afghan war, the final combined cost is projected at approximately 6 trillion dollars. Fiscal responsibility? No, its more like wasteful spending!

    Still trust the GOP and believe they're best suited for running our country? Better think twicw before you get swept away by their propaganda!

    January 18, 2012 at 7:12 pm | Reply
  34. keven77

    Ideology aside - the U.S. negotiating with the "Axis of Evil" or Iran with the "Great Satan" would be tough sells to their respective domestic audiences.

    The problem here is that it is difficult to see what each side has to offer the other....

    What Iran wants: a dominant position in the region and a redefinition of how oil revenues are allocated and distributed. Well...that would make the United States dependent on Iran.

    What the U.S. wants: an Iran that does not build a sphere of influence, but instead remains within its borders. Also, an Iran w/o a nuclear weapon. Both would cost Iran a historic opportunity to assert its longstanding claims.

    Bottom Line: neither side is in a position to enter into any sort of accommodations

    January 18, 2012 at 7:05 pm | Reply
  35. Roy

    Panetta says we will always leave diplomacy as an option. What diplomacy, the American government and its allys have been
    badmouthing the Iranian government and relentlessy testing its nerves. The western world and Isreal have only their interest in mine. We need to address our own back year rather a country whose history is way to complex for most Americians to understand let alone even trying to communicate with them.

    January 18, 2012 at 7:04 pm | Reply
  36. Jesus Cristo

    ████ ██ █ ████ everything ███ █████ is █████ ████ ████ fine ████ ███ █ ██████ love █████ ██████ your Federal Government.

    January 18, 2012 at 7:00 pm | Reply
    • RagMcmuffin


      January 18, 2012 at 7:04 pm | Reply
    • NSain

      Best post ever!!

      January 18, 2012 at 7:12 pm | Reply
    • Draft Dodger Newt


      January 18, 2012 at 8:04 pm | Reply
  37. keven77

    The Iranians already have a "nuclear option," namely, the prospect of blockading the Strait of Hormuz.

    January 18, 2012 at 6:50 pm | Reply
  38. Jesus Cristo

    Any Politician who votes for war needs to either put a uniform on or have their children fitted for one.

    January 18, 2012 at 6:44 pm | Reply
    • Roy

      Well said

      January 18, 2012 at 7:04 pm | Reply
  39. RagMcmuffin

    Once again, you can not communicate with terrorists that do not communicate! All they are doing is buying time. Cant wait for the first attack. It is intimate because they are intimate.

    January 18, 2012 at 6:44 pm | Reply
    • RagMcmuffin

      An Iranian non-profit company says it will honor U.S. President Barack Obama's request that Iran return a drone that crashed there last year.

      But instead of the actual drone, the company says it will send miniature toy versions. A lot of them.

      See what I mean? Lets blow em to hell where they belong

      January 18, 2012 at 6:47 pm | Reply
      • Ninoos

        They can blow you back.

        January 19, 2012 at 1:05 am |
    • LenGrady

      Iranians are not terrorist. Think about how the USA was fed up by just paying Taxes to the UK. We sacrificed our men and women to fight that war just for sovereignty. Now think about Iran, we replaced their democraticly elected leader with our puppet. We spy on them, run covert operations, fly unauthorized drone missions over them. Oh, they should like t and not fight back?

      January 18, 2012 at 6:52 pm | Reply
      • RagMcmuffin

        You are a dweeb! Its people like you that scar the hell out of every other American. We do that for good reason. They want to kill you, your family and any American they can. That's what they do. That's what they will die to do. Why don't you go over there if your so concerned about it and take your family and see if you make it back.

        January 18, 2012 at 6:58 pm |
      • keven77

        I think I understand what you're try to say, but you may be overstating your point. With all due respect, your coming across as a little bit overly-empathetic. Iran is our enemy. You can't forget that...not for a second.

        January 18, 2012 at 7:00 pm |
      • RagMcmuffin

        I tell you what, unless any of you idiots on this blog has lost a family member in these past wars you need to shut the F up cause you do not know a damn thing about whats going on until you lose one, and yes I lost one in Afghanistan this past October and one in the Gulf war. Now either shaddup or join the military and do something good for your country besides smoking dope for a living.

        January 18, 2012 at 7:08 pm |
      • bob

        i wonder if the iraqis or afghanis peed on ragmcmuffin's kin? probably not. they have more class than that.

        January 18, 2012 at 7:27 pm |
      • Draft Dodger Newt

        Dear Rag; I couldn't give one flying fuck about your idiot relatives who have only themselves to blame for their demise. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go burn a fattie.

        January 18, 2012 at 8:07 pm |
      • Bob Knippel

        Iran's connection to numerous acts of terrorism is well established. Iran may not be willing to take on nations with different ideologies directly, but Iran has no problem attacking those nations through the use of proxies.

        January 18, 2012 at 8:11 pm |
    • wavejump1100

      do you mean imminent?

      January 18, 2012 at 7:05 pm | Reply
      • RagMcmuffin

        um yes

        January 18, 2012 at 7:08 pm |
    • bob

      in 1968 iran was given a small nuclear reactor by the united states under the atoms for peace initiative. as was the norm back in that day the reactor was fueled with weapons grade uranium. Before our countries had a falling out we supplied iran with a second core for the reactor. All told iran has been sitting on about 8 kgs of weapons grade urnanium that would be very easy to isolate from the spent fuel. This is enough to build a primitive fat man type implosion bomb. read this again so there is no misunderstanding – iran has been sitting on the key to building a nuke for nearly half a century – and yet no attacks. what exactly is it you think they are waiting on?

      January 18, 2012 at 7:25 pm | Reply
      • Rob

        What I'm getting from this is that you believe that we gave them what they needed to make their own bomb way back in the 60's...

        When you pull stuff from your arse, you get doo doo on your hands...

        January 18, 2012 at 7:55 pm |
      • Bob Knippel

        Spent reactor fuel is NOT enriched bomb material.

        January 18, 2012 at 8:16 pm |
  40. SoldierOfFortunes

    Yes and while TALKS are underway may be USA can tell Iran why the USA imprisions a royalty of another nation?And where is the HUGE trust account??? In the Swiss Embassey??? With TransCanada??? Saudi Arabia??? Money money money....Money is to be one of many subjects eh USA...when someone is worth alot of money the lies told to keep it is just downright evil isn't it USA??? Ask the Queen of Thieves about it now....

    January 18, 2012 at 6:43 pm | Reply
    • Mike Sterling


      January 18, 2012 at 6:56 pm | Reply
  41. Change

    For all you rightwing nutjobs calling for war against Iran, I have a question for you. Have you enlisted yourselves and your love ones to fight this war you're calling for? If not, then why not?

    January 18, 2012 at 6:38 pm | Reply
    • keven77

      Change – your post from earlier confirms that you are a leftwing nutjob.

      Look dude, if you wanna live your life as a partisan, than that's up to you. But the name calling just makes you look dumb.

      January 18, 2012 at 6:41 pm | Reply
      • Draft Dodger Newt

        But it's alright for you to insult people, eh fuck face?

        January 18, 2012 at 8:09 pm |
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        Yes may a 1000 camels hump you endlessly for 100 years

        January 18, 2012 at 9:41 pm |
  42. Kaeden

    The WWIII hourglass doesn't have much left on top.

    January 18, 2012 at 6:38 pm | Reply
  43. Change


    You're mentally insane!

    January 18, 2012 at 6:35 pm | Reply
  44. keven77

    We find ourselves in a situation in which neither side wants to force the other into extreme steps and neither side is in a position to enter into broader accommodations. And that's what makes the situation dangerous. When fundamental issues are at stake, each side is in a position to profoundly harm the other if pressed, and neither side is in a position to negotiate a broad settlement, a long game of chess ensues. And in that game of chess, the possibilities of miscalculation, of a bluff that the other side mistakes for an action, are very real.

    January 18, 2012 at 6:28 pm | Reply
  45. OGEZE

    "The top Republican in the House, Chairman John Boehner, R-OH, criticized any administration effort to talk with Iran, saying on Wednesday it makes America "look weak." So I am trying to understand Boehner's position. He would risk war with Iran rather then give diplomacy a chance because we may "look weak". On the contrary, I belileve diplomacy makes us look strong. The world knows what the U.S. is capable of militarily.

    January 18, 2012 at 6:27 pm | Reply
    • keven77

      the problem with this is that it is difficult to see what each has to offer the other.

      January 18, 2012 at 6:31 pm | Reply
    • IH8Taliban

      the issue is that iran is pursuing nuclear weapons and has been known to arm redical islamic groups. diplomacy will never fix that.

      January 18, 2012 at 6:32 pm | Reply
      • keven77

        well, there's really nothing to least nothing that either side is willing to offer.

        January 18, 2012 at 6:33 pm |
      • Alkahest

        Now, I don't like Iranian leadership, but the US has been arming radical groups for a long time, and is funding Israel, which as a state has killed an absolutely overwhelming number of innocent civilians when compared to the attacks they are in retaliation against. If both Iran and the US are unwilling to commit to diplomacy because of these things, then when can we ever hope for a resolution aside from war? We're not perfect ourselves, so just swallow a bit of that pride and show some real courage.

        January 18, 2012 at 6:46 pm |
      • IH8Taliban

        if youre referring to the US arming the muhjhadeen back in the 80s that hardly counts.

        January 18, 2012 at 6:58 pm |
  46. IH8Taliban

    this makes me sick! grow some nuts white house. these guys probably appologize to their wives when they come home early and theres three people gang bangin her. "well honey we can just settle this with diplomacy".

    January 18, 2012 at 6:24 pm | Reply
    • me138


      January 18, 2012 at 6:29 pm | Reply
    • Draft Dodger Newt

      What's this got to do with your home life?

      January 18, 2012 at 7:16 pm | Reply
    • Iranacockuptheirass

      Yes, may 5000 camels nurse you from their cocks to heal you from a damaged home life

      January 18, 2012 at 9:42 pm | Reply
  47. Jesus Cristo

    If you dont like it move the hell out of here and move to friking Israel! America FIRST and if that boders you, YOU ARE A TRAITOR!

    January 18, 2012 at 6:23 pm | Reply
    • me138

      your comment "BODERS"

      January 18, 2012 at 6:30 pm | Reply
  48. Joshua Ludd

    "If you, Iran, are prepared to engage seriously and come clean about your nuclear program and demonstrate to the world that you have no military intent,"

    And just as with Iraq we ask another nation we have threatened that has no reason to trust us and every reason to distrust us to simply open up their biggest secrets for our perusal to make sure they aren't a threat to our interests. Frankly, given how much our intelligence agencies have gotten wrong over the last decade from 9/11 to the anthrax attacks the media doesn't mention anymore to Iraq it is hard to believe Iran is developing nuclear weapons based on the flimsy evidence given so far. If Iran is at this point developing weapons, should we be surprised? We have spent the last decade sabre rattling and threatening them while invading nations to either side of them. All of this after overthrowing their government in the 50s to reinstall the Shah for our own benefit and backing Iraq in starting a war against them. For all of this... when was the last time Iran actually started a war with anyone else???

    January 18, 2012 at 6:15 pm | Reply
    • E=MC2

      OK Luke Skywalker. has been attcking the West, through it's proxies, for decades. They dont have the military might to do so othersie. yet, because the only kill innocent civilians by the hundrreds more justified than the U.S. engaing in conflicts do to outside circumstances. OK Mr. McCullugh, here is a new history lesson for you: As musch as the Iranians play up the fact that the U.S installed the Shah, the Islamic theocrats were quite happy we removed the previous scoundrel. Now, Iran does get rid of the Shah and does what? Commit's international terrorism around the world! Wow, they did take the moral high ground. Let's see, they held the U.S. Embassy staff for 444 days. They did commit terrorism around the world through it's various proxies. The U.S and Iraq? Well, lets look at that. Iraq invaded Iran and later invaded Kuwait. Iraq under Saddam was very naughty. We, along with the international community, kick Saddam out of Kuwait, but instead of punishing him and removing him, we patiently agree to a cease fire. Saddam remains in power, they defy the cease fire and shoot at plains and defy inspectors etc etc. We wait YEARS, not months, but YEARS for him to comply, THEN we invade. Oh, but what about WMD? They never found them- Ha! Well, actually they did and destroyed what they found. The U.S suspencted Saddam was still hiding more and after non-complianec with the cease fire invaded. "But they never found more". If you watched the mianstream media and CNN this past year, you saw, although not publicised too much, the FCAT that Saddam told the tribunal that the REAL reason HE DID evade the inspectors was to make it look like he still had WMD! He wasn't afraid of the U.S because, well, we are too patient and we let him stay in power last time, he was afraid of Iran and wanted the story to play to Iran ears. Sorry, this was not FOX but people like Wolf Blitzer (look it up, it's true). So, we did have reason to believe in what is know known to be deception. OK, we can justify Iraq now. Afghanistan? (/11, I need not say more. Tell me one place on earth that the U.S invaded out of anger and held the land? Japan? Look at it today. Germany? Leading nation in Europe. Oh yes! Phillippines! They asked us to leave.....and we did, Now they want us back 🙂 This notion that the U.S invades willy nilly to gain is pathetic. By the way, Iraq held an auction for rights to build oil fields and we didn't get any! Remember our war FOR OIL! Wow, we got none and now we left. Iraq got rid of a tyrant and was able to have free, not perfect, but free elections! Boy is the U.S terrible! Now you want to questions motives concerning Iran. Grow up! read history more and learn something instead of crying like a baby! This is the real world and it is NOT Utopia!

      January 18, 2012 at 6:35 pm | Reply
  49. J R Brown

    The first step in the President using our taxmoney to bribe yet another hostile country to pretend to be our friend while taking our money and stabbing us in the back....

    Obama's a putzzzz...

    January 18, 2012 at 6:08 pm | Reply
    • jamest

      I like

      January 18, 2012 at 6:10 pm | Reply
    • Draft Dodger Newt

      Um, you know we haven't raised taxes to finance our wars, no? Nope – we've simply borrowed. Lots. Thanks, China.

      January 18, 2012 at 7:14 pm | Reply
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        Yes may 7000 camels stoke your royal penis made of fine silver and gold

        January 18, 2012 at 9:44 pm |
  50. Joe

    They're open to more appeasement, appeasing Muslims is a specialty with this administration.

    January 18, 2012 at 5:57 pm | Reply
    • Terrible_Ted

      YES!!!!! I do love it when a plan comes together. Soon the missles will be flying...Hallelujah...Hallelujah.

      January 18, 2012 at 6:00 pm | Reply
      • Draft Dodger Newt

        What's all white with a black asshole?

        The A-Team.

        January 18, 2012 at 10:20 pm |
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        Yes, may the black assholes of a 1000 camels be painted on by the tongue of Iranians

        January 18, 2012 at 10:42 pm |
    • jamest

      Contracted around the world for military, the Middle east is full of scum they are lower than north korea. As an American I am proud to say if you dont like the U.S.A. then leave our land, keep your children from coming here and stay with your extreem leaders and suffer in your homelands and stop accusing the U.S. of everything especially your countries failures...

      January 18, 2012 at 6:03 pm | Reply
      • E=MC2

        finally a grown up. Thank you!

        January 18, 2012 at 6:18 pm |
      • Draft Dodger Newt

        An illiterate who could only obtain employment by serving the military is a "grown up"? That's rich. Oh, and James...lolololololololololololololol!

        January 18, 2012 at 7:12 pm |
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        Yes, may 3000 camels take your toys and go play in sand that is far far away

        January 18, 2012 at 9:46 pm |
    • Joshua Ludd

      Oh, you mean like they appeased Bin Laden? Who the heck is it you think they have in any way appeased?

      January 18, 2012 at 6:11 pm | Reply
  51. John

    What wrong with trying to talk to them. And you never know It may help, and beside that It better than sending are son and daughter to war. And beside that I don't think that talking to the First Is a sigh of weakness, really I think It would be the smart thing to do. And If that don't work than you may have to go to other thing. But the first thing out of the Republican mouth Is send In the Troops, But you never see any of there Kid In the Military.

    January 18, 2012 at 5:56 pm | Reply
    • E=MC2

      "John", no the first thing out Republican's mouthes are not "send in the troops". What a pinhead remark. No, conservatives do not want to send our kids into battle, yet we do understand that it is needed many times. Read history. This has been part of mankind since the beginning of time. To be so naive that you think we can always "talk" it out is so irresponsible. Urrope asked for us to wait while they "talked" to Iran. What did they find, Iran used the time to continue their program and did NOT do anything. Like North Korea, they play on the fact that pinheads like you will do anything to avoid a "confrontation". They know that people like you will buy your kid's all the candy they see at the checkout line so they will feel good and you wont look mean. Wake up, the world has bad people like Imanutjob and Kim-Il-logical. They will abuse their own people for goodness sake. Do you know that the Iranian regime sent hundreds of thousands of it's children into minefields to clear them during the Iran-Iraq war. They do not have the same morals we do. Their people may, but the regime does not. The FACT is the leadership in Iran is messianic. they see things VERY differently than you do Tinkerbell. We can send in some F22's and B1 bombers along with cruise missles, or you can patiently wait until you read the news, as the people of Europe did after appeasing Hitler, to the massive carnage this regime commits after attaining a nuke. No one likes war. i know you think conservatives do. Churchill, who was criticised for warning of Hitler said it best: "if you are not a liberal by the time you are 20, you haven't a heart. If you are not a conservative by the time you are 40, you haven't a brain". Now go back to your parents basement, grow up and face the real world. Oh, and dont forget to brush your teeth before you go to bed. I see those nerd candies in your back pocket. Pinhead.

      January 18, 2012 at 6:15 pm | Reply
      • I don't think so...

        Pinhead? You must be a follower of that O'Reilly clown. Maybe it's time you got your redneck backwardazz head out of your rectal cavity. You and the rest of the right wing robots that listen to your dimwitted heroes on the radio and cable TV make me sick. You are nothing but a bunch of misinformed, reactionary sheep. Perhaps it is YOU who currently resides in Mom's basement(or maybe her bedroom). You are a worthless, spineless, brainless puke. Grow some brains, and if there is anything left in your worthless husk of a body, start growing a pair. You, like your God Limbaugh, never served this country in any way, shape or form, and you are not worthy of claiming its rights or priveleges. Your "facts" are lies you've been fed by the sewer line that is rightwing radio. Do some research of your own, and get off the Neocon teat, moron!

        January 18, 2012 at 6:35 pm |
      • E=MC2

        Wow, lets see where do we begin? I put forward some historical facts and you,, not. It is so easy to call someone a name and leave any semblance of reason on the side. OK, we know you can say some pretty ugly things about people, not state any facts, do not know anything about history and just rant, rant,rant. You must be a liberal! No, I actually have never watched or listened to Rush Limbaugh. I do listen to O'Reilly from time to time on line. And your point? By the way, it was not the Republicans that called for regime change- that was Bill Clinton. Yes, the democrats called for regime change and military action against Iraq first! Bet you forgot, or never heard that before! Well, do yourself a favor and actually look up on You..Tube videos about Clinton and Iraq. There are a lot of videos proving this. I know, it doesn't fit YOUR narrative. To better suit your mind set, I would suggest driving over to your local 7-11 or grocery store and picking up a National Inquierer or Star magazine. I heard they have a great article on how Bush is really Adolph Hitlers nephew and that Rush Limbaugh is actually Bill Maher's twin brother. Wow!!! Now, get off the web and learn before you try to play here with grow ups!

        January 18, 2012 at 10:07 pm |
    • Joshua Ludd

      If Republicans don't want to send our troops to war they sure have a funny way of showing it... with two wars and occupations which follow on the heels of Republicans fighting wars in those same two countries in the 80s and early 90s.

      January 18, 2012 at 6:18 pm | Reply
      • E=MC2

        Why do I feel like I am talking to a bunch of elementary school, the Democrats under Clinton came up with the idea of regime change for Saddam. They also called for military action. Yada, yada, yada...I know, you don't "remember" this. Look at "Clinto and Iraq" and you will see all the news clips. So, no it wasn't the Republicans alone. Sorry to spoli your party, but facts are facts. Yes, I have served in the U.S government, federal level in research. One of my best friends is a career Military Colonel. I knew Reagan's National Security advisor and I have read extensively the history of the Iraq conflict. Why I bothered replying to a narrow minded, mentally challenged individual like you escapes me, but I just can't let individuals like you post nonsense on the web as people will believe your naive opinions.

        January 18, 2012 at 10:13 pm |
  52. Change

    And what did GWB do during the eight years he was in office? Instead of imposing sanctions on Iran, he destabilized the entire region by invading Iraq and even making things worst by subsequently abandoning and prolonging the Afghan war. Now we have to start from scratch trying to bring Iran to the negotiating table.

    January 18, 2012 at 5:50 pm | Reply
    • jamest

      What have or do you do for your country other than complain?

      January 18, 2012 at 5:58 pm | Reply
    • E=MC2

      Oh boy. Another history buff. No, Bush finished a war that was started by Iraq whn IT invaded Kuwait. We kicked them out, they agreed to cease fire terms, they broke the rules, we waited YEARS for compliance and THEN we kicked their tushes. Now, Iraq is free to elect it's leaders, Saddam and his psycotic sons are gone and change occurs. It is always messy, but leads to real change. The Arab spring was partially due to this sea of chnage and peoples are chosing their futures. Again, there will always be a difficult period when change occurs, yet finally people will have the possibility of freedom which you, my dear friend, have. Bush did not attack Iran because we were so engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan. We did, after all, acquiesce to Europes call for depolmacy. Europe failed miserably. No we have forces out of Iraq and the possibility of dealing with Iran. By the way, both CNN and the major networks reported this past fall that Saddam did indeed try to fool the inspectors into believing they had WMD. It was not because he was afraid of the U.S., it was because he was afraid of Iran. Sorry, but this is what the mainstream press, NOT FOX, reported. When someone, who was known to have WMD, continues to behave suspiciously and avoids you, it is completely legitimate to assume he is still hiding something. History, IS provong that Bush was justified in FINALLY attacking Iraq. Oh, by the way, no the U.S. military did not cause 9/11 as I am sure you also believe.

      January 18, 2012 at 6:03 pm | Reply
      • Draft Dodger Newt

        "Arab spring"; the term given to the peoples of the Arab world who turfed out their American appointed and backed oppressors. Iran has every right to hate our meddling guts. Every right.

        January 18, 2012 at 7:07 pm |
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        Iran needs to nuke so we can get the
        shown on the road

        January 18, 2012 at 9:19 pm |
    • E=MC2

      Wow, draft-dodgem Newt- what a reply. One question before I really reply- what have you EVER done for your country? You may disagree with Newt, yet he achieved more than the majority of politicians ever in Washington. He is probably they most successful House leader ever. After 40 years of democratic rule, he brought the Republicans back into power, balanced budgets, reformed welfare and in doing so pissed of A LOT of democrats who vilified him because of that. This is nothing new in Washington. Whenever someone is successful, the opposing party will try to bring them down. No surprise with Newt. Of the 40 odd charges brought against him, all but one was found to be without merit. THE ONE he was found guilty of was teaching a history course! Heaven forbid someone teach!!!! By the way, the congress changed the ethics laws after this whole fiasco because of the frivolous claims made. Now, it is much harder to bring charges against legislators because of this abuse the democrats committed against Gingrich. When you look into factual records, the truth comes out. The liberal media doesn't want to talk about the results of the ethics inquiries, they simply want to bring up the fact that charges were made. Hypocrites.

      January 18, 2012 at 10:21 pm | Reply
      • MN-Soldier


        Please stop with all the BS history lessons. The left and the right wing people are all wrong, youtube is wrong, all the wiki sites are wrong, and half the main stream media is wrong. All I see is people stating their oppinions, an you trying to change their minds with your "history" lessons,Boo Hoo, clinton talked about a change in iraq first, boo hoo, bush screwed up our entire country and half the world. . That is very republican of you. Both sides need to grow up, start working together, and start seeing the big picture. As a Soldier currently deployed origionally to pull the last of the troops out, and now as the "Contingency" plan for Iran, I can say that we don't need another war. My last tour in 2005-2007 was 22 months of hell in Iraq, this tour marked the last time I had to see the dirty streets of Iraq, and worry about an EFP killing me or my battle buddies while we protect a society that wants us dead. The last thing I need is to be extended another year so I can go fight another futal war, lose more friends, and maybe never see my family again. I know what I signed up for, and I will accept any mission that is given to me, but it makes me sick that all you civilians think you know what its like to be shot at, blown up, or kill another person. After 7 years and 3 combat tours, I look and feel like I am 35 (I"m 27), I am tired of fighting, and tired of being away from my family. You people have no grasp on the harsh reality we face on the ground. War isn't easy, and next time you write something, think about the people who are actually here, fighting so you can sit on your couch and bitch about all the worlds problems.

        Very Respectfully,

        – A weary and tired Soldier

        January 19, 2012 at 5:22 am |
  53. jamest

    where is iran located? is it located between a goats knutts and its a$$hole???

    January 18, 2012 at 5:48 pm | Reply
    • War Criminal General Sherman

      Of course you wouldn't know. You're ignorant.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:58 pm | Reply
      • jamest

        lolololololol you type brown.

        January 18, 2012 at 6:03 pm |
      • jamest

        Are you a nand sigger over her in U.S. soil?

        January 18, 2012 at 6:05 pm |
    • Joshua Ludd

      Actually, its located between those other two nations full of poor brown people on the other side of the world we invaded and occupied for having supposedly been some kind of a threat to us despite us having the most powerful army the world has ever known and being on the other side of the world.

      January 18, 2012 at 6:19 pm | Reply
    • Ninoos

      Check your GPS idiot.

      January 19, 2012 at 1:25 am | Reply
  54. E=MC2

    It still amazes me how naive some people are to the Iranian threats. Imagine, if you will, the U.S. going to the UN and declaring that Iran should be wiped off the map and that the Iranian people are pigs. What would the world reaction be? Demonstrations, renouncements, calls for apologies etc etc. There would be no end to the criticism. Yet, Iran did just that when threatening to anihilate Israel. Were there any protests in nations around the world. No, because the world expects that of Iran. So, we basically understand that their leadership is "nuts". We are now faced with a nation that is a net exporter of electricity and of course oil. Iran says it wants nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Why? It doesn't take a rocket scientist or even a greater at Walmart to figure this one out. Yet, we get people here who state that the West just wants another war in the Middle East or against Muslims. Wow! You can go to the U.N. rant on about foulish things, threaten other nations and then the U.S gets bashed. Hmmmmmm...... ever since the hostage crisis, yes they did hold our embassy staff hostage for 444 days, Iran has been a rogue nation. The very idea of them having ANYTHING to do with nuclear technology is a no-no. It's like giving an arsonist a can of gasoline to play with. Wake up people, it is time to deal with Iran once and for all BEFORE thay get a weapon. Once they have one, the game is over. No, I dont think they will launch a nuke, I hope, but they definately will export more terrorism and throw their weight around the Middle East without fear of "regime change". Are we that naive to let that happen? Oh that's right, the West also thought Hitler's build up would not be anything to seriously worry about- that Hitler would not do anything stupid with it. A few million lives lost and they were wrong. There are always trade offs in life. Nothing is easy. We either let Iran have a nuke and everyone of you reading this will pay through the wahoozy for oil, or we stop this rogue regime, further change in the Middle East and assure energy supply. yes, it is about oil because of you, me and everyone else. The big oil companies like higher prices, so it IS NOT them. The average consumer pays more, the economy suffers, people loose jobs and everything feels the effect. it is the real world people. This is reality, not Utopia. The time to confrot Iran with a final offer is now and if they dont take it, remove the threat and bomb the heck out of them.

    January 18, 2012 at 5:44 pm | Reply
    • UShaslostITSmind

      The only Hitler and Nazi like kingdom we see is the Nation of Israel and US.
      Once in a while try to take a trip outside of US/Israel. Idiot!

      January 18, 2012 at 5:49 pm | Reply
      • jamest

        lol you are funny Iran was not a hate nation until hitler sent his ambasador over there to what was the persian gulf back then Iran stinks of hitler wipe them off the map men wemon children and animals

        January 18, 2012 at 5:57 pm |
    • E=MC2

      I'll make a deal, the day after you actually read a book about history, THEN I will agree to visit the "world" idjit. Pinheads like you make statements with no facts and all are supposed to listen to you. Grow up, read some history, stop watching TV and move out of your parents house. then we can talk. otherwise....shut up.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:53 pm | Reply
      • UShaslostITSmind

        I already live outta US. Go away, trash, crawl back in your kibbutz. How may Palestinian babies did u kill last nite?

        January 18, 2012 at 5:56 pm |
      • J. Edgar Hoover: Flaming Homo

        You're not educated, you're brainwashed.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:57 pm |
    • Draft Dodger Newt

      Anything from Israels mouthpiece, The New York Times, is to be taken with a large grain of salt.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:55 pm | Reply
      • Iranacockuptheirass

        May 8000 camel jockeys / sandniggers work in your salt mines until there cock over runith

        January 18, 2012 at 9:48 pm |
    • svann

      He didnt say Israel should be wiped off the map, he said that God would wipe them off. If you dont think that changes the meaning then why do you keep misquoting it?

      January 18, 2012 at 6:01 pm | Reply
    • Joshua Ludd

      Imagine if you will Iran overthrowing the democratically elected government of the US to reinstall a monarch for their own benefit then backing Canada in a war against the US once a revolution overthrows that dictator. Then imagine Iran invading the Canada and Mexico and occupying both for years while spending a decade threatening and sabre rattling towards the US.
      As for Israel, they have their own nuclear weapons and they have not only threatened as much or more than Iran, but have also actually started wars with other nations many times over the last 50 years.. unlike Iran.

      January 18, 2012 at 6:24 pm | Reply
  55. Change

    How bout Ghettysburgh you mingy graycoat?

    January 18, 2012 at 5:30 pm | Reply
  56. Misled

    John Boehner said President Obama is weak for the way in which he is handling this conflict with Iran. Perhaps that explains why John Boehner is always crying. Its a sign of weakness!

    January 18, 2012 at 5:26 pm | Reply
    • E=MC2

      Brilliant logic Einstein. Obama is a our commander in vacation mode. Obama stretched out his hand to Iran and was slapped. the Iranians have a VERY strong pride in their culture and feel others are inferior. Every time we offer them something, like North Korea, they simply want more. That worked in NK didn't it? Now, Obama is at the tipping point and the international community knows it. The weakness of this President spills out. The Iranians know that this is the monet to make the plunge and go for it. Obama is too weak and they understand that a real President with guts may move into the White House next year.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:50 pm | Reply
      • Joshua Ludd

        Actually, that would be Bush... who set a new record for vacations taken and went on vacation to his toy ranch after he took office, and after he declared war.. both times. What do you want Obama to do? We can't go into yet another war at this point. It would break us financially and it would require a draft... so unless you want to go fight in Iran to defend Israel from an unrealistic threat from a country that may or may not be developing WMD (again) that hasn't attacked anyone else in centuries you might want to think it over a bit more.

        January 18, 2012 at 6:28 pm |
      • War Criminal General Sherman

        Joshua, chickenhawks like E=MC2 love to watch others pay the price for their truculence. If we are plunged into a war with Iran, rest assured that he and his godforsaken ilk will be as far, far away as they can possibly be.

        January 18, 2012 at 6:59 pm |
      • Free Bradley Manning

        A real president with guts: you mean Ron Paul? Because in the entire political spectrum, he's the only one who has a pair.

        January 18, 2012 at 7:02 pm |
  57. Change

    @Tom Long Beach CA

    I hope you realize that you're the foreigner in CA. Go back to your red mother fuc*king confederate state.

    January 18, 2012 at 5:08 pm | Reply
    • Tom, Long Beach, California

      name the spot to meet LOSER

      January 18, 2012 at 5:24 pm | Reply
      • jamest

        lol kids

        January 18, 2012 at 5:42 pm |
      • John Wayne Was A Faggot

        Wear a dress, Change. Tom really hates women, and as such will be easy to defeat as his own blind rage will work against him.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:44 pm |
  58. nik green

    Furthermore, we already know that Steven Erlanger of the New York Times LIED to the NYT readership (and the American people in general) when he fabricated elements in an IAEA report on Iran's nuclear program.

    January 18, 2012 at 5:07 pm | Reply
    • John

      He should be in prison.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:11 pm | Reply
    • Yakobi

      That presupposes anyone reads or pays attention to the NYT.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:13 pm | Reply
    • hmmmm

      Steve Erlanger, a Jew I presume? Ofcourse, he is going to make US go to war for Israel!

      January 18, 2012 at 5:15 pm | Reply
      • jamest


        January 18, 2012 at 5:43 pm |
  59. nik green

    This is not possible. Panetta's stance is bogus; he knows exactly what the deal is... he is trying to promote some kind of "moral high ground", when he *knows* that war with Iran is an absolute certainty. The hardliners in Israel, the US/UK military industrial complex, the ranks of paranoid Islamophobes and the neocon cartel behind DC foreign policy (and the Obama Administration) REQUIRE another major conflict, and NO amount of diplomacy, real or imaginary, is going to prevent it.

    January 18, 2012 at 5:02 pm | Reply
    • Yakobi

      One can only hope. Getting rid of the Ayatollahs in Iran once and for all will finally bring peace to the region.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:10 pm | Reply
      • SheryllLk

        Where do you live, yacoub? Do you have any sense in you? Attack on Iran will only make them more nationalistic and one.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:13 pm |
      • Joshua Ludd

        Yeah, because its been Iran not Israel or the US that has been starting war after war in the region.

        January 18, 2012 at 6:30 pm |
    • Yakobi

      You speak for all Iranians? They BEGGED us for assistance when they were marching in the streets protesting A-jad and we turned them down. Plenty of Iraqis welcomed us when we went in to take out Hussein; plenty of Iranians would welcome getting rid of the Ayatollahs.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:21 pm | Reply
      • hmmmm

        this is a differeent war! no need to attack Iran. Iran has done nothing to US. We will be fighting a war on behalf of Israehell. plain and simple.

        we toppled Iranian leader to implement our puppet the Shah there. We corrupted that country and its US's fault. So don't blame Iran.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:24 pm |
      • jamest

        i like, i like, i hope they will stone them with reefer weed.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:45 pm |
      • jamest

        hmmmmmmmmm, go live there and love it.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:46 pm |
    • Joe Daigle

      In case you haven't noticed, it was George Bush that started the last two wars we were involved in and his father made the decision to go to war the time before that. Neither Obama, both retardicans. I mean republicans. Get a clue. A war with Iran would be the last thing the administration wants, or any other country except for Israel. The entire globe would end up in a funk and at the end of the day its another war where we could likely destroy most of their military hardware within weeks and all the cowards would do is take off their military uniforms and bomb the crap out of their own people at the chance of maybe killing an American or two. Though I suspect it would be mainly an air campaign if war were to escalate between our countries.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:32 pm | Reply
      • Yakobi

        In case you hadn't noticed, Clinton DIDN'T go to war against al Qaeda when they attacked us multiple times on his watch; GWB fixed that. Carter DIDN'T go to war against Iran when Iran committed an act of war by taking our embassy staff hostage and we're still dealing with the repercussions of his inaction, as is the entire Middle East. So YOU get a clue.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:40 pm |
  60. Ryan

    I wonder if Boehner would have said the same to Kennedy when Khrushchev parked a bunch of missiles in Cuba? Interestingly enough, Iran poses no immediate threat to the United States as they do not have any missiles that could carry a reasonable payload out of the Middle East let alone the 6000 miles to the northeast United States. While they could potentially hit Israel, that would be really stupid on their part considering Israel has 300 nuclear warheads.

    January 18, 2012 at 5:00 pm | Reply
    • Yakobi

      Well, you're wrong one two accounts: 1) Iran wouldn't need to attach a nuclear bomb to a missle to threaten us, they would merely need to sell it to a group of terrorists willing to use it. 2) Iran poses a threat to the flow of oil out of the middle east because they can disrupt shipping through the Straight of Hormuz.

      Besides, the Bush Doctrine states we should not wait for an enemy to attack us before we act (I just threw that in because I'm sure it would p!ss you off).

      January 18, 2012 at 5:18 pm | Reply
      • Ryan

        1) That is still suicidal for Iran. If such a device were detonated, the radioactive material can be quickly traced backed to the facility it was produced, and then we would quickly be able to destroy whatever nation supplied the device.
        2) First, if they cut the supply of oil, we can cut their supply of gasoline, so this would also be a stupid move. Lets say they did that though, the cost of a war with Iran would most likely far exceed the rise in oil prices from a smaller source of oil. The economics of it dont make sense. In the medium term, the Saudis would probably find it beneficial to boost pipeline capacity into the Red Sea.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:30 pm |
  61. joel

    i belived INDIA is more dangrous then IRAN ,india did,n get long with their surrouding ,PAKISTAN,CHINA,BANGLADESH,BURMA.AND SIRI LANKA almost 1.6 billion people lived in dangrous why the world ,ignoring this matter if you are best friend with RUSSIA you are never be friend with USA .if pakistan have problem ,inida has problem to.

    January 18, 2012 at 5:00 pm | Reply
    • John Wayne Was A Faggot

      Careful, common sense tends to piss people off.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:22 pm | Reply
  62. usaf2

    We can trust the Persians way more than the Scummmmmbagggg Saudis for sure

    January 18, 2012 at 4:56 pm | Reply
  63. Change

    The problem is not so much the republicans we have in office but the incompetent rightwing racist mother fuc*king a-holes who keep electing these mother fuc*kers to office. I just wonder why when the terrorists attack us, they don't leave our civilized blue states alone and instead attack these backward red mother fuc*king confederates states and teach them a fuc*king lesson for a fuc*king change.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:53 pm | Reply
    • sielingfan

      u mad bro?

      January 18, 2012 at 4:57 pm | Reply
    • keven77

      Yeah, 'cuz that's a pretty sober-minded and unbiased analysis.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:58 pm | Reply
      • Frank Tillery

        Well said. He seems pretty upset about something.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:08 pm |
    • Happy Pappy

      is something troubling you?

      January 18, 2012 at 5:00 pm | Reply
    • Jim-Bob

      FUC*K YEAH!

      January 18, 2012 at 5:03 pm | Reply
    • Tom, Long Beach, California

      good name "Change" I hope its worked out for you better than the BS lies we were fed by the blue state idiot in the White House.......

      January 18, 2012 at 5:04 pm | Reply
    • Yakobi

      They attack us when they know they can get away with it. When you have a weak sister like Clinton or Carter running the country, every pissant dicatator looks to walk all over us.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:07 pm | Reply
      • wittynotes

        Are you ready to send in your kids, brothers, or sisters, or go in by yourself?

        January 18, 2012 at 5:33 pm |
      • Yakobi

        I already did my time. Now it's your turn.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:41 pm |
  64. hawken

    Talking is always a good idea.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:53 pm | Reply
  65. RdyStdyGO

    The US Should strike, with a tactical weapon that will deliver surgical accuracy to targets of interest. Disclaimer... all efforts to shield and protect loss of life of peace loving Irainian national should be maintained. Lack of "real" action not talk will only involve devestating consequences and there will be no disclaimer from their side... none.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:51 pm | Reply
    • SheryllLk

      Sure – we have seen how "tactical and surgical" strikes have worked out in Iraq and Afghanistan. Please dont post here. You make US all look stupid.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:56 pm | Reply
      • Tom, Long Beach, California

        no one has to make you look stupid, you have that achieved long ago

        January 18, 2012 at 5:07 pm |
  66. SheryllLk

    Ok fellas, time to send out your kids to war..... off to war you go to ... to fight .... to fight in the name of Israel....

    January 18, 2012 at 4:48 pm | Reply
    • ChickenShitHawk

      Not my kids. I have money and connections. Oh, wait – that only works in a draft.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:06 pm | Reply
  67. RdyStdyGO

    We should offer to help them with their nuclear "weapons" program by demonstrating the use of already developed "preemptive" tools. A tactical weapon could render surgical precision to factions that don't want to play ball. Disclaimer... all measures to avoid or lessen the impact on the general peace loving populace should be takeen for sure. But make no mistake, in-action will involve devestating consequences if they can come to fruition with a weapon. There will be no "disclaimer" in how their weapon is deployed...

    January 18, 2012 at 4:46 pm | Reply
  68. John

    First of all this should be the last term for "The top Republican in the House, Chairman John Boehner, R-OH, ,, if that is mental state of the man then it is time to clean the house of war mongers who think that in a civil society you dont talk to your enemies. I'm so sick and tired of these politicians who send your kids to go fight senseless wars while their kids are smoking pot on college campuses. Americans had a meathead like Boener for 8 years and it set back the nation 20 years,, it'll take 4 Obamas to recover from that mess created.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:43 pm | Reply
    • Yakobi

      Yeah? Well _I'm_ sick of namby-pambies like YOU who think wishful thikning and good intentions will magically transform evil, unstable regimes into peaceful states that don't threaten their neighbors. Threats without any sort of deterrent are hollow. Dictators and little kids know it, why don't you?

      January 18, 2012 at 5:06 pm | Reply
      • J. Edgar Hoover: Flaming Homo

        Yeah, well I'm sick of chickhawk scumbags such as yourself. You and your inbred offspring can go serve as cannon fodder for absolutely nothing. No loss there.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:10 pm |
      • Yakobi

        What are you, like 12? Do you parents know you're using the computer?

        January 18, 2012 at 5:12 pm |
      • John Wayne Was A Faggot

        Ooooohhhh.....good one, Yogi. Seriously, that the best you can do? "12-year-old-on-moms-computer"; the standard internet retort of the imaginatively challenged the world over.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:29 pm |
      • Yakobi

        I guess "imaginative" to you means coming up with such clever handles. Go get your homework done before dinner.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:45 pm |
    • Tom, Long Beach, California

      sure you would MORON

      January 18, 2012 at 5:09 pm | Reply
  69. Yours Truly


    Your mamma has AIDS!

    January 18, 2012 at 4:42 pm | Reply
  70. #$%^&*

    What about Israel? Will it give up 200+ nukes and WMDs. ?

    Noooooo, who has guts to ask the Jews? The Jews have US by our balls.... and they squeeze them real tight when it comes to Israhell.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:41 pm | Reply
    • jamest

      they may have you by the balls lil boy, not us real men..

      January 18, 2012 at 5:53 pm | Reply
  71. Flipper

    Iran has negotiated with Western powers over their nuclear program (can you say E-3?), making promises, and then pulling back on them. This enabled Iran more time to develop their nuclear program. This is their strategy. Promise to talk, listen to proposals, pledge to follow them, and then at the last second pull out of the agreement. Nothing is accomplished b/c Iran only uses these negotiations to stall for time.

    Now why would Panetta, a man I respect, ever think that sit-down talks with Iran would actually accomplish something? Look how well talks went with North Korea. It's folly to think Iran wants to resolve tensions with the US.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:39 pm | Reply
    • Annie Rand

      Right on, Flipper! You are so Right, war, not diplomacy is the only answer in the Middle East! Just so long as it's only Americans who do the dieing and not Israelis...

      January 18, 2012 at 4:45 pm | Reply
      • Flipper

        I never said war was the only answer...but feel free to put more words in my mouth that I didn't say and then base your ignorant, snarky response on that.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:03 pm |
      • Tom, Long Beach, California

        Hi Annie.....idiot thinking like yours will get us that "Change"?

        January 18, 2012 at 5:13 pm |
  72. Chris Bird

    Boehner says diplomacy with Iran makes us look weak? Well, if he wants to fight them so bad he can always pick up a weapon instead of hiding behind his desk.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:33 pm | Reply
    • J. Edgar Hoover: Flaming Homo

      It's not the chicken-hawk way. Never has been. Never will be.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:37 pm | Reply
  73. whataworld

    Boehner ......says on Wednesday it makes America "look weak."

    Yea' and we look very brave when we carpet bomb poor villagers and peasants from 20.000 feet above in air. And we call ourselves "land of free and brave" .... ha ha ha

    January 18, 2012 at 4:27 pm | Reply
    • Flipper

      Well the Allies did that during World War II. Were we jag-offs back then too?

      January 18, 2012 at 4:33 pm | Reply
      • ustupid US

        U punks have a wish to pay $20/gallon at the gas pump. ofcourse, US doesn't care for innocent loss of live. u guys are cowards. bomb from high up in air, mostly innocent people.

        IRAN has done no harm to America as a country! US has brought the MILITANT AMERICA to the Muslim world..

        January 18, 2012 at 4:37 pm |
      • Flipper

        Well "ustupid" is definitely living up to his name.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:41 pm |
      • J. Edgar Hoover: Flaming Homo

        In all honesty, I'd have to say yes (with the benefit of hindsight, of course), in that it resulted in horrific losses on the civilian population. That said, The Nazi bombings of Warsaw, London, Coventry, Rotterdam pretty much set the stage for a complete and total reciprocity of hate. Let's not forget either, that the fledgling Luftwaffe cut their teeth bombing Guernica.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:48 pm |
      • doofus

        you don't actually believe that, do you?

        January 18, 2012 at 4:55 pm |
      • ConcernedNetizen

        Let us not forget, all those war pictures of firebombed civilian cities in Europe. If the walls were still standing, and the roof gone.. it was a firebombing. Granted Germany firebombed as well... but on 100th the scale. Most of Europe's civilian casualties were caused by allied use of firebombs. War is an interesting tool for politicians, and a nightmare for citizens.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:01 pm |
      • Tom, Long Beach, California

        yes, he(?) and his inbred relatives want to live under Sharia law someday......I know, they won't get it

        January 18, 2012 at 5:18 pm |
      • jamest

        ustupid US you is da stupid one..

        January 18, 2012 at 5:54 pm |
  74. yup

    Wow...first the Taliban, now Iran.....who is winning this war on terror. I can hear Obama....should I get on my knees too. Thatletter was a big smack in the face to us all.....thought we didnt negotiate with this element. Iran has a high level of dilusion and will claim this a victory of historic proportions, hes right, the US folded and dropped there draws and is ready to take it up the pooper....

    January 18, 2012 at 4:25 pm | Reply
    • sayer

      The japanese attacked us and now we are friends. Did we take it up the pooper when we decided to talk to them?

      January 18, 2012 at 5:06 pm | Reply
      • War Criminal General Sherman

        Yup takes it up the pooper as he talks to all the pretty little fairies while he's high on meth.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:13 pm |
  75. KyleGlobal

    I wonder how many people wanting to attack Iran even know that we caused all this mess in the first place by the US overthrowing the democratically elected government of Iran in the 1950s and replacing it with a dictatorship friendly to the US. Of course, people tend to resent dictatorships imposed upon them by foreigners and Iranians were no different. They overthrew their US sponsored dictatorship and the world ended up because of that with the theocratic dictatorship of modern Iran. The US has a lot of responsibility in this current mess.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:17 pm | Reply
    • Nate Higgers

      Geez, the next thing you're going to say is that the MASSAD and the CIA have been conducting terrorist attacks inside Iran killing their scientists and army generals in order to provoke them into war. (insert sarcastic eye roll)

      January 18, 2012 at 4:21 pm | Reply
      • svann

        Not sure which direction the sarcasm is pointed but kyleglobal is 100% correct.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:25 pm |
      • HelpingHand

        Your sarcasm meter is broken.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:28 pm |
      • Nate Higgers

        You need to go back to sarcasm school.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:28 pm |
      • Tom, Long Beach, California

        Nate..........did you finish your PHD in bigotry yet.........nice name fool

        January 18, 2012 at 5:22 pm |
    • mipolitic

      the mess is yet to come . be sure this is not going to go away until it is removed.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:25 pm | Reply
    • J. Edgar Hoover: Flaming Homo

      That's enough common sense from you, young man. Now go to your room.................and wait for me.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:34 pm | Reply
  76. svann

    If you think talk makes you look weak then you ARE weak. And if you make that statement in public then you are even weaker.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:17 pm | Reply
    • KyleGlobal

      His comment makes me think of a man who beats his wife to make himself not "look weak."

      January 18, 2012 at 4:19 pm | Reply
  77. mipolitic

    iran has been in talks with usa for many years, terror attacks against usa interest and assests including attacks on usa troops in iraq and afghanistan , this is how iran has been communicating with the states for decades. time to give iran a final answer. may be obama does not read his mail. i wish obama gets re-elected as long as he leads firmly.

    January 18, 2012 at 4:15 pm | Reply
    • ustupid US

      you went to their lands, idiot American!

      January 18, 2012 at 4:29 pm | Reply
  78. bob


    January 18, 2012 at 4:15 pm | Reply
  79. Dave (aka "Peaches")

    "The U.S. recently sent a letter to Iran warning about blocking the Strait of Hormuz, among other communications, CNN reported earlier this week. The United States has suggested to Iran that the two sides establish a channel of direct communication to ensure miscalculations don't escalate."

    I don't know if the U.S. ADMINISTRATION is aware of this, but the U.S. ADMINISTRATION's attempt to escalate sanctions against Iran that effect it's oil exports and other nations ability to import that oil - IS DIRECT COMMUNICATION.

    And and enormously ARROGANT miscalculation. Does the U.S. administration understand English or arrogant threats and posturing like sanctions to force countries to bend-over backwards and acknowledge ARROGANT U.S. catering of Israeli interests and FORCING U.S. taxpayers to pay for this?

    January 18, 2012 at 4:14 pm | Reply
    • Nate Higgers

      There's always one smart person who is not asleep and understands exactly what is going on. Why can't you just be a mindless sheeple idiot like everyone else? Aren't you concerned about Tebow or the Kardashians or Jersey Shore? You know...things far more important than reality? Dude....come on.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:17 pm | Reply
      • jdcamb

        Surely there must be some level of moderation here? Seeing as the Handle Nate Higgers is a blatantly racist and the corresponding diatribe he spews aliigns nicely with that of a meathaed racist. We all can see exactly what is wrong with our country/society....

        January 18, 2012 at 4:50 pm |
    • Mendoza

      US doesn't have an embassy in Iran. Communication is done through a third party.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:18 pm | Reply
  80. KyleGlobal

    From the article: "The top Republican in the House, Chairman John Boehner, R-OH, criticized any administration effort to talk with Iran, saying on Wednesday it makes America 'look weak.'"

    The truly strong don't have to worry about communication making them look "weak". It's unfortunate that Mr. Boehner seems to think the US is weak and needs to act like a bully to "prove" that it is not. The US is by far the world's strongest power. Those with greater minds than Boehner's can see that discussion does not make one "look weak."

    January 18, 2012 at 4:12 pm | Reply
  81. Nate Higgers

    I'm converting to Islam right now so they won't want to kill me. Wa-li-li-li-li-li-li-li!

    January 18, 2012 at 4:08 pm | Reply
    • Jim-Bob

      Don't forget to slice the clit off your 8 year old daughter with a piece of broken glass. Wa-li-li-li-li-li-li.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:17 pm | Reply
      • HelpingHand

        You clearly missed the joke. Also, female circumcision is only still practiced in tribal Africa, which has nothing to do with Islam.

        Just giving you a helping hand in understanding the world around you.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:30 pm |
    • usaf2

      Hey You Nate Higgers!! just FYI 99% of Persians are not practicing any kind of religion, they love to drink wine Vodka and Party!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      January 18, 2012 at 5:14 pm | Reply
      • peres

        You stupid iranian.Party in Iran maybe with a goat.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:43 pm |
  82. chill

    If Boehner thinks talking to your adversaries show weakness, then maybe he should shut up. What's he afraid of?

    January 18, 2012 at 4:04 pm | Reply
    • Pvt Eddie Slovak

      He's just another chicken shit chickenhawk who has no problem sending other people's kids off to die in order to compensate for his own inability to get it up with anyone other than teen-age male prostitutes.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:20 pm | Reply
  83. Dave (aka "Peaches")

    "While diplomacy is an option, Panetta noted that, given threats made by Iran, the US is also willing to respond militarily."

    First of all - it's ALWAYS the U.S. administration, not the United States that responds militarily. ALFREAKINGWAYS.\

    It's NEVER the United States, or even the United States government - unless this is specifically authorized through our representatives - that responds militarily.

    So get that FREAKING right - Ok. NEVER DO THIS AGAIN CNN. We live in a representative democracy. Not a communist hivemind.

    Are you clear on that you propagandist fascist corruptor of the free press?

    January 18, 2012 at 4:01 pm | Reply
    • jimmy

      I think you need some anger management

      January 18, 2012 at 4:18 pm | Reply
    • jdcamb

      Only the wealthy can afford our brand of democracy. The rest of us just pay for it.. Some of us with our lives. Nobody returning from Iraq or Afghanistan believes that they fought for our democracy.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:57 pm | Reply
  84. svann

    Talking to your enemies may not always help, but not talking NEVER helps.

    January 18, 2012 at 3:58 pm | Reply
  85. Mat Fortier

    Racism and hate won't get you no where...
    I'm sure that there a diplomatic way to resolve this issue. At least, we must try very hard to do so. War should be the last solution to adopt.
    I do think that Iran should come clean and show to the world they are not developing any Nuclear weapon... if it's for a civilian purpose (hospital and energy) the choice is theirs, not the US.

    January 18, 2012 at 3:54 pm | Reply
  86. pugsly

    kill now, talk later

    January 18, 2012 at 3:54 pm | Reply
    • Mat Fortier

      And what kind of a reputation will it leave for the US? I believe this is more complicated than to kill now...

      January 18, 2012 at 4:00 pm | Reply
    • dorothy

      As absurd as your statement is, it captures perfectly Obama's current Iran policy. We or our Israeli friends (with our help) are actively assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists and scholars inside Iran on their home turf. Any talk about diplomacy is cheap when everyday you've got more blood on your hands.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:18 pm | Reply
    • peres

      Bomb Iran.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:45 pm | Reply
  87. JOE

    @ Ed sr of Dallas Tx

    And the GOP's solution?

    January 18, 2012 at 3:53 pm | Reply
  88. Ed Sr of Dallas Tx

    Panetta is a liar as is most of the Obama cabinet. They make diplomatic mistakes and then ask for tolerance and talks? This administration is a joke!

    January 18, 2012 at 3:50 pm | Reply
    • Bradley Manning: Hero

      And the previous administration wasn't? I didn't see Osama go down under chickenhawk Dubya.

      January 18, 2012 at 3:58 pm | Reply
  89. Jimbo

    If we go to war with Iran it will just breed a new generation of islamic monkeys that will want to blow us up in retiliation for years to come.

    January 18, 2012 at 3:50 pm | Reply
    • Bradley Manning: Hero

      Unlike all the monkey's in this country who want to blow up the Mid-East for years to come, right? Same shit, different pile.

      January 18, 2012 at 4:00 pm | Reply
    • Duane - St. Pete FLA

      yeah Jimmbo, just when they are starting to warm up to huh?

      January 18, 2012 at 4:00 pm | Reply
  90. MMallon

    This is absurd. The diplomacy being offered to Iran here is the same that was dangled in front of Saddam's nose prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. "Come clean about your nuclear program and demonstrate you don't have military intent." Well, how exactly do they do that? They can let all the inspectors in the world into their country to see the centrifuges but everyone has already made up their minds about whether or not the Ayatollah wants a bomb. And if you are convinced they are working toward a functional atomic weapon or already have one, and demand to see the evidence, what if they don't show it to us because it doesn't exist? Does this sound familiar?

    January 18, 2012 at 3:50 pm | Reply
    • Nate Higgers

      Are you implying that American elitists and special interest groups make up such pretexts for war? Why *GASP*...that almost sounds like a conspiracy nut. We've never engaged in such behavior before. (The Maine, Lusitania, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty, 9/11, WMD) .........

      January 18, 2012 at 3:59 pm | Reply
  91. Brad76

    Thank the good lord! Pray for peace everyone!

    January 18, 2012 at 3:48 pm | Reply
    • Duane

      Yes we all hope for peace but Iran's actions suggest they will push for war.....sadly they want to try and take on the big kid on the block in hopes others will join in Jihad. It didn't work with Hussein so I do not understand why they feel it will be any different

      January 18, 2012 at 3:51 pm | Reply
      • HelpingHand

        Other than the attack on the US with 9/11 (which was committed by *Saudi* terrorists) Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Iran have never instigated nor wanted a war. Iran is only pushing it's political and geographical advantage to get the US to ease up. They have Hormuz by the balls, that causes gas prices to rise considerably. Iran doesn't want a war, but putting gas prices at an all time high will get the US to back up a bit... hopefully. It's either that or the US attacks first.

        Just giving you a helping hand in understanding the world around you.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:37 pm |
  92. JOE

    Although we cannot trust Iran, we could be underestimating them by saying they won't come to the negotiating table. But I don't think tough sanctions would work if we imposed them and just sit back and wait for Iran to respond. We must act like the adult in the room, work and work Iran diplomatically until they eventually give in. Furthermore, I don't think we have to humiliate them while trying to come to a resolution. After sanctions, the best option would be to demonstrate to Iran that we are still willing to come to a peaceful accord. I believe the bullying days of GWB are over. And that approach doesn't work anyway.

    January 18, 2012 at 3:45 pm | Reply
    • Carlin123

      I think your right. I would rather be friends with Iran than enemies.

      January 18, 2012 at 3:48 pm | Reply
    • Nate Higgers

      War with Iran would be bad for everyone. Russia and China won't sit by silently.

      January 18, 2012 at 3:54 pm | Reply
      • Bradley Manning: Hero

        Our 4000+ dead in 10 years of aggression will become 4000 dead per week.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:02 pm |
  93. Duane - St. Pete FLA

    hummmm...the libs will grab a hold of this just like Chamberlin did in 1939 when after a visit to Germany he declared......"peace in our time"......just before Hilter attacked Poland and plunged the world into World War II. Iran has no intention of stopping the quest for nukes....while our rookie Pres Obama and his crew chat them up (with all the main stream media wetting themselves that Obama will save the world) Iran will continue to build a bomb. We are in big trouble when they do.....think things in the middle east cant get worse??? wait and see............

    January 18, 2012 at 3:37 pm | Reply
    • Carlin123

      Even if they get a nuclear weapon there is nothing they can do to us. If we wanted Iran gone , POOF Iran would be gone. America is the 1800 lb gorilla in the room. Don't you know that?

      January 18, 2012 at 3:41 pm | Reply
      • John Wayne Was A Faggot

        Ball less chickenhawk bravado from a morbidly obese fuck-tard who screws little animals.

        January 18, 2012 at 3:53 pm |
      • Duane - St. Pete FLA

        John Wayne Lover......they would love you in Iran lover

        January 18, 2012 at 4:03 pm |
      • Pvt Eddie Slovak

        Gorilla's like to thump their chests and eat bananas. Americans like to thump their chests and eat deep-fried lard.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:12 pm |
      • John Wayne Was A Faggot

        Duane, they would ride me like I rode Montgomery Clift in 'Red River'.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:14 pm |
      • Reg

        Maybe for the next decade....two, MAYBE. China will surpass the US, and Russia is re-building and re-modernizing.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:30 pm |
    • Duane - St. Pete FLA

      we sure are the 800lb gorilla.....and yes, poof they would be gone. what's your point? I was on a small five man nuke team in the service and there are nukes out there that are small and can be given to ANY terrorist group they want to do their bidding. one nuke, just one could devastate an entire city. So we destroy them what....still hundreds of thousands effected (killed or sick) here in the USA, you’re ok with that? You have no clue.......we cannot let them build these weapons……..

      January 18, 2012 at 3:58 pm | Reply
  94. john

    We should just surrender to them....

    January 18, 2012 at 3:37 pm | Reply
  95. Carlin123

    It's about F**ing time!

    January 18, 2012 at 3:36 pm | Reply
    • Flipper

      I wonder how many Europeans said the same thing when Chamberlain sat down with Herr Hitler and Mussolini at the Munich Conferences in 1938? That resulted in a "peace agreement" that lasted all of seven months.

      January 18, 2012 at 5:01 pm | Reply
  96. JOE

    The GOP is hoping that the Obama administration comes to a speedy resolution and ends this conflict withIranwith the hopes they would regain the White House and have less foreign unrest to deal with. But the reality is this administration didn't improve our trust and credibility abroad for the GOP to get in the White House and F-up things once more. Likewise, this adminsitration didn't end the Iraqi war to make roon for another GOP sponsored war. And I'm confident that with the Obama administration calling the shots in 2012 it is very likely that this conflict would get resolved peacefully. That is without inteference like what the GOP displayed during the Libyan conflict.

    January 18, 2012 at 3:35 pm | Reply
    • Steve

      You need to save up and go buy a clue, we are Iran's sworn enemy, do you understand that that means? These are people that regularly kill, maim and torture their own citizens. The conflict with the US is one of the means they use to maintain their grip on power. What Iran is thinking is simple; we have gotten the Americans to back down, now is the time to strike. Did you know that the Mexico has found evidence that the Iranians are in contact with the drug smuggling gangs in that country? Aren't you wondered why it is suddenly the Mexican gangs are so bold? Iran has the means to bring a war to our doorstep, this is a strategic advantage they did not have before, do you believe they will just let that go?

      January 18, 2012 at 4:01 pm | Reply
      • John Wayne Was A Faggot

        North Korea, Russia, China, India, Belarus, Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, for starters, regularly kill, maim and torture their citizens. Guess we better go after them as well – no need to be selective, right?

        January 18, 2012 at 4:27 pm |
      • Flipper

        You conveniently forgot Libya, John Wayne. No need for the US to go in there, right?

        January 18, 2012 at 4:57 pm |
      • John Wayne Was A Faggot

        No, Flipper, there wasn't. NATO didn't get involved because of civilian mistreatment. NATO got involved because of oil.

        January 18, 2012 at 5:18 pm |
  97. DeeNYC

    it would be nice but islam isn't capable of diplomacy. they only know death and destruction. civility and islam don't mix.

    January 18, 2012 at 3:28 pm | Reply
    • alex J

      Do you know anything about Islam to make such stupid coment?

      January 18, 2012 at 3:35 pm | Reply
      • Duane - St. Pete FLA

        I agree with Dee in NY.....they hate us and our way of life.

        January 18, 2012 at 3:40 pm |
    • Ruaracist

      Go find some help! You are full of hate!

      January 18, 2012 at 3:42 pm | Reply
    • Bradley Manning: Hero

      Speaking of not mixing – neither does intelligence with GOP evangelical war-loving chickenhawks. Still waiting for big, bad, scary Iran to assassinate people on foreign soil, to send drones into villages, killing and maiming many in the hopes of hitting their 'target', to occupy and subjugate and brutalize the citizens of sovereign states for 10 years. As for their developing nuclear capability, Ahmadinutjob's empty rhetoric is nothing more than false bravado. His masters aren't insane – they're fully cognizant that launching such an attack would constitute suicide. I would worry more about countries that already possess the bomb; North Korea, Pakistan and India. I would worry more about an American political party which does more to fan the flames of war in the name of the 'peace' than anything.

      January 18, 2012 at 3:48 pm | Reply
      • fred

        no shame in fearing a country seeking nuclear weapons that glorifies death, especially suicide, on the basis of religion. Your argument is "apples and oranges" when you compare iran to any of the countries you mention and therefore is specious.

        January 18, 2012 at 7:39 pm |
    • Steve

      DeeNYC, is this based on your vast knowledge of Islamic culture?

      January 18, 2012 at 3:55 pm | Reply
    • Jewl

      US has diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, and Pakistan to name a few fanatic countries. Iran is not a fanatic country and if we had good relations with them, we would not hear so many negative news and you would think they are cool!

      January 18, 2012 at 3:56 pm | Reply
      • Ruaracist

        Followers can't comprehend the fact that if Iran was suicidal, their society would not have lasted some 5000 years. They automatically feed on the stratigic negative news and assume Iran is fanatic stemming from the hostage crises of the late 70's, yet I bet 99% of them don't even realize the fact that the hostages were taken after the US refused to return the billions of dollars that the late shah (a western appointed dicatator) had transfered out of Iran before fleeing.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:13 pm |
      • Flipper

        So by not returning billions of dollars to an new, extreme Islamic fascist state that hates out guts, they had the right to march onto US soil and take US citizens hostage? Really?

        BTW, Iran has not lasted 5,000 years. The civilizations that occupied what is now Iran have varied and evolved. Before 1979, Iran was not some Islamo-fascist terror state that brutalized its people and sought to obtain nuclear weapons so it could incinerate Israel and start a second Holocaust. But now it is and you're befuddled on how to deal with it. Their leaders aren't Westerners like you and me. They think very differently.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:54 pm |
      • ruaracist

        Flipper, you are arguing a point based on emotions thus your facts are completely wrong. (Maybe you are a paid blogger tasked with promoting Iranophobia, but I doubt it as I think you are just another poorly infomred emotional patriot) Iran (which means the land of the Arian) was named in 1935 when the british broke up Persia and created countries like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Afghanestan. Kwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Israel, United Arab Emirates where created later after WWII. There is a community of 25000 jews living in Tehran alone, all of whom have refused Israel's offer of $10,000 per person to relocate to Israel. Do you speak persian or are you aruging things based on what you've heard and read without considering who owns/supports the publishers that are feeding such content to the masses?

        January 18, 2012 at 6:09 pm |
  98. John Wayne Was A Faggot

    Diplomacy! What a novel concept. This should piss off all the chickenhawks.

    January 18, 2012 at 2:41 pm | Reply
    • Ed Sr of Dallas Tx

      If John Wayne was a faggot...then your momma is a lesbian!

      January 18, 2012 at 3:51 pm | Reply
      • John Wayne Was A Faggot

        So THAT'S where I developed my love for pussy. Thanks, mom.

        January 18, 2012 at 3:54 pm |
    • Flipper

      The belief that diplomacy is the answer to all international problems is naive at best. Diplomacy has been tried with Iran (E-3 negotiations from the last decade) and have failed spectacularly. If Iran was a sensible country ruled by practical leaders, then diplomacy is fine. But Iran is not a sensible country. It's a ruthless, terror state hell-bent on acquiring nukes (and using them), dominating the Middle East, and obliterating Israel. Try negotiating with that.

      BTW, how did that diplomacy/appeasement thing turn out with Nazi Germany & Fascist Italy in Munich in 1938? Peace in our time, eh?

      January 18, 2012 at 4:46 pm | Reply
      • Jim-Bob

        I hope the Japs chop you up into little pieces and then sell it to us as tuna.

        January 18, 2012 at 4:56 pm |
1 2

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.