Graham vows to block nominations unless White House more forthcoming
February 11th, 2013
04:38 AM ET

Graham vows to block nominations unless White House more forthcoming

By Kevin Liptak

President Barack Obama's nominees for secretary of defense and CIA director could be held up by Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham unless the White House provides more information about its response to September's attack on an American diplomatic post in Libya.

The South Carolina lawmaker made the threat Sunday on CBS, using the phrase "no confirmation without information" in vowing to put a hold on the nominations of both John Brennan and Chuck Hagel unless the Obama administration provides more information about the Benghazi attack.

FULL STORY
Post by:
Filed under: Benghazi • Brennan • Graham • Hagel
soundoff (8 Responses)
  1. KansasMan

    @Sam_Richardson Her? Who is "her"? Lindsey Graham? You do realize that Sen. Graham is a man, right?

    February 11, 2013 at 5:58 pm | Reply
  2. Kevin

    Remember when Sen. Graham demanded answers and full break down of the president and key players activities after the 9/11 bombing? And when he demaned the same rigorous detail regarding the alleged WMDs that were cited as a reason to invade Iraq?

    Neither do I. I'm beyond being sick and tired of this surreal, amateurish partisan Kabuki theater.

    February 11, 2013 at 2:31 pm | Reply
  3. GGinSanDiego

    Shame on Lindsey Graham. Vote on the merits of the men, Senator. Just another example of how out-of-touch the GOP is with what Americans want and expect from their Congressmen and women.

    February 11, 2013 at 1:11 pm | Reply
  4. Lyndsie Graham

    For the record, I'm all for the appointment of Chuck Hagel as Sec. of Defense. I'm sick and tired of all these idiotic right-wingers running everything in Washington D.C.! We need a sane foreign policy and that's that!

    February 11, 2013 at 11:30 am | Reply
    • Patrick

      Well said, Lyndsie. Thank you.

      February 11, 2013 at 6:08 pm | Reply
    • Joey Buttafuoco

      Exactly.

      February 12, 2013 at 1:48 am | Reply
  5. Sam Richardson

    They all really answered for what happened.... This is just a ploy to make more gridlock and to make her look more important then she really is

    February 11, 2013 at 10:41 am | Reply
    • KansasMan

      Who is "her"? Lindsey Graham? You do realize that Sen. Graham is a man, right?

      February 11, 2013 at 5:59 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.