

By Barbara Starr
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta approved a request from the FBI for high-tech military detection equipment to assist in surveillance on the underground bunker in Alabama where a 5-year-old boy was held hostage, CNN has learned.
The hostage situation ended Monday when FBI agents entered the bunker and freed the boy. The 65-year-old hostage-taker is dead, law enforcement officials on the scene said.
The military detection equipment was delivered on site, according to a military official, but it could not immediately be determined if the equipment was used before or during the rescue.
Three Defense Department officials tell CNN that the equipment requested was similar to the technology used in war zones to detect buried explosives. Some small number of troops would have been needed to operate the equipment on-site.
“Panetta personally approved it” said one senior Defense official, emphasizing the military was prepared to offer whatever it could to assist in rescuing the child. That official emphasized the involvement of the military was strictly limited to offering technical assistance and gear not readily available to civilian law enforcement.
U.S. military personnel would have played “no role” in the assault, the official said, as U.S. troops are not permitted to undertake civilian law enforcement action.
|
|
Post by: By CNN Pentagon Correspondent Barbara Starr Filed under: Justice Department • Military • Panetta |


CNN's Security Clearance examines national and global security, terrorism and intelligence, as well as the economic, military, political and diplomatic effects of it around the globe, with contributions from CNN's national security team in Washington and CNN journalists around the world.
E-mail us at securityclearance@cnn.com


Troll. The article clearly states that the military was not involved in the "assault" not the "operation." The assault being the actually clearing of the bunker, killing the target, recovery of the captured boy. The article was about the military using specialized equipment (some sort of ground penetrating radar?) to aid law enforcement in better doing their jobs. Unbelievable that people would actually gripe about the aid provided when the end result was positive. Get a life people.
I agree buddy, these guys are obviously just people who like to complain about anything and everything. Stick their kid down there and they'd be asking for U.S. Army to break into that bunker and save their kid. Way to use this forum to stir your anti-gov conspiracies Steve.
Yes, I support state sanctioned murder of crazies kidnappers with bunkers.
How could this article say the military played "no role" in this operation? They were the ones operating the equipment! used to guide the entry team! What hypocrisy.
Does that mean we are going to see more military intervention in stateside police affairs? This strikes me as a dangerous new precedent. The government seemed to have used a very emotional event to justify military intervention.
Well put, Steve.
The military played no role smart guy. Read the article, they gave equipment to the FBI. Equipment. It's like going to a tech company and getting the equipment except the equipment is ready and available in the DOD stockpile. I wonder if you were down there in the bunker, would you care where the equipment came from? If you say Yes you are a liar.
Govt Breaks Posse Comitatus Law
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/02/govt-breaks-posse-comitatus-law-in-hostage-theatrical-display-2556048.html