December 4th, 2012
06:55 PM ET

The science behind camo

The Army is ready to buy different camouflage for its fatigues and equipment, just eight years after troops in Afghanistan were outfitted with new uniform.

The move to a different uniform comes after soldiers, many of them redeploying to Afghanistan, began voicing their criticism in the summer of 2009 of the "universal" camouflage pattern, introduced in 2004 and meant to be used in all types of battle environments.

The problem: the one-size-fits-all approach of the universal pattern wasn't working.

CNN's Chris Lawrence spoke to one camo designer, whose three patterns are in running to outfit U.S. soldiers. But the developer has his eyes set even further down the road, to technology that can make U.S. troops invisible on the battlefield.

Click here for the full story on the Army's selection process.

soundoff (7 Responses)
  1. dedicated hosting

    Excellent goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you're just too magnificent. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you're saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it smart. I can not wait to read much more from you. This is really a wonderful website.| dedicated hosting http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/NacegyDynaxiphne

    August 5, 2013 at 8:09 pm | Reply
  2. The Sweet Smell of Mendacity

    Not quite as cowardly as hiding behind women, but it'll do.

    December 5, 2012 at 8:00 pm | Reply
  3. Hahahahahahaha

    You suppose we could use this technology to hide all those southern republicans' trailer houses? Hahahahahahaahah

    December 5, 2012 at 4:56 pm | Reply
    • lololo

      Actually the reality is way more highschool drop out, barely literate, ghetto, alcoholic, low IQ, welfare loving, america hating, drug using, sub human baby factory hispanics and blacks voted for Obama than obese mcdonalds eating, trailer park living sister loving, white tr@sh voted for Romney.

      December 5, 2012 at 6:04 pm | Reply
      • The Sweet Smell of Mendacity

        The cleaners called. Your brown shirts are ready.

        December 5, 2012 at 8:01 pm |
  4. Paul

    Soldiers were critizing the UCP pattern in the ACUs long before 2009. Soldiers started critizing that horrible "camouflage" as soon as it was introduced.

    Tim, I'm willing to bet that they didn't interview Crye because Crye is not in the running.

    December 5, 2012 at 3:01 pm | Reply
  5. Tim Kenney

    Why didn't you interview Crye Precision, the makers of currently the most effective universal camoflage: multicam. They have consistently understood what patterns, colors and designs work most efficiently in the field. And no, I am not on their payroll and this is not a plug.

    December 5, 2012 at 9:46 am | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.