Panetta on Benghazi attack: 'Could not put forces at risk'
A protester reacts as the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi burns.
October 26th, 2012
01:28 AM ET

Panetta on Benghazi attack: 'Could not put forces at risk'

By Chris Lawrence

The U.S. military did not get involved during the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, last month because officials did not have enough information about what was going on before the attack was over, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said Thursday.

At a Pentagon news briefing, Panetta said there was no "real-time information" to be able to act on, even though the U.S. military was prepared to do so.

"You don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on," Panetta said. "(We) felt we could not put forces at risk in that situation."

A defense official provided more context on Panetta's comments about the decision-making involved in not sending U.S. troops to the consulate being attacked in Benghazi.

He said there was a drone aloft but not directly over the area at the time the attack began.

He said the drone was redirected and arrived in time to record some of the attack. But he described what the drone saw as "looking down, seeing a bunch of buildings and fires, a lot of chaos on the ground."

The real Benghazi lessons

He said it was not enough to discern exactly what was happening.

"We didn't have good eyes on the situation. There were security forces there on the ground, but they're in the middle of a firefight - not sending a Sitrep (Situational Report).

The official could not reveal the specific reaction times for the military's Fleet Anti Terrorism Security Teams, which are classified, but said "it would be physically impossible for them to get there in time to intervene in that attack from say, Rota, Spain."

He cited the time it takes just to get their transportation in the air. The official said "these situations normally deteriorate over time ... but usually in a few days, not two hours." He explained that even quick-reaction teams are often positioned for places where intelligence shows a "deteriorating situation" near an embassy.

The official also provided context for Panetta's and Gen. Martin Dempsey's remarks about criticism on the response.

"It's not helpful to provide partial answers," Dempsey said. And Panetta criticized what he called "Monday morning quarterbacking."

The defense official said it was directed at criticism coming from pundits and Capitol Hill.

"In perfect hindsight, yes - we'd do it differently. But how it looks weeks later is not how it looked at the time.

"You had the movie, the 9/11 anniversary and unrest in various countries in that region. All that factored into the decision to put troops on a heightened state of alert. But that doesn't mean forces are positioned everywhere in the world, ready to run to the rescue. We're not the fire department. And there was no actionable intelligence that Benghazi was going to be attacked on 9/11."

Next month, the Democratic-led Senate Intelligence Committee will hold a closed hearing in Washington to review the security situation and intelligence surrounding the Benghazi attack, according to a committee announcement released Thursday.

The hearing, not open to the public, will review intelligence collection and threat reporting in Libya and other Middle East countries before the September 11 attack on the U.S. mission as well as what was known and who is responsible for the attack, among other issues.

A number of government investigations continue into what happened on the attack.

Doubts surface over e-mail on claim of responsibility for Benghazi attack

Post by:
Filed under: drones • Libya • Military • Panetta
soundoff (1,185 Responses)
  1. jrt1098

    If the press allows the Obama administration to get away with this COVER UP in Benghazi ... they have failed the American people and are certainly treasonness in their negligence !!!

    October 29, 2012 at 12:24 am | Reply
    • Todder

      Obama is to blame for this!!! You are an fool! If you want to blame Obama for this then you need to call Bush Jr. to account for allowing 9-11 to happen in the first place. His incompetent administration couldn't prevent the worst attack on US soil in history. He followed that up by an unprovoked war that cost several more thousand lives and then finished his time out by destroying the US economy. You need to look in the mirror to find the closest terrorist. Blind support of republican policies is tantamount to being an American Taliban supporter. Turn of Faux news and educate yourself. Wasn't in Bush/Cheney who said criticizing the president while troops are in harms way in unAmerican? If you hate Obama that much, leave the country. Found your own theocratic republic somewhere and take all the other Obama hating closet racist with you!

      October 29, 2012 at 1:10 am | Reply
      • ILikeRush

        Obozo should have ordered the defense of the American soil. That is part of our country and we were attacked. The area should have been defended and recaptures.

        October 29, 2012 at 1:32 am |
  2. Charlie

    Sounds like the latest Hollywood thriller doesn’t it? The slimey politicians and non-operational CIA types sit in their suits calmly sipping coffee watching video feed from a drone of embassy officials dying on the ground. A nearby CIA response team is told not to respond. “To hell with this!” they say. They go in anyway and rescue those still alive. They are in a running gun battle for nearly a half a mile as they take the living back the CIA safehouse. Then the safehouse comes under attack too. They call into CIA headquarters for backup. The politicians and analysts listen as these men desperately plead for help. “Where is our backup!?” The The Flag officers in command of the region are relieved of command after they attempt to disobey orders and send the nearby Tier 1 Rapid Response teams in to assist. After all is said and done, in the weeks to follow the American public will slowly learn the shocking details of a conspiracy and a coverup that goes right to the top…

    October 28, 2012 at 10:53 pm | Reply
  3. Tonyk

    Wow, Panetta is a damn fool. You couldn't put forces at risk? What about the 1991 rescue of American embassy staff in Somalia?

    October 28, 2012 at 10:47 pm | Reply
  4. Zeph

    What a load of bull! The only reason they didnt send aid is because they wanted the Embassy to fall! @#$% you Obama your a disgrace to humanity!

    October 28, 2012 at 10:44 pm | Reply
  5. JD

    There's no way CNN will depart from their liberal slant in the news. Not even when they have the lowest viewership in cable news JFK they realize hat WE stop watching them because if their LIBERAL CONTENT!!

    October 28, 2012 at 10:19 pm | Reply
  6. heckemiker

    Why have an American presence there at all, except for the oil, honestly?

    October 28, 2012 at 9:35 pm | Reply
  7. Anna

    Ted Turner's CNN crew should all be holding their heads low. They have to be following orders from someone at the top.
    Could it be Ted, himself? They ALL know that what they are doing (or should I say, "not doing," ) is shameful.

    Candy Crowley didn't do enough damage to Romney's campaign during the 2nd debate. They must feel they need to protect Obama from any political fallout from the Bengazhi attack on our embassy.
    CNN news may never be respected again. The truth will come out with or without CNN's input.

    October 28, 2012 at 9:19 pm | Reply
  8. New Yorker

    Another part of this story that is not getting enough attention is there is a person in jail today because he created a video that hurt someone's feelings. What happened to freedom of speech? Or does that count only when you offend Christian values?

    October 28, 2012 at 9:09 pm | Reply
  9. rs1201

    OBAMA AND HIS ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION ARE LIARS. THEY'RE REFUSING TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BENGHAZI TRAGEDY UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION...THAT'S CONVENIENT!

    October 28, 2012 at 9:06 pm | Reply
    • militarymama

      You are ABSOLUTELY correct.... Obama's only defense is that it is being "politicized". Who is the real bull ******* here Mr. Obama???? No, I did not refer to you as "President" on purpose. My oldest son is in Afghanistan. Even tho they are living constantly with the situation of "Friendly" Afghan's killing our troops, our troops are under orders to NOT return fire without first requesting permission.....REALLY? NO flipping way!! What a disgrace for a "Commander in Chief". Mr. O – - u gotta go!!

      October 29, 2012 at 12:49 am | Reply
  10. Andthen

    And then- after all this happens Obuma, and all the nit wits that report to him, go on a 14 day crusade to proclaim that it never happened." It was caused by a youtube video- "!!!!! proclaims President Obama to the 3rd world dictators at the UN that he admires so much.

    October 28, 2012 at 8:41 pm | Reply
  11. BullSeye58

    At this point, it seems that Obama and his sycophants in the WH didn't want to respond with gunships, SEAL's, etc. because the more of that you do, the more it looks like a WAR, which would horrify the wusses that voted for him 4 years ago. Valerie Jarrett tried to talk him out of getting Bin Laded multiple times; looks like she was more persuasive this time.

    October 28, 2012 at 8:28 pm | Reply
  12. Richard

    A little more information-
    http://www.examiner.com/article/as-benghazi-facts-seep-out-obama-s-approval-ratings-plunge

    What I know so far:
    So Obama says he didn't know about this but in fact he an everyone on his team knew.
    Hillary tries to take blame, but in fact she asked Obama for more security for Benghazi and he turned her down
    Panetta said there was no way to help but in fact there wer drones in the air and a number of different forces nearby, some of which were refused permission to help.
    The lies just keep rolling on and on, don't thye?

    October 28, 2012 at 8:25 pm | Reply
    • Mary-Anne

      Thanks for the link....also interesting story here

      http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/robbins-report/2012/oct/28/general-losing-his-job-over-benghazi/

      October 28, 2012 at 9:15 pm | Reply
  13. anamaus

    I am an Independent voter tired of your one sided programs in favor of Obama, Americans need to know the true about what happen in Benghazi and we need it before the election, so time for you all to change you ways and pressure Obama to tell the true and let all Americans view the tapes. AMERICA HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW.

    October 28, 2012 at 7:55 pm | Reply
    • J. Walker

      You don't understand. This is not an agenda-free press with the desire to report the facts. Go to your Senators and Congressmen and urge an end to the delay of truth telling. CNN doesn't care. You are feeding the monster here, wasting time. The election is coming and all this energy begging the press to act like the respectable journalists is like asking medical personnel complicit with Nazi experiments to act within the Hippocratic Oath and "do no harm".

      October 28, 2012 at 8:44 pm | Reply
      • Richard

        The bottom line at this point is that Obama lied to us. There may be more to it or maybe not. It's hard to say what was going through Obama's mind when he refused to provide secruity when even (as we now find) Hillary Clinton asked him. Certianly Obama has not been reticent to spend money, he's spent a lot more than any other president. Maybe he wanted to maintain a low profile. However, we were deceived about that. An Panetta – even recon drones have ample armement, there were destroyers off the coast, there were people who wanted to help. The press is spinning a story of 150 attackers but the actual reports from those who were ultimately killed was more like 20. That was the information Panetta had. Why did they let those men die? We may never know. But they lied, lied again and kept on lying. This we know.

        October 28, 2012 at 8:58 pm |
  14. Ken Johnson

    I find the lack of News on this HUGH story about the death of hero's being killed by their own country leaders a disgrace. If this was a story about a cute puppy it would be on every page with a link. But having Hero's DIE while waiting for support and having that support cancel is a criminal act. So take every award you've ever received and burn them because you and your company and the leaders of are country are cowards. Just hope the next time you call 911 and wait for help it's not cancelled because it's a bad day for bad news.

    October 28, 2012 at 7:41 pm | Reply
  15. Lee

    CNN is about as uselss as breasts, (<insert word of choice) on a bull! I would have used the correct wording but I figured it would make front page news on CNN instead of the other more important story we are all commenting on!!!

    October 28, 2012 at 7:35 pm | Reply
    • obamacansaveyourhouselosangeles

      i bet CNN gives more coverage to what Britney Spears is (not) wearing than to Benghazi

      BS = ( . ) ( . )

      October 28, 2012 at 11:34 pm | Reply
  16. karenjay

    Can I just say that every time I hear that they did not have enough information and needed to assess the situation before they threw our military into harms way-I just want to scream. If I am being attacked on the street and a cop is sitting there with a gun in his holster, I sure hope he doesn't just sit there while he "assesses the risk" he will be under. Please, this is why we have marines-they take risks when we are in danger to save us.

    October 28, 2012 at 7:14 pm | Reply
  17. Romney/Ryan 2012

    CNN, I hope you and the rest of the MSM are ashamed for your lack of coverage. You know it would cost YOUR candidate the election.

    October 28, 2012 at 6:58 pm | Reply
    • Stace

      I agree. You journalists at CNN are gutless cowards! Why don't you do REAL investigative journalism anymore? Why don't you protect the american people from deceptive leaders? You love your position and money too much, I guess. Why aren't 4 dead americans important to you? THREE times – that's THREE times those at Benghazi called for help and it was ordered that those who could help stand down! General Ham lost his job because he chose to disobey and tried to send help. Panetta is a traitor to the American people. And so is the mainstream media.

      October 28, 2012 at 7:13 pm | Reply
      • anamaus

        You are absolutely right, all you see or heard from them is Obama Obama. America needs valance and fair news, not one sided one for Obama. We need the true about Benghazi and we need it now, not after the election. I am an Independent voter fed up with your one sided programs.

        October 28, 2012 at 7:51 pm |
  18. cathkol

    Hillary didn't mind the stain on the blue dress.Do you really think she minds blood on US uniforms?

    October 28, 2012 at 6:23 pm | Reply
    • Stace

      Hillary Clinton cares about position and power. She doesn't care for the american people or their sovreignty. It's deplorable and heart-wrenching to think our brave ex-navy SEALS had no help and they were LEFT BEHIND!!!!!! I thought no man was ever to be left behind?

      October 28, 2012 at 7:17 pm | Reply
  19. Joe Clark

    Secretary of Defense Panetta would have the American people believe they didn't know what they are trained to know. The risks in the area were well known but somebody(ies) took their eyes off the ball and as a direct result four Americans were placed in harms way and died. I have not heard of anyone being reprimanded for this costly oversight but you can be sure some individuals in the administration took some real "heat" over this sad event.

    October 28, 2012 at 6:12 pm | Reply
    • JohnVoter

      Does anyone remember "Blackhawk Down"?
      Putting troops into a situation without knowing what they will see risks additional lives.

      Criticism should be directed to why security was not better before the attack (but remember it was the consulate, not the main embassy), and why those in the fight didn't have live communication with the general in charge of US Africa Command.

      October 28, 2012 at 6:19 pm | Reply
  20. DougHD

    Wrong photo caption. Administration has now made clear this was not a protest. Didn't CNN get the latest White House memo? You need to switch from video protest to terrorist attack as though the White House never called it a video protest in the first place. Geez guys, keep up with with cover up!

    October 28, 2012 at 5:43 pm | Reply
  21. debbyK

    Why is there no mention of Benghazi on today's CNN homepage? America, please watch the interviews given by Charles Woods, grieving father of hero Navy Seal Ty Woods. The Obama team, including Hillary and Bill, are BUYING TIME to cover for Obama until after election. With a large number of early voters, every day counts in the cover up. Piers Morgan, Anderson Cooper, Candy Crowley - please step up and interview Charles Woods on your show. Or would this ruin your reputation with Barack, Michelle, the likes of Wasserman-Schultz and the Hollywood elite?

    October 28, 2012 at 5:07 pm | Reply
  22. lynnsii

    And wait till they show the Bin Laden capture movie. Ultimate hippocracy. The same technology they used to brag about.. (I mean capture) Bin Laden was not good enough to go in and save our men in Bengazi. They all sat and watched. Sad, very sad.

    October 28, 2012 at 4:35 pm | Reply
    • dumas

      Bin laden was planned for months, Benghazi happened in a matter of hours. Your apology is flawed and your comment worthless.

      October 28, 2012 at 5:08 pm | Reply
      • dumas

        stupid spell check, should be analogy.

        October 28, 2012 at 5:09 pm |
      • dumas

        stupid spell check, should be analogy.

        October 28, 2012 at 5:09 pm |
      • Lee

        Hours, almost 8 hours. If you watch all the news from when it first occurred you would have thought that this happened and was over with before you knew it. Also you never heard about the SEALS responding from another location to help out and then killed. This was all information that the White House knew from day one. It never was a riot in response to a video. Call it what it is a cover up, nothing more, nothing less!! The American people are smarter than this. An 8 hour fire fight with AK-47 and RPG's, a car chase back to the CIA safe haven, attacks at the CIA safe haven. I am not the sharpest tool in the shed but even I can figure out this was an attack and not a riot!

        October 28, 2012 at 7:06 pm |
      • DE

        You are uninformed and in no position to be telling somebody else they are. Our military was nearby and ready to go but they were told 3 times to stand down. Two of the people who were killed were SEALS who disobeyed orders and went in to try and save lives. The Obama administration watched a LIVE FEED of the attack. There were direct calls for help and the help was denied THREE TIMES. There was no lack of information. This administration is not just incompetent, it's evil. They invented the youtube story to cover up the fact that they were running guns to Syrian rebels. You'd never find that out here. That's probably your problem.

        October 28, 2012 at 7:11 pm |
  23. Bubba

    Let them dismember an Ambassador because a soldier might get hurt. ? This is not sounding like the country I thought we were

    October 28, 2012 at 4:34 pm | Reply
    • Bruce in VA

      Sadly, we are not.

      October 28, 2012 at 4:51 pm | Reply
    • Lee

      You are so right! Ask any Marine or Soldier, no man left behind!!

      October 28, 2012 at 7:08 pm | Reply
    • J. Walker

      Have you contacted your Senator or Congressional Rep? CNN. DOESN'T. CARE. WHAT. YOU. THINK. OF. THEM.

      October 28, 2012 at 8:52 pm | Reply
  24. lynnsii

    And wait till we see the Bin Laden Movie.. ultimate hippocracy.. The same technology they used to (brag about) I mean capture Bin Laden was not good enough to go in and save our men in Bengazi...They all sat around and watched.
    Sad.. very sad.

    October 28, 2012 at 4:31 pm | Reply
  25. larry5

    Since Panetta has admitted that he's totally incompetent why hasn't he resigned. Oops. I forgot. He was appointed by Obama and his only job is to follow orders. What a disgrace to the flag these two people are.

    October 28, 2012 at 4:19 pm | Reply
  26. Trisha

    Why are you not reporting the truth about Obama and Benghazi? CNN, ABC, NBC, and CBS are so biased it is sad. Four American heroes are dead. The Obama administration has hours to help them! Two drones, a gunner ship and jets less than an hour away. Obama watched video in real time and did nothing. He needs to go in November. He is a disgrace.

    October 28, 2012 at 4:16 pm | Reply
    • J. Walker

      Have you contacted your Senator or Congressional Rep? The Press isn't going to change this. They're just going to cherry pick what to report. Only the Congress and Senate can impeach.

      October 28, 2012 at 8:53 pm | Reply
  27. Debbie

    The world knows now that the president knew about this 2 hours after it started. He is making a bad situation worse by continuing to lie for over a month now. They were watching live as it unfolded. Three times they were refused help. Who refused. Not the military I am sure. No Commander would tell his people to "stand down" during an attack. So it must have been someone in the WH. Why won't they show the video they have. Everyone knows there was a drone recording the entire event. Why did the pres say it was the you tube video when he knew it was a lie? If he didn't want us to know why not just say they couldn't release the info? So many questions and four Americans dead. Imagine how they felt, waiting for help that would never come to rescue them. They are the true heroes. God Bless them.

    October 28, 2012 at 4:14 pm | Reply
  28. Chris

    why won't the administration, obama release the video and audio for this? ... it has been 2 months. if he wanted the american people to know it would have already been released. my guess is the 'investigation' will be completed and released on November 7th. obama the most transparent president, Not !

    October 28, 2012 at 4:05 pm | Reply
  29. Chris

    U.S. Embassey under attack for 7 hours, 4 americans dead, DEAD !
    where was the president ? why wasn't he getting someone in there to help !!
    why wasn't he screaming at the joint chiefs, panetta, clinton to find out what heck was going on !! they had a drone in real time to see what was happening. and brian williams is GUTLESS. wouldn't ask the tough question. i used to respect him, how gutless !!

    October 28, 2012 at 4:00 pm | Reply
    • Lee

      Great points! It is sad that you have to dig on CNN and many other news sites just to find this story! It should be front page! So much for unbiased media. They are doing their part to get the almighty one re elected. What ever happened to fair and impartial reporting, all I want in the news is facts! To me not reporting a story you are aware of is as bad as lieing about it!

      October 28, 2012 at 7:13 pm | Reply
  30. Robj

    Panetta, you have been around Clinton and Osama Obama for so long, and now you have caught their disease of not knowing what truth is.

    October 28, 2012 at 3:49 pm | Reply
  31. lb309

    Regardless of the 'fog of war' argument, Obama and his representatives were still going-on about the film, more than a week after the attack.
    .
    Say you're in a bar with a buddy, and some guy runs up, shouts "you guys are dumb" and hits you. Your buddy has several options. (hit back, run, call for help, etc.) If your buddy is the Obama administration, they start waving copies of SAT's in the air trying to prove you're not dumb.

    October 28, 2012 at 3:46 pm | Reply
  32. Will

    CNN I’d like to thank you for providing me a great argument that your network and the rest of the media is in the tank for obama. This has been a great example for me to use to convince friends that your network does not report the news if it does not go along with your agenda. Keep up the great work and soon you can catch up with msnbc as the least trusted news source.

    October 28, 2012 at 2:51 pm | Reply
    • Duane Winterfeldt

      I agree wholeheartedly with this comment. Where are your PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS?? In the Obama Biden tank?

      October 28, 2012 at 3:59 pm | Reply
    • timgenster

      I agree too! The 'volume' on this cover-up situation MUST be turned up as loud as we can make it BEFORE BO gets re-elected! THAT would make this even worse.

      October 28, 2012 at 4:05 pm | Reply
    • Debbie

      Does the main stream media really think we will come back after the election. How can anyone expect to get current news from these outlets? Not me!

      October 28, 2012 at 4:17 pm | Reply
      • cathkol

        If Obama would have been in office during the 911 attacks on America, he would have told the New York Firefighters to stand down.

        October 28, 2012 at 4:20 pm |
    • PatriotStorm

      Four dead Americans and CNN, among others, is dtill covering Obama. How many people need to die before you break the chains?

      October 28, 2012 at 4:40 pm | Reply
    • Lee

      The lack of attention CNN and many other news agencies have given this topic is disgracful! Not reporting is just as bad as lieing about a story, you get the same end result! Wake up America!!

      October 28, 2012 at 7:16 pm | Reply
    • J. Walker

      It is safe to assume there ARE no professional journalists. Contact Congress.

      October 28, 2012 at 8:55 pm | Reply
  33. Michael

    Why is this not bigger news? Why did I have to search for Bengahzi to find this 2 day old article? Come on CNN, how do you not see this as a problem for everyone who has relatives serving overseas in a military capacity? Is one American life, let alone four, not worth causing an international incident over? Anne Coulter was right about the current leadership.

    October 28, 2012 at 2:47 pm | Reply
  34. trishlwm

    Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette, General Carter Ham, Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty. Are these men being made scapegoats for the dismal performance and failure of the administration in Washington, D.C.? Americans are demanding answers NOW–not six months or one year down the road.

    The performance of the administration is nothing more than an ongoing, gigantic cover-up conducted at the highest levels in D.C. to ensure Obama be re-elected.

    Were two military officers relieved of their duties because they refused to “stand down” when requests were made from Benghazi for military help?

    Were two Americans, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, murdered by terrorists because the administration officials in Washington, D.C. refused to send aid and relief to them, but instead ordered them to “stand down?” Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty refused to “stand down” and went back to the Consulate from the Annex to save Americans under attack there. They did save Americans from the Consulate but were unable to find the Ambassador and Sean Smith. They then returned to the Annex and were murdered.

    The highest levels of the administration in Washington, D.C. did nothing to save these men’s lives. It is a cover-up, and they are guilty of murder.

    October 28, 2012 at 2:28 pm | Reply
    • Duane Winterfeldt

      Amen!!

      October 28, 2012 at 4:00 pm | Reply
  35. obamacansaveyourhouselosangeles

    you can bet your sweet bippy that if either Obama or Panetta had been in Benghazi and were being fired upon that THEY WOULD HAVE called in the Military that was already in the immediate area for damn sure.

    When will the LIES STOP?

    October 28, 2012 at 1:47 pm | Reply
    • macsuirtain

      Never. Only when big money has nothing to say in politics. Then and only then will the lies cease.

      October 28, 2012 at 2:32 pm | Reply
  36. Consequence

    What the Obama Administration could have done during the seven hour interval of fighting at the Consulate and Annex in Benghazi is a serious matter, but most crucial is what decisions the Obama Administration made to insure the safety of the Consulate BEFORE the 9/11 anniversary date. No marine guard detachment, no insurance of libyan government security protections, no fast reaction plan, an easily breachable compound and the should have been heavily tightened security on 9/11 (certainly, as noble as his intentions were, the Ambassador should not have been in Benghazi on 9/11) – all spelled poor preparation. This is not Monday morning quarterbacking...it is the job of the administration to plan all these contingencies in advance and to be smart about all existing threats. If they cannot match security with the threat level, then it is time to close the Consulate and get out of Dodge until things improve. This is SOP in the State Department.

    October 28, 2012 at 1:43 pm | Reply
    • StanCalif

      Why was Stevens in Benghazi on the anniversity of 9/11? He already knew his security had been stripped away. No one ordered Stevens to go there, he made a very foolish choice. In any "investigation", let's find out why Stevens made such a foolish decision. This isn't all Obama's fault! Then report the names of congress who voted to strip embassies of security funding!!!

      October 28, 2012 at 3:20 pm | Reply
      • JonPenn

        Stan, that's a very obtuse statement. The US Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the President and the SecState. They do not run around on their own like cowboys in the wild west. Dig deeper and you will find the truth, but not here on CNN.

        October 28, 2012 at 3:46 pm |
  37. J. Walker

    To date there have been nearly 1000 replies about the coverup of Benghazi. Most of the respondents I have read are incensed, frustrated that people in power could care so little for Americans in service to their country. I don't think those thousand are the only Americans who feel this way. You could probably find thousands of others ranting in similar subject comment-o-spheres trying from their little corner to make someone tell the truth. Meanwhile, no one at CNN is reading these, anyway, because it simply provides an impotent outlet for our frustrations. If we were smart, we'd be like Occupy Wall street, and find a nifty name to march on Washington, bring in busloads of people and just wait out the announcement that someone is ready to tell the whole truth and nothing else. But, then that wouldn't be all that smart, because CNN and NBC and CBS and ABC (who have I forgotten?) would find something to write about that was much more vital-someone in Hollywood who is getting a divorce, wants to adopt a baby from the Outback, or a spider that has re-routed a whole highway project. I just don't think this is effective. I wrote my Congressman. Forget the news people. They only write Orwellian pablum to give the hungered masses so the movers and shakers won't be bothered by them.

    October 28, 2012 at 12:53 pm | Reply
    • mary kirk

      Why was the Rear Admiral directing the MED air carrier strike force "temporarily" relieved of his command and reassigned stateside? The Obama administration has not been truthful and the US press is compromised and complicit in maintaining the Obama administration 9-11 Benghazi terror attacks propaganda.

      October 28, 2012 at 1:43 pm | Reply
    • timgenster

      Unfortunately, this is all too true. Complaining to CNN might make you feel good for a few minutes, but they're either not paying attention at all, or simply laughing at all the 'irate nut jobs' (what THEY think) 'and their rants.' Take your efforts to a higher power, and we'll likely get more done. Somehow, this cover-up has got to reach more people BEFORE BO gets re-elected. THAT will make this all much worse, and covered up even faster!

      October 28, 2012 at 4:12 pm | Reply
    • Lee

      Great idea let's get a march together before the election. I am there!!! The United for Truth March"!!

      October 28, 2012 at 7:19 pm | Reply
  38. James

    Not enough real time information ???–Baloney Panetta–Not buying that one–

    October 28, 2012 at 11:35 am | Reply
    • Carri

      The Mosaic of lies, deceits and state-sponsored terrorism:
      The hidden real truth about Benghazi

      - Doug Hagmann (Bio and Archives)  Sunday, October 28, 2012
      (28) Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
      1.3K
      Most people know that we’ve been lied to about the attacks in Benghazi, but few realize the extent of those lies or the hidden secrets they cover. After all, the lie is different at every level. Thanks to a well placed source with extensive knowledge about the attack, the disturbing truth is slowly beginning to emerge and is lining up with information contained in my previous articles published here weeks ago (Here, Here and Here). The truth reveals the most serious situation in the world today as it involves the interests and destinies of us all.

      A mosaic of lies
      According to the U.S. government, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed during a spontaneous protest at the consulate office in Benghazi by a frenzied crowd of Muslims outraged over an obscure internet video. Recently released “sensitive but not classified e-mails” from Stevens to the U.S. Department of State painted a picture of poor security for U.S. personnel and the embassy, which was obviously true but had little to do with the events of September 11, 2012. The failure to dispatch an extraction team or otherwise rescue the men during a firefight that lasted upwards of nine grueling and tortuous hours was not the result of any intelligence failure, but caused by our unwillingness to widen the conflict and expose the nature and scale of our true mission in Benghazi.

      Based on information provided by my source and corroborated elsewhere, the official account by administration officials is a mosaic of lies that were necessary to cover the unpalatable truth of covert actions taking place in Libya, Syria, Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. The primary objective of our covert actions was to secretly arm anti-Assad “rebels” in Syria by funneling arms from Libya to Syria via Turkey, with other destinations that included Jordan and Lebanon.  Regarding the threat to Stevens and the other murdered Americans, the truth will reformat the persistent question posed to government officials, from UN Ambassador Susan Rice to White House Spokesman Jay Carney and others from “how could you not have known” to “how could you have done these things?”

      First, it is important to understand that Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty and Tyrone Woods were not killed at a consulate office in Benghazi—as there is not such office there. They died at one of the largest CIA operations centers in the Middle East, which was located in Benghazi and served as the logistics headquarters for arms and weapons being shipped out of the post-Qaddafi Libya.

      Although the U.S. government insisted that Stevens was involved in securing and destroying the numerous caches of arms and weapons once under the control of Qaddafi, the operation was more complex than that. The visual accounts of weapons being destroyed were indeed real, but those weapons were not operational. The working weapons were actually separated and transported to holding facilities for their eventual use in Syria. Russia was fully aware of this operation and warned the U.S. not to engage in the destabilization of Syria, as doing so would endanger their national security interests. Deposing Assad, as despotic as he might be, and replacing him with a Muslim Brotherhood-led regime would likely lead to unrestrained Islamic chaos across the region.

      The Turkish warning
      According to my source, Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 to meet with his Turkish counterpart, who reportedly warned Stevens that the operation was compromised. They met in person so that Stevens could be shown overhead satellite images, taken by the Russians, of nefarious activities taking place in Turkey. But just what were these nefarious activities?

      It is reasonable to suspect that these activities were more dire than just your average “gun running” operation. Since the overthrow of Qaddafi, it is estimated that upwards of 40 million tons of weapons and arms were shipped out of Libya to Syria. But it was also known inside intelligence circles that Qaddafi possessed chemical weapons in addition to numerous surface-to-air missiles. Could it be that Russia obtained unmistakable surveillance footage of the anti-Assad “rebels” being shown how to load chemical payloads onto missiles inside Turkey near the border of Syria? Weapons, of course, that were shipped from Libya by the CIA in conjunction with various Muslim Brotherhood rebel groups.  If so, such weapons could be used as a “false flag” type of operation—one that would be implemented to “set-up” Assad by making it appear that he was using these weapons on forces dedicated to his overthrow.

      The blowback by the international community would be swift and punishing, and the entirety of the civilized world would be demanding his overthrow. NATO would then be used to expedite his ouster, and Russia’s moral position within the international community would be weakened. Was the meeting held to show Stevens that the operation was compromised and that they had to stop?

      A Nation/State sponsored attack?
      While the administration asserts that the attack in Benghazi was conducted by a group of rebels acting alone, the facts seem to indicate otherwise. The level of coordination was such that we did not deploy military assets, located just an hour or two away by air, to rescue Stevens and the others at the CIA operations center in their time of need. If, as the administration contends, that the attack was perpetuated by a group of frenzied rebels, our military could have easily handled them in short order. So why was there no rescue operation?

      Perhaps the statements made yesterday by Leon Panetta, U.S. Secretary of Defense provides some insight if one analyzes the essence of those statements. Among other things, Panetta said that “...the basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on…” Well, it has been confirmed we did know what was taking place on the ground in Benghazi, so exactly what did Panetta mean by this statement?

      Against the backdrop of the official story, it makes little sense. If, however, one considers the alternative, that the attack was coordinated and was a nation/state sponsored attack, then it becomes clearer. Panetta and the highest levels of this administration likely knew exactly what we were doing, and knew that the operation was compromised. They knew, or had reason to believe, that the attack was being conducted at a nation/state level in response to our covert operation in Libya and arming the anti-Assad Syrian opposition.

      Although Russia figures prominently here, Iran now comes into focus as Russia is not likely to directly engage U.S. forces. They must, however, protect their interests. Much like we were using anti-Assad forces to advance our objectives in Syria, Russia was using Iranian-backed forces to protect theirs. It appears that the attacks were conducted or facilitated by Iranian assets—perhaps as many as three teams of assets in Benghazi.

      As the White House and other agencies monitored intelligence in real-time, they faced a dilemma. They knew that the nation/state sponsored attack teams were lying in wait for U.S. rescue forces to arrive, which is the reason the fight did not conclusively end sooner. They did not know exactly where all of the attack teams were, but knew they were present based on signal communication intercepts. Could they risk such exposure by deploying a rescue team to Benghazi, only to end up with another Black Hawk down type scenario? In addition to that scenario, the entire operation now becomes exposed for what it is. Take another look at Panetta’s statement in that context. Does it now make more sense? Bad PR in an election year, no?

      As daylight approached with no response from the U.S. and no aid to the Americans under fire, the attack teams had to disperse into the cover of the remaining darkness, but not before their mission was accomplished. And sadly, it was.

      Fallout

      From the day of attack in Benghazi, Iran has been engaged in a full spectrum attack on the U.S. and NATO across the board involving embassies, bombing and even cyber attacks. All of this is the fallout from the arms and weapons smuggling operation, which was far greater than understood by the Western media.

      Russia has now moved their contingent of S-400 missiles into much of Syria in anticipation of NATO establishing an “air cap” over Syria. A ten-mile “buffer zone” along Syria’s border has been created for Syrian refugees, but it also acts as a catalyst for the encroachment into Syrian territory. It sets the stage for further advancement and erosion of Syrian land, incrementally, of course.

      It is also of critical importance to note that last weekend, Russia completed large-scale exercises of their Strategic Nuclear Forces under the watchful command of President Vladimir Putin. These were the first such nuclear exercises conducted since the fall of the Soviet Union.

      To those with discernment, it is obvious that we are at the precipice of World War III. Putin himself stated as much, noting that WW III will not start in Iran but Syria, his own “red line in the sand.”

      Copyright © Douglas Hagmann
      Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.

      Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

      Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com
      Older articles by Doug Hagmann

      October 28, 2012 at 11:50 am | Reply
      • C.A.

        If the CIA was conducting a covert operation in Benghazi – why were the requests for extra security being denied? Why wasn't the military on alert?

        October 28, 2012 at 12:24 pm |
      • Lorraine

        Thank you for telling the truth as CNN and others will not!

        October 28, 2012 at 1:10 pm |
      • GRP1953

        Excellent post. I have tried to spread it to everyone I can, and those MSM who will not even cover the story.

        October 28, 2012 at 1:37 pm |
      • Consequence

        Interestiing novel, but far exceeds probability...

        October 28, 2012 at 1:52 pm |
  39. Ellie P

    CNN SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE COVERUP. WE NEED TO REBEL AGAINST CNN AND LET THEM KNOW THAT AMERICANS DETEST AND WILL NOT TOLERATE SUCH BIAS. IT IS UN AMERICAN. WAKE UP PATRIOTS TURN OFF CNN & MSNBC!!!

    October 28, 2012 at 11:34 am | Reply
    • nobamaMD

      CNN… the big question is WHY you aren’t digging deeper into the coverup… and WHY you aren’t asking hard questions of the Administration? It’s appalling that this isn’t “front page” coverage every day until we get the real answers…. who covered this up? who issued the “stand down” orders? why isn’t the POTUS telling us all the details, even though he says he is? The American public MUST know…. and now, not three months from now.

      October 28, 2012 at 11:57 am | Reply
    • J. Walker

      You didn't elect CNN. You may not have elected your own Congressional Representatives, but you probably voted. Whoever holds office representing your state is accountable to you. CNN is not. They have their own agenda. WRITE AND CALL YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS and ask for them to intervene now, not after the election. Quit wasting time here. I wrote mine. Write yours, and if your work and means permit travel,go to Washington and bring a sign with a brief message. But don't expect CNN to cover it. They'll be all over what some actress or singer is doing.

      October 28, 2012 at 9:10 pm | Reply
  40. Mary

    Come on CNN.... Why did you stop covering the Banghazi Crisis? There is much more to be said and shown to the American people BEFORE we vote for our next president! This is really important. We deserve to know what happened and WHY Office Woods's requests/pleads went unanswered by our Govenerment. We need to know NOW what the White House is NOT telling us. Please don't buy into their excuse that it needs to be after the Election!!!!! WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW, BEFORE THE ELECTION*!^!!!!!

    October 28, 2012 at 11:19 am | Reply
  41. Joe H

    Joe
    If anyone needs to know who to vote for, just ask yourself one question... Why is it that the hearings for the Benghazi attacks are scheduled AFTER the elections? Then you'll know who to vote for. Obama does not care one bit about our Ambassadors, our security personnel, the CIA, or our Military. And Joe Biden is so Socially inept that he can't even think of appropriate words to say to a grieving father of a former Navy SEAL who voluntarily gave up his life to protect the people that the President refused to protect.

    October 28, 2012 at 11:16 am | Reply
  42. Tammy

    CNN You should be ashamed of yourselves! I have read and trusted you as a news orginization for years. Unfortunately you can not seem to report the real news. Media is powerful and you are corrupt. You have the opportunity to bring the world the stories that all should know. Instead you have grown into cowards. This is an absolute outrage. Im standing up as an Independant American and calling your bluff. I will speak to anyone and everyone that will listen with even half and ear about the PURE NEGLIGENCE that you, other media outlets, and the Administration have shown. You are no longer news casters, you are no longer one of the great reporters. You have turned a blind eye to what news is suppose to be, the whole story, the facts, no matter what side of the political coin they may land on. SHAME ON YOU CNN. I can not even come close to putting into words what you have really done here and how appauled I am. I hope and pray that we will one day have a news orginization or a 'lone wolf reporter' who seeks and speaks the truth without fear or agenda. I am utterly dissapointed and angry. Without the unbaised truth I can never trust in you again.

    October 28, 2012 at 11:06 am | Reply
  43. Dywlf

    I understand the security team was in contact with the CIA, reports would have been relayed to the president within 10' minutes. Panetta's BS doesn't fly.

    October 28, 2012 at 10:48 am | Reply
    • wh0622

      Obama and Panetta lied and our people died!!!

      October 28, 2012 at 11:06 am | Reply
      • Rita

        4 men killed is very sad. BUT where the this outrage when 4000+ were killed in Iraq looking for the weapons of mass destruction? Why weren't you in an outrage for all these people being killed by Bush's lies about the WMD. All they found was a few hammers. Why didn't you say something about that? Is it because Bush was a Republcian????

        October 28, 2012 at 1:24 pm |
      • Soldier

        This is for Rita I am so sick and tired of the hole WMD in Iraq. Google National Ground Intelligence Center then look for a report that went to Congress about the over 500 WMD in and around Bagdad. Then ask your self why has the Army's WMD response teams have been doing 6 months rotations to Iraq from the begining to at least 2007. I was there where were you? Now what about the 2 CNN people that had to get treated for nerve agent in 2003? I am just saying there is alot people don't know so unless you were there hold a artillary shell that was filled with liquid, you don't know so be quite. Or you can look at my medical records and explain to me why I have scaring all over my lung.

        October 28, 2012 at 1:59 pm |
  44. Dutchman37

    If we can’t protect our Consulate and the staff assigned to any Foreign Embassy, then how can we protect our citizens who travel to any foreign land? The Benghazi, Afghanistan Terrorist attack against our Consulate, was another success for the terrorist against the USA; they now have succeeded in another attack directly on USA soil. They (Terrorist) are going to embellish this as a Great Jihad moment against the Infidel Americans and no doubt will be rejuvenated and gain new recruits to join their Terrorist Idealistic believes. My concern is our current government (President Obama’s Administration) doesn’t want to engage these terrorist any further and that is “Mission Incomplete” Whether it is the World Trade’s Twin Towers in NY City, The Pentagon in DC or Flight 93 in PA, or whether it is 3,000 killed or 4 killed, they have again killed Americans and we need to avenge these deaths. Secretary Panetta stated about this we “Could not put forces at risk”. I say we are putting every American at risk if we don’t move heaven and earth to protect our Embassies and citizens anywhere that our State Department allows our citizens to travel. That is what our Military does, they are the risk takers and they “swear to defend and protect” not to do situational analysis and then allow citizens to die, because it is too risky. The problem is, I feel; President Obama doesn’t want any more troops in any conflicts until after the elections and that is the underlining problem, he (President Obama) took the safe way out over the Benghazi attacks and now we look like cowards in the eyes of the Terrorist and the rest of the world

    October 28, 2012 at 10:41 am | Reply
    • StanCalif

      Wait a minute!
      Ambassador Stevens' security was stripped due to congressional action (including Paul Ryan) that reduced funds for ambassadors world wide! Stevens chose to be in Benghazi on 9/11, no one ordered him to go there! He knew full well that security would be lacking. Why on earth travel to such a dangerous and be there on 9/11??? Stevens made a very foolish decision! Finding someone else to blame is just as foolish! Stevens obviously screwed up, not Obama! Congress (including Paul Ryan) screwed up as well!

      October 28, 2012 at 11:45 am | Reply
      • KenL

        Funding had nothing to do with it. Resources were available and ready and some were on location but were told to stand down. The blame goes to the chain of command as far as it goes. Panetta said it was because they did not have enough real time info. The question is, with all the real time info they had why couldn’t they see the available resources was needed?
        On the funding side, defense budget cuts are an Obama proposal and Romney wants to maintain military strength.
        If our security in the CIA and State the ambassador should be able to go anywhere.

        October 28, 2012 at 2:34 pm |
      • lgp

        Obviously, Stan gets his misinformation from CommieNewsNetwork. The Ryan budget (which doesn't specify cuts to embassy security) would not take effect until 2014. The cuts in embassy security THIS YEAR are all on Obama's bloody hands.

        October 28, 2012 at 4:04 pm |
    • StanCalif

      First of all, our government does not "protect" American citizens where ever they choose to travel. Any citizen who gets into trouble abroad is responsible for his own security. Sure, our embassies will assist any citizen who makes contact and requests assistance. But NO goverment agency guarantees your safety when travelling abroad!

      With a passport in hand, you are free to go almost anywhere you please (some exceptions with countries that require a visa to enter). You travel at your own risk, our government provides no security! You are expected to behave and respect the laws and customs of countries you travel to. Embassies will assit you, if you screw up, but you must get to one first!

      October 28, 2012 at 12:26 pm | Reply
  45. cyclonewarningcenter

    CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC ARE NOT REPORTING THIS STORY JUST TO COVER UP FOR OBAMA... TURN TO FOX NEWS NOW TO ALL THE REAL NEWS ON THIS..

    Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer said tonight that his sources tell him that Obama was one of the people in the room watching the Benghazi attack go down and both he and Col. David Hunt agree it would have taken an order by the president to intervene. Further, Col. Hunt said that we were only 20 min away by jet and a couple of hours away by AC-130 gunships and special forces, and the decision not to intervene had to be political.

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1NbtQGTDCM&w=640&h=390]

    October 28, 2012 at 10:33 am | Reply
    • berber24

      "NO REAL-TIME INFO. MY $#@!!!" How much more real-time can you get than 2 predator drones flying overhead recording the event live?? Panetta, Martin Dempsey and David Petraeus sat safely in DC watching the whole thing unfold and DID NOTHING!!! I'm sure they and everyone else trying to cover their rear-ends believe Ty Woods and Glenn Doherty got what they deserved, since they were ordered to STAND DOWN but disobeyed the order. Only 4 people died in this attack, but there were 30 people there, who would have died if these two had not disobeyed the order. They owe the next breath they take and every breath after that to these two brave heroes. I hope they will all find the courage to speak out and tell the truth about what really happened-BEFORE THE ELECTION!!!! After the election, it won't matter so much, since we will all be at the mercy of this evil, cold-hearted admin. for 4 more years–and they won't be the least bit concerned about how the American people feel.

      October 28, 2012 at 1:13 pm | Reply
    • justagurlinseattle

      General Jack Keane says Obama response was appropriate, quick…. and effective for this type of attack….

      http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/10/25/fox-military-analyst-counters-rest-of-network-d/190932#disqus_thread

      October 30, 2012 at 10:01 am | Reply
  46. Bertrand Bert

    What is worse, the White House coverup or the CNN coverup? Absolutely reprehensible. RIP journalism.

    October 28, 2012 at 9:35 am | Reply
    • donanna

      I agree with the white house cover-up concept and the following CNN 'cover-up'. I beleive that having a repeat of 9-11-2001 on 9-11-2012 would have incovenient to the Obama admin.
      As to Panetta's comment that we don't send troops into harm's way with out full info (paraphrased) No. 1 that is what our troops volunteer for and #2 how much info did Stephens need to send requesting help before the amount of info would have warranted sending in help before our Embassy was over-run

      October 28, 2012 at 11:40 am | Reply
  47. blackirishblonde

    Panetta says.: ‘You Don’t Deploy Forces Into Harm’s Way Without Knowing What’s Going On’ is crazy. We sent Seal Team Six into Pakistan without letting Pakistan know. We put them in harm's way. Yet we have two heroes Woods and Doherty two former SEALS that ignored direct orders to stand down and fought to the bitter end,waiting for help. Well as far as I'm concerned MR. PRESIDENT~~ Osama Bin Laden Is Dead. So Are Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

    October 28, 2012 at 9:31 am | Reply
    • bsherm

      Weird and stupid argument and totally off point. What the joint chiefs did not want to do is create another Mogadishu situation (Black Hawk Down moron) in a way better armed city that just staged a successful revolt. It's a miracle only 4 were killed in the two hours of this very targeted attack. Bin Laden got whacked ina carefully planned raid - are you saying we should have let the Pakistanis handle it like they did his capture in Tora Bora. Idiot ...

      October 28, 2012 at 10:07 am | Reply
      • Mike C

        You are off base! You could not have had better intel in such a hot situation. Jets were 20 min. away that could have taken out the morter team that was laser fixed. A rapid response team and gunships could have been there in 2 hours. They were told to stand down because of a fund raiser in NV. The military leaves no one behind unless the Commander in Chief leads from there.

        October 28, 2012 at 10:59 am |
      • wh0622

        Why let people kill our ambassador and 3 others that are on our soil in another land when we have the resources readily available to help them. They were refused support three times. Impeach Obama and throw out Panetta while taking him to court for lies to the american public.

        October 28, 2012 at 11:11 am |
      • Josh Samuel

        Shame on you and on Obama and Panetta. they knew they were about to be assassinated but they preferred avoid to confront the muslims, simply cowards.

        October 28, 2012 at 12:27 pm |
      • New Yorker

        They didn't want to create another Black Hawk down , because it would harm Obama's chances in the election, not because our military is afraid of a gun fight. Someone made the choice better four dead Americans and a win in the election over sending in help and maybe more dead Americans in a failed rescue. I think people would have had more respect for Obama's team if they sent in a group of SpecOps and failed than telling everyone it was about a stupid video.

        October 28, 2012 at 8:53 pm |
      • NS Bingo

        Like you really know what the JCS were planning and directing. It is the SECDEF, with direction from the POTUS, who decide force response. You uneducated and annoying moron – You may leave now.

        October 28, 2012 at 11:14 pm |
    • donanna

      Agree completely!!!!

      October 28, 2012 at 11:41 am | Reply
  48. harpman

    One clear fact is that the embassy staff requested in August that a security detail remain in place instead of being withdrawn. The State Department refused the request and told them that they need not ask again. Heads should roll for this idiotic action just prior to the 9/11 anniversary.

    October 28, 2012 at 9:25 am | Reply
    • bsherm

      Why was Stevens even there putting others in harms way if he believed that? - Benghazi did not have an embassy (The embassy where ambassadors normally are is in Tripoli), it is/was a small lightly staffed consulate and constrained by budget cuts imposed by Ryan as was all diplomatic security. You really need to be better informed before posting idiotic things.

      October 28, 2012 at 10:14 am | Reply
      • occasionalposter1

        Fi you believe this, you are delusional. With ALL of the monies Obama and company have access to, print and divert to special interests under "presidential authorities" of different kinds, Ryan and his cohorts certainly have not been able to stop TRILLIONS of dollars from being spent in other areas. Don't blame Ryan. Blame Obama and people with your blinders mentality. You blame Republican for cutting but don't think one iota about the trillions that get spent. Even a 5th grader can see through that hypocracy.

        October 28, 2012 at 10:33 am |
      • Mike C

        Hey, The WH sent Stevens there and stated funding was not a issue. Stop reading old BHO talking points.

        October 28, 2012 at 11:05 am |
      • wh0622

        State Department had multiple millions in there operational funds for security but chose to not spend them in Lybia. Why, and why accuse Ryan who had nothing to do with this action. Typical Lib attack which is trying to refocus the blame away from Obama.

        October 28, 2012 at 11:14 am |
      • StanCalif

        I agree! Being in Benghazi on 9/11 was Stevens' choice, no one ordered him to go there! It's unfortunate that he made a very poor decision knowing full well that Paul Ryan and others in congress cut off security funding! Had Stevens stayed in Tripoli during the 9/11 anniversity, he and the others would stil be alive! Stevens screwed up and paid the price! Now let's all blame others!

        October 28, 2012 at 12:01 pm |
      • Lou

        And Yet Valerie Jarrett Has full time protection ! This Administrations priorities are self serving, criminal. I cannot express how sickened I am by their actions, as well as the cover up by the main stream media! This is not the America I have known.

        October 28, 2012 at 2:31 pm |
  49. cathkol

    Donate! American Hero, Ty Woods, sacrificed his life leaving behind a beautiful 3 month old baby boy.

    Won't find this on CNN. They won't cover the story because they're un-AMERICAN and could care less about these fallen heroes! When it involves their sons or daughters, I'll be sure to turn the other ear!

    You can find the link below on Dick Morris.com.

    http://donate.seal-nswfamilyfoundation.org/events/ty-woods-memorial-fund/e21388

    October 28, 2012 at 9:21 am | Reply
    • bsherm

      It seems you believe that it would have been far better to have gotten many more Americans killed in a situation that could have only escalated Black Hawk Down style if we had "invaded". The two contractors killed would have still been dead .. killed in the first two hours. Panetta and the Joint Chiefs were correct.

      October 28, 2012 at 10:19 am | Reply
      • berber24

        I'm afraid you are not up on the facts. The 2 Navy SEALS were not killed till 6 hours after the attack began. The 2 of them were able to protect and defend the 30 people in the safe house for 6 long hours. They had a laser sight on the people shelling them with mortars and called in exact coordinates, so the jets–they believed would come–could take the mortars out. But the jets never came. For 6 hours the jets never came. These 2 brave, selfless heroes had to have died knowing the military they served so faithfully for so many years had abandoned them. "Lions for Lambs"

        October 28, 2012 at 12:55 pm |
      • New Yorker

        So in your eyes better four dead Americans, so Obama can avoid a Black Hawk down? How about it if that was your son protecting Obama's policy in Libya?

        October 28, 2012 at 9:00 pm |
  50. Lisa

    CNN Report on this story and the facts and stop helping Obama hide what he did to help kill these brave men! It is clear for the world to see. You have lost all integrity on this one!!!

    October 28, 2012 at 9:11 am | Reply
    • Lee

      Because of the handling of this situation I am a Democrat voting for Romney!

      October 28, 2012 at 7:27 pm | Reply
  51. ducky657

    Here's the point Leon–you had CIA assets calling for one thing–close air support they would direct using their laser sight. In case you and your President don't know this there was little risk in sending an AC130 to deal with a mortar crew. You knew there was no danger–the problem is BHO could not have six months to decide what to do so he punted and hoped no one would survive these planned attacks. Unfortunately for you thirty people survived as a result of Ty Woods and Glen Doherty's efforts so you guys are screwed!

    October 28, 2012 at 8:57 am | Reply
  52. Ben

    No real time info other than an email which they may or may not have read, repeated calls from those involved and at least one heroic SEAl who defied orders to rush to their aid over SEVEN hours and streaming real time video that they watched that showed a sustained and organized attack over SEVEN hours including armored personel carriers, missiles and RPGs (not the weapons of a mob angry about a movie). They knew what this was. They knew what kind of group this was if not the specific group and they knew that without help in hour one that these people would die.

    The real sin is that knowing all this they continued to mention a movie trailer as one of the causes if not the cause and "terror" as an abstract secondary reason if at all.

    October 28, 2012 at 8:56 am | Reply
  53. Taskmaster

    Obama,Panetta and Hillary Clinton are all trying to cover their rear ends. They will try to bury this just like they did with Fast and Furious .. It's the standard liberal response "it's someone elses fault."

    October 28, 2012 at 8:49 am | Reply
    • Barb45

      Agreed

      October 28, 2012 at 8:51 am | Reply
  54. ducky657

    As a veteran I know one thing–if Leon Panetta did not have any real time intelligence available he must have been in the toilet. CNN accepts this guy's word for one reason–he is for their guy! When the truth comes out–and it will eventually–CNN will be seen as complicit with ABC, CBS, and NBC because they are not covering the fact that three times Ty Woods was denied help by the President and as such they sealed this hero's fate. He saved thirty people even though he was told to stand down. Keep ignoring this story CNN at your own peril

    October 28, 2012 at 8:38 am | Reply
    • Barb45

      Agree

      October 28, 2012 at 8:52 am | Reply
  55. zaqaz

    Your pathetic administration PUT Chris Stevens et al into harms way without adequate security.

    First, you brought down the previous government, and then acquiesced to not letting Marines guard our civilians working in the State Department?

    Disingenuous is the word that comes to mind – as a start. I sincerely hope your administration is raked over the coals to find out WHY you sent in lambs to the slaughter.

    October 28, 2012 at 6:33 am | Reply
    • bsherm

      Moronic comment, Stevens put himself and others into harm's way being in a small consulate instead of the EMBASSY in Tripoli as he foolishly believed the people of Benghazi were his friends. Embassy – Ambassador. Consultate – consular officers.

      October 28, 2012 at 10:35 am | Reply
      • StanCalif

        Agree! Stevens screwed up, badly! Maybe he forgot to look at the calendar. Being in Benghazi on 9/11 was just plain foolish. He already knew his security had been gutted.

        October 28, 2012 at 12:09 pm |
  56. Harry From Pa

    Wow I can see alot of trolls tonight, what has happened was a travesty, but what I will say was where was anyone on this page when 911 happened more than 10 years ago? I remember watching it and getting ready to deploy to afghanistan. I also remember how people didn't say anything about all the intelligence that Bush had before the attacks occurred and yet nothing was done. What about all the pages missing from the report? Oh yeah we forgot about that, oh and how many people died? Too many either way. In case people haven't noticed news is biased no matter which news it is, whether it is CNN, or even Fox. I try going to both, I come running right back to CNN.

    October 28, 2012 at 4:23 am | Reply
    • ducky657

      Yeah–no one can gloss over a story like CNN! Can you imagine what would be the narrative if John McCain was President? The headlines would be all Libya all the time and President McCain is involved in a cover-up. BTW–I stopped watching Fox a long time ago–any news outlet which helps either party can't be trusted. The RINO agenda is as progressive as Barack Obama without admitting they are. Ask yourself these questions–what was Ambassador Stevens doing in Benghazi on 9/11 and who told Ambassador Rice and WH Pressor Jay Carney to sell the 'video' story the President is still trying to sell with the help of guys like Brian Williams? This was never about a video–CNN started to cover this story but when things got too hot for their guy they dropped it!

      October 28, 2012 at 8:47 am | Reply
      • sleeptastic

        somehow I doubt that President McCain would have stood idly by while our embassy was being overrun by terrorists.

        October 28, 2012 at 5:22 pm |
    • Ben

      Harry, the only trolls are the apologists who try to compare the pre 9-11 world to the 9-11-12 world. That is the definition of trolling and misdirecting.

      October 28, 2012 at 8:58 am | Reply
      • bob

        If you think that Bush and his goons didnt know something was gonna happen prior to 9/11 than you dont know the FACTS. AND if you actually think things are different since 9/11 in terms of threat assesment in the CIA. Than you once more have shown your lack of FACTS. READ and think instead of just watching the"news" Enjoy your ignorance and the kool aid. Its the sheep like You that allow Bad men to do bad things. Now get lost and READ A FEW BOOKS

        October 28, 2012 at 10:51 am |
    • NS Bingo

      Harry, Bill Clinton had a chance to kill UBL in 1999 and he FAILED! So, that makes him ultimately responsible for what happened on 9/11. The "Bush is responsible for 9/11" argument is pure BS, and frankly, getting quite annoying. The story here is the failure of the SECDEF and POTUS to come clean on what really happened in Benghazi. Please try to stick to the topic. Thanks.

      October 28, 2012 at 9:46 am | Reply
      • bsherm

        NS – Clinton was condemned for attempting to kill Bin Laden during the Lewinsky ordeal you morons were more worried about at the time. Try to be better informed, remember history, and stay on topic.

        October 28, 2012 at 10:38 am |
  57. REDFIRESTORM

    Evil derivatives - the words of the prophets are written on the subway walls and tenament halls - bonsoir street smart - make them beg for mercy - like a rolling stone (wink)

    October 28, 2012 at 3:58 am | Reply
  58. REDFIRESTORM

    Simon and Garfunkel: "Fools, silence like a cancer grows" You cannot blame CNN for our Federal government's outdated intelligence technology. CNN does not make the news - it simply analyzes and then reports it. Blame Obambi-poo for the cover-ups and delays. GIGO: "Garbage In - Garbage Out" If you feed the media garbage -then garbage gets reported. All the CNN commentators - like Anderson and Erin - love to toss the garbage back on their face whenever they can. Just like when Gov. Romney was accused of wanting to make General Motors fail. Obambi-poo did not want America - and in fact the whole world - know that organized terrorism is still very much alive and thriving. They do not want us to know our cybersecurity and intelligence tech are outdated and rapidly becoming useless for feeding accurate and reliable real-time intelligence. Yes, Obambi-poo has weakened our nation in too many ways to list. No doubt CNN will marshall all its resources - like Obambi-poo better do during the aftermath of nature's fury - to eradicate DNC's evil storm once and for all.

    October 28, 2012 at 3:45 am | Reply
  59. Thomas Fuller

    For a year, my military officer son was deployed in a similar situation, undercover in an Iraqi police station, 40 km from the nearest FOB. He had a satellite phone to call for backup. He told me not to worry; they would never leave him out there twisting in the wind. I know now that he was wrong. If it was politically expedient for them, this administration would have sacrificed him, then told me how brave he was and insisted they would punish his murderers. He is set to deploy again. I cannot trust these men and women. If they didn't know, they are incompetent. If they did know and did not act, they are corrupt.

    October 28, 2012 at 3:45 am | Reply
    • Barb45

      So in agreement with you. I will keep your son in my prayers as I pray for all the service men and women.

      October 28, 2012 at 8:55 am | Reply
    • karianez

      So very true. Well wishes of safety for you and yours.

      October 28, 2012 at 10:35 am | Reply
    • MayavBoroda

      Obama lied to American people and clearly it is cover up! What happens to CNN?
      Love to Obama so much.. 4 Americans are dead ...Not important to CNN...they want to keep Obama in power.
      Disgrace to US Media.

      October 28, 2012 at 5:07 pm | Reply
  60. janabh

    Anderson Cooper
    Wolf Blitzer
    Candy Crowley
    Soledad O'Brien
    Erin Burnett
    John King
    Ashleigh Banfield
    Alexis Glick,
    Christiane Amanpour etc. etc.,
    should all lose the right to call themselves journalists as well as decent human beings.

    CNN's president, Gerhard Zeiler doesn't deserve his position either.

    The entire purpose of the media's is to inform and protect the people. It is not their job to protect the president. Where is their integrity? professionalism? and common decency and there shame?

    We knew that this administration had already leaked a series of classified information in order to try to pump Obama up as being tough and effective on foreign policy and to get every inch of political capitol that he could on the killing of Bin laden. Of course CNN and the rest of the "Obama Press" didn't report much on the leaks because they were so reckless that they made "their guy" look bad.

    Now, because of Obama's ideology, his cowardliness and incompetency and his desire to make it appear that Al Queda "is on the run" and "normalized", four American patriots and heros are dead.

    This article here Chris Lawrence is a soft piece. No probing questions. As the truth of what happened to these four men in Bengahzi is slowly being revealed, (despite the administrations lies and obsvication) I pray that people will pay attention to this story, that they will turn to Fox news since they are pretty much the only news organization reporting on it and that they will really give some thought to what exactly occurred here, before they vote. Obama arrogantly thought he could get away with this cover up (remember how he feigned indignation during the 2nd debate over the idea that he and his administration would ever politicize this terrorist attack – oops, I mean this man made disaster? He thought he could get away with it because he knew he could count on CNN and the rest of the media to cover up his incompetency, his lies and his cover up.

    October 28, 2012 at 3:19 am | Reply
    • Spike

      I agree 100%. These so called reporters just repeat White House talking points hook, line and sinker. When I was trained as a Marine I was told that we never leave our own behind. I don't recall there being a clause about gathering weeks of intellegence beforehand.

      October 28, 2012 at 3:53 am | Reply
    • ducky657

      The problem is they feel they are bigger than the news–don't you get it? Most of the people you mentioned could not string together two sentences without a teleprompter–remind you of anyone else? Style trumps substance and they have to make sure their guy gets elected. Great post but asking these folks to show any semblance of balance is beyond their meager abilities!

      October 28, 2012 at 8:52 am | Reply
  61. Doug

    You guys are not getting the point here. Obama wants to destroy our nation, he wants Sharia law, and he is Muslim. Stop thinking all this is by accident, he is doing exactly what he wants to do. Obviously who ever is controlling CNN "behind" the curtain is with Obama, they are NOT making a mistake, they are moving forward with a PLAN. CNN does not care people if you trust them or not, they have a clear objective, and your crying about their reporting means nothing to them. Something much deeper, and terribly wrong is going on under our noses. Better all wake up and start sending emails to congress. Typing in this blog serves no purpose, contact your reps in congress today.

    October 28, 2012 at 2:57 am | Reply
  62. Beth

    Panetta "You don't deploy forces into harm's way".....is he in charge of the Peace Corps? What about leaving our Ambassador "in harm's way" ...that's ok? Is this a case of incompetence...or maybe thinking fast is not this President's strength...after all he needed years to find a way to catch Bin Laden, and then the ground work for that had already begun during Clinton's time – Bill started tracking Bin Laden after SS Cole, before 9/11 happened. You know, the White House probably think we are stupid and easily fooled, but if you travel a lot, you'll realize just how clever most Americans are in comparison to the rest of the world. But Barack wants us to be more like them. Michelle said it – she was never proud to be an American before Barack got elected – he probably felt the same way...really a patriotic couple..eh?

    October 28, 2012 at 2:30 am | Reply
  63. mipolitic

    BS , from CIC passed through the voice of a guy that would retrack this in a heart beat in front of TROOPS .

    Panetta is a man that will not undermine the USA , and at this point he is on the wrong side of history and he knows it .

    Walk , just resign ! or SPEAK UP and restore the CODE ,,,,of HONOR !

    October 28, 2012 at 1:58 am | Reply
  64. John Russo

    Now we have a cover up by the main stream media. You folks are not doing your job. This is now beyond bias. Come on folks get in the game !

    October 28, 2012 at 1:39 am | Reply
  65. Private Investigator

    Among the many shameful aspects of the administration's refusal to help our people is the lack of candor by General Petraeus. It's difficult to understand how a man so many servicemen and women looked up to can put his "career" ahead of the truth. He should be mortified and guilt ridden to play a part in this charade. Shame on you, General.

    October 28, 2012 at 12:50 am | Reply
  66. NoChangeNoHope

    Report: Hillary Asked For More Security in Benghazi, Obama Said No

    Read more: http://nation.foxnews.com/hillary-clinton/2012/10/26/report-hillary-asked-more-security-benghazi-obama-said-no#ixzz2AZ7yJFoH

    http://newsninja2012.com/bombshell-clinton-ordered-more-security-obama-denied-request/

    CNN is pitiful.

    http://nation.foxnews.com/hillary-clinton/2012/10/26/report-hillary-asked-more-security-benghazi-obama-said-no

    October 28, 2012 at 12:43 am | Reply
    • bsherm

      Fox News ... LOL. I'd rather get my news from a bathroom wall. CNN is simply reporting what an official said.

      October 28, 2012 at 10:30 am | Reply
      • Allison

        The bathroom wall has more credence than CNN does at this moment. So, go sit on your toilet and read on.

        October 28, 2012 at 8:44 pm |
  67. Debbie

    Judging by the responses on this page, I am not the only one in total disbelief that the real news on Benghazi is not on the front page. You should be ashamed of yourselves for not getting the whole real story out there. Americans were murdered and our government is trying to hide it in the name of an up coming election. At least Fox News is covering this and letting the American people know what is going on. Step up CNN let the people know what the hell is going on. This story is huge We the people should be told the TRUTH and all of it!

    October 28, 2012 at 12:37 am | Reply
  68. Beth

    CNN and all the other TV stations not reporting the Benghazigate tragedy are aiding and abetting a cover-up – you play games with people's lives and futures, as this is all it is to you...a game of winners and losers – moral courage and integrity and proper reporting and investigation are not important to you unless it fits into your agenda. Protecting a dishonest President to get him re-elected. And if that happens? He will spend the next 4 years defending himself against one investigation after the other, and the country will slip further down the drain. And in the end you will find yourselves totally embarrassed – again.

    October 28, 2012 at 12:30 am | Reply
  69. Jan

    CNN is useless as a news organization and not to be trusted any more.

    October 28, 2012 at 12:27 am | Reply
  70. Beth

    CNN and all the other TV stations not reporting the Benghazigate tragedy are aiding and abetting a cover-up. You play games with people's lives and futures, as this is all it is to you...a game of winners and losers. Moral courage and integrity and proper reporting and investigation are not important to you unless it fits into your agenda. It's all about protecting a dishonest President to get him re-elected. And if that happens? He will spend the next 4 years defending himself against one investigation after the other, and the country will slip further down the drain. And in the end you will find yourselves totally embarrassed – again. Remember Monica?

    October 28, 2012 at 12:00 am | Reply
    • ducky657

      They have to make sure their guy gets re-elected. Some of these people are close personal friends with the President and one of them meets once a week with him to talk over policy, strategy, and propaganda. You can't really blame them since their former CEO thinks it is a good thing US service members are killing themselves faster than the enemy can kill them! CNN has become ABC, CBS, and NBC–the only exception is that they report 24/7 for the White House!

      October 28, 2012 at 9:26 am | Reply
  71. JuJuBee

    Why does CNN show the caption under the picture as a "protestor"?

    October 27, 2012 at 11:49 pm | Reply
    • lgp

      Because they haven't received permission from the White House (Valerie Jarrett) to change the alibi.

      October 27, 2012 at 11:51 pm | Reply
  72. lizzytalorburton

    Obama won't talk or answer questions about the murders in Libya - his not talking about it and running and hiding from it is a definite sign of GUILT– its so obvious why Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama won't talk - GUILTLY RETARDS, both of them. Dirty Dogs for not sending help when the four Americans begged and begged and begged some more and then died without any help at all. And then the President soon after the Americans were killed and tortured goes to Las Vegas and partys and raises money for himself. Even if he wins the election, he and Clinton are losers, everyone knows it.

    October 27, 2012 at 11:36 pm | Reply
  73. Peeloneoff

    I will see all of you folks over at FOX.

    October 27, 2012 at 11:30 pm | Reply
    • Rhonda Wax

      CNN is aiding in the cover up. Most Americans don't rely on the networks or cable for accurate news reporting anymore. The major networks, along with CNN have become irrelevant and deemed untrustworthy. It is unconscionable the way CNN and the networks are withholding the evidence that is mounting for this fiasco! It is all because it will harm their "beloved" Obama and help change the course of the election. I predict that after a Romney victory, evidence will "suddenly appear" for the reporters at CNN and it will finally be reported. CNN will try to save face, but it will be too late. After the media bias in this election alone, one could never see them as journalistically viable.

      October 27, 2012 at 11:52 pm | Reply
    • ducky657

      Most conservatives left Fox when they began to be more worried about their access to the President than they were with reporting the news in a fair an balanced way.

      October 28, 2012 at 9:28 am | Reply
  74. scrtjrny

    On tonight's show Justice with Judge Jeanine one of her guests said his source confirmed Obama was watching what was happening in Benghazi in real time and could have ordered help be sent when Navy Seal Tyrone Woods requested it. Why isn't CNN doing their job to get this story out there for the world to know? CNN you were the ones who found the ambassador's diary. Come on CNN, investigate and get to the truth.

    October 27, 2012 at 11:20 pm | Reply
  75. helenecha

    If Libyan leaders didn't understand how important for them to take seriously on that terrorists attack happened in their country, we would not imagine that they're going to be capable of leading Libyan people to a better future.

    October 27, 2012 at 10:56 pm | Reply
  76. SickandTiredof being SickandTired

    Obama administration and MSM so eager to divulge information about the top secret raid to kill OBL to the point of illegal security leaks, and NOW, Benghazi.....the opposite. So ironic. No Presidential press conference, no main stream media coverage, no forthcoming information.

    October 27, 2012 at 10:46 pm | Reply
  77. Sam TC

    Really..... CNN, this is your best? Your Silence says it all. I used to turn to you for news..... No More

    October 27, 2012 at 10:40 pm | Reply
    • Cynthia

      I totally agree. Outrageous lack of reporting on this issue. Why????

      October 27, 2012 at 10:44 pm | Reply
    • lgp

      878 responses to this 'story'. That's more than CNN can count as viewers on any given day. You'd think they'd get a clue.

      October 27, 2012 at 10:51 pm | Reply
  78. Tony M.

    Gee, CNN, I'm sensing a trend in all of these posts. No one is buying your bull. Simply, you are not doing your jobs. Start asking real questions. You are dishonoring the American heros that lost their lives in this attack. It's disgusting. Do your damn job.

    October 27, 2012 at 10:34 pm | Reply
  79. John R

    The death of UBL has been used as campaign capital by the POTUS. The death of four Americans in Benghazi appears to be a campaign inconvenience and we believe if we don't talk about it, perhaps it will just go away? I wonder if there is any journalistic integrity to be found within the ranks of CNN? The American people deserve better and this nation is in serious trouble when political gain continues to trump the truth. What is CNN afraid of? It couldn't be ratings!

    October 27, 2012 at 10:34 pm | Reply
  80. Hello CNN this is news look into it!

    The hottest news story right now and CNN has one post about it half way down the page???

    This was a MAJOR failure from top to bottom. Oh, and they had the entire complex under surveillance for 2 hours from the air. Not enough intelligence my buhtty... Can anyone say COVER UP???

    October 27, 2012 at 10:26 pm | Reply
  81. sandscribe6

    Whistle blowers are beginning to come out – the truth will be known (maybe not before the election, but that is what the news media are counting on as they want Obama re-elected.) If Obama is re-elected and the truth comes out, he may wish that he had not won the election because he will be facing impeachment proceedings (in spite of the protection of his attorney general). Remember, Watergate was the coverup of a burglary with no one killed, this is the coverup of something much more sinister with our ambassador and 3 others killed with State Dept, DOD and WH viewing it all in live time thanks to overhead drones and security cameras and no assistance provided. Shame on our leaders for not doing the right thing all for political reasons and shame on CNN for not investigating and reporting. My neighbors who voted for Obama last time around are shocked that this coverup is taking place and today told me they early-voted for Romney because they said "something stinks" and they could not in good conscience vote for Obama without knowing the truth. Because the senate and administration are stalling the Benghazi investigation until after the election, it could hurt Obama's re-election anyway.

    October 27, 2012 at 10:15 pm | Reply
  82. American HeroesDead

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/cia-operators-were-denied-request-for-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources-say/

    October 27, 2012 at 10:05 pm | Reply
    • satxdog

      CNN's coverage of this Bengazi coverup is deplorable. Have you no shame CNN? Journalists are supposed to report on real stores and tell the truth not try to DECEIVE the American public with lies and ommissions. I guess you no longer have any journalists, just left wing lazy or corrupt writers who pretend to be reporters. You got the same information on Bengazi as foxnews.com but you are too scared to tell the truth because you are trying to protect a president who allowed 4 AMERICANS TO DIE BECAUSE OF HIS INCOMPENTANCE or such a liar who will do anything to get re elected. CNN is a disgrace to the American people who expect the media to inform us about the FACTS on any issue instead you lie and deceive. The truth will come out soon and your netwoirk will look like idiots. No wonder more people are no longer watching your network because of your biased reporting.

      October 27, 2012 at 10:25 pm | Reply
  83. txvoter1

    it took me 5 minutes to find anything on CNN about Libya. what a biased, worthless network,

    October 27, 2012 at 9:45 pm | Reply
  84. deborah

    CNN you are just like the other liberal media.....just get Obama re-elected. Americans need to know the truth about this and you are too

    much of a coward to report it. When all this comes out you will have to answer to America for your lack of reporting....shame on you.....

    October 27, 2012 at 9:45 pm | Reply
  85. Tom Jackson

    Shame, shame, shame on you CNN! If you thought Fox was wrong about Libya you'd be saying so. Instead, you try to assist in the re-election of a man unfit for the Presidency. You're silence is appalling and repulsive.

    October 27, 2012 at 9:37 pm | Reply
  86. C.L.A.

    Perhaps Panetta should have consulted Sean Smith's on line gaming buds. 1. No security – "we saw one of our 'police' that guard the compound taking pictures.". 2. A matter of life and death – "assuming we don't die tonight.".

    October 27, 2012 at 9:35 pm | Reply
  87. Dale Palkki

    This should be headlines. I searched for over 5 minutes to find the word Benghazi. Shame on you CNN. You certainly are no news organization and need to remove one of the "Ns" from your name. How silly you will look as this plays out. All credibility lost.

    October 27, 2012 at 9:06 pm | Reply
  88. garyschnid

    This won't make the headlines because CNN is biased toward Obama. This shows the current administration was asleep at the wheel. First saying it was a protest and then finally weeks later calling it the terrorist attack that it was. This is a pure demonstration of the Obama administration failing at protecting US citizens on US soil. I wonder if we had hijackers on planes again, how many planes would have been crashed into their targets before scrambling the fighter jets, or if the jets would have been scrambled at all.

    October 27, 2012 at 8:47 pm | Reply
  89. In.The.Middle

    CNN, stop hiding this story and covering for the president. The artical is hidden, should be front and center, AND you are not even telling us everything there is to tell. SHAME ON CNN!!!

    October 27, 2012 at 8:28 pm | Reply
  90. MitziW

    Panetta and the rest all saw this going down in real time and refused to act. This is treason, and it should be on the FRONT PAGE!

    October 27, 2012 at 8:15 pm | Reply
  91. Terry Wigfield

    When will this administration stop lying? Mr. Panetta said they didn't have enough information to attack. A C-130 gun ship could have been there from Italy in 90 minutes. Even if you don't have enough information you get send the gunship over the area and begin sending seal units on their way. The final decision is made when they get over area. The administration never even had any forces stage to get ready.

    This is one of the biggest news stories ever. Watergate was about Nixon lying about a blotched burgularly. This is about 4 deaths and no attempt made to rescue these people. Hell. Obama knowing what happened went to Nevada the next day to campaign. CNN and other media not covering this story just shows how much they want Obama to win.

    Walter Cronkite was a liberal but he never let his idealolgy impact his coverage. CNN and it's reporters do not provide news coverage, it's a propaganda machine for the liberals. Total lack of professionalism. I have cancelled my newspaper and magazine subscriptions and never watch CNN, ABC, NBC, or CBS (except for football games-they haven't politicize them yet). I have also started writing and boycotting the companies that advertise on them.
    PEOPLE IT'S TIME TO DEMAND THAT CNN AND REST PERFORM THEIR JOB OR SHUT THEM DOWN!!!!!!!!

    October 27, 2012 at 7:56 pm | Reply
    • garyschnid

      Football has been politicized when they changed the Monday Night Football theme music last year.

      October 27, 2012 at 8:39 pm | Reply
    • Drake

      You're assuming there was an AC-130 sitting on the ground just waiting for a call in Italy, your 90 minutes becomes more like 2 and a half hours to get the pilots into the plane, get everything fueled, get some osrt of mission brief, etc. 90 minutes is also a long time, and throwing assets in blindly without a sitrep and specific targeting package for air support is a recepie for absolute disaster. So you have no idea what you're talking about. As for not covering it, you're a liar. Flat out liar.

      October 28, 2012 at 8:12 pm | Reply
  92. blackirishblonde

    Panetta says.: ‘You Don’t Deploy Forces Into Harm’s Way Without Knowing What’s Going On’ is crazy. We sent Seal Team Six into Pakistan without letting Pakistan know. We put them in harm's way. Yet we have two heroes Woods and Doherty two former SEALS that ignored direct orders to stand down and fought to the bitter end waitng for help .Well as far as I'm concerned MR. PRESIDENT~~ Osama Bin Laden Is Dead. So Are Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

    October 27, 2012 at 7:56 pm | Reply
  93. Rico

    This administration is trying to brush this under the rug because of the election and CNN is so biased that they hide this story away when it should be on the front page. A U.S. embassy was under siege and American lives were being lost but that was not clear enough information to send help? Of course you aren't going to have a clear picture of what is happening during a surprise attack! But you better have the nuts to send help IMMEDIATELY! If one of Panettas sons was in that embassy, you better believe he would have had enough information to send help. Hey CNN..Grow a pair yourselves!

    October 27, 2012 at 7:49 pm | Reply
  94. niguelman

    WHERE IS CANDY CROWLY WHEN YOU NEED HER?

    October 27, 2012 at 7:43 pm | Reply
    • bhaskie357

      You mean Candy "He actually did call it a terrorist attack" Crowley?

      This is all Yellow Journalism at its best. Twist the truth and any statements to sway those uneducated enough to have their own opinion over to the cheer leading team for Mr. Obama. As stated by another poster, why does the caption specify the person in the picture as a "protester" and not a terrorist? Main stream media has reverted a century.

      Well, we don't have to buy it anymore. There is enough technology out there for us to KNOW the truth. Please, those who were there, who were friends of those who died, don't let this go. Open your mouths and give us the truth. Don't be cowed by your bosses, Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama. Your friends, and our murdered public servants, deserve the truth to be know.

      October 28, 2012 at 4:20 am | Reply
  95. Harin

    The White House is hoping the American people are so simple that they actually believe we were powerless to react to this attack. Our military does not EVER leave a small unit on its own when attacked. Requests for support and aid are immediately answered, no matter what the situation and I guarantee you information is always fluid and uncertain. Even so the rescue force is sent without fail. For some reason, the White House denied the small force we had on the scene the help they repeatedly asked for, to the point where a few CIA operatives actually disobeyed orders and went on their own, saving many at the cost of their own lives. True heroes died while the White House watched from above and denied them their requests for help. Why? and why will the main stream media not ask and DEMAND real answers, instead of walking the same talking points that have been discredited already.

    October 27, 2012 at 7:34 pm | Reply
    • Drake

      No, that's just not true. We attempt to respond to calls for help when we can, but if you think there's never been a small unit that needed help that big army wasn't able to provide, you're incredibly naive. It happens, more than anyone would like to admit. It sucks, but we all know the risks when we sign up to serve. The uninformed are the chickenhawks who've never served or been in any position of danger and want to crucify the administration based on anonymous sources and the partisan hacks at fox's reporting.

      October 28, 2012 at 8:06 pm | Reply
  96. axtell66

    I would beleive panetta could not put forces at risk if he chose not to do so if his three sons and three grandchildren needed it.

    October 27, 2012 at 7:27 pm | Reply
  97. axtell66

    "The U.S. military did not get involved during the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, last month because officials did not have enough information about what was going on before the attack was over, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said Thursday"

    WOW!!!!! Three requests for support were denied with drones watching the entire 6 hour and 20 minute siege?

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/cia-operators-were-denied-request-for-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources-say/

    October 27, 2012 at 7:21 pm | Reply
  98. obamacansaveyourhouselosangeles

    Panetta said that they did not have enough Information about what was going on to take any action.
    What was going on was that 4 Americans were being killed, shot and murdered on American SOIL!

    ALL Foreign Embassies are AMERICAN SOIL.

    not enough Intelligence.?? NOT ENOUGH BALLS to take ACTION. Fire the sob's who refuse to protect our own.

    October 27, 2012 at 7:16 pm | Reply
    • Paula

      Exactly 100% GD right!!

      October 27, 2012 at 7:49 pm | Reply
    • lgp

      General Carter F. Ham, Commander, Africom attempted to defy Valerie Jarrett's order to stand down; he was relieved of his command and replaced by General David Rodriguez.

      Valerie Jarrett? Yes, the bat-faced woman from Iran is our defacto Commander-in-Chief because Barry the Boy Wonder has neither the intellect nor the gonads to fulfill his duties. If that doesn't scare the snot out of you, you are beyond hope. Then again, if you are getting your news from CNN, you still believe in Santa Claus and unicorns.

      October 27, 2012 at 10:45 pm | Reply
  99. lila kelley

    Malarkey. Bull Stuff.

    October 27, 2012 at 7:10 pm | Reply
  100. Do your JOB AND INVESTIGATE THIS

    That CNN is barely covering this, and when you are, you are simply parroting the administration line, shows just how in the tank for Obama's reelection you are.
    If this had happened a month before the 2004 election, it would be incessant front page news.
    Grow a pair, and start performing your proper function of being a check on those in power, and who seek it.

    October 27, 2012 at 7:07 pm | Reply
    • Scott

      Anyone who trusts CNN (or most any other single news source) to give them the full story on any issue involving our current president is a fool. There was a time when the reader could read the "News" to get factual and relatively unbiased and complete information. Today, we see only the pleadings of pundits and partisan "reporters" offering material which, when worthy of puplication, belongs on the editorial pages. Unfortunately, there are those who can't tell the difference and rely on those who which offer them what they want to believe vs. factual information. An uninformed and peer-driven electorate is the result.

      October 27, 2012 at 9:10 pm | Reply
1 2 3 4 5

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.