October 19th, 2012
02:30 PM ET

Analysis: Five weeks on, confusion and contradictions on Benghazi suspects

By Tim Lister, Chris Lawrence and Paul Cruickshank

Five weeks after terrorists stormed the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, confusion over the nature of the attack, the extent to which it was planned and the identity of the perpetrators seems as pervasive as ever.

The latest in the conflicting reports coming out of the country: the naming of Ahmed Abu Khattala as a suspect in the assault that left four Americans dead.

Abu Khattala was identified in published reports this week as the leader of Ansar al-Sharia, an Islamist group widely suspected to be involved in the consulate attack.

Also: How intelligence understanding of Benghazi changed

Both The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times reported Wednesday that Abu Khattala was at the consulate while the attack was unfolding.

"Witnesses ... have said they saw Mr. Abu Khattala leading the assault," The New York Times reported.

But some sources in Benghazi say they doubt Abu Khattala had such a role, telling CNN that he is neither the leader of Ansar al-Sharia nor currently connected with other jihadist groups.

Two sources in Benghazi contacted by CNN describe Abu Khattala as conservative but not a jihadist. They say they had previously heard nothing about his being a suspect in the attack.

That view was echoed by Hamad Bugrain, a spokesman for the February 17 Brigade, who denied that Abu Khattala led the attack and said he "is no longer active in any military service or in any brigades." February 17th is considered one of the more effective units in Benghazi and intervened to help Americans trapped at the consulate's annex building on the night of the attack.

Bugrain added that Abu Khattala had been connected to Ansar al-Sharia at some point but he now has a "normal lifestyle."

Another source with well-established contacts among Libyan jihadist groups said Abu Khattala had come to prominence during the 2011 Libyan revolution after being freed from Abu Salim prison in Tripoli.

The source said Abu Khattala had a radical reputation as a "takfiri" - a Muslim who accuses other Muslims of being apostates if they don't follow certain aspects of Sharia law. He added that Abu Khattala's former brigade had been suspected in the assassination last year of former Interior Minister Abdelfattah Younis in Benghazi, after he had defected from the Gadhafi regime.

Abu Khattala himself spoke with Reuters in Benghazi on Thursday and said he had heard he was a suspect only through news media.

"These reports say that no one knows where I am and that I am hiding," he told Reuters. "But here I am in the open, sitting in a hotel with you. I'm even going to pick up my sister's kids from school soon."

He denied being a leader of Ansar al-Sharia but said he was friendly with the group and knew its members. He also acknowledged going to the consulate the night of the attack after receiving a phone call about the assault, but told Reuters: "Just because someone is there doesn't mean they were behind it."

"I arrived at the scene just like the others did - to see what was happening," he told Reuters.

Abu Khattala gave the same account to New York Times correspondent David Kirkpatrick, who told CNN Friday: "He said he was on the scene but arrived after the shooting had already begun and was just basically trying to break up a traffic jam." (Watch the interview)

But Kirkpatrick said he did not think Abu Khattala's account was particularly convincing.

Lack of central authority an obstacle for investigators

One of the problems investigators face is the lack of central authority in Libya, where security relies upon various militia that co-exist uneasily. Additionally, many senior members of the security services - especially in Benghazi - have been assassinated in recent months.

The rampant insecurity in Benghazi is repeatedly referenced in roughly 160 pages of diplomatic traffic released Friday by the U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa.

They include one cable sent from the consulate just a week before the attack that reports: "An hour-long gun battle broke out between local police and militia forces August 28 ... demonstrating the very delicate dynamic among the city's official and unofficial security forces."

Kirkpatrick, who spoke to CNN from Benghazi, said Libya doesn't "have much of an army or police force ... so I think (Abu Khattala) feels a certain amount of impunity walking around the streets of Benghazi."

In several cases of politically motivated violence, suspects have been detained and questioned before being released "for lack of evidence." Few prosecutions have occurred.

When asked by CNN Friday if the United States has a good idea of where the leadership of Ansar al-Shariah is, a U.S. official said the current thinking is that the group is concentrated east of Benghazi.

Libyan officials say that dozens of militants who previously had compounds in and around the eastern town of Derna had recently sought refuge in the forests and ravines behind the coastal town of Susa, which lies between Derna and Benghazi.

Earlier this month, three Libyan policemen were killed in an attack on their checkpoint at Susa that was blamed on Islamist radicals.

Asked about the intelligence-gathering process in Benghazi, the U.S. official said: "We obviously don't have boots on the ground," but he did suggest that U.S. agencies are working with Libyans to gather information.

Was al Qaeda involved?

U.S. and Libyan authorities are also investigating whether al Qaeda's affiliate in North Africa - al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) - had a role in the Benghazi attack.

Several days after the assault, the president of Libya's Parliament, Mohammed al Magarief, asserted that U.S. intelligence had intercepted communications between elements of AQIM and Ansar al-Sharia.

Neither U.S. nor Libyan officials have given further details.

Since the fall of Gadhafi, experts believe AQIM has tried to expand its operations northwards into Libya from its sub-Saharan strongholds. Sources briefed by Western intelligence told CNN that last year two senior AQIM figures made trips to Libya to explore the possibility of cooperation with local Libyan Jihadist groups, secure weapons supplies and scout out possible locations for training facilities.

One of those operatives, Mohktar Belmokhtar, an Algerian founding member of AQIM, spent several months in Libya and traveled up to Libya's northern coast, according to the source.

The other, Abdelhamid Abou Zeid – whose reported execution of Western hostages has cemented a reputation for extreme brutality - made several trips to Libya in 2011, according to the source.

Both men are now believed to be in northern Mali, which has become the epicenter of AQIM operations after jihadist groups took control of much of the region this year.

soundoff (325 Responses)
  1. John

    Should make for interesting interchange at Monday's debate

    Romney "New reports from Libya suggest that the story wasn't reported correctly by the administration"

    Obama "Even newer reports, which you are privy to state " It wasn't Al Queda, and was just as likely spontaneous as it was pre-planned by a major terrorist group".......You should be ashamed for Lying Mr. Romney, you just receivied this."

    October 20, 2012 at 6:39 pm | Reply
    • EdD

      Then of course Romney can counter with the news reports that al qaeda claimed responsibility on 9/15 while Obama was promoting that a vudeo was to blame. Let me repeat this; al qaeda came out and said they did it.
      "Al-Qaeda says attack on U.S. consulate in Libya ‘revenge’ for death of its 2nd man"
      english dot alarabiya dot net/articles/2012/09/15/238197.html

      October 20, 2012 at 6:43 pm | Reply
  2. Soldier of Fortunes

    Sheeple for People I see...you need to take off the rose colored glasses...the Robpublicans set this up like bowling pins..
    They knew ahead of time the security issues...timed it for 9-11 and Robmoney was the first to make declarations...they have been doing that to the White House since the Black Boy that got his Law Degree at Harvard is now in Charge...
    And they really don't like that...didn't think it would come to pass...been bellowing in their bourbons since...they crucify those they cannot forget or those they cannot stand or both...either way Law Boy is a good pick...Harvard trained...
    He will give us reports and the White Boys of the White House don't like that...they just can't shut him up...lol...GOOD!!!

    October 20, 2012 at 6:11 pm | Reply
    • Allena Westbrook

      I agree with you,strange this person who made this awful film said he was paid $50million from five donors?????film on you tube all hell breaks out people die Romney out speaking before even the President has any facts he's all over this setup setup just saying.

      October 20, 2012 at 7:42 pm | Reply
  3. Captain

    ODD FACT ... the two days before this attack, the News began reporting about new investigations of Bush WH complicity in 9/11, as well as the Silverstein (Israel/Mossad) connection. "Suddenly" this 'attack' happened, and that News disappeared.... don't think these things are planned – think again....

    see youtube - CIA Asset Susan Lindauer Can Now Speak 10 years after 9-11.
    Yeah, Bush WH did it. Lied about everything. More on VeteransToday

    October 20, 2012 at 6:03 pm | Reply
    • Get Real

      Although all of the confusion over who did it is disturbing, this admin looking the other way for 3 months leading up to this tragedy is worse. Stevens warned of the al Qaeda flag being flown over gov bldgs and training facilities. He warned of violence and growing issues. In early June the Brigades(pro al Qaeda) bombed this Embassy and warned that as long as drones fly they will continue. Libyan officials warned about the possibility of attacks. What did we do? Denied that Eastern Lybia had a growing concern. Denied requests for security. Then, above all else, we listened to the attacks for 6 hours and chose to not send in support over supposed clearance concerns. We weren't concerned about clearance in Pakistan but suddenly when american lives are in direct threat we choose to show that concern? People please find out all of the facts. Don't let mass media or me or anyone tell you what the arguments of this awful event should be. There were failures everywhere in the timeline and everywhere in the chain of command.

      October 20, 2012 at 7:12 pm | Reply
  4. cadillacrich

    SECURITY DENIED
    AMERICANS DIED
    0BAMA LIED and is now FRIED.

    October 20, 2012 at 5:37 pm | Reply
  5. dd

    Why was there confusion? The Embassy was yelling for security help and describing the deteriorating situation in LIbya as al Qaeda strengthen. The diplomatic letters are clear. Obama and Clinton ignored our Embassy and were neglect in the murders of four Americans. When is the buck going to stop at Obama's White House. Maybe after 100s of news journalists are slaughtered some place; maybe then the NYT may pay attention to the incompetence.

    October 20, 2012 at 5:33 pm | Reply
  6. EdD

    There should be zero confusion. On 9/15 it was reported that al qaeda took responsibility for the attacks stating that the attacks were revenge for the death of their 2nd. Every since has been orchestrated to create confusion.

    October 20, 2012 at 5:08 pm | Reply
    • BigTBone

      Hey Tom Clancey, where's the link to corroborate the Al Queda claim?

      October 20, 2012 at 5:35 pm | Reply
      • EdD

        Here ya go
        "Al-Qaeda says attack on U.S. consulate in Libya ‘revenge’ for death of its 2nd man"
        english dot alarabiya dot net/articles/2012/09/15/238197.html

        But you keep acting like you know what's going on.

        October 20, 2012 at 6:46 pm |
  7. REDFIRESTORM

    PRESIDENT OBAMA: Bob Schieffer will be moderating the final debate monday night. Here's a few things you should know about mr. schieffer. he hosted "face the nation" of cbs. he started off as a young investigative reporter for the washington post while nixon was president. he did not believe bob woodward and carl bernstein about the possible magnitude of the watergate break-in. he wished that he had accepted the watergate assignment. he has experience with your situation. he will look in your eyes and see nixon. just know that is why he will look at you that way after asking about terrorism and benghazi monday night

    October 20, 2012 at 1:49 pm | Reply
    • 2020

      REDFIRESTORM, what a bad joke and you are a typical joker without a brain. Nixon may be your own breed.

      Unlike you, Bob Schiffer has equal intellectual capability as the President, they can see each other eye to eye, have a intellecgent discussion. No sure about Romney though.

      One piece advice to you, go home you waste everyone time.

      October 20, 2012 at 4:38 pm | Reply
  8. reg

    The president's rose garden speech is a non-issue. He didn't really say anything, he rode the fence at Axelrod's instruction – which most likely sounded something like this 1) be outraged about Benghazi, 2) mention terrorism, but don't label it directly as such. And Obama is a great orator and did a great job, but he said nothing really meaningful that would indict him later on. The whole speech, if you read it is all emotion and gusto, no fact.

    The administration then sent him on his way to Las Vegas to raise campaign money and begin driving the lead up to Susan Rice speaking 4 days later. I want to see where she got these talking points. This is prime CHI politics. Use someone else outside your cabinet to deliver misinformation that can be sacrificed. In the meantime, use the cover of this distraction to achieve your agenda. Axelrod and team know that eventually their actions will come to light, they are just hoping that the election is over and the confetti falling diminishes the noise.

    October 20, 2012 at 10:40 am | Reply
    • Howard

      OBAMA'S POSITION ON THE LIBYA TRAGEDY ... FLIP FLOP ... FLIP FLOP ... FLIP FLOP ...

      October 20, 2012 at 12:20 pm | Reply
      • No Relegion

        In contrary to Romney who has FLOP FLIP.....FLOP FLIP .....FLOP FLIP

        October 20, 2012 at 4:54 pm |
  9. gep1955

    We won't hear the full story on this until Obama is out of office. He blew it big time by lying, so did Hillary. Four dead Americans and this is how they handle it? What chance do we have as living citizens from this bunch? Treasonous.

    October 20, 2012 at 10:36 am | Reply
  10. xynnek

    Obama is toast. Nothing can defend his refusal to understand or recognize the cancer of radical Islam that is alive and well.

    October 20, 2012 at 10:30 am | Reply
  11. Ken

    The administration probably did report the info for the same reasons that police departments puts out false or misleading information so suspects will come to the surface. I wonder who paid off these terrorists to tray and throw the election.

    October 20, 2012 at 10:18 am | Reply
  12. Michelle

    Dear CNN, if there is ever an open forum for readers to ask POTUS a question, I would like the chance to ask one thing. Was he calling the 9/11/12 attack in Libya during the speech in the rose garden an act of terrorism or not? I think it's fair at this point that the answer be clear. If there is opportunity to pose this question, please, please do so.

    October 20, 2012 at 8:27 am | Reply
    • Rick

      Just send him an email. You can Google "Email Predient Obama" and you can find the link there. I've sent letters before and actually got a response once. It was pretty much a canned response, but I did get one.

      October 20, 2012 at 8:44 pm | Reply
  13. WhatNow

    It is just shameful that Chairman Issa is turning the deaths of four Americans into a political agenda.

    October 20, 2012 at 8:20 am | Reply
    • anoel2005

      Obama is the one who politicized the death of Stevens and 3 others because the Obama campaign didn't want a narrative out there that contradicted their slogan "Osama is dead and al Qaida is on it's heels".

      October 20, 2012 at 9:06 am | Reply
      • USMC6523

        Everyone uses any sound-bite for whatever they are trying to promote. Let's all calm down and let the all facts be learned before shooting anyone. Oh yea,,, that won't happen it's an election year, we won't hear any truth from anyone until November 5th.

        October 20, 2012 at 4:48 pm |
    • cadillacrich

      On what planet do you reside?

      October 20, 2012 at 5:35 pm | Reply
  14. ckarke

    I can't find anything on who took credit for this terrible act. Can anyone tell me where to find it? I did try but must be missing it.. Usually these cowards are so proud of themselves they can't wait to take credit.

    October 20, 2012 at 6:58 am | Reply
  15. Anncourage

    President Obama did not say the attack on the Consulate was an act of terror. In paragraph 3 he said the US condemns this outrageous [not terror] attack. In paragraph 4 he talks about denigrating religious beliefs and says, but there is no justification for this type of violence. He is clearly linking the attack to the video. Only much later in paragraph 10 he refers generally to acts of terror.
    If the President said the attack was an act of terror, no one reported that. All of the reporting was that the attack was attributed to the video. Read The Caucus by Peter Baker and Sarah Wheaton in the Times on Sept. 12.
    When the President said the US condemns, “this outrageous and shocking attack” and will “bring to justice the killers who attacked our people” and goes on to say, “we reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others but there is no justification to this type of senseless violence” he is referring to reaction to the video, not terrorism. A spontaneous violent reaction to a video is an outrageous, senseless type of violence. An act of terror is very purposeful.

    October 20, 2012 at 6:58 am | Reply
  16. Michelle

    You know what has been a recurrent thought in my head? Joe Wilson's "You Lie!" all through these years. But I never wanted to scream it louder than when he was in the Rose Garden giving that speech. If people didn't pay attention to all the other lies or promises not kept, i'm pretty sure after the news blows up this weekend they will.

    October 20, 2012 at 6:49 am | Reply
  17. MontanaTrace

    Well Mr. President, it appears they are not on their heals, as you say at your re-election rallies.

    October 20, 2012 at 6:20 am | Reply
  18. MontanaTrace

    What's not confusing and has become clear is that the election was more important than what really happened.

    October 20, 2012 at 6:18 am | Reply
    • Michelle

      Something besides the truth certainly was... Ego? Floundering "legacy"? Election?

      October 20, 2012 at 6:28 am | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      How disrespectful to those that died in service to our country. Re-election at any cost. Shameful. What else is like this that we are kept from knowing?

      October 20, 2012 at 6:39 am | Reply
  19. Alan

    Actually, it sounds to me like the White House had very little to do with the decision about security at this post. It sounds more like our house foreign affairs and intelligence comittee's that dropped the ball here. They kept drawing down on security knowing that the region was growing more and more unstable. Who heads up these comittee's anyway?? Oh thats right. I wonder how many more embasies and consulate posts our comittee's have cut back security for?? Of course that's the GOP perogative is it not? Cutting spending?? I love the way CNN brings low-ball guy John King in when there is political fodder to be dug.

    October 20, 2012 at 4:25 am | Reply
    • Karen

      Obama did not attend security briefings which pretty much left life and death decisions up to whoever was available. Obama is keeping silent (did not answer the debate question & not responding to the Senate investigative committee) because there is no way out for him he is counting on his voters to be uninformed and for the most part they are.
      The budget for security was cut by a democrat majority. That was established during the Senate investigation which was on TV.

      October 20, 2012 at 8:19 am | Reply
      • Guy

        What may be more damagng to the President is ..... " was there any intelligence report from the NSA or any other government agency sent to the Presidents attention that indicated an imminent attack on the embassy /consulate in Benghazi ?" "We were the last flag flying" ... The Bristish were gone ...Red Cross was out of there .... seems to me there was only one target left ! Oh yeah lets decrease the securitty staffing in Lybia .... where's the intelligence in that ?? Mr Donilan ... Were you aware of any of these occrurances or requests .... ??? "Did you ever warn the President of the events and possible attack in Lybia??? If not given all the information now known ...either there was a complete lack of communication ( hard to swallow that one) You didn't warn the President ( a fireable offense for deraliction of duty) OR You did do your job and warned the President and the warnings went unheeded ... Even in the second debate the President seemd a bit sheepish... like he knew somthing was out there when he told Romney to "proceed" I dont have dog in this fight because ever since "IM NOT A CROOK NIXON" lied to US I have a deep distrust of government .... At least Kennedy had honesty to admit to the american publc his utter failure for the BAY of PIGS... an error of commision I just wonder if this situation in Benghazi is an error of omission either on the part of the intteligence community or the president ...We'll find out sooner or later because whats done in darkness will eventually be exposed by the light

        October 20, 2012 at 9:27 am |
  20. Bettyuann

    The President ain't confused. He knows exactly what happened. He knows who the terrorist are. And he knowns where to find them. He do0n't care what republicans think. Romney is confused. Issa is confused. Republicans are confused.

    October 20, 2012 at 3:59 am | Reply
  21. Baboo

    Ask mossad and they will tell the truth about this and 911 attack by cave dwelling ragheads...American sheeple need to wake up and not believe everything their govt tells them..

    October 20, 2012 at 2:55 am | Reply
  22. haloguy628

    It is highly inconvenient for this administration to really get down to the truth in this matter as that would blow their boasts of defeating Al Quaeda right out of the water. So of course they are not going after the mastermind and are constantly trying to obfuscate and muddy the waters.

    I however am pretty sure that this, and a few others shady deals of this administration will be fully exposed once Romney is in office.

    October 20, 2012 at 1:59 am | Reply
    • Independent Thoughts

      Obama had some fairly significant course corrections once he got into office. Do you presume that any Presidential Candidate has as much information at hand as the current Commander in Chief? This is a matter for the Commander in Chief as it is an an assault on our Nation. We, as a Nation, will always go kick the ass of any that do such unto us. That is the way we have done it and that is the way we will do it. It has nothing to do with who is on office. It is the American way. This should not be a political point. And for those on the Left who want to say that Obama took out Bin Laden, I would offer similar advice... Our system will eventually take care of those. For Obama's credit, he did give the go on the mission that was filled with doubt. Not unlike the coach that goes for it on 4th and 2 on the 50 yard line, if the team makes it, it was a great call, if not, then not. No more, no less. It was a gutsy call and it worked out. Good for us as a Nation and we should all support the Commander in Chief who made the call. And if we think the Commander in Chief failed us recently, then we vote him out... But we should not undermine the Commander in Chief on something like 'they should have done more'... you cannot stop all events... simply impossible... I will not hold Bush responsible for 911 and I will not hold Obama responsible for this... And you should not hold yourself responsible for the next crime that is committed against you unless you have really done something wrong...

      October 20, 2012 at 2:19 am | Reply
    • WhatNow

      Independent...Thanks. I agree with you. I too did not hold President Bush responsible for the deaths on 9/11. I am saddened that some think this is the time to point fingers and use the deaths of 4 Americans as political fodder before the weeks before the election.

      October 20, 2012 at 8:14 am | Reply
  23. Independent Thoughts

    Left and Right... Comments about Bush and Clinton... Independent in thought, I try not to lean to far toward either side... Presently a bit to the left but not always there and hoping the right comes back towards center... There may certainly be a better way to run the government and maybe Romney is it... I certainly won't jump up and down and proclaim that Obama's change is great... Here is one of my rubs: the right tells me that Obama is running us (US) into the ground financially yet it was mostly Bush (Rumsfield, Cheney & friends) that entered us into unfunded wars (into Iraq being most egregious as it lost us significant Islam nation support and gained us little if anything). What I desire from the fiscally (financially) responsible right is an acknowledgment that the Bush years were not fiscally responsible. I want my nation to move towards a balanced budget that trends the deficit in the correct direction. I see my National Debt as the greatest threat to my Nation's future sovereignty. And I want to see how it is done. A balanced checkbook that shows the cuts in funding and the increases in government revenue (i.e. taxes) that are required to fix this sinking ship of finance. I am sick of politicians on the left and the right telling me how easy it is to fix the budget. It is not. There will be many programmatic cuts (Social & Department of Defense – and this will impact the socialized industries that require government funding to exist – and this will impact jobs in most congressional districts as the Defense Industry has grown to become the creature that Eisenhower warned us against) and there will be tax increases. Does anyone honestly believe you can lose weight without adjusting your caloric intake (how much you eat) and how much energy you expend (exercise)? And don't get me wrong, I value a strong National Defense and will vote to maintain it. It causes me concern that the Joint Chiefs of Staff cannot cut Defense spending due to the jobs that will be impacted. If you are truly concerned about a Socialist State, look no further than the Defense of our Nation. It is Socialized. And I would vote to maintain a certain level of Industrial Base to maintain our defense (not unlike paying a firefighter to be on standby for some future event), but I recognize it as what it is, a certain level of Socialism that is required in our society (I know, some folks are confused that Socialism is Communism is like worship of Satan... be at ease, schools and roads and transportation and utilities and emergency services and defense of our nation are all socialized... hell, we even socialize growing corn to produce ethanol which would be otherwise nonprofit making). And yes, I fully understand the tremendous difficulties we as a nation have with our social programs and I get angry with the abuses... What I am suggesting is that the left and right both get off their high horses and come to the middle to meet with us who have enough thought capacity to entertain advices from either side. What the hell happened to high school debate? Have we really become a Nation of Left and Right where an individual is not allowed to entertain thoughts from either side? Have I become an outcast in our society because I give consideration to both sides of an argument?

    October 20, 2012 at 1:44 am | Reply
    • Intell Guy

      No, rather I think you have become an outcast for blathering. Nobody has time to read a page long dissertation.

      October 20, 2012 at 8:59 am | Reply
  24. lily

    It is really sad that some in the media have tried to avoid reporting on this whole Libya story–it has been relegated to a bottom of the page item on a line–right under a story about Beyoncy or Timberlake. I am truly embarrassed for the people that report for them. Obama's handling of this is a National Disgrace, as well as the most deceitful thing a President has done since President Johnson lied about the Gulf of Tonkin!!

    October 20, 2012 at 12:58 am | Reply
    • markntx

      Reading these desperate comments from all you Faux News sheep is sad and hilarious at the same time. Why don't you have your pity party on their "I Am A Great American" site? Oh ya, because they don't allow you to voice your opinions on their website! "We Report. You Decide." what a crock...LOL

      October 20, 2012 at 1:08 am | Reply
      • Bettyuann

        Mistakes were made. The prez took responability. The GOP decided to make a big issue out of it. So the Prez let them. He is roping the dopes in and will humiliate them. I'm sorry he hurt the mother of the computer guys feelings. The victims families must really be hurting. .

        October 20, 2012 at 4:06 am |
      • Intell Guy

        Hey Mark: I work for DoD as an intell officer and have for 22 years. You and the rest of the American people were lied to for political gain. FACT, period. We knew the day of the attack who did it, who they were talking to, and exactly who was in the compound and C2ing the operation. You, sir are an uninformed gutless liberal.

        October 20, 2012 at 8:53 am |
    • f4xtrafn

      I'd say President Bush's lies about WMD's in Iraq that he used as a fabricated reason to start a war that needlessly killed and maimed thousands of Americans is at the top of that list. Romneys daily lies and uninformed bellicose foreign policy statments portrays an ominous future for Americal if he's elected. New wars in the middle east, an economy killing trade war with China, destruction of all facets of health care, exremist right wing religious policies targeting women's rights . . . the list of backwards thinking policies is endless. But at least the religeous extremists will be pleased that he publically promised to seek approval from the church before he would sign off on any new law put before him. Just what we need, a Christian Supreme Ayatollah to watch over Congress and the Senate and us.

      October 20, 2012 at 1:31 am | Reply
      • Rick

        Jetblue should offer free trips out of the country, for paranoid Democrats, such as yourself, if Romney is elected. Just like they said they'd do if Obama got re-elected, for those bugging out Republicans. You really think Romney is going to try and overturn Roe vs. Wade? You're nuts if you think so. Try reading both sides of the news, who knows maybe it will enlighten you somewhat.

        October 20, 2012 at 9:18 pm |
  25. D-Nice

    Republicans have lost their minds, plain and simple. The attack happened and nothing can change that. The reason why it happened is irrelevent. Does it really matter WHY people flew planes into the towes on 9-11, would that change the number of dead? It just smacks of desperation on the right, trying to publicize the deaths of Americans. Maybe they should go back to "you didn't build that".

    October 20, 2012 at 12:45 am | Reply
    • lily

      100 cables and e-mails asking for help-saying how dangerous it was-and the White house didn't know--they are either incompetent or liars!!!!

      October 20, 2012 at 1:00 am | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      Read your own comment. You are guilty of politicizing this tragic event. You want to discount the importance as to why the event took place? Without understanding that and not preparing so it won't happen again...... it will! You want to ignore it because of politics.

      We need to understand why as much as how, so we can prevent it ever happening again.

      People like you are more interested in protecting the politics of the President than the people who have been and are at risk of losing their lives.

      That's the worst kind of politicizing anyone can be guilty of.

      We need to know why.

      October 20, 2012 at 6:33 am | Reply
    • Intell Guy

      So "D Nice": You're ok with the adminsration deliberately lying to the American people for political purposes?

      October 20, 2012 at 8:58 am | Reply
  26. Duke Davis

    If it breaths and its Muslim in Lybia , kill it . So simple .

    October 20, 2012 at 12:43 am | Reply
    • markntx

      Wow, Duke. And exactly how many years have you been working on that 3rd grade diploma?

      October 20, 2012 at 1:20 am | Reply
  27. Cadiz

    And the left is complaining that Romney and the right is 'using' this to embarass the President for political purposes. What nonsense, this just happened weeks ago and it is symptomatic of this President's poor grasp of foreign events. This is exactly why the USA needs to dump Obama and get someone who can handle being President. The left wing needs to get off the weed long enough to see what is happening outside of the borders of the USA. This President thinks that America needs to apologize when what the rest of the world wants is for America to show leadership.

    October 20, 2012 at 12:21 am | Reply
    • D-Nice

      Willard's reaction to the attacks was so much more appropiate, huh? Just politicze the events before you even know what happened. Very presidential..

      October 20, 2012 at 12:48 am | Reply
  28. Etch A. Sketch

    Mormon Bishop Mittens throw a press conference about the Benghazi attack while it was still happening!

    That is un-Presidential. That is disgraceful.

    Mittens had no clue any of our people were being attacked and killed! The families of these slain Americans did not even know what was happening yet!

    In Mitten's 47% video, Mittens is caught saying how he hopes a terrorist attack occurs to make Obama more vulnerable!

    Think about that. Mittens would rather Americans get hurt or killed in order to make Obama look bad so that he can win the Presidency!

    That is not somebody you want as a President.

    October 19, 2012 at 11:58 pm | Reply
    • Intell Guy

      Dear Etch: You have been lied to by this adminstration, and have been since the day of the attack. Everyone in the intelligence community knows this.

      October 20, 2012 at 9:03 am | Reply
  29. Etch A. Sketch

    The RIGHT-WING nuts fail to realize that there are TWO different issues at play here.

    1. The MILLIONS of ANGRY ARABS rioting and creating chaos because of the YouTube Christian Taliban video.

    2. The Benghazi Attack

    These MILLIONS of ANGRY ARABS were rioting and creating chaos BEFORE and AFTER the Benghazi attack. They blamed US PROPAGANDA for the YouTube Christian Taliban video.

    These MILLIONS of ANGRY ARABS were attacking US and Western facilities and symbols all across the Muslim world because of the YouTube Taliban video ... BEFORE and AFTER the Benghazi attack.

    As COMMANDER-in-CHIEF you have to QUELL the MILLIONS of ANGRY ARABS before the rioting and chaos gets further out of hand that might lead to INSTABILITY in those regions. Hence, you have to let them know that US gov't and PEOPLE do not support the YouTube Christian Taliban video.

    In the minds of RIGHT-WING nuts, who are looking for an excuse to support there fairy-tale narrative about Obama, because the Obama's administration had to respond to TWO different issues simultaneously, it was too much for the feeble minds to grasp. Hence, it supported their narrative that Obama is somehow lying.

    Obama's administration were saying TWO different things in regards to TWO separate issues!

    In regards to the Benghazi attack, they were consistent in calling it an "ACT of TERROR". Obama used that term numerous times in the following days.

    What remains unknown or murky about the Benghazi attack, is whether it was a PRE-PLAN AL QAEDA attack or whether it was a SPONTANEOUS attack under the cover of the MILLIONS of ANGRY MUSLIM MOBS rioting and creating chaos in the Muslim region.

    Was Benghazi suppose to be a a SAFE HAVEN? Did Ambassador Stevens evacuate from Tripoli to Benghazi because of the fear over the ANGRY MUSLIM MOBS attacking the Tripoli embassy over the YouTube videos?

    Remember, the US embassy in Egypt was attacked earlier. So, the thinking could have been to get out of Tripoli ... assuming it would be safer in Benghazi.

    So once the INVESTIGATION is over, we'll know more about why Ambassador Steven had left Tripoli for Benghazi.

    October 19, 2012 at 11:52 pm | Reply
    • annieL

      Thanks for a reasonable assessment. Initially "talking down" a mob or a hostage taker is always the professional approach in civilian law enforcement. And Libya is a much more volatile and difficult environment, as this excellent article describes. Our ambassadors have to work with the weak and disorganized new Libyan government to get anywhere on a criminal investigation. Benghazi is not New York City but even American police, DAs and mayors often release the barest of details about a crime while the investigation is underway. So we know that the Republican reaction to this is just a political take-down.

      October 20, 2012 at 1:23 am | Reply
    • Intell Guy

      Etch: You have been lied to. There was no mob. This was a deliberate attack by AQIM. The USG has known this since day one.

      October 20, 2012 at 9:05 am | Reply
  30. Etch A. Sketch

    test

    October 19, 2012 at 11:34 pm | Reply
  31. Dee

    I heard the journalist Erin who is keeping this story alive has an agenda her husband is a Wall Street guy and she is a Mitt fan so naturally she wants to make the President look bad.

    The families have spoken and noone is listening I think they should let the independent committee do their job and then get the truth instead of making it political. When you listen to Erin she sounds like some of the people on FOX she is obsessed with pushing this story and not waiting for the investigation to be complete.

    What happen to good journalist that report the correct news and not be opinionated and serve their own agenda.

    October 19, 2012 at 11:33 pm | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      Yes, bury it in committee. It's costing the President votes.

      October 20, 2012 at 6:46 am | Reply
  32. Alex

    Confusion about the perpetrator?
    Try "AlQaeda", yep the cool guys France, Italy and the US helped to take power there.
    Do you need a drawing?

    October 19, 2012 at 11:21 pm | Reply
    • Shangheyed

      QUESTIONS FOR MY CULTIST FRIENDS?

      Answer me this, how is it that a man can kill and preach about when it is OK to kill and still follow the laws of the god of abraham?

      why did mohammed have his followers bow to jeruselem before bowing to mecca if mecca was so important?

      The Kaba in mecca has nothing to do with islam it is a pagan site used by 360 different pagan religions before mohammed took mecca by force. The pilgrimage as well is pagan (infidel) practice having a yearly Olympic like peace once a year so these different religions can pray and trade... how can you just take someone's religious site and call it yours? Then still call them infidels? (ibid) Golden Dome... you and I know horses can't fly...

      Curious are the 72 virgins good muslim virgins or are they infidel virgins

      why is it that mohammed can have 9 wives and allow his followers only 4 if they can afford the property?

      would you marry your 9 yr old daughter to a 53 yr old man like mohammed?

      why did mohammeds own family kick him out of mecca?

      why did mohammed exile two indigenous tribes from medina when he himself wasnt even from there

      Why did mohammed kill every man woman and child from a third indigenous tribe in medina when they wouldnt assist them with their war on mecca? Genocide by so called prophet... is that the guy you follow?

      why did he rob and steal from caravans from Mecca when he was at war with mecca?

      why did mohammed even need to fight mecca if he was to so called prophet of god?

      why do islamist follow sharia law when it is not even mentioned in the Koran, it was invented by man 200 yrs after mohammeds death is MAN's laws... nothing to do with the Koran.

      ISLAM IS WHAT MOHAMMED WAS...

      October 19, 2012 at 11:42 pm | Reply
      • Meastn

        Boy,
        You have lots of questions. But you are not in search for answers. Nor we muslims are in need of replying with so much questions brought together irrelevantly. First you have to know the politics of 6th century Arabia before hand.

        Stick with your silly hatred over there. That is with no cure. And we are not in need of curing you anyway.

        By the way, keep on believing a novice bunch of insurgents (not SEALS) had somehow managed to hunt an Ambassador of the most powerful nation, with all of his guards.
        Maybe it is time for you to judge your own beliefs.

        October 20, 2012 at 2:13 am |
  33. Krista

    It must be much worse than we think…

    In lieu of coming out and explaining what happen hours after the attack and telling the truth, we have gotten the You Tube treatment.

    One possible reason…It is quite possible that we watched and knew in real time that we were under attack. (Our facilities and that area of the world have some of the best 24/7 surveillance anywhere). It is quite possible that we or our allies received request for assistance during the attack. It is quite possible that we made the decision either after seeing all was lost, including personnel, not to proceed with force on force to save our people.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:58 pm | Reply
    • Jay Reardon

      Wow you Rethugs are incredibly stupid.

      October 20, 2012 at 12:45 am | Reply
  34. phil

    A reporter has more intelligence then the white house.... Great the white house isn't shady they are just incompetent!

    October 19, 2012 at 10:56 pm | Reply
  35. reg

    hey anybody notice this board being funky.... if you've been on a while, go back and check your posts please.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:54 pm | Reply
  36. Tim

    The part of this that is so scary is that after this happened we now know the White House knew in 24 hours that this was a terrorist attack. Why did they for two weeks try to blame this on a obscure video that was put out in July? I hope it was not a coverup by the White House, but I am afraid it is.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:51 pm | Reply
  37. clarinet

    Obama has greater reason to resign in disgrace than Nixon did. But he won't because he is a coward. Vote Romney.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:41 pm | Reply
  38. Luke

    Obama lied, Americans died, and Candy Crowley covered for him. Romney / Ryan 2012.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:41 pm | Reply
    • ny88

      I read the transcript of Romney's 47% dinner party conversation with his donors. How sick is it that they discuss the IRAN hostage crisis, wondering if there is some way to "duplicate" it. With all the money some of these people have, how hard would it be? Romeny even mentions that he has people on his staff who have worked for the Israeli Premier. Then Romney goes on to assure them that should the opporunity present itself he will take advantage. Nothing about how horrible a situation would be for the victims. Now after watching Romney smirk his way thru that "news conference" it makes perfect sense. In his warped mind he's thinking "Yeah! What a great opportunity!"

      October 19, 2012 at 11:31 pm | Reply
  39. Fredsta

    I think it would be difficult to arrive at a better MidEast policy than Obama/Clinton is already doing. Just as the emerging class of freedom-minded Arabs are attempting to implement modern, legitimate, rule-of-law governments in a region plagued by conflict and extremism, so is the Administration trying to support them.

    The two worst things US can do is: ignore them, or attack them. We need to build bridges with the right folks, of whom there are plenty. The shame of Stevens' death is that that is exactly what he was enthusiastically doing. What a loss! God rest his soul.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:37 pm | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      I agree with most of what you say. Exception: we can do better than Obama/Clinton. Don't settle for what we have. It's a start in the right direction but we can do better.

      October 20, 2012 at 6:52 am | Reply
  40. lily

    Obama is "not optimal" and we are going to fix that-Romney 2012

    Definition of OPTIMAL: most desirable or satisfactory

    October 19, 2012 at 10:34 pm | Reply
  41. Smokey

    The fact is, this election has caused the total and immediate politicization of this incident, and both candidates and both parties are equally at fault. This politicization is hindering the investigation of and response to this incident and damaging America's interests. Obama's wrong in that his administration had incorrect information and put it out there even though they also had other, better information. But that's something that happens when you have to respond to these things without being sure what's actually going on. Romney was wrong in that his first response was to attack and undermine the President, before anyone even knew what was going on, and in doing so he damaged the response to an international incident; when the President is acting as leader of his party and advocate for its policies, by all means attack him, but when he's acting as America's head of state and commander in chief, you should have the deference and respect for the office and for the country to lay off for a few hours at least.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:22 pm | Reply
    • Jaws3119

      Smokey, what have you been smoking. The white house knew with 24 hours exactly what happen and they lied to the public for two weeks.

      October 19, 2012 at 10:25 pm | Reply
      • Andy

        You can look on Google and watch the address in the Rose Garden, which took place the day after the incident, where Obama calls it "an act of terror." I'll be the first to admit he didn't have all of his subordinates reading from the same page, but then that's hardly uncommon nowadays, is it? The same thing's happened to Romney.

        I don't expect you to change your mind, of course, I believe everyone who plans to vote decided long before the debates – but I just thought I'd get that out there.

        October 19, 2012 at 11:01 pm |
      • Backgammon

        I don't care what Obama said in the Rose Garden. I care that he lied to me, he lied to the UN, he lied on the View, he lies. This isn't golng to work. Obama needs to be IMPEACHED, NOW

        October 20, 2012 at 12:10 am |
    • Backgammon

      At what point do you think Obama & Co should go to Lybia and get this guy who is bragging? You think 6 weeks, 8 weeks, right after Obama is elected. NO THANKS. This is going to be settled before the election.

      October 19, 2012 at 10:27 pm | Reply
      • Hoss man

        Hold your hosses cowboy/girl! Where did you get all this inside information??!!

        October 20, 2012 at 12:26 am |
    • simonssays11

      I don't know how you call the investigation hindered, as this reporter-Kirkpatrick says that they know the guys and the main guy that did it. So, how do you call it hindered?

      October 19, 2012 at 10:29 pm | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      Obama DID NOT say it was an act of terror. He did use the word terror but not in that sentence or context. He still doesn't call Ft. Hood terror.

      He is protecting himself and the Muslims from having that name.

      October 20, 2012 at 6:57 am | Reply
  42. Jaws3119

    Funny, CNN has a story about the Benghazi suspects but no story about the lies and cover up by the white house. Come on CNN, please try to be a news organization. Maybe that's why your last in viewership and falling fast.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:22 pm | Reply
  43. PNWjim

    Alright all you right as$ SMARTIES, tell me who committed this crime, how did they fo it,why did they do it right then when they could have anytime. With all the loose unaccounted for weapons anyone of the old rebels could still have heavey weapons .And for those of you good hearted people who thought OUR President was lying suggest you look up the Rose Garden speech and hear for yourself the words "act of terror".And lay off MS. Crowley.Romney should not rely on his shrills and maybe do a little research of his own and then he would not have looked show foolish getting caught in a lie.Let the experts do their jobs and let the truth come out instead of trying to produce the facts to fit your little world vision.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:16 pm | Reply
    • Backgammon

      The Ambassador will be dead a month. What sort of time line do you think is acceptable to hear the truth???
      If Obama is reall huntig this guy down, why doesn't he go to the TV Station where the guy is bragging about the kill and being slapped on the back???? Why doesn't someone talk to him?????

      October 19, 2012 at 10:21 pm | Reply
      • Voyager 1

        Seriously? Do you think the President is going to find the suspect in 24 hours? This is not CSI where the crime is solved in an hour. You are talking about Libya a confederation of tribal chiefs and lo- tech. Its like the old wild west only in preent time. You, I am sure, are smart enough to understand that. Go ahead though and vote for Gov Romney, Dude. He will have us in another big war before his first year is out and maybe you'll be happy then.

        October 19, 2012 at 10:25 pm |
    • Voyager 1

      I agree wholeheartedly. I've been reading up on Gov. Romney and President Obama and I think President Obama is whats best for the U.S.A. Some GOP sent me that video of the rose garden news conference trying to show President Obama is a liar and I was confused because it clearly shows what the president said.

      October 19, 2012 at 10:22 pm | Reply
      • tkret

        At the end of the tape he said 'acts of terror', and never used the word terrorism. The acts of terror was a reference to what was said just previous, not referring to the attack on our Consulate.

        BTW, if you think obama is what's best for the USA, get ready to see a lot more of this type of incident, and no one being held responsible, nor being sort after. And exactly what is it about obama's foreign policy that you like? He has never told us what his policy is.

        October 19, 2012 at 11:05 pm |
  44. John Kaufman, Oceanside, CA

    Unfortunately this attack has happened, but the real question now is what should be learned from this attack to prevent this same or similar situation from happening again? Why not have in place a clear set of rules of engagement stating exactly what happens when a US embassy is attacked, what happens when an American embassy staff is killed? There are many means to reprisal and I am not jsut talking about a military response. Let all those who hate us and want to carry out terrorism on notice. A country that harbors terrorists needs to be held accountable for what they harbor.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:10 pm | Reply
    • Backgammon

      I wasn't even going to answer you but, do you think, say next July 4th we should know who killed our Ambassador and the President lied for 2 weeks because the Terrorist are really gone. I promse. Really, I promise they are really nice guys.

      October 19, 2012 at 10:33 pm | Reply
  45. Majav

    Ask Mossad. They know.

    October 19, 2012 at 10:08 pm | Reply
  46. Mark Baird

    "Don't you see the difference in these two men. Romney called it THAT day. If Obama said this was a terroist attack the next day, WHY did he spend the next two weeks saying it was a demonstration and VIDEO."

    And this impacts our foreign policy how? Or, is it about the conservative tough guy ego?

    October 19, 2012 at 10:04 pm | Reply
    • kim

      Hey, Mark Baird, if Romney gets elected he will immediately attack somebody, and when he does start the next war you should be on the front lines in the first wave. Romney is a school yard punk that happens to have a lot of money, but he and his sons are far too cowardly to enlist in the military and do their duty. If you want to vote for a liar and a coward, that's your business, but don't expect people to die for his stupidity.

      October 19, 2012 at 10:19 pm | Reply
    • tkret

      "Don't you see the difference in these two men. Romney called it THAT day. If Obama said this was a terroist attack the next day, WHY did he spend the next two weeks saying it was a demonstration and VIDEO."

      And this impacts our foreign policy how? Or, is it about the conservative tough guy ego?

      October 19, 2012 at 10:04 pm | Reply

      Mark, How does this affect our Foreign Policy? It shows a number of things. 1>> obama has said OSB was killed and implied al qaeda went with him. 2>> The attack shows the world that we are back to the Jimmy Carter days, when Muslims could take Americans hostage, hold them for 444 days, and not fear retribution on our part. The message we are sending is we are weak, and will stay that way if obama is re-elected. 3>> Tapes and memos are now coming out showing the W/H was aware of the potential for problems a few months prior to 9/11/12, and the US did nothing about the situation. 4>> Muslims knew nothing of the tape prior to obama an company blabbing to the world about it. 4>> Any bad news concerning terrorists attacks would not bode well for obama's re-election.
      Believe me, this has nothing to do with the 'conservative tough guy ego'. BTW, where did you pick that phase up?

      October 19, 2012 at 10:41 pm | Reply
  47. steve

    It would be optimal to identify the terrorists.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:53 pm | Reply
  48. ckarke

    I like the idea of the fact checker on stage with a horn. Maybe it will keep everyone honest.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:52 pm | Reply
    • Majav

      A cattle prod or a collar with a zapper would be nice too. Have you ever seen two grown men shout down each other so badly? Sure. All the time. Fox News. Welcome to the 21st century communication style in which communication is confused with belligerence. Classy. And only effective for the low brows that are impressed with brawls and bloody noses.

      October 19, 2012 at 10:11 pm | Reply
    • MontanaTrace

      How about buckets of water.

      October 20, 2012 at 7:00 am | Reply
  49. Hadenuffyet

    Just GTFO of the middle east altogether. Let the ones who want democracy get off their duff and fight for it.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:52 pm | Reply
  50. talbet

    Bush overlooked alarmingly large amounts of data allowing 9-11 to happen. America came together because American's had been killed. Republicans politicizing this while Americans are still mourning is sick.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:49 pm | Reply
    • steve

      Yep. It is optimal to blame Bush.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:54 pm | Reply
    • Backgammon

      Oh Talbet, give me a break! How long do you intend to carry water for this empty suit? Obama does not have a plan and frankly I don't think he WANTS this job. He wants out. He can golf, go to Hawaii, live like Bill Clinton.
      No one who wants a job would act like Obama! He is trying to tell us he can't do the work, he is a better celebrity, a guy who needs to hang in California. He needs to golf, he does not need this pressure. He has even told us he is LAZY. What are you not understanding???

      October 19, 2012 at 9:59 pm | Reply
      • Lucky

        Backgammon: You need a hug and a beer. You assume many,many things. Your think everything the gov't does is a conspiracy? You jump from one topic to another without a coherent thought. Going back to the Clintons ? The ambassador was gay ? Obama just wants to play golf? Get a hold of yourself,. If you don't like CNN avoid it. No one is forcing you to watch it. If the USA wants to go back to the Bush years then vote for Romney. Bush put Obama so deep in a hole that Jimmy Hoffa couldn't climb out of it. All these unproven theories and smack talk are just that.....talk.

        October 19, 2012 at 10:19 pm |
      • Backgammon

        •Right-wing Bloggers Say Amb. Stevens Was Gay – Huffington Post

        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michelangelo-signorile/right-wing-bloggers-say-a_b_1...

        http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/09/did-ambassador-in-libya-die-for-administrations-pro-gay-agenda/#.UF-7DDZoJ1o.email

        October 19, 2012 at 10:24 pm |
      • PNWjim

        Backy, Considering you must be part of the upper5% are YOUR stocks doing better now than 4 years ago?. Jobs are up and out of work numbers are getting better .33 million people have insurance[ and now will not have to go to the E ROOM for their health needs like ROMNEY seems to think us moochers do]and taxes are lower.Car industry is starting to boom and when OBAMA says we will find the wrong doers and they will meet their end, he means it .Ask bin laden.Oh thats right, he's not talking.And by the way even some of the rightys said Romney jumped the gun JUST TO MAKE POINTS WITH HIS BASE.Also as I remember we did not have boots on the ground so how do you blame Obama losing track of weapons.We do not control the world as much as you neocons the would like to.

        October 19, 2012 at 10:42 pm |
    • Sh8un

      Well said, Talbet.

      October 19, 2012 at 10:02 pm | Reply
    • simonssays11

      So, in what year will Obama and the Obama Kool-Aid drinkers stop using Bush as their Crutch to always fall back on. Obama said on his campaign that he knew what was wrong with economy and knew how to fix it. Great Job!, He just needs another 4 years to screw up....Now you want to blame this Libya attach on Bush too, or tie the misgivings of Obama back to Bush...What's good for the goose is good for the Obama? When do you hold your guy accountable? Or do you not have standards, just keep your guy in there to keep pitching Balls? You LuLu's

      October 19, 2012 at 10:27 pm | Reply
  51. ckarke

    Everyone is a Monday morning quarterback.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:47 pm | Reply
    • fred37ify

      Barrack would have to GO to a security briefing to be briefed ! But obviously fundraising and Hollywood parties are more important to the boy !

      October 19, 2012 at 9:56 pm | Reply
      • PNWjim

        Freddie, The President does not have to go to briefings because they Intell agency brings him 'binders' full of info [not on women] and all you people that blame cnn for being whatever you think it is: should just go away and never come back. And those who choose to blame muslims for all the unrest .Do you blame all catholics for the slaughter of thousands, or all whitemen for the stealing of their land and killing of thousands of native americans[ the only true Americans] Maybe it does in your world but not in mine.

        October 19, 2012 at 11:31 pm |
  52. mcskadittle

    Has any terrorist group taken responsibility for this attack, this is very strange we should have heard something by now

    October 19, 2012 at 9:45 pm | Reply
    • Chuck

      Yes, Al Queda of Libya took credit

      October 19, 2012 at 9:54 pm | Reply
      • PNWjim

        No one has claimed responsibility, and again this is not our country so we must ask permission to be there and to investigate.I know you rightys want to think you are in control of things and when something like this happens you first instinct is knee jerk,but I would rather have a person in power seek the all of the facts before making a statement.Thats a sign of a solid leader at any level.

        October 19, 2012 at 10:52 pm |
  53. Kevin Lenihan

    Let's not forget, the cover up was not the only problem here. There is no excuse for having effectively no security there! None! Even if Martians somehow prevented all the requests for more security from reaching the state department, even if these same aliens prevented intelligence reports of the numerous attacks and incidents in Bhenghazi in the preceding months...what were they thinking? A freshman in high school could tell you that you need to have a strong presence in this turbulent, extremist filled country that was struggling to build a government. And oh yeah, it was 9/11! No intel or security requests should even have been needed!

    Biden tries to distract with talk of budget cuts? Please. There were Marines in embassies all around the world that weren't needed.

    The Marines were not in Libya because the liberals in the state department and in the admin did not want to offend Islamics who might see them as occupiers and infadels. Why did Bin Laden attack the US? Because there were troops in Saudi Arabia. Liberals blame 9/11 on our offending Muslims. And that's what they were worried about here. And that's why these people died.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:42 pm | Reply
    • fred37ify

      Wrong ! There were marines in Libya ! But they were in Tripoli when they should have been in Benghazi !

      October 19, 2012 at 10:00 pm | Reply
    • Oscar

      I agree that, based on what information we have, the lack of security was a mistake. But if there had been security, the attack would likely still have happened, and conservatives would be instead be saying that the presence of such high security was the problem – that somehow it was a magnet for extremist anger towards the US.

      With the current political climate, there is no way for the administration to calmly discuss an issue or admit a mistake without marking itself as a target for destruction by conservative commentators.

      Also, I would point out that no president is infallible.

      October 19, 2012 at 10:37 pm | Reply
  54. Chuck

    Funny how when you wait to investigate a crime a month after it happens, that its hard to find the
    suspects.
    We have such intellegent men running this country dont we.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:40 pm | Reply
  55. rightospeak

    It is confusing because all we hear is lies . " ....nations are shoved into wars in order to destroy themselves,to break up their structure, to destroy their social order, to destroy their populations " -from a book by Eustace Mullins. He meant the U.S.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:38 pm | Reply
  56. stevehc1

    Hopefully the Rice decoy confused the enemy long enough to give American and Libyan intelligence enough time to identify and begin tracking the specific perps.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:36 pm | Reply
    • Nozzo

      It is a good bail out attempt for Obama and incompetent administration

      October 19, 2012 at 9:51 pm | Reply
  57. Anne

    Interesting to read this blog. I am curious why on some CNN blogs (like this one) you can read comments that seem to escape censorship while most CNN blogs are clearly subjected to censorship. Uncensored comments are critical of President Obama as they should be. The censored blogs give the impression that Obama is a hero, he is a savior of the economy and the country and of course Romney/Ryan are monsters.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:33 pm | Reply
    • Mike

      Nicely put. I agree. Let's check back tomorrow to see if they censored your comment.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:35 pm | Reply
    • rightospeak

      i noticed the censorship many times, Anne .Once there was an article on using nuclear energy and I knew that it is not economical unless subsidized by a government. Germany was dismantling theirs.My comments vanished 5 times because it did not agree with official propaganda.So it is with comments about a war with Iran. When the drums of war were beating fevershly not long ago,comments were vanishing that were againt the war from Reuters, MSNBC or you were just banned. That much for our "freedom of the press ".

      October 19, 2012 at 9:48 pm | Reply
      • Backgammon

        CNN had to get a grip. They had no audience, no bloggers, no stories. It is hard to spend 4 years on the Obama train.
        I just happened to find them telling the truth tonight. To my shock. If they get it together thay may not fold.
        I have 4 theorie somewhere on this blog,, please read and comment back.
        Please

        October 19, 2012 at 10:03 pm |
  58. simonssays11

    Why is it, the Dem President can lie, continue the lie and not be hounded by the media?

    October 19, 2012 at 9:28 pm | Reply
    • Nozzo

      I am Obama, Commander-In-Chief of USA, I can lie with all the helps from CNN, media but your...

      October 19, 2012 at 9:54 pm | Reply
      • PNWjim

        I am ROMNEY and the church says I can lie all I want as along as its for the churchs cause and still go to my private planet when I DIE because I baptisted so many dead people from other religions[ how does a dead person accept J.C. as their savior when they can not speak] Maybe the secret lies in the Garden Of Eden in the great state of MISSOURI.

        October 19, 2012 at 11:40 pm |
  59. Intell Guy

    I have worked for the intelligence community for 22 years, and continue to do so for the Department of Defense. I can tell you categorically that the American people have been lied to, and continue to be lied to, by the adminstration. We have known from within hours who, what, when, where and why. The entire intelligence community knows the truth, the lowliest analyst knows the truth. The stunning thing is the the HASC or the Senate Intelligence Commitee hasn't issued subpoenas.
    To the American people: you have been lied to.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:24 pm | Reply
    • tuscany590

      Your assessment is 100% correct & the only people that can't see this are those on the left that lack intell in the cranium.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:32 pm | Reply
    • stevehc1

      "I have worked for the intelligence community for 22 years, and continue to do so for the Department of Defense." – Yeah, R-I-G-H-T. . . ...NOT...

      October 19, 2012 at 9:40 pm | Reply
      • Intell Guy

        Steve: you are another shrill, hollow liberal. I have worked for 22 years in DoD. Any 24 year old analyst in DoD or anywhere in the IC knows the adminstration is lying, and its only a matter of time before someone provides the intell to Bob Woodward and blows the roof off this.....in fact, I'm stunned it hasn't ahppened already.

        To the American people: you have been lied to, boldfaced, disgusting, politically beneficial lies.

        An Intell Community veteran :)

        October 19, 2012 at 9:46 pm |
    • fred37ify

      We have been lied to from day one by the DNC ! And every body in it !

      October 19, 2012 at 9:41 pm | Reply
    • steve

      It is not optimal for you to disclose your vocation.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:57 pm | Reply
    • Hadenuffyet

      If and when they act , you'll never know it , unless they want you to.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:58 pm | Reply
    • PaulyRattt

      Yeah, the intellignce community is on the case.

      WMDs in Iraq. WIFFFF
      9/11 WIFFFFFFF
      Paki A bomb Khan network WIFFFF
      Fall of the USSR WIFFFFFF

      The record ain't really that great.

      $15 billion just to build the Bhagdad embassy, how much to maintain security? Gotta have a Basra consulate plus security. Bhenghazi was a freaking consulate. Couple bildo for structures and more security. Don't forget we'll need a pile of cash for the actual embassy itself in Tripoli. Plus security. we're well on the way to $2 Trillion for mideast adventurism over the last ten years. Throw a little more on the fire. Don't seem so conservative to me.

      October 19, 2012 at 10:43 pm | Reply
    • Baboo

      May be you can tell us the inside story of 911... Lots of people are looking for answers.

      October 20, 2012 at 2:57 am | Reply
  60. john johns

    We were led to believe that government had these people identified and in custody so just how is that possible that are they not?

    October 19, 2012 at 9:14 pm | Reply
  61. Tyler

    It is unbelievable to me that CNN can finally cover Libya and completely fail to question why Obama lied about this for a week. Why a California man was arrested for the video that we now know had nothing to do with the terrorist attack. Obama claimed in the debate that he knew it was a terrorist attack the day after. WHY THEN DID HE LIE AND BLAME IT ON A YOUTUBE VIDEO PROTEST???? For an entire week. There was no protest (we know that from security video). It was a flat out terrorist attack and he lied about it purely for political gain. What a spineless, sorry excuse for a leader. To top it all off, he went out and accused Romney of politicizing the event. You disgust me Obama!!!

    October 19, 2012 at 9:07 pm | Reply
    • Truly

      It's like hearing about a Three Stooges episode with guys bungling around. Too bad it's not funny.

      Romney/Ryan 2012

      October 19, 2012 at 9:25 pm | Reply
    • simonssays11

      Yes, isn't it odd that the bulk of the media always gives Obama a free pass. Do you also notice that the media never prints anything negative about Obama. When did the media stop printing the number of KIA in Iraq and Afghanastan? When Obama was elected, the count stopped..Why, because he promised to end all wars and pull everyone out..So, if we idiots don't see the numbers, it's as though there is no more war...It amazes me how stupid people are and let this guy lie...They even allow him to call others liars and don't call him out..I have to say, I was shocked when Matt Damon spoke against Obama...Hollywood people are usually brainwashed pretty well..Look at Longoria...She just vomits their Hollywood thinking...

      October 19, 2012 at 9:25 pm | Reply
  62. USA

    I don't think the hunt for the suspects is so puzzling, it's what's coming out of the Vice Presidents and President's mouth that is puzzling. They flat out lied to Americans and are continuing to lie. Why doesn't CNN put this front page news, with a headline about the WH lying, instead of "puzzling hunt"

    October 19, 2012 at 9:07 pm | Reply
    • Tyler

      NO FREAKING KIDDING. THE OBAMA PROTECTION BY THE MEDIA ON THIS IS SO FRUSTRATING. A TERRORIST ATTACK COVERED UP AND THEY WON'T COVER BUT 1/10 OF THE STORY. See Fox news for actual Libya coverage.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:12 pm | Reply
  63. res65

    c'mon cnn stick to your u-tube blame game would you

    October 19, 2012 at 9:06 pm | Reply
    • steve

      That would not be optimal for cnn.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:58 pm | Reply
  64. Dan

    The administration knows exactly who attacked & killed Stevens & 3 other Americans... 3 hrs before Stevens was Killed he was talking to the pres. of Turkey, arranging for funneling the chemical weapons to the rebel leaders of Syria.... the Russians warned him not to do this, he ignored all warnings and was thus, attacked by a Russian hit squad.

    Obama is the fraud here... he doesn't know how to tell the truth.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:06 pm | Reply
  65. res65

    c'mon cnn stick to your original u-tube story for someone to blame

    October 19, 2012 at 9:05 pm | Reply
  66. WDinDallas

    Send in a SEAL team, grab him, and take him to GITMO.

    October 19, 2012 at 9:04 pm | Reply
  67. nick

    Where were all you Benghazi looking for reason and blame when 911 hit. It seems to me the country pulled together when that happend on Bush's watch. 3000 died not 4.
    So your cocodlie tears ring empty, because we see thru your hatred for Obama and it has nothing to do with Bengzzi
    Your man is still gonna lose

    October 19, 2012 at 8:53 pm | Reply
    • Mike

      if you only get your news from cnn.com, you are a victim of propaganda. CNN is in full campaign mode currently. There will be no mention of unfavorable polls. You won't get a fair take on Bengazi from CNN. A less biased source is here: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2012/10/19/benghazi-security-vacuum-ignored-before-attack/1644925/.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:00 pm | Reply
      • rmincalifornia

        If you really want a heavy dose of propaganda from a news channel check out Fox News or CNBC. Problem is one may never know the real facts, as in what happened to poor Romney in that last debate where he was fact checked on the spot in front of millions of viewers.

        October 19, 2012 at 9:07 pm |
      • PNWjim

        Mike if do not like CNN because you dont hear what you want, then you should go away and dont comeback.No one is forcing you to be here. If you think FOX news matches your views better and you do not want to hear something other than your own weak arguement repeated over and over then you should just tune in to the Fox and return to fetal position.

        October 19, 2012 at 11:51 pm |
    • Mike

      Everyone knows Fox and MSNBC are heavily-biased. But CNN parades as a neutral source.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:27 pm | Reply
  68. Charlie

    CNN=PRAVDA

    October 19, 2012 at 8:52 pm | Reply
  69. james harris

    I believe it was more a case of bad intel [remember iraq] mixed with people wanting answers before all intel was known if admins had said wait til we hav info repubs would hav complaind about that so they released info they had at time which was bad but not complete sort of a catch 22 for the admins what bothers me all the more is that repubs have tried to politicize this a fact that cant be disputed

    October 19, 2012 at 8:42 pm | Reply
    • MollyBee

      Thank you, james harris. The GOP, FOX and Mitt Romney have stooped so low on this. It's frightening how they are so willing to play volley ball with the safety and well being of our representatives and troups abroad. Shameful!

      October 19, 2012 at 8:49 pm | Reply
      • reg

        Molly Bee and James –

        While I think it's great that you're respecting the military and intelligence officials in allowing them to do their work without exposure (the president could take a lesson from you both). I think you're missing the point. It has been clearly established that it was a terrorist attack at this juncture. Now that this is a 'fact' the question is if they had such limited intel, why go to the media with a story that doesn't seem anywhere near the facts? A round of 5 morning shows is extreme. Don't you think? At some point, you have to scratch your head and wonder right, at least I hope so. The stories are too controverted, they took entirely too long to walk everything back. You can bash the repubs as much as you want, but it doesn't change the facts. You should be smelling something wrong here.

        October 19, 2012 at 9:00 pm |
    • Mike

      If you can't see that there is a cover-up going on, you are not paying attention. Obama clearly did not tell the truth about Bengazi during the last debate. If you don't understand this, Romney will explain it to you Monday (unless, perhaps Crowley is scheduled to moderate and block the argument).

      October 19, 2012 at 9:05 pm | Reply
      • Zach

        Mike,

        The fact is there have been Republican congressmen, such as William Thornberry R-Texas, who have claimed the CIA gave them the same briefing the Obama Administration was giving the American people 7 to 10 days after the event.. Not to mention that with every statement released by this administration they were quick to note that they were giving us the information as they are given it, there is a pending report being done, and that we truly don't know all the details to what happened....and honestly we still don't. This has become a completely politicized issue. Our government is not omniscient, especially in regards to trying to gather information in a fragmented country of loose militias, with no strong central government. Honestly, take a look at the issue. What's the bigger story for you here the fact that we had diplomats bravely working with Libyans to protect our and the new Libyan government interests or the fact that you feel Obama politicized this? I feel if we all focused on the the prior the focus more on the tragedy and the facts...as CNN is posting here. But, unfortunately, that isn't the case. Instead of prayers to the families of those lost and support to our country to get those that have wronged our brothers, we watch several media outlets vehemently play partisanship and we eat it up readily. There is plenty to blame Obama here, but politicizing this issue that as a nation we need to stand together on is the blatant ugly side of politics.

        October 19, 2012 at 10:02 pm |
      • Backgammon

        I don't think s Zach. We should be impeaching this President not electing him???

        October 19, 2012 at 10:30 pm |
    • Backgammon

      Hi Jamie, my name is Backgammon and I wanted to reply to you without the impression of an attack.
      ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND? How long and how much suffering does this country have to endure so that Liberals can feel good about electing a man who should be impeached, at this very SECOND.
      Please read my post below, think about my theories and tell me if you still think this is a communication problem????
      Please.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:24 pm | Reply
      • PNWjim

        Backy, I have been reading yor garbage for a while and could not take it any longer.If you want to believe the FOX guys that all well and fine but some of us see improvement in what we had 4 years ago when Bush left us in shambles but I have found that to be true with the most republicans. They see and want whats good for them and not whats best for the middle class, the heart of America .Thanks President Obama for seeing through these tough times and may have 4 more years to ' right' our ship of freedom. May all the Backys of the good old nation remain calm and turn their station back to Fox so you will feel good .

        October 20, 2012 at 12:12 am |
  70. reg

    CNN, a little direction for you. Since it's been firmly established this was a terrorist attack, here is the 'hot' follow-up story you should be investigating now. Give us the journalism '101' who, what, where, when, how on how the 'movie' story made it into 5 morning shows. Shouldn't you have Susan Rice back in now? For someone so ready to give a detailed accounting of a protest gone awry, seems strange now that the administration is claiming confusion. Have her back in, would love to hear her give a play-by-play on her instructions. Interesting that she is nowhere to be found. Likely on a paid sabbatical courtesy of the administration, or using those amassed unused vacation days. She should be back in office a sometime shortly after November 6th I'm sure.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:41 pm | Reply
  71. 173 LRRP

    Intel may be difficult but is doubtless being done. Any second guessing by anyone but CIA and associated allied intelligence agencies will just obfuscate the general understanding. To make a political stand on this by RR is close to treasoeous. The Administration cannot tell what they know without alerting the terrorists (intelligence, methods and techniques). When the CIA and the President are certain of their intelligence, I would expect missile strikes and/or Delta/Ranger/Seal/Marine SOF action.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:35 pm | Reply
    • Alaskan

      Whew! Good thing Obama isnt using Bin Laden as politics. Wake up dude!

      October 19, 2012 at 8:47 pm | Reply
    • PartOf

      I too have wondered what has happened to the reporting on CNN. As CNN became fixated on the Benghazi issue with every anchor repeating the same thing over and over for the last two weeks. I too wondered if they somehow had shifted their producers and were becoming more like Fox, introducing this "red herring" before an election to affect the election. There are so many issues coming up Voter Suppression in Florida, which I have experienced, 23,000 homeless children in Florida, trying to reshape our judicial system, the rise of the Plutocrats and the Koch Brothers,
      30 million un-insured and the lost of insuring people with pre-existing conditions if we lose Healthcare and yet CNN focused on Benghazi.

      At least this story portrays the real confusion in Libya and lack of stability and the militia's running the country. Isn't that anarchy?

      What is it that people want, ok you want Rice to resign. Great. The question is why can't these people respect the parents of the Americans who lost their lives. In fact, how many lives do we have to lose in the Middle East. What is our purpose War or is it Oil, or is it trying to tell people in other countries what to do? How is this helping Americans whether Republicans or Democrats. Do we want another 10 years or war in the Middle East? How about World War III. Why can't we reach out and help each other? Why the blind eye to proverty? Why are we hurting ourselves with wedge issues that in the end hurt the masses? We have gone bankrupt spiritually and morally.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:19 pm | Reply
  72. Chip Souza

    has CNN become a propaganda machine?

    October 19, 2012 at 8:34 pm | Reply
    • MontanaSon

      Near as I can tell, about 8 or 10 years ago.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:35 pm | Reply
      • Michelle

        Can you feel the tide turning? I love it when the boards look like this. CNN joining the vast right wing conspiracy – LOL!

        October 20, 2012 at 5:16 am |
  73. Shane

    Obummer will kill anyone at this point, he needs a good bump at the last minute. There will be a major drone strike and a news release that they have killed those responsbiile for the massacre (when i fact, it was Barack Hussein Osama...oops i mean Obams's fault in the first place)

    October 19, 2012 at 8:32 pm | Reply
    • Xairesephos

      Apart from veiled racism and mediocre humor, you've contributed nothing to this exalted forum.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:36 pm | Reply
    • MJ

      This man pleaded on the day he died for help. Do you Liberals now know why Big Bird is not an issue? Obama will probably let them know when and where we will strike, as well as, the Media. Isn't this like giving a copy of your Play Book to the opposition??

      October 19, 2012 at 8:42 pm | Reply
    • Fred Phred

      True, but Bush would kill anyone too.

      Unfortuntely for the us, it was our own soldiers! But he did settle the family vendetta after Saddam tried a hit on GHW Bush back in the early 90s. So alls well that ends well, at least for Dubbya.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:48 pm | Reply
    • rmincalifornia

      Actually, given what Romney said when he was secretly recorded back in September, one can start to wonder if Romney's supporters or campaign had something to do with it. In that recording Romney claims to have enlisted campaign specialist which also did campaigns overseas, specifically the middle east. He also stated that if an event in the middle east came up before the election he would take full advantage of it. Furthermore, Romney also stated that his campaign people had some plan in process but that if he shared it he would have to "kill" who ever he shared it with. At first glance it seems like it's all fun and games, but now days who knows how far greed will take someone. I also seem to remember hearing at one time in the news that the attack appeared to have been instigated. But by who? Maybe we will never know.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:00 pm | Reply
  74. flavoter

    This is darn sad people need to remember the media has to deliver something any type of story and the worse it sounds or appears the more they hope people will be drawn in. That’s how they get their big pay checks!

    If they had information about Osama how many think they would have found a way to leak it?

    Let the investigators do their jobs and let them give a fully vetted report to congress and the American people speculation is just that. But it keeps people talking and the spin spinning.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:30 pm | Reply
  75. james harris

    like and respect cnn very much, like the fact that they seem to be down the middle like i am but having partisans like fran townsend who is so obviously repub is making me less confidnt in what i percieve as an unbiased network.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:30 pm | Reply
    • John

      If you think CNN is unbiased you may have bigger problems. Soledad O'Brien....needI say more? Watch it all day and tell me what u think?

      October 19, 2012 at 8:58 pm | Reply
    • Mike

      CNN is not unbiased. I too, hope that I could come here and get unbiased news, but that is not the case. You really have to go to multiple sources and then decide for yourself. CNN is bigtime into propaganda mode this week.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:34 pm | Reply
  76. Sane

    What is sad in this whole thing is that 4 people lost their lives. Intelligence take time to gather and they work under cover..I have always voted republican..But it is very sad to see that one of the parties is trying to gain political leverage on someone's death. The party I have voted for would never do that. I would be hard pressed to believe that McCain would have allowed the death of people to be campaign theme instead of trying to explain the proposed policies...This is not the conservatives that I knew all these years..I am sad to see the state of Romney/Ryan's campaign. It is already shameful here in Arizona the campaign that Jeff Flake and Joe Arpaio are running.. For the first time, I may vote against Republicans or wont vote at all...

    October 19, 2012 at 8:29 pm | Reply
    • MontanaSon

      How ironic in light of the fact that I, lo these many years a faithful supporter of the party of hope and change, yea a brother of the democrat union, must break with that glorious tradition and cast my vote elsewhere this November.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:34 pm | Reply
      • nick

        Bye. I don't believe you were ever a follower, because a true follower with any common sense ould see what Obama has accomplished after taking over the humongous mess.
        In the mean tme brace yourself for another 4 years.

        October 19, 2012 at 8:48 pm |
      • Michelle

        Lol! Sarcasm wins you points every time! ;)

        October 20, 2012 at 5:07 am |
  77. Terrance Kozak (Canada)

    Let's make this really easy for you to understand. It has been discovered that Syria is getting arms from Libya being smuggled through Turkey. Why is the truth taking so long? Who wants the USA to know that parts of Libya (eastern Libya to be exact) have been taken over by al Qaeda just weeks before the election?

    October 19, 2012 at 8:27 pm | Reply
  78. Pat

    Maybe if the Obama administration had investigated early on instead of covering up the facts for his own personal gain, they wouldn't be having as many problems.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:26 pm | Reply
  79. sam

    Baur and Townsend are wrong, who was going to rely any information to the U.S. if no one was there to see the attack??? Who the hell was suppose to rely this info??

    October 19, 2012 at 8:25 pm | Reply
    • mudgwa

      Sam
      They watched in "real time" according to Mrs. Lamb and even had video from drones. There is no debate about what happened except from the people that want to deny anything wrong happened. Move along nothing to see here.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:57 pm | Reply
  80. josh rogen

    i don't know what this story is talking about, Obama arrested the guy who made the video, case closed.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:24 pm | Reply
    • MontanaSon

      Well stated. And it would have been, had it not been for that pesky non-news network, Fox, and the internet.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:28 pm | Reply
    • esmith1001

      Obama arrested who? I hope you're just kidding. He never arrested anybody. This is just one more thing he seems to be getting credit for that he didn't do. That list is getting longer. BTW, he didn't kill Bin Laden either. Come to think about it, he really hasn't done much himself, except talk.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:56 pm | Reply
  81. Amy Beth Katz

    Could it be all this confusion over whether it was a protest or planned terrorist attack is CNN's fault? They covered the news constantly that week and showed images of protestors in Libya and Cairo, and referred ceaselessly to the anti-muslim film as the impetus for the violence. They seem to have forgotten their own reporting!

    Also, could it be possible that the CIA is following/watching suspects and finding out who they are associating with rather than arresting them right away? Surveillance would be the smart thing to do to catch the whole group responsible.

    What drives me crazy is that CNN seems like they are now an extension for FOX News... just in the last couple of weeks. Makes me wonder if the Republican producers are writing the news these days. This Benganzi thing is such a destructive red herring distracting the public away from other issues that matter to them!

    October 19, 2012 at 8:23 pm | Reply
    • MollyBee

      CNN, my go-to news medium, does seem like they allow the feckless, reckless FOX bully them sometimes. Good point.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:55 pm | Reply
    • Mike

      That's hilarious. They are a propaganda machine for the left. CNN failed to punish Crowley. The didn't publish the gallup poll showing Romney up by 6 points. They put the ridiculous 'binders' thing on their front page. The bias is way into the propaganda range.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:41 pm | Reply
  82. Charlotte

    They should probably start with the RNC.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:23 pm | Reply
  83. sam

    Of course Abu Khattal wont hide, hes in his own country!! The only way a military group can get him is a drone strike or a boots on the ground. No securty expert like Townsend or Baur have any other ideas.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:22 pm | Reply
  84. Backgammon

    Well, it is about time CNN. You have been covering for Obama for FOUR years! I just happened to go by CNN and saw you were finally telling the TRUTH.
    While Obama is wildly hunting this guy down, he is on TV giving interviews and being a hero!
    When will you people understand how horrible the Obama administration and Obama expressly have hurt our Country.
    You may be too late, and you have the next 4 years of BLOOD on your hands.
    I think Romne can win this but he certainly needs your help by just being truthful for a change. STOP covering for this idiot.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:22 pm | Reply
    • mike

      You are a big ZERO and need to go back and get some high school diploma so that you can understand politics. right now you are just stupid and a big dummy.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:47 pm | Reply
      • Truly

        Wow, couldn't you think of any kind of intelligent reply?

        October 19, 2012 at 9:30 pm |
  85. MontanaSon

    Ordinarily, the United States would smite Abu with a cruise missile, but unfortunatley, he happens to lead Obama's re-election committee in Benghazi.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:21 pm | Reply
  86. Something Wrong Here

    FACT1: Obama and company have been caught trying to cover up Benghazi attack by claiming common day protesters turned violet over a video…….WHY: They didn’t want Americans to know Al-Qaeda is alive and well and our diplomats were not adequately protected……Despite numerous request……….

    FACT2: The video explanation was televised by Obamas administration on many talk shows and a UN speech……..This broadcasting of the Video incited many riots with additional deaths (mainly Muslim) …..Many Many Muslim knew little of video until after the Obama administration mass broadcasting of it.

    FACT3: A video of our own was created apologizing for the disparaging video (the one Obama and company advertised) and broadcast in Muslim countries on tax payer’s dime!

    This is impeachment material folks!!!!!!!

    October 19, 2012 at 8:19 pm | Reply
    • Backgammon

      YES, something is wrong. Nixon was impeached for lying and NO ONE DIED! What is wrong with these people that they don't see what a failure Obama is??? I just don't get it. I am not willing to sacrifice my kids and grandkids for a another Obama term.
      While I am thinking about it....When I was working, I hired thousands of people for various projects for several companies. I don' want a database (which would be very Leona) I want to look at the pages, see how they print, what do they say about themselves. I can't see that on a database and I can not imagine that grown people who have had the slightest bit of business, and Don't know what a binder is for????? REALLY?

      October 19, 2012 at 8:46 pm | Reply
    • Backgammon

      Sorry, Something Wrong Here. I have been holdig my Malevolent feelings for CNN for a very long time.
      If CNN does not persue the Lybia story, they should go out of business. (I read they were close, no wonder)
      I have heard three alternate theories. If you think about it, just being unprepared would not be this bad. If they were only guilty of not putting enough security in the area, they could take that hit. Here we go:
      The killing of Moammar Gadhafi, Hillary said. We came, we KILLED, we left. HA. HA. Ha. # 1 We lost large number of guns in the Gadhafi stage,.perhaps our Ambassador was going to negotiate their return & it went F & F (that is another story) # 2. What if Obama needed another rescue because he couldn't hold off the Bin Laden kill any longer?.
      Someone kidnaps our Ambassaor and our Super team of Seals save him?? But the save didn't happen.
      # 3. How about Hillary and Obama decide that how cool would we be if we sent a unmarried, no children, guy who could be gay into that area. After all he had a life time of service, was a great man. His facebook and his photos suggest such a thing. These are just theories. What ever it is, it was not a Video! If we elect this criminal who should be impeached,NOT elected!!!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE! And just as a FYI, # 4. I don't think Obama even wants this job. His first debate certainly did not reflect his interest. I think he wants to go to the cushy 35 million dollar house that Penny Pritzer (of hotel fame) is getting ready for a JAN move in. Google it. He has seen Bill Clinton's lifestyle and he would like to just play golf and drop by some of his celebrity friends, with his Presidential Coolness. Obama certainly did not function for the last 4 years like a leader. Where was he??? How dare him after so mahy people trusted him.
      Obama did not do ONE of his promises. I will cut the deficit in half, I will close Gitmo, I will unite the people, I will lower the unemployment to 6%. WHAT????

      October 19, 2012 at 9:16 pm | Reply
  87. dikoosh

    He killed Americans and he is not afraid or hiding? Perfect timing for a sweet Drone missile attack on his non-hiding ass.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:14 pm | Reply
  88. John

    So why did OBAMA blame this on the VIDEO...what was he trying to hide???

    October 19, 2012 at 8:13 pm | Reply
  89. reg

    I love how CNN is now, more than month plus after the attack, willing to get into the weeds around specifics of the day of. A little late don't you think? I mean State Department personnel and Intelligence officials have already sat in front of congressional hearings and said as much that it was a "terrorist attack". So why are we noodling this now? This would certainly have been helpful the week of the attack, but I am yawning now. Looking at the by-line on this piece we have 3 authors; let's assume these guys are likely cub reporters sent out to gather up the details, to do clean-up essentially, so CNN can say, " we covered it". I give these guys great credit, and wish they would've been assigned this piece at the beginning, rather than all of CNN's top names, who essentially sat there towed the "movie" brief and indicted anyone questioning it, rather than asking for the release of the facts. Journalism can't be editorial opinion without fact, we need facts, that's what CNN is supposed to be about. Give us the facts please, early and often. Losing respect for your brand.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:09 pm | Reply
  90. Jack

    If it came up in the debate, my response to Mitt....

    Let the intelligence agencies do their jobs and figure out what happened. It is better that they take the time needed to get it right than a bunch of guess work. When they know, you will know. And stop using it for partisan purposes because the time it is taking to get it right is politically inconvenient for you.

    Done. There have been too many times that got the US into trouble because of bad or ignored intelligence. Vietnam and Iraq2 come to mind. Mitt should stfu. The more he pushes too hard to get political advantage the worse it reflects on him.

    October 19, 2012 at 8:02 pm | Reply
    • MontanaSon

      Sounds reasonable. But then, you probably wouldn't have attempted to misdirect the public for two weeks either.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:14 pm | Reply
    • ok

      O.k. well what do you want, a President that's afraid to go that extra mile, a President that hides inside the United States, and wants to look the other way when it comes to terrorisim, a President that will not confront a problem and send out cronies to lie to the American public and use a patsy to cover up the fact that a High ranking American Official got assasinated under his watch... In order to keep "looking good" in the Political game...

      October 19, 2012 at 8:16 pm | Reply
      • Charlotte

        LOL! Just go back to your Faux Noise it's all you are capable of grasping.

        October 19, 2012 at 8:25 pm |
    • John

      NONSENSE JACK..this is not about pushing this is about getting the TRUTH which is obvious many want to hide the facts....this will not go away...why should it...when the president clearly blamed this on a FILM this shows his level of INCOMPETENCE...I have lost total respect for this fool he is not FIT to LEAD this nation...the scary thing is BIDEN is WORSE!!!

      October 19, 2012 at 8:17 pm | Reply
      • Charlotte

        John, you are conveniently ignoring both the facts and the timeline. Moreover your clear understanding of how the intelligence community and chain of command and actually anything resembling research and investigation in general clearly mark you for an insider in the classified discussions and such. So you are either committing a felony here by releasing classified intelligence or you are committing a horribly embarrassing gaffe by showing us how little intelligence you actually posess. Which is it? Huh, SWEETIE????

        October 19, 2012 at 8:27 pm |
    • ok

      To tell you the truth I really think there is a lot more to Libya and Afganistan than you know... I think it's worse and more of a danger to American troops to cut down their ranks and reduce funding. All the American Armed Forces deaths that happen now are more than likely due to diminished bases and no reinforcements. If it's going to be like that then I say pull out of all these countries 100% because leaving them unarmed and under staff is a dangerous game.

      It's the same as Libya, with this guy in the White House that sees the world as the USA is the enemy and we need to believe in our enemy, believe that things will just get better if we put down our guns... What a dangerous way to operate when you are in a state of war with an enemy that is always thinking...

      Happening right now are more than likely plans for attacks sophisticated attacks... Our enemy wants nothing more than a United States President that prefers to "lay low" ...

      October 19, 2012 at 8:24 pm | Reply
    • Backgammon

      Don't you see the difference in these two men. Romney called it THAT day. If Obama said this was a terroist attack the next day, WHY did he spend the next two weeks saying it was a demonstration and VIDEO.
      Please read my theories...there are 4.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:53 pm | Reply
      • Jack

        As you said, theories. And that is the right way to put it. But it is different when someone presents it as fact.

        One of the other news items of the last few days is the Zimmerman case. Its going on 8 months and we still dont know the full story. We the public are still not sure who did what. All we hear are outsiders conclusions based on the partial information we do have. The various sides on the issue either wanted the guy convicted and sent to prison (or worse) immediately. The other wanted him to walk immediately. Neither wanted to give prosecutors the time to do their jobs. And both were wrong.

        Actually this works both ways. Wouldnt the Obama people want to know for certain who was responsible so they could go get him now and kill him? Then use that for political advantage like the other side is using Libya for theirs?

        October 20, 2012 at 7:22 pm |
  91. Txguy

    I don't consider this a cover up, who can make sense of reports from such an unstable country? A real cover up was Bush and Iraq.

    October 19, 2012 at 7:49 pm | Reply
    • Charlotte

      Precisely. But the little boys must pretend like they know better.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:28 pm | Reply
  92. Fubarack

    There are so many lies from the administration now, I don't think even state run moderators can hide this anymore. Bamer is toast.

    October 19, 2012 at 7:40 pm | Reply
  93. Willie12345

    Watch the news closely this weekend. A lot of information about and surrounding the attack is now coming to the surface.

    October 19, 2012 at 7:31 pm | Reply
    • Charlotte

      along, with any luck, of ten years of Rommiekins' full tax returns.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:28 pm | Reply
    • Mike

      Yes, but don't expect to get the truth from CNN. They have sold their soul to the devil. They believe that any action is justfied in getting Obama reelected. All news from this point until the election will be heavily biased.
      CNN is not an ethical news organization. Don't forget this.

      October 19, 2012 at 9:23 pm | Reply
  94. Dorkus Maximus

    Is five weeks such a long time? Given that the attack came amidst an apparently unrelated riot and happened thousands of miles away in a country that's not particularly stable or well organized? Given that no group has claimed responsibility? Given that the general state of chaos has inhibited U.S. agents in their investigation?

    How many serial killers in the U.S. have roamed and killed for years without being found? How long did it take to identify all of the participants in the 9/11/2001 attacks in the U.S.?

    October 19, 2012 at 7:19 pm | Reply
  95. jim

    I wonder why the authors did not ask candy crowley? she seems to be the one with the answers

    October 19, 2012 at 7:19 pm | Reply
    • MontanaSon

      Ha! And, conveniently, the transcripts....

      October 19, 2012 at 8:16 pm | Reply
  96. Tony

    So fundamentally, it comes down to the fact that al Qaeda, under its various names, is still thriving, and carried out the deadly strike on the US consulate in Libya.

    ...Why didn't Obama just say so? (Oh yeah, it's because he wants everyone to believe that he has neutralized al Qaeda...

    October 19, 2012 at 7:17 pm | Reply
    • Dorkus Maximus

      Why didn't Obama say what you think he should say? Maybe because it isn't true?

      Don't you remember when G.W. Bush was running for reelection? The continued existence of al Qaeda was touted by Dick Cheney and many others as the biggest reason we needed to reelect Bush. You know, don't change generals in the middle of a war and all that.

      October 19, 2012 at 7:23 pm | Reply
      • Charlotte

        MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. ROFLMAO!!!!

        October 19, 2012 at 8:29 pm |
  97. firewalker225

    This should be front page news.

    Another FAILED OBAMA PLAN.
    Come on CNN where's the story ...your readers HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW ...You can only PROTECT OBAMA SO LONG.

    Watchdog asked to investigate stimulus-backed battery plant after claims of idle workers

    The top government watchdog for the Department of Energy has been asked to investigate a stimulus-backed Michigan battery plant where workers reportedly spend hours every day playing cards, watching movies and generally not working.

    It was reported today that the LG Chem plant in Holland, Mich., which was approved for a $150 million federal grant from President Obama , had started putting workers on furlough due to lack of demand for their lithium-ion cells.

    October 19, 2012 at 7:17 pm | Reply
    • Charlotte

      Success rate for Obama-supported ventures is better than that of the private sector. Go do some research before you continue to embarrass yourself.

      October 19, 2012 at 8:31 pm | Reply
      • jb1111

        I am so very TIRED of this Comedian-in-Chief.

        Will be so glad to have a REAL LEADER as President again.

        I have already VOTED FOR ROMNEY.

        October 19, 2012 at 8:48 pm |
  98. Chris

    Obama, Hillary, and the rest of 'em have become so involved in the election that the barbarian Muslim terrorists are openly taunting them, knowing they are safe.

    October 19, 2012 at 7:17 pm | Reply
  99. 28Mamerican

    Personal opinion :
    What we know for sure is that a #muslimrage riot cleared the way for this attack. There is virtually no realistic chance of holding individuals accountable because of the nature of the attack. Any effort to convict any individuals of this will be seen (by me) as a scapegoat. These attacks were virtually impossible with out the #muslimrage riots. Personally I hold islam accountable for encouraging such things. You could potentially make the leaders of the radical groups who encouraged the riots go up in a puff of smoke but that is about as close to justice as you can get.

    October 19, 2012 at 6:23 pm | Reply
    • Chris

      Convict you say? Kill 'em where you find 'em.

      October 19, 2012 at 7:17 pm | Reply
    • AG

      There was no riot. That was part of the Obama fog story

      October 19, 2012 at 8:33 pm | Reply
      • PNWjim

        AG, The weapon used to kill our people could be shot by one person, alone gun man if you will, but there was some sort of commotion or riot or attack whatever phrase you want to call it.They could have killed whenever they wanted to but elected to use the event to do the deed. Now all the other riots in all other nations were all part of this conspiracy? And other 9-11s have gone by without riotting so I do believe the outlying fact is the film caused the fog needed to do what they intended in doing at some time. This is an act of terror just like the President said in the Rose Garden.

        October 19, 2012 at 11:13 pm |
      • reg

        The president's rose garden speech is a non-issue. He didn't really say anything, he rode the fence at Axelrod's instruction – which most likely sounded something like this 1) be outraged about Benghazi, 2) mention terrorism, but don't label it directly as such. And Obama is a great orator and did a great job, but he said nothing really meaningful that would indict him later on. The whole speech, if you read it is all emotion and gusto, no fact.

        The administration then sent him on his way to Las Vegas to raise campaign money and begin driving the lead up to Susan Rice speaking 4 days later. I want to see where she got these talking points. This is prime CHI politics. Use someone else outside your cabinet to deliver misinformation that can be sacrificed. In the meantime, use the cover of this distraction to achieve your agenda. Axelrod and team know that eventually their actions will come to light, they are just hoping that the election is over and the confetti falling diminishes the noise.

        October 20, 2012 at 10:32 am |
  100. Bruce Miller

    THIS SHOULD BE FRONT PAGE NEWS. WE ARE HAVING A PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE MONDAY ABOUT LYBIA.

    October 19, 2012 at 5:59 pm | Reply
    • Jack

      It is front page news dufus.

      October 20, 2012 at 6:59 pm | Reply
1 2

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.