Congressional calls for investigation into anti-IED flap
July 30th, 2012
04:42 PM ET

Congressional calls for investigation into anti-IED flap

By Mike Mount

As roadside bombs continue to be the top killer of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, a Republican House member is asking for a congressional inquiry into why an Army report favoring a system that increases detection of the bombs was altered to seem less effective, presumably to push an already existing Army system that troops said was inferior.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-California, a member of the House Armed Services Committee, also is asking congressional investigators to look into why some Army units that requested the bomb-detection system were denied access to it by the Pentagon bureaucracy.

The investigation request surrounds a new privately developed software system called Palantir, which according to U.S troops and commanders who have used it, is more effective in helping troops in Afghanistan track and predict the location of deadly roadside bombs than the existing Army system.

Earlier this year, after ordering the system pushed out to units in Afghanistan that had been urgently asking for it, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond Odierno requested the Army's Operational Test Command to report on Palantir by surveying troops who have used it.

Documents obtained by Security Clearance show that the initial report came back with overwhelmingly positive feedback on Palantir and recommended that more computer servers be put into Afghanistan so more units could use the system.

But despite the findings, the commander of the test command, Col. Joseph M. Martin, ordered the report destroyed and another report generated that removed favorable references to Palantir as well as the recommendation to add additional servers.

"Please ensure that any and all copies of the 25 April report are destroyed and not distributed," a memo directed by Col. Martin said.

"Upon destruction of the previous report, please confirm to me in email that all copies of the original report, dated 25 April has been destroyed," it continued.

The newer report would then seemingly push troops to use the service's own Distributed Common Ground System, a similar program already in use in the field but less favored by the troops that use it.

Odierno ordered an investigation into Martin's actions in July, according to officials familiar with the investigation who were only able to say the investigation was being led by a three-star Army general.

It is unclear what led Odierno to ask for the investigation, and Army officials were only able confirm there was an investigation.

"There is an ongoing investigation being conducted to determine the facts in the matter," said Army spokesman Lt. Col. Freddie Mack.

The presumed lack of transparency by the Army to use a senior Army general to investigate prompted Rep. Hunter to request a congressional inquiry, according to officials in Rep. Hunter's office.

This week Hunter wrote a letter to Odierno asking for answers to why Martin would change a report to prevent the expedited use of the software to troops in the field and forcing it to undergo more reviews.

"With so much at stake on the ground for our men and women, it is important that they receive the most technologically advanced assets available, whether it is an organic asset within the services or a commercial off-the-shelf product," Hunter wrote to Odierno on July 23, referring to the Palantir system.

"I am frustrated that even the Chief of Staff of the Army can't receive an honest and transparent assessment from his own independent evaluation command," Hunter said.

All of this started last fall when, after the success of the Palantir system with other U.S. military units, the Army's 82nd Airborne Division in Afghanistan urgently requested the system, but those requests were denied by the Army for reasons that remain unclear, said Hunter in a July 24 letter to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee requesting an investigation into the Army's actions.

He said that data at the time showed that the Palantir system indicated find-and-clear rates for roadside bombs was improved by 12%. Several other urgent requests by the 82nd also were denied until Gen. Odierno was told about the denials and stepped in to ensure the system was delivered to the soldiers.

Hunter said, despite Odierno stepping in, the unit still did not receive the software until February of this year because of resistance by Army officials who seemed to prefer the Army-developed intelligence software system called the Distributed Common Ground System.

Hunter also said he learned of other Army units that have since been denied requests to get the system while in Afghanistan and still have not received them.

Army officials did not respond to questions about the reason requests were denied to troops in the field who had requested the Palantir system.

But in another response to Security Clearance, Army spokesman Mack said, "The Army is currently using Palantir in-theater, and the service has signed (May 2012) a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) to assess integration of the technology in the Distributed Common Ground System."

"The Army plans to demonstrate Palantir capabilities within the Distributed Common Ground System program this September based on CRADA successes," Mack's statement continued.

A spokesman for Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said, "The secretary believes that the Army can handle this appropriately. And obviously, we will consult closely with Congress. The Department of the Army ... is consulting."

Post by:
Filed under: Congress • Military
soundoff (7 Responses)
  1. pure cetone slim cétone de framboise

    I thought the Republicans in congress (you know, the place where laws are *supposed* to be made) finally decided to just pass a straight net neutrality law. Whatever happened to that?

    http://tinyurl.com/d893016557ea992ef3f90776c97985f2

    July 14, 2015 at 10:22 am | Reply
  2. BobE

    I wonder how much money Thiel is giving to Hunter and other congressional members and lobbyists to push his technology? He had put out fake sales numbers to support false valuations so that he can eventually dump the company and pocket profits.

    DCGS is costly but look at the prices of Palantir..

    July 30, 2012 at 6:20 pm | Reply
    • Boondoggle?

      LAWL, I have yet to see the point of Palantir. I mean, it's a nice sell for them that knowing the prices of meat and food at local markets is essential to projecting stability in a COIN up, but COME ON! All I know is the J2 guys sat in a room with Palantir contractors...probably watching movies off the morale drive I bet.

      July 30, 2012 at 6:29 pm | Reply
    • Cindi

      After reading the article, my first impression was, this is about a money thing and I question, does Palantir really work. I figured if Palantir really worked, every combat engineer unit would have it, right ?? But......combat engineers just don't look for roadside bombs, they go everywhere through out Afghanistan. They go to village's, they are in the mountains, they go out with Special Forces, etc. So, if Palantir really worked, why aren't all of the engineers using it in Afghanistan ? Engineers jobs are to look for bombs. BUT, if Palantir really does work, then it must be cheaper to send the engineers out to look for the bombs, because Palantir I'm guessing, cost a lot of money.

      July 30, 2012 at 7:30 pm | Reply
  3. ed

    Does not surprise me in the least.

    July 30, 2012 at 5:53 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.