GAO: Military lowering bar to evaluate Afghan troop progress
July 25th, 2012
06:47 PM ET

GAO: Military lowering bar to evaluate Afghan troop progress

By Larry Shaughnessy

America's strategy in Afghanistan has been clear: Have U.S. troops step back from combat to focus on training Afghan National Security Forces so they can take over in 2014.

To hear the administration and military tell it, the plan is working.

"We're building the capacity of Afghans, partnering with communities and police and security forces, which are growing stronger," President Barack Obama said last year.

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said just about the same thing last month. "We have built up an Afghan army so that they are increasingly in the lead for their operations. And they are every day improving their capability."

But are the Afghans better soldiers, or is the military lowering the standards by which it measures the Afghan National Security Forces?

A new GAO report found "key definitions used in ANSF assessments have changed several times and assessments did not fully measure ANP (Afghan National Police) capability until recently."

For example, in January of 2011, the Department of Defense's highest capability rating for Afghan army units was "independent." But by August the highest rating was "independent with advisors." That meant with U.S. help, if needed.

"These changes, as well as the elimination of certain requirements for validating units, were responsible, in part, for its reported increase in April 2012 of the number of ANSF units rated at the highest level," the report stated.

The GAO also found problems with the basic reporting system for the Afghan National Army and the ANP.

"While the assessment tool did rate the ability of ANA and ANP units to meet their counterinsurgency mission, according to (the Department of Defense) it did not address civil policing and other responsibilities of the ANP," the report says.

A Pentagon spokesman said the changes were made to better assess how the Afghan forces are doing.

"The methods and tools" used by NATO's International Security Assistance Force and the NATO Training Mission in Afghanistan "have certainly evolved," Pentagon spokesman Cmdr. William Speaks said, "but the changes that have been made have been designed to more accurately track the progress of ANSF units. Standards have been made more realistic, but not less rigorous.

"Changing metrics over time is not a flaw, rather the changes represent a constant refinement and an evolution of metrics as the campaign itself progresses.

soundoff (10 Responses)
  1. Dark Knight Rises Bane Coat

    Thanks for making me apart of these great opportunity.

    August 31, 2012 at 6:00 pm | Reply
  2. hack cf

    This internet site is truly a walk-through it genuinely will be the details you wanted concerning this and didn’t know who to inquire about. Glimpse here, and you will absolutely discover it.

    July 28, 2012 at 5:37 pm | Reply
  3. cctv jogja

    Thanks for sharing this information. I really like your way of expressing the opinions and sharing the information. It is good to move as chance bring new things in life, paves the way for advancement.

    July 27, 2012 at 2:21 am | Reply
  4. Aaron Chaney

    DEIR HEZZOR, (SANA)_At the forefront of the Syrian armed forces offensive termed Confront, contain and extinguish, all terrorists are quantified based on internal security reports and special reconnaissance that works in conjunction with a community effort being engaged throughout the whole of the nation. As outlined by a defense ministry spokesman, "The citizens of Syria wholeheartedly support this round them up directive since many of them report being threatened with violence if they refuse to accede to the demands of seditionists. Our CCE policy is a viable and necessary approach to establish order by contending with any individual or group of individuals who are deluded – for whatever reason, into believing that a nation can be hijacked and seized by engaging in organized terrorism."

    July 26, 2012 at 10:30 am | Reply
  5. NN

    Nothing ever changes with DoD. If they can't measure up and meet their goals, they simply change the criteria for success and "mission accomplished." They're nothing but a bunch of slimy scoundrels.

    July 25, 2012 at 10:20 pm | Reply
  6. Killer O'Bama

    It looks like all that killing over there in Afghanistan is starting to pay off bigtime. Just look at all that copper, lithium, gold, silver, do I need to go on? Now I'm beginning to feel as happy as a cow with six tytts after reading the report above!!!

    July 25, 2012 at 8:11 pm | Reply
  7. Quigley

    It appears that the proxy occupation of Afghanistan might be a success in the short run. Now the greedy politicians plus the U.S. and other European firms will get to exploit Afghanistan's resources to the fullest much to my chagrin! It goes to show just how history has away of repeating itself. The very same thing happened in China just a little over 100 years ago when the Boxer Rebellion was finally crushed there!

    July 25, 2012 at 7:52 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.