April 10th, 2012
03:59 PM ET

Annan: Stopping Syria violence "at risk"

Kofi Annan, the United Nations-Arab League envoy to Syria, told the U.N. Security Council that he was "gravely concerned at the course of events" in the crisis-ridden Middle East nation, after Syrian President Bashar al-Assad failed to withdraw troops from cities and towns by Tuesday's deadline. (For the latest Syria developments click  here)

In a letter, Annan said the Syrian government should have used the days ahead of the deadline to send a "powerful political signal of peace."

Annan wrote the letter as Syrian troops pounded cities across the nation, opposition activists said. Annan said he was not giving up on the peace plan he brokered, but the fresh violence as the deadline came and went blighted hopes for success.

Here's the text of his letter:

His Excellency

Mr. Ban Ki-moon

Secretary-General of the United Nations

New York

Excellency,

I would like to update the Council on my mission as Joint Special Envoy of the United Nations and the League of Arab States for Syria. I do so in the context of the 10 and 12 April timeline. We enter a critical moment in the implementation of the six-point plan, and I am gravely concerned at the course of events. I would be grateful if you could bring this letter to the attention of the members of the Security Council.

As I reported to the Security Council on 2 April, the Syrian Government had informed me the previous day that it would implement a plan for withdrawing its military units from populated zones and surrounding areas to take effect from 1 April up until 10 April 2012, with no new deployments to population centres. I subsequently relayed to all sides that upon the completion by the Government of its commitments under item 2 of the plan by Tuesday, 10 April, all parties should immediately cease all forms of violence, so that a complete cessation is in place by 0600 hours Damascus time on Thursday, 12 April. I appreciated the Security Council’s support for this timeline in its Presidential Statement of 5 April, further to its support for the six-point plan in its presidential statement of 21 March.

In this regard, the days before 10 April should have been an opportunity for the Government of Syria to send a powerful political signal of peace, with action on all aspects of the six-point plan, in particular through the urgent and visible implementation of its commitments under item 2 of the plan, namely, to cease troop movements towards population centres, to cease all use of heavy weapons in such centres, and to begin pullback of military concentrations in and around population centres.  In the last 5 days it has become clear that such a signal has yet to be issued.

With respect to humanitarian access, discussions are ongoing regarding an expansion of humanitarian access and capacity to reach the estimated one million people in need of humanitarian assistance.  Following  participation in the Government-led humanitarian assessment mission in March, the United Nations, in coordination with the Syrian Arab Red Crescent, is now delivering assistance to displaced persons in Tartous Governorate.

With respect to detainees, on 5 April the ICRC announced that they had agreed to procedures with the Government for visits to places of detention, including an immediate visit to Aleppo Central Prison.  In a letter dated 8 April, the Government of Syria informed me of the release of 97 people detained for participating in opposition activities. The Syrian Government has also informed me of the pardon of 211 individuals who had surrendered.

With respect to journalists, the Syrian Government has sent me a letter, informing me of the attribution of visas to journalists from 21 international news organisations.

With respect to the military provisions of the six-point plan, the Syrian Government has underlined security issues in several letters detailing actions by armed groups against government forces, civilians and property. As for its own commitments, it has informed me of some military movements. According to the communications addressed to me, Syrian Armed Forces withdrew some units from the city of Idlib, the Zabadani area as well as from positions in the governorates of Dar’a on 5 and 6 April and from Dayr al-Zawr on 7 and 8 April.

Despite these assurances from the Syrian Government, credible reports indicate that during that same period, the Syrian armed forces have conducted rolling military operations in population centers, characterized by troop movements into towns supported by artillery fire. While some troops and heavy weapons have been withdrawn from some localities, this appears to be often limited to a repositioning of heavy weapons that keeps cities within firing range. Furthermore, several new localities also appear to have been subject to military operations, including the use of heavy weapons on population centres.

While the absence of UN observers makes it difficult to fully ascertain the situation on the ground, the rapid increase of refugee flows into Turkey gives a strong indication of a surge in violence.  Between 15 December 2011, and 31 March 2012, the average rate of refugees entering Turkey from Syria was 96 persons per day. By contrast, the average rate of incoming refugees in the last 9 days has been 707 persons per day. The spike is unquestionable, and of the greatest concern, given the  implications for the situation inside Syria.

Finally, in a letter of 8 April, the Syrian Government then introduced new conditions for any full implementation of the plan: (a) written assurances that armed opposition groups are prepared to cease all violence, (b) immediate disarmament of armed groups and (c) commitment by regional countries that they would not finance or arm opposition groups.

These new Syrian requests constitute ex post facto requirements that are not part of the six-point plan which they agreed to implement. This puts at risk the cessation of violence in all its forms that is so urgently needed and which must take place on 12 April at 0600.  I have however been advised by Foreign Minister Lavrov, following his meeting with Foreign Minister Al-Moallem, that the Syrian Government is no longer insisting on written guarantees, but would need me to assure that the other parties and governments also accept the plan.

I remain of the view that every effort must be made to achieve a cessation of violence in all its forms on 12 April at 0600am. We have been in close contact with the leaderships of the Syrian National Council, the Free Syrian Army, local coordination committees and other groups.  We have engaged the whole spectrum of the opposition to explain what is required of them alongside the Government’s implementation of its obligations.  Members of the opposition have indicated to us and publicly that they would observe a cessation of all forms of violence provided Syrian forces withdraw from cities.

Meanwhile, the UN team led by General Mood has worked closely with Syrian military authorities to start technical preparations for the potential deployment of observers to supervise and monitor a cessation of armed violence. Progress on technical issues appeared to have been made but substantive differences emerged. General Mood is returning to Geneva to report on his mission, and I should be in a position to provide the Council with more information on 12 April.

If the required political will is present and the implementation of the six-point plan can proceed as agreed, the cessation of violence of 12 April will need to be followed in short order by the deployment of an effective international monitoring mechanism. This will require quick action from the Security Council. This could then create the necessary conditions for an inclusive political solution that meets the democratic aspirations of the Syrian people.

But recent events are deeply concerning. The prevailing security and human rights situation is unacceptable. This crisis has lasted for more than one year, has produced an intolerably heavy death toll and is now triggering increased flows of refugees throughout the region. Earlier this morning, I saw with my own eyes the devastating impact of the crisis in a refugee camp in Turkey, close to the border with Syria. The scale of the suffering of the Syrian people is clear. A cessation of violence is urgent.

The Syrian leadership should now seize the opportunity to make a fundamental change of course.  It is essential that the next 48 hours bring visible signs of immediate and indisputable change in the military posture of the Government forces throughout the country, as called upon by the six-point plan, and that items (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 of the six-point plan are fully implemented, to enable a cessation of armed violence on 12 April. We urge the opposition also to fulfill their commitments to the six-point plan and give no excuse for the Government to renege on its commitments. The clear declarations coming from the opposition are encouraging in this respect.

I have been in constant contact with countries with influence.  I appreciate the support they have given to the six-point plan and to my efforts. The unity of the international community, and in particular of the Security Council, is of vital importance to find a political solution to the Syrian crisis. At this critical moment, I would be grateful if a united Council could register its deep concern at the state of the implementation of the Syrian Government’s immediate obligations, and impress upon the parties the importance of meeting the deadline of 12 April. The cessation of violence in all its forms is a first but essential step. It must not be delayed by new conditions. Violence must stop now.

On 12 April I hope to be able to give a more detailed assessment of the situation on the ground.

Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration.

Kofi A. Annan

Joint Special Envoy of the United Nations

and the League of Arab States for Syria


Filed under: Arab Spring • Assad • Diplomacy • Free Syrian Army • Middle East • Syria • UN Security Council • United Nations
soundoff (7 Responses)
  1. Valentin

    FROM CAROL HERMANSometimes, ya just gotta read between the lines. Syria did NOT join the fight, when Israel spent 3 weeks banitig the trap. The IDF "jab" stuff at least contains clues that Israel does not want to keep anything in lebanon. And, that nasrallah has competition now, in the Bakakta Valley. Like it or not. The french are showing up. Where they're known as the "masters" in this part of the world, anyway. Except for iran, france is "one of these people." So french. A real paris on the mediterrainean. With a few setbacks, now.What you also see is that nasrallah and assad aren't "pals." And, assad's angry at the intrusion. Because all of a sudden there are new middle-men; where he once had a free trade zone. Pushing hash hish, and all sorts of other contraband through to his "customers." There's a lot of shaking "out" going on inside those tents, folks.And, not all the partners are happy, happy. These goons tend to shoot each other over profits, as well. So just stand back.lebanon is far away from it's old $4.5 billion tourist industry. And, the shi'a. Many of them. Now have nowhere to live in lebanon. And, they're about as welcome as arafat's old fishes.You've just got to let the gangs work this out. Maybe? The better question is: WHO IS THE GODFATHER IN THE SHADOWS? Is it Chirac? I wouldn't be surprised.Some day, ahead, Olmert will turn out to have been a prophet, in how he handled things. While looking weak. And, fooling ALL of his enemies. Don't be so fast writing conclusions, before you know all the facts.

    May 23, 2012 at 10:20 pm | Reply
  2. shivadass

    http://freeuntodeath.wordpress.com/

    http://freeuntodeath.wordpress.com/

    http://freeuntodeath.wordpress.com/

    don't let them distract you anymore.
    It's time to take back your life, and your country.
    Wake. Up.

    April 12, 2012 at 1:43 am | Reply
  3. radgast

    Russia armed this army with one goal in mind, to crush the opposition and have Assad remain in power. A resolution to impose any safe zone will be vetoed by Russia or China as long as they politically can. It doesn't seem like a fair fight that Russia can arm one side and the world has to sit by and watch unarmed men women and children die by the thousands from it. Whatever the outcome, I doubt the Syrian survivors will forget their agony is supported by those countries and in fact at least one assisted with it.

    April 10, 2012 at 7:59 pm | Reply
  4. facts please

    putin built the fence and he will deside when it comes down , but i suspect assad will fall without the fall of the present syrian standing gov.
    assad will be turned over for a bribe

    April 10, 2012 at 5:50 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.