March 5th, 2012
05:30 PM ET

Holder: Not 'assassination' to target Americans in terror hunt

By Terry Frieden

Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday defended the targeted killing of U.S. citizens abroad who are suspected of plotting to kill Americans, rejecting critics' arguments that those strikes amount to assassinations.

While not referring directly to the government's drone attack on U.S.-born Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen last year, Holder was unflinching in providing publicly for the first time the Justice Department's legal justification for using lethal force, saying attacks like the strike that killed al-Awlaki fell within "our laws and values."

RECOMMENDED on GPS blog: Evaluating Holder's speech on targeted killings

"Let me be clear: An operation using lethal force in a foreign country, targeted against a U.S. citizen who is a senior operational leader of al Qaeda or associated force, and who is actively engaged in planning to kill Americans, would be lawful," he said.

Security Clearance: Covering terrorism, military, intelligence and diplomacy

The attorney general's speech to an audience at the Northwestern University Law School in Chicago marked his most expansive comments on the subject of deadly attacks against Americans since his lawyers in the Office of Legal Counsel wrote a still-secret opinion declaring such lethal attacks are legal and justifiable.

But he said three conditions must exist. The U.S. government must have determined that the individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against America; capture of the suspect is not feasible; and the operation would be conducted within the principles of the law of war.

Holder argued that al Qaeda has the ability to spring surprise attacks and is considered to be continuously planning against to attack on America. Therefore, the law allows for striking even before the "precise time, place, and manner of an attack becomes clear."

"Such a requirement would create an unacceptably high risk that our efforts would fail, and that Americans would be killed," he said.

Holder rejected the charge that the deadly operations violate the government's ban on assassinations and dismissed the notion the strikes fit the definition of assassination at all.

"Some have called such operations 'assassinations.' They are not, and the use of that loaded term is misplaced," he said. "Assassination are unlawful killings," while killings under the conditions he outlined would be lawful.

Holder also took issue with those who have charged the government agencies must get permission from a federal court before taking action against an al Qaeda target.

"This is simply not accurate," Holder said. "Due process and judicial process are not one and the same, particularly when it comes to national security. The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process."

Al-Awlaki and another American, Samir Khan, were killed in September when a drone operated jointly by the CIA and a military unit destroyed a vehicle in which the men were riding in Yemen. Al-Awlaki, who U.S. intelligence officials have said was an operational planner for attacks, was the target of that strike.

Khan was traveling with al-Awlaki and was not specifically targeted.

Court documents show that Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab, the so-called "Underwear Bomber," told U.S. authorities that al-Awlaki had played a major role in the plot to blow up a commercial airliner en route to Detroit on Christmas Day 2009. President Obama later said al-Awlaki had "directed the failed attempt."

The American Civil Liberties Union, which filed an unsuccessful lawsuit challenging the administration's drone program on behalf of al-Awlaki's father, said the speech was "a gesture towards additional transparency," but continued to object to the legal rationale.

"Few things are as dangerous to American liberty as the proposition that the government should be able to kill citizens anywhere in the world on the basis of legal standards and evidence that are never submitted to a court, either before or after the fact," Hina Shamsi, the director of ACLU's National Security Project, said in an e-mailed statement. "Anyone willing to trust President Obama with the power to secretly declare an American citizen an enemy of the state and order his extrajudicial killing should ask whether they would be willing to trust the next president with that dangerous power."

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden said Holder's speech left questions unanswered.

“For example, the government should explain exactly how much evidence the President needs in order to decide that a particular American is part of a terrorist group," Wyden said in a statement released on Monday.  "It is also unclear to me whether individual Americans must be given the opportunity to surrender before lethal force is used against them.  And I’m particularly concerned that the geographic boundaries of this authority have not been clearly laid out.  Based on what I’ve heard so far, I can’t tell whether or not the Justice Department’s legal arguments would allow the President to order intelligence agencies to kill an American inside the United States."

Holder also used the speech to defend the use of civilian courts to try terrorists, noting numerous successful prosecutions.

"The calls that I've heard to ban the use of civilian courts in prosecutions of terrorism-related activity are so baffling, and ultimately are so dangerous. These calls ignore reality," Holder said. "If heeded, they would significantly weaken - in fact, they would cripple - our ability to incapacitate and punish those who attempt do us harm."

And Holder indicated more targeted killings are possible.

"When such individuals take up arms against this country, and join al Qaeda in plotting attacks designed to kill their fellow Americans, there may be only one realistic and appropriate response," Holder said. "We must take steps to stop them in full accordance with the Constitution. In this hour of danger, we simply cannot afford to wait until deadly plans are carried out, and we will not."

He concluded, "This is an indicator of our times, not a departure from our laws and values."

Follow Security Clearance on Twitter


Filed under: Al Qaeda • Anwar al-Awlaki • AQAP • drones • Intelligence • Justice Department • Living With Terror • Terrorism • Yemen
soundoff (1,412 Responses)
  1. Jarret Franklin

    I think that as long theses eaves-droppingmissions are done on calls from the U.S. to another country then they are alright.

    June 11, 2013 at 2:07 pm | Reply
  2. Dorthea Furblur

    Computer programming requires some very intricate work. This is the type of work that thrives on details and people who work in this field understand that the absence of even the minute elements can spell a huge difference in the overall result. If a programmer fails to correct this problem, it can lead to errors down the line. As a result, bugs will appear in the system and errors will emerge later on. Programming is also taxing work, requiring hours upon hours of writing, testing and debugging. This is why computer programming thrives on team work. Without team work, a single computer program can take decades to complete.,,

    Please do take a peek at our new website
    <http://caramoanpackage.com/

    May 3, 2013 at 12:47 am | Reply
  3. get retweet

    You could certainly see your enthusiasm in the work you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers such as you who aren't afraid to mention how they believe. Always follow your heart.

    September 17, 2012 at 11:41 pm | Reply
  4. Jack

    Its not assassination to Murder American Citizens. Its National Security.
    When there are literally thousands of lose ends revealing the US Government's
    Involvement in the execution of the 911 attacks, It is National Security to change the laws,
    like the Patriot Act or NDAA, to give them the Legal ability to track down, spy on, torture, and murder
    US citizens to keep their mistakes secret. Be careful about giving too much credibility to this section on CNN.
    Stop worrying about the boarder. The Threat is from the inside. 911 was an inside job. Look into it!

    April 24, 2012 at 11:13 am | Reply
  5. michael

    If I did not see In GOD we trust and having lived within US all my life I would not exactly know just where I am, at least by the lack of protection of citizenship that is. I see the flag but heck thats all over the world as is the money and the guns and the bombs and the plnanes and of cours4e our judge jury and executioners in Camoflage.

    They can do what tehy want becauxzse they can do what they want and Americans like it that, at least it will be awhile before they run out of foreigners to mug and then wanna guess who will be nexyt?

    April 22, 2012 at 6:38 pm | Reply
  6. michael

    Data points, words phrases symbols and yes our Intelligence does employ iits disinformation personel to monitor even this site with its data points and no am not a conspiracy nut mainly because I do not give a Darn, ya live with what yuu got and watch the dominoes no matter in this nation or rest of world get knocked over, an interesting game to watch. Of course they can kill whomever and yes wherever they want they are the Worlds deciders on who is not a friend but a pliable asset and if not they erase that ones ass....
    Notice how carefull thyey are to say AL Q or some associated, What they got a Union, oooh, forgot that will get you assassinated in Latin America if you work for some of US manufacturers.
    Unless one iws with the Fianical movers in Africa today, Heaven forbid you reject moving from your lands so a mining operation and try to lead a demonstartion against a Euro?Centric nations interest or yu could just end up being an Associated group, hell talking to the wrong guy or just being in the vidcinity of a wedding party an Associate may attend will in all likelihood wipe out three family linages and al would then automaticly be Afghan Taliban or some one associated with them.
    We enlist the NGOS we back door finace, except for our One of a Worlds Faith Based Initiative groups, the only state sanctioned Religion religion in US or near any American overseas p[resence, well finaced and logisticly well supported, God is indeed on our side and God will burn your but if you ever gbet labled a Terrorist by worlds largest Avenging Angels.

    April 22, 2012 at 6:34 pm | Reply
  7. Jo

    Where the hell are Al Sharp-Tongue and Jesse Jack a$* Oh they only get paid for white man never giving the black man a break. DAng It! they could made another billion spouting hatred agaisnt the white man. But this has to be a white man with his finger on that trigger. C'mon jess and al your slipping!

    April 4, 2012 at 6:33 pm | Reply
  8. jim

    What's the big deal? No one had a problem when Bin Laden was attacked in Pakistan, a terrorist is a terrorist no matter what country they're from.And if you wish to attack the US then you wish to die at there hands. The difference is, if a foreign terrorist in the US was wanted by another country , we'd get them for them. Instead of hiding them.

    March 17, 2012 at 12:03 am | Reply
  9. Dave

    So much for the rule of law. What will we say when another country takes this same stance against their citizens living in the US? "Drones and assassins are OK!" not exactly the message we need to be sending Iran, Syria, North Korea or Venezuela..

    March 8, 2012 at 11:34 am | Reply
  10. Joe

    Face it we are living in a different world! I remember every complaining about the original patriot act and how they could phone tap anyone... and usually it was ppl selling pot that was paranoid! If it comes to a point that a person is passed as a person of interest between 3 branches of government and gets hit by a hell fire... if he is a pot farmer in KY then yes its over stepping. But a man that goes on public record waging 'un-declared war against his home county'... screw them!!! When it comes to Waco.... things might have been handled wrong then but; we have done it ever sense the trail of tears... Things happen and its SUCKS! But when someone praises death to women children and men not in uniform then why are we debating this?

    March 7, 2012 at 6:35 pm | Reply
    • cmf4100

      I agree completely with you. Screw them.

      March 20, 2012 at 5:39 pm | Reply
  11. Joe

    One word... TREASON! Punishable by death!...

    March 7, 2012 at 6:23 pm | Reply
  12. marg

    If any AMERICAN especially BORN CITIZEN chooses to aide, abide or standby any terrorist or act of terrorism should have no rights under the law. When an individual VIOLATES the USA CONSTITUTION and any LAWS REVISED from it. The only ammendment that individual should be entitled to is that you are no longer protected by the laws of the USA.

    March 7, 2012 at 11:57 am | Reply
    • Skeptic14

      It is a sad day when most Americans think it's ok for the Government to assassinate natural born citizens without so much as a criminal CHARGE, let alone a trial. The foundation of freedom in this country is crumbling (by deliberate destruction) before our eyes and so few get it... I'm truly scared for my kids.

      March 7, 2012 at 12:27 pm | Reply
      • Jo

        Why? Are you training your kid's to be terrorist's? No? Then I wouldn't worry too much.

        March 24, 2012 at 11:55 am |
    • ME

      Shouldn't we also use this same reasoning to get those rogue US gov. agents who murdered those people in Waco, Tx.
      I

      March 7, 2012 at 12:42 pm | Reply
      • dakota2000

        They were protected from prosecution. Clearly guilty. But in this case not having a trail worked to their advantage.

        March 7, 2012 at 4:25 pm |
    • scott

      The problem isn't how to deal with a terrorist but what the definition of a terrorist is, don't be so naive.

      March 7, 2012 at 1:58 pm | Reply
      • duckforcover

        Exactly right Scott. German Jews felt safe until they weren't.

        March 23, 2012 at 10:32 pm |
    • dakota2000

      Civics 101

      Executive (does the deed)
      Legislative (Makes the law)
      Judiciary( Decides if the law has been broken and the consequence)

      Question for the day: Which branch of government is Obama in?
      Hint: Its not the one where he decides who is guilty and who is not.

      March 7, 2012 at 4:27 pm | Reply
  13. steveo

    I wonder what the reaction of Americans would be if a foreign nation killed a defector on US soil for plotting against them?

    March 7, 2012 at 10:31 am | Reply
    • ytdontplay

      Two teleprompters, can't anyone in the obama admininstration speak off the cuff?

      March 7, 2012 at 10:47 am | Reply
      • CNNshill

        No. It's a well oiled machine. Why leave margin for error?
        The illusion is complete.

        March 7, 2012 at 11:21 am |
    • Brock

      Good c2a1V I should feeinitdly pronounce, impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs as well as related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Nice task..

      April 4, 2012 at 3:21 pm | Reply
  14. krehator

    "Legal" is whatever the govt decides. It interprets the law anyway it wants. Right and wrong has nothing to do with it. You have no rights. It's a mirage.

    March 7, 2012 at 7:00 am | Reply
    • andres

      It is amazing what mental gymnastics that the justice department has been doing to provide a 'legal' basis for its actions. It was started a long time ago (minutes after signing the bill of rights) and was significantly accelerated by Jimmy Carter's FISA in the late 70's and greatly expanded by Bush 2 with further extensions by Obama.

      We need to take back our constitiution, bill of rights, and control of our governement. If you are brave enough join me in ensuring that not a single incumbent standing for election is returned to office this fall. Have them wake up Wed morning saying wtf???

      March 7, 2012 at 1:19 pm | Reply
  15. lou yannuzzi

    screw the aclu and senator ron wydon and kill those bastards.

    March 7, 2012 at 6:37 am | Reply
    • andres

      Yes by all means, get rid of all of our civil rights so that the government can target anyone IT deems to be a threat. If you are old enough to remember the cold war and the soviet union, you might think for a moment or two and change your mind. If not old enough do a little reading about unchecked government powers.

      Would you say the same thing about aclu if you were arrested and imprisoned simply because someone in the government had a problem with you? Likely not you'd be screaming for someone to defend your civil liberties.

      March 7, 2012 at 10:41 am | Reply
    • Timothy

      So then what you are saying, if I understand you correctly, is that the government can now presume the guilt of an American, and, without the need to try and convict them in a court of their peers, summarily execute them?
      Watch out, pal, your time will come.

      March 7, 2012 at 11:33 am | Reply
  16. Carl

    Not much different really from SWAT, except the geographical reference. The argument about the target doesn't seem as relevant as the argument about locale (foreign country), but even here wartime precedents abound.

    March 7, 2012 at 6:24 am | Reply
    • jetblack

      Funny, now if America doesnt like you...your a terrorist. If you think for yourself and USA doesnt like the way you think... your a terrorist and now its okay to kill you!?! GREAT!

      March 7, 2012 at 6:32 am | Reply
      • CNNshill

        Pretty much.
        The "government" is now run by thugs and criminals. (Openly now)
        The takeover is complete.

        March 7, 2012 at 11:34 am |
    • andres

      Another good reason to get rid of SWAT. Militarizing the police force will ultimately hurt us all in the end.

      March 7, 2012 at 11:17 am | Reply
      • CNNshill

        " rid of SWAT"?
        Yeah right.
        Have you seen some of the REGULAR police force gear and tactics lately?
        While you slept...

        March 7, 2012 at 11:59 am |
  17. pcman

    I think it's a fine line that has to be walked! We should never veer from our constitution.
    However in incidences like OBL! I think it was clear cut, that he was a threat to the U.S. If the decision is based on the same criteria that is used to claim one a terrorist, then I believe what they are doing is just.
    I mean surely they can't label you a terrorist for helping an old lady cross the street. Right?

    March 7, 2012 at 4:29 am | Reply
    • Lady_Dragon0612

      The constitution means nothing anymore.....its true value has been reduced to that of an aged piece of paper with some cool signatures on it. If it meant anything, the American people would have tossed out the current government a LONG time ago......

      March 7, 2012 at 10:41 am | Reply
      • CNNshill

        "the American people would have tossed out the current government a LONG time ago..."?
        HAHAHA!
        It's been tried. The opposition is pummeled time after time. Why do you think they dream up these draconian laws? To use them againest you!
        It's serious stuff. But here we sit with our "parlour" talk...
        What's on TV tonight?

        March 7, 2012 at 11:41 am |
      • Skeptic14

        It is a sad day when most Americans think it's ok for the Government to assassinate natural born citizens without so much as a criminal CHARGE, let alone a trial. The foundation of freedom in this country is crumbling (by deliberate destruction) before our eyes and so few get it... I'm truly scared for my kids

        March 7, 2012 at 12:28 pm |
  18. Julie "Jooolie"

    At the state level the government Exploits and uses Americansand branwashes them with "top secret" operations. Then everyone watches as the person who is brainwashed is spit out and no better than annoying shit on someones shoe at that point. I guess–"believe in a greater good for all" or at least hippocratic oath said it best "Do No Harm"

    March 7, 2012 at 4:22 am | Reply
  19. Julie "Jooolie"

    Hmmm do mercenaries ever get rewarded with "US Citizinship" if they are a group of non-americans hired by the US to carry out a task? Just curious.Mercenaries killing Kadafi deserve a slow tortuous death, as do the authority that hired these monsters. ( I think the CIA ) ////just curious...all life observations over the years/

    March 7, 2012 at 4:15 am | Reply
    • Dave

      I hope it's not only me that thinks you are an idiot.

      March 7, 2012 at 7:35 am | Reply
  20. dakota2000

    We are no longer a free people. America is over. Lets admit it. Let torture who we please. Lets kill who we please. Let hold without trial who we please.

    That's it. Just give up. Lets hold a Lottery for the lucky american who will get to p i s s on a copy of the actual constitution. It will make great TV. (Note Obama Holder have first dibs so you will have to hold their manhoods for them before you get your chance.)

    Give everyone an iPhone and the government can do what ever it wants.

    March 7, 2012 at 2:55 am | Reply
    • pcman

      You must be really drunk! And having some issues with Obama's privates! I think you like him! You want to kiss him! You think he's sexy!

      March 7, 2012 at 3:19 am | Reply
      • dakota2000

        Well he does have a nice chest...

        March 7, 2012 at 3:27 am |
      • pcman

        Lmmfao! That was funny. I had no idea you had a sense of humor! Truly, that was funny!

        March 7, 2012 at 3:29 am |
  21. Julie "Jooolie"

    You have got to be kidding me. What kind of a D. ickhead is this Holder guy? I only coud stomach the first paragraph of the bullshit he was saying. First off, he's a pinhead-these are persons, including a lot of Americans, with a congenital disease, meaning they were born already dumb.Unfortunately, many Americans are like that. And the Americans who have average intelligence never want to expand, their understanding. The scary thing is that many of these idiots are in these governmental jobs, making decisions about who they think is what, what they do, etc when in fact they really don't know, because they just don't know truth. How dare they target people–INDIVIDUALS- for that matter, and tell everybody that crock of shit. To these US gov assholes targeting with LETHAL force you self proclaimed " witch hunters" ooOFF with your heads! 'You're Fired!'

    March 7, 2012 at 2:46 am | Reply
  22. dakota2000

    They tried to impeach Nixon and Clinton, essentially for being liars. How much worse a liar must be than a murder if Obama and Holder remain in office.

    March 7, 2012 at 2:25 am | Reply
    • pcman

      You should join the I hate Obama club!
      Oh wait, you have its called the Republican party!
      What are people gonna say?
      Obama saved the auto industry!
      He got Osama bin laden, something G.W. Bush couldn't do in 7 years!
      Jobs are being created and not lost!
      Unemployment is the lowest its been since GW was in office!
      The housing market is improving!
      The stock market has been above 13000 all week long!
      It just crazy what this man is doing to our country! Somebody stop this man, before he fixes our country completely!

      March 7, 2012 at 2:48 am | Reply
      • dakota2000

        So, what you are saying is, that your 401K us up so F the constitution?

        March 7, 2012 at 3:27 am |
      • pcman

        No, thats not what im saying at all!
        I love our country, and our constitution.

        March 7, 2012 at 3:33 am |
      • DumbDems

        Wow, let us examine your comments here, since you are obviously incompetent:::::

        "Obama saved the auto industry!" –> No he bailed it out, and now Government Motors is moving to China, good job Osama on saving the US jobs
        "He got Osama bin laden, something G.W. Bush couldn't do in 7 years!" Too bad how many hundreds of troops died while the nitwit waited 7+ months after they discovered his location
        "Jobs are being created and not lost!" What country are you living in?" China or India?
        "Unemployment is the lowest its been since GW was in office!" Genius that is only because Unemployment numbers are based on benefit payouts. Most have run out therefore the numbers LOOK lower. Typical Dumbocrat mentality
        "The housing market is improving!" Again where are you living?
        The stock market has been above 13000 all week long!
        "It just crazy what this man is doing to our country! Somebody stop this man, before he fixes our country completely!" Please wait for NaziCare to take effect and your parents get gassed because they are too expensive to care for. Oh wait I forgot Osama did not even read the plan until it was passed. Apparently the monkey didn't have his staff put pictures in the ObamaCare plan. Totally understandable.

        March 7, 2012 at 7:46 am |
      • CNNshill

        Parloiur talk you fools.
        You all squabble around like babies in diapers crying about puppets. Figureheads (daddy figures) designed to keep you off point. Off target. Amerika is nothing but a MARKETPLACE run by elites who have zero alligiance to it other than securing profit from you. You are manipulated, TV addicted consumers. PERIOD. Look beyond the sideshow. It's hard though isn't? To realize you have been living in a vicious manufactured illusion.
        Have a nice day. Move along. Nothing to see here, nothing to see...

        March 7, 2012 at 12:11 pm |
      • ruthie

        really ...wake up you are brain washed and uninformed ,yea where have you being living in a cave ...

        May 22, 2012 at 1:54 pm |
  23. Old Salt

    It's always been okay to kill Americans. They do it in this country all the time.

    March 7, 2012 at 1:40 am | Reply
    • pcman

      Geez! Really?

      March 7, 2012 at 2:24 am | Reply
    • dakota2000

      ruby Ridge, waco, kent state, fill in the rest here.. .

      March 7, 2012 at 2:31 am | Reply
  24. Dieyoung

    I don't even want to know how many rednecks are going to start murdering innocent people just because murder has now been legalized.

    March 7, 2012 at 1:35 am | Reply
    • dakota2000

      To paraphrase nixon: Its not murder if the president orders it.

      March 7, 2012 at 1:58 am | Reply
      • Dieyoung

        That is very true, the president could have anyone killed if he sees them as a threat.

        March 7, 2012 at 2:10 am |
      • dakota2000

        I was being ironic. Are you being doubly Ironic? I can't tell..

        March 7, 2012 at 2:56 am |
      • Dieyoung

        But it is true, if you pose a threat to the nation you could either get arrested or killed legally by the government.

        March 7, 2012 at 3:09 am |
      • dakota2000

        I think the key thing here is, did he have his hand on a button and was going to nuke the white house, or was it that he and his buddies can sent the terrorist planning "to committee" and he was just hanging around surfing the internet for porn.

        It makes a big difference if the threat was tomorrow, or some vague time in the distant future.

        March 7, 2012 at 3:13 am |
      • dakota2000

        Only in a James bond movie....

        March 7, 2012 at 3:28 am |
      • Dieyoung

        Yeah, but now someone can kill another person and just tell the police that the person was talking about committing a terrorist act and that person would practically get away with it.

        March 7, 2012 at 4:02 am |
      • dakota2000

        After you kill them be sure to drag them inside your house and say they threatened you. You can through the terrorist thing in if you want... and call them a commie sympathizer too. Can't hurt.

        March 7, 2012 at 4:35 pm |
  25. IH8Taliban

    kill em all, let allah sort em out

    March 6, 2012 at 11:44 pm | Reply
  26. twig

    spring is the time for revolution

    March 6, 2012 at 11:32 pm | Reply
  27. Carlos

    The worst form of terrorism was comited by George w Bush, by invade Iraq with false pretense and kill thousand of inocent people, that mean he should get killed by a drone atack? By those who think he is a terrorist?why amaricans don't say he comited crime against humanity. His government kill more people in Iraq than Saddan Hussein during his regime.

    March 6, 2012 at 11:10 pm | Reply
    • Hell832

      Because America doesn't have as much freedom as you think, The government keeps everything in the dark and out of the media. Im pretty sure most of america, (and I) thought that George Bush was a pet monkey for atleast a year or so, after the even dumber monkeys elected him. and again in 2004.

      March 7, 2012 at 1:02 am | Reply
    • DumbDems

      Carlos, please go back across the border and learn how to use proper tense. Oh nevermind, Osama Obama will teach you English and give you free money if you stay.

      March 7, 2012 at 7:49 am | Reply
      • CNNshill

        Here you are folks. This an example of the current informed amerikan.
        The classic, cliche spewing Bigot.

        March 7, 2012 at 12:16 pm |
      • Stupidu

        If every non-american was to go back to their country, imagine what would you be left – N O T H I N G !!! State ordered and okayed killing is not assassination – only in American dictionary and when it suit them

        March 8, 2012 at 1:17 am |
    • Jo

      your so well informed. But you didn't even know how to spell the name of our country? do you know spell check exists?

      March 24, 2012 at 12:07 pm | Reply
      • Mohamadou

        16a12b352c0hello there and thank you for your information e28093 I have enrtaicly picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise some technical issues using this web site, as I experienced to reload the website lots of times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK? Not that I am complaining, but slow loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway Ie28099m adding this RSS to my email and could look out for a lot more of your respective intriguing content. Make sure you update this again very soon.. 187

        April 3, 2012 at 12:18 pm |
  28. Meh

    I've got no problem with terrorists being wiped off the face of the earth. The trouble is that too many in DC consider returning vets, people on no-fly lists, and any who dare protest them as "terrorists."

    March 6, 2012 at 11:00 pm | Reply
    • dakota2000

      You sir are obviously a terrorist. Don't plan to fly in the near future. You are being watched. (do you really think that CNN doesn't turn over all information about you? Your email address, the IP addressed of your computer? PLEASE. you are on the least now buddy.

      March 7, 2012 at 2:45 am | Reply
      • DumbDems

        How do I get on the "Least" too?

        March 7, 2012 at 7:50 am |
      • CNNshill

        You already are on the "least" listened to, Dum.
        Find something more productive to do than pick at someone's syntax.

        March 7, 2012 at 12:19 pm |
    • dakota2000

      Actually, I should say, since you are a terrorist, the Obama's government now has the right to blow up your house when it wishes. If you have wife and child, put them in hiding.

      Fair warning.

      March 7, 2012 at 2:47 am | Reply
  29. Bobby

    Does that include you, Holder. You're the one who supplied guns to the Mexican drug cartels and killed our own law enforcement officers.

    March 6, 2012 at 10:59 pm | Reply
    • pcman

      Yeah bobby I was there and saw him do that.
      I seen him drive by, and just thought he was picking his nose. But I think now he was signaling Mexicans that the weapons are in his trunk. Cause right after he shot the law enforcement, he opened the trunk and started handing a gun to every Mexican around. When suddenly the Mexican women broke into a dance while singing "la coca Rocha", and all them played limbo. Just to see how low you could go!
      Congratulations! You are the lowest of lows!

      March 7, 2012 at 2:33 am | Reply
      • CNNshill

        Pour yourself a Bud and plant your braindead blob of protoplasm in front off the TV for some more education PC...

        March 7, 2012 at 12:29 pm |
  30. Byron

    Liars, it's all lies.

    March 6, 2012 at 10:47 pm | Reply
    • Tushar

      It's a pity you don't have a donate botutn! I'd without a doubt donate to this brilliant blog! I guess for now i'll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will share this site with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

      July 1, 2012 at 2:13 am | Reply
  31. NPhxAz

    Oh, Mr Fast and Furious is REALLY good at killing Americans. Just ask the parents of deceased BP agent Brian Terry. Both him and his Kenyan/Muslim boss are the phonyassed THUGS of the century! So sue me- punks.

    March 6, 2012 at 10:34 pm | Reply
    • pcman

      Cuckoo! Cuckoo!

      Hey I was wondering, if Jane has 3 apples, and gives Jeff 2 apples, how purple does that make Jane?

      March 7, 2012 at 3:03 am | Reply
      • CNNshill

        Take another med PC.
        Don't worry about real issues and what is being done to your freedom and country.
        There must be something good on TV to while away your day...

        March 7, 2012 at 12:23 pm |
  32. Hockey

    Watch what you say, this administration will be after you next. Ever notice how obammie looks like mussolini when he raises his arrogant head in a speech

    March 6, 2012 at 10:23 pm | Reply
    • pcman

      Yeah, clearly he's Mussolini reincarnated!
      Did you ever notice how Joe Biden, and Hitler both have eyes? I bet Biden is Hitler reincarnated!

      March 7, 2012 at 2:19 am | Reply
  33. psicaptain

    It's legal? Then kill Holder he's an American terrorist.

    March 6, 2012 at 10:07 pm | Reply
    • dakota2000

      Even holder deserves a fair trial.

      March 7, 2012 at 2:32 am | Reply
  34. anti_zionist

    http://www.thenation.com/article/israels-war-crimes

    Read.

    Learn

    March 6, 2012 at 9:47 pm | Reply
    • dakota2000

      How were you able to post a link without getting censored by CNN? I am impressed!

      March 7, 2012 at 4:36 pm | Reply
  35. bribarian

    The police state has begun

    March 6, 2012 at 9:06 pm | Reply
  36. Jose M. Pulido

    Many U.S. atheists or religious citizens who commit premeditated murder get killed by the death penalty every year. I wish no one had to die prematurely by the death penalty but that is the way the laws are set up now.
    An American Islamist/Muslim terrorist who lives overseas and instigates and causes murders of other innocent Americans, is also guilty of murder and according to the law, he deserves the death penalty. Therefore, if the U.S. sends such overseas murderer a missile delivered by a drone, he just got a speedy trial followed by the legally-deserved death penalty.
    If we could not chase American Islamic/Muslim terrorists overseas, every one of them could commit terroristic acts on American soil and flee to the relative safety of foreign lands. Terrorist should learn that if they commit a terrorist act in the USA and flee to another country, there will be a missile with their name on it delivered by a drone; they can run but they cannot hide, at least forever.

    March 6, 2012 at 9:03 pm | Reply
    • anti_zionist

      You need to shut your mouth traitor.

      Or else

      March 6, 2012 at 9:39 pm | Reply
      • Julie "Jooolie"

        I believe Humberto –And with this type of thing..they are targeting INDIVIDUALS–not a group- but INDIVIDUALS. And these individuals good- bad- other...If it were me, and I was going to be killed like that by Lethal Force, I would go to a country like Ireland, cause that extradition wouldn't fly there–everyone knows the US cant get this fugitive –ever- if they plan to use lethal force. Irish don't believe in the death penalty so execute , lethal force..

        March 7, 2012 at 4:05 am |
      • Julie "Jooolie"

        Scus I meant Irish dn not believe in the death penalty TO excute///

        March 7, 2012 at 4:08 am |
    • dakota2000

      I think you are a terrorist and I will be requesting that the military blow up your house tomorrow morning.

      Have a good night.

      March 7, 2012 at 2:29 am | Reply
      • pcman

        Oh Dakota youre so compassionate! Where did you get such a kind heart? Was it oz?

        March 7, 2012 at 2:55 am |
      • CNNshill

        Happened in Afghanistan all the time Dakota.
        To the villagers: We need you to move. We have progress coming through here. (i.e: a pipeline)
        Villagers: Naa, thanks anyway, but we have lived on this land for GENERATIONS.

        Later that evening...
        Here are the co-ordinates for the "reported" TERRORIST activities in that area.
        Incinerate them.
        Well done.
        Next?

        March 7, 2012 at 12:36 pm |
    • CNNshill

      You live in the manufactured, cliche ridden, cartoon world Joey...

      March 7, 2012 at 12:31 pm | Reply
  37. oneSTARman

    Does this include the TEA PARTY?

    March 6, 2012 at 8:25 pm | Reply
    • dakota2000

      Yes, the if Bachman had won, the Tea Party headquarters would have been nuked.

      March 7, 2012 at 3:15 am | Reply
      • pcman

        Why are you such an extremist dude! You say all of these hateful things about Obama, and anyone who supports him.
        You call him Muslim, when you know thats not true!

        March 7, 2012 at 3:27 am |
      • dakota2000

        First, I never called him a Muslim.
        Second, if here were Muslim, I would not have a problem with that.

        March 7, 2012 at 4:19 pm |
  38. Art

    Didn't President Bush's Justice Department also prepare a secret opinion that waterboarding didn't constitute torture? And now, don't many prominent Democrats want to prosecute and disbar the lawyers who prepared those opinions?

    And, did waterboarding kill either kill any subjects or any innocent civilian bystanders? Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot. Innocent bystanders weren't killed by drone stikes. They were just collaterally damaged.

    March 6, 2012 at 8:22 pm | Reply
    • Jo

      All Special Forces troops have endured waterboarding. All I thought of was my face will be very clean.

      March 24, 2012 at 12:13 pm | Reply
  39. Carlos

    This is dangerously. It create a precedente that allow de enemy to do the same with americans. It's Lawfull to kill the enemy, Right? If they consider the americans as terrrorist.

    March 6, 2012 at 8:09 pm | Reply
  40. Catharsis

    look in the mirror eric holder

    March 6, 2012 at 8:07 pm | Reply
  41. zlul

    Its simply amazing at how liberals view this. Had this been proposed by a republican they would riot.

    All of seem to miss the bigger picture of not having due process. So what happens if the US Gov't falsely claims you're a terrorist? They don't have to prove you are a terrorist, they simply have to label you as one for whatever reason they want and they are now free to kill you.

    March 6, 2012 at 8:07 pm | Reply
    • pcman

      Republicunt! Its not that easy. So quit it already!

      Stop guessing that you know what liberals are thinking.

      You assume way too much,
      But know way too little!

      March 7, 2012 at 2:40 am | Reply
  42. Eye in the sky

    'Eminent threats' to the government are to be exterminated on contact. And lie as you might, we do know what your thinking!

    March 6, 2012 at 8:05 pm | Reply
    • Jesse

      Europe banned gun ownership to prevent revolutions. We need a balance in this country. Republicans have great ideas, so do democrats. It's time we hold our leaders accountable. It's time we get involved in our government. You know why Switzerland works? Everyone owns a gun, everyone is mandated to have health insurance but it is privately run, they vote on weather or not to have federal taxes every 20 years, they only ask for the best. What you are left with is the safest, best designed, healthiest, and wealthiest countey in Europe. The reason being the people take an active role in their government. Don't be hateful, don't be emotional, don't presume,ask questions, but be involved.

      April 24, 2012 at 9:02 pm | Reply
  43. Fr33th1nk3r

    "The American Civil Liberties Union, which filed an unsuccessful lawsuit challenging the administration's drone program on behalf of al-Awlaki's father..."

    Are you freaking kidding me? The ACLU is actually representing terrorists now? Disband them already....

    March 6, 2012 at 7:59 pm | Reply
    • anti_zionist

      Someone should disband your facial features..

      With a bat

      March 6, 2012 at 8:07 pm | Reply
      • Russ

        you should be arrested for treason

        March 6, 2012 at 8:21 pm |
      • anti_zionist

        Hope you weren't talking to me.

        March 6, 2012 at 8:24 pm |
  44. marg

    The right decision was made because if any threat or harm is made to the USA by anyone of foreign or domestic there only due process under the law should be for the individual(s) to be exterminated COMPLETELY.

    March 6, 2012 at 7:23 pm | Reply
    • anti_zionist

      Your a nasty retard ain't ya..

      Tom Jefferson would beat you to death.

      Get the fukk out of my country.

      March 6, 2012 at 7:56 pm | Reply
    • CNNshill

      Perfect definition of a NAZI Marg...

      March 7, 2012 at 12:39 pm | Reply
  45. F. Lee Hall III

    This is what is wrong with America. Politics and business have eclipsed the Constitution and Human Rights. Over 1/10 of the population is curently in prison, the vast majority of which were from poor circumstances thus could not afford competant Legal representation. Now, the Attorney General is advocating the MURDER of Americans who disagree with the current political agenda of the U.S. Whats next? Castration for male adults who watch the Disney channel, because they could possibly be attracted to the teens who dominate the shows. This country is headed for Civil War.

    March 6, 2012 at 7:07 pm | Reply
    • politically correct

      1/10 of American population is in prison?
      Where do you get these ridiculous numbers from?

      March 6, 2012 at 7:13 pm | Reply
      • Enco

        http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/One%20in%20100.pdf

        March 6, 2012 at 7:58 pm |
    • Fr33th1nk3r

      Sorry, LEE HALL, but I seriously doubt the Founding Fathers intended for us to interpret the U.S. Constitution to such a literal extreme, that we are unable to take even the most basic common sense action to defend our sovereignty and our citizenry from terrorists and our enemies.
      If the U.S. Constitution renders us that ineffective in protecting our nation's interests, I would say it needs revising, which the Founding Fathers DID provide us an avenue for. Clearly, granting our military the legal right to eliminate terrorists, regardless of their national affiliation or citizenship status is a COMMON SENSE measure that better allows us to defend ourselves and our citizens.
      Stop trying to create legal backdoors for our enemies, and then trying to hang it on some imagined ethical highground.

      March 6, 2012 at 8:12 pm | Reply
      • anti_zionist

        Hey watch out buddy.

        Keep your mouth full of zionist cokk, and ur gonna end up just as fukked as they ate soon to be.

        Don't fukk with my rights, you little Jew bitches

        March 6, 2012 at 8:22 pm |
    • Russ

      really??? 1/10 of the population is approx. 35 million people. Do you even UNSTANDARD what you are typing.

      March 6, 2012 at 8:23 pm | Reply
    • oneSTARman

      There are Over 2.5 MILLION in Prison in the U.S. – The MOST and Highest Percentage of Population in The WORLD – But that is Still NOT 10% – YET

      March 6, 2012 at 8:30 pm | Reply
    • CNNshill

      The first rational, consise post I have read here, F. Hall.
      (Which is a pathetic state of affairs...)

      March 7, 2012 at 12:46 pm | Reply
    • CNNshill

      P.S. "Over 1/10 ". Missed a zero F. Lee.

      1 in 100. 1 percent and growing...

      March 7, 2012 at 1:59 pm | Reply
    • dakota2000

      its more like 1/100.
      Still really high.

      The feds have nukes. I think it would be a pretty short civil war..

      March 7, 2012 at 4:40 pm | Reply
  46. dudley1015

    If Holder is involved, it's probably unconstitutional.

    The guy would disarm every law-abiding American and leave citizens at the mercy of criminals.

    This guy is the worst thing to happen to the Office of the Attorney General, well, maybe ever.

    March 6, 2012 at 6:29 pm | Reply
    • pcman

      No he wouldn't! Just stop it already! Everyone knows youre an extreme, conservative, Christian Republican!. And would vote for Osama bin laden if he was running against Obama! So just stop it with your way over reaching conspiracy theories!

      March 6, 2012 at 6:36 pm | Reply
      • me138

        I dislike Obama and his policies and I am not a Christian in fact I am an atheist, and I also can not stand republicans. Democrats and republicans are ruining this country.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:00 pm |
      • politically correct

        You're denouncing god?

        March 6, 2012 at 7:15 pm |
      • anti_zionist

        Pcman is a post bot.

        If I c another bot post, I'm going to compromise the bot system.

        Pcman's name is supposed to be an irony aware only to the hack behind the system.

        Zionists, your pushing it.....

        March 6, 2012 at 7:59 pm |
      • pcman

        Im a post bot?
        That's funny!
        And youre delusional.

        March 6, 2012 at 9:02 pm |
      • anti_zionist

        I don't think so.

        Your a fukk bot for various zionists...

        March 6, 2012 at 9:41 pm |
      • Intellibronc

        What do you thing 'fast and furious' was? You think it was actually a method to track weapons? The pravda media had been pumping the lie that most weapons used by the neanderthals south of our border were coming from the states. That is abjectly false. Most actually come from the medieval east through venezuela. This most corrupt regime in American history wanted to promote this myth so they could disarm the responsible Americans. To think otherwise would be intellectually dishonest, which illiberal marxists are.

        March 6, 2012 at 10:36 pm |
  47. dudley1015

    To kill an enemy combatant in a foreign country a war must first be declared. This is a Congressional duty. It has many benefits and offers many restraints. It puts the country and its economy on a war footing. It declares unequivocally who is our enemy and why. It makes war unconditional. this puzzy-footing around with a police action here, a regime change there is not American. If we want war, declare it, fight it, and be done with it. War yes. Assassinations, no. I don't trust Holder to be the one who can make decisions that are clearly in the realm of authority of Congress, not the Executive Branch. He hates an armed American, anyway.

    March 6, 2012 at 6:22 pm | Reply
    • obolder!

      You presume an awful lot! When has holder ever said that "he hates an American". You're spreading hatred with lies! You should be ashamed of yourself!

      March 6, 2012 at 6:30 pm | Reply
      • anti_zionist

        If you side with a traitor, you will be treated in kind.

        Watch out filth...

        March 6, 2012 at 8:25 pm |
    • Your Name Here

      The term, dude, was "armed American". And yes he does hate them. He uses the Constitution when it's convenient for him to do so, and skirts it when it's not. The man's a tool. "Fast and Furious" anyone? He's a lying jerk!

      March 6, 2012 at 9:20 pm | Reply
  48. humberto

    Wow, Obama was thinking of his own two daughters when he called Fluke.

    March 6, 2012 at 6:11 pm | Reply
    • humberto

      How is that girl Fluke going to become a ligitimate member of the bar after trying to defraud people for her personal contraception for sex needs before Congress ?

      March 6, 2012 at 6:18 pm | Reply
      • humberto

        let alone sit on a jury.

        March 6, 2012 at 6:20 pm |
      • politically correct

        How did she defraud anyone with contraception?

        March 6, 2012 at 6:47 pm |
      • humberto

        Whats the matter politically correct, can't you read ?

        March 6, 2012 at 7:00 pm |
      • humberto

        Sex is no accident.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:11 pm |
      • humberto

        all she did was try to steal from a fund.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:14 pm |
      • humberto

        they got away with it too.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:16 pm |
      • humberto

        Thats why it's Unconstitional .

        March 6, 2012 at 7:18 pm |
      • humberto

        No extra charge

        March 6, 2012 at 7:21 pm |
      • humberto

        It's already a political slush fund.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:27 pm |
      • Rozzi

        You lmust hang out with Rush Limbaugh alot hahahhahahahaha

        March 6, 2012 at 7:47 pm |
      • politically correct

        Humberto, sure I can read. Its how I know youre nuts!
        And no I haven't seen anything about Sandra fluke stealing from any fund. But apparently you haven't read anything like that either, because you won't post a source, or even know of the fund youre say she stole from.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:51 pm |
      • humberto

        No Razzi i don't – I dislike his inveingling to obstruct justice for his corrupt politically correct players too.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:57 pm |
      • Rozzi

        Ya that’s true cant find anywhere on the internet saying that she stole money from anyone so humberto ur full of sh** and stop posting definitions from Wikipedia you make your self look bad dude.

        March 6, 2012 at 8:01 pm |
      • Rozzi

        Ok so stop quoting everything that Rush says

        March 6, 2012 at 8:02 pm |
      • humberto

        Politically Corect, you still can't read – I said trying – think, what was she appearing before Congress for ? Your ignorant banter doesn't change the facts.

        March 6, 2012 at 8:03 pm |
      • humberto

        Rozzi, you don't know what you know.

        March 6, 2012 at 8:23 pm |
      • Rozzi

        Ok dude i guess not cuz i dont know myself...right lol dbag

        March 6, 2012 at 8:42 pm |
    • humberto

      Don't wash yourself, just cover it up.

      March 6, 2012 at 6:28 pm | Reply
    • humberto

      So what now, more banter about how the pickpocket was trying to better themselvea ?

      March 6, 2012 at 8:11 pm | Reply
  49. Martin Timothy

    Jesus Christ in reply to Pontius Pilate, who had assured him of his power of life and death, said he had no power, else it was bestowed by God .. Neither has Obama, and just as Jesus decried those Jews who handed him over to Pilate, as “guilty of the greater sin,” so is Eric Holder.

    Obama and Holder's conduct as officials of the United States Government, is unacceptable in the light of the killings .. and for turning from evidence linking Jews to the 911 attacks, else why were 60,000 or so Jews absent from their workstations at the WTC, on the day.

    And from the criminality of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, among other things .. both must answer charges of capital treason & murder, as Israeli assets, for the premeditated killing of US citizens, for war crimes, and for the 2007 murder of two of Obama's butt buddies, from the days he spent peddlin' his ass at the Chicago bath house!

    March 6, 2012 at 6:10 pm | Reply
    • the shrink!

      Santorum? Is that you?

      You are way too delusional!

      Paranoid Schizophrenia?

      March 6, 2012 at 6:21 pm | Reply
      • anti_zionist

        The shrink...

        Your a traitor.

        The time is coming when you should hush that talk, lest you endanger yourself

        March 6, 2012 at 8:03 pm |
    • LarryLaMore

      What ? You sound crazy !

      March 6, 2012 at 7:24 pm | Reply
  50. mike

    So is an accused serial killer a terrorist?

    This effectively equates to execution without burden of proof or a trial.

    March 6, 2012 at 6:04 pm | Reply
    • politically correct

      Not if he can be served. But if he were to hide under an umbrella of another country's security, then yes he probably would be considered a terrorist threatening the lives of individual innocent americans.

      March 6, 2012 at 6:51 pm | Reply
  51. Bazoing

    Why is the post button in Spanish?

    March 6, 2012 at 6:03 pm | Reply
    • dudley1015

      Because most Americans can speak some Spanish, while illegals speak no English. It is so important to make sure that those who are in the country illegally get to offer their opinions on CNN.

      But I'm not bitter about it...

      March 6, 2012 at 6:24 pm | Reply
      • pcman

        My post button isn't in Spanish!
        Maybe youre being hacked.

        March 6, 2012 at 6:32 pm |
    • dakota2000

      Lo siento, ¿qué dijiste?

      March 7, 2012 at 2:34 am | Reply
  52. Ray from Austin

    Eric Holder says it's OK to kill a US Citizen abroad suspected of terrorism but he wanted to give 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed a trial in federal court in New York.

    March 6, 2012 at 5:55 pm | Reply
    • dudley1015

      Agreed.

      While the guy caught in a terrorist act should have been killed but instead gets a trial on Mainstreet USA, the one suspected of it will be summarily executed. Holder is the chief law-enforcement officer of the domestic US, NOT the arm of the CIA or Special OPs whose job it is to get these guys and bring them to the military prison in Cuba.

      March 6, 2012 at 6:27 pm | Reply
      • politically correct

        Thats just it! This guy was caught and can be served, to appear in court.
        However in my personal opinion it should be in a military court, as he is not a us citizen, and was part of a regime that we declared war on.

        March 6, 2012 at 6:56 pm |
  53. Bill

    NOTHING EVER HAS MADE ME THIS F-ING ANGRY.

    "The U.S. government must have determined that the individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against America;"

    ISNT THAT WHAT A F___KING TRIAL IS FOR YOU DUMB F-ING SELF-SERVING CONSTITUTION BURNING S–THEAD?!?!?!?

    "and the operation would be conducted within the principles of the law of war."

    Oh, now its a WAR? WHEN DID CONGRESS DECLARE WAR AGAINST YEMEN?!?!?!?!??!

    that is under CONGRESSIONAL powers, declaring war, is it not?

    SCREW OBAMA SCREW HOLDER

    I WANT MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BACK

    absolutely anybody NOT OBAMA 2012

    March 6, 2012 at 5:45 pm | Reply
    • politically correct

      Nothing has ever made you this f__king angry?
      I bet you were pretty angry when Obama beat out McCain/palin in 2008!
      And I bet you get even more angry when Obama wins again in 2012. Republicans are so out of touch they want to take us back 100 years.
      And their hatred for everyone other than white Christians is intolerable, even by most white Christians. Until they get on the path of live and let live, they won't be winning many more elections. Especially against a great incumbent like Obama!

      March 6, 2012 at 6:43 pm | Reply
      • idiotliberal

        Are you going to post on everything you don't agree with? Shut up already and let others talk.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:09 pm |
      • politically correct

        Yes, if you say something I disagree with, I will declare my point of view! Thats the whole idea of a post. But spoken like a true republican racist, you can't be deterred from you idiotic ideas, and your only argument is to tell others to shut up... Thats so childish, an ineffective. Thats why the whole country see you as the ridiculous fundamentalist that you are!

        March 6, 2012 at 7:22 pm |
      • Your Name Here

        politically correct, I'm not a liberal or racist. But I am pretty certain that you're an idiot!

        March 6, 2012 at 9:29 pm |
      • dondijon

        Mr. Obama lack a legitimate Certificate of Birth and will be declared a non citizen, a challenge has been made and will force a ruling persuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), This case was granted Certeriori and AFFIRMED!

        March 7, 2012 at 3:29 am |
  54. Eoin

    Hey, take up arms against this nation and plot to kill Americans you will lose your life. Don't want to be taken out by a Drone then don't join a terrorists group and don't plan to kill americans. Pretty Simple isn't it?

    March 6, 2012 at 5:16 pm | Reply
    • HONESTLY!

      If someone joins a cult or a religion, that claims those who dont believe as they do should be killed, should they be considered terrorists?

      March 6, 2012 at 5:19 pm | Reply
    • Bill

      Idiot, how do you know there isn't a CIA file right now drawn up on some terrorist that shares your name?

      One idiot CIA operative lazily google's your name and down flies a missile onto your little vacation beach.

      I've been on the no-fly list with my nice white Irish name, yet of COURSE they would NEVER make another similar mistake and target one of us with a drone strike without ever giving us a trial.

      TRIAL HELP PREVENT MISTAKES BY DUMB PRESIDENTS.

      The constitution... it has a purpose.

      March 6, 2012 at 5:52 pm | Reply
    • anti_zionist

      Fukk you eion..

      Your a traitor.

      Watch out.

      March 6, 2012 at 8:06 pm | Reply
    • Michal

      Hi there! This kind of posting could not be peulishbd any better! Here post reminds me of my previous room mate! I adore finding sites of which view the valuation on providing a good source for nothing. In truth the blogging is releasing its wings quickly. Your formulate is a great one than it. I was studying some of your posts on this website and i also conceive this site is actually informative.

      June 28, 2012 at 10:32 pm | Reply
  55. HONESTLY!

    Do you think the war in Iraq would have went alot smoother if we just has secret service ice Saddam Hussein?
    And what about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?
    Should he be considered a terrorist as well?

    March 6, 2012 at 5:07 pm | Reply
    • James

      The whole problem we have in Iran is that we got rid of Saddam. Saddam might be a monster but he is a secular monster that kept the religious fanatics down. Under Saddam Iran was completely secular.

      The moment we got rid of him we had unrest for the last 10 years, probably more Iraqi died in the 10 years since his removal than what would have died under his regime.

      March 6, 2012 at 5:18 pm | Reply
      • HONESTLY!

        Sounds like taking Saddam out was a bad idea, period?
        he had nothing to do with 911, there were no weapons of mass destruction.
        I've never understood why we invaded Iraq in the 1st place. Considering 15 of the 19 terrorist involved in the 911 terrorist act were from Saudi Arabia.

        March 6, 2012 at 5:24 pm |
  56. HONESTLY!

    I say if we know undoubtedly that they are terrorist, TAKE EM OUT! It doesn't matter what country they are from, or in!
    We need to trust those we've voted in to lead our country.
    i would just like to know the criteria they use to claim if someone is or isn't a terrorist?

    March 6, 2012 at 4:59 pm | Reply
    • humberto

      Trust – assured reliance on the character, ability, strength, or truth of someone or something b : one in which confidence is placed.

      What happened to in God we trust, all others have to pay?

      criteria -a standard on which a judgment or decision may be baseed.

      March 6, 2012 at 5:24 pm | Reply
      • politically correct

        I completely understand the definitions of the words in my post.
        So I dont really understand what your comment is saying.
        Sounds like you want to get rid of our laws and government, and let the pope, and priest run our country?
        Thats very dangerous, we would then have unrest here in the USA, like they have in Muslim countries.
        our forefathers new this, that is why separation of church and state was put in place!
        I say we trust in logic and sound science! And not rely on some invisible being who may or may not exist! and those who live their lives on a literal interpretation of any "bible" is the reason we have so much unrest today. Please people learn to think rationally, and stop looking to your bible (which is the word of man not god) for guidance.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:10 pm |
      • humberto

        as usual, you infer alot.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:30 pm |
      • humberto

        and Your all out of context

        March 6, 2012 at 7:37 pm |
      • humberto

        Proof beyound a doubt

        March 6, 2012 at 7:44 pm |
      • humberto

        Thats what the criteria is supposed to be.

        March 6, 2012 at 7:50 pm |
  57. idb

    Holder would say that. Just like he thinks it is ok to smuggle guns to Mexico, getting Federal agents and innocent civilians killed, but not for Americans to defend themselves. This guy should be in prison.

    March 6, 2012 at 4:53 pm | Reply
  58. Arden30

    Terrorists are terrorists. They should all be killed or treated equally no matter where they are from (America or elsewhere in the world).

    March 6, 2012 at 4:52 pm | Reply
    • James

      What makes one a terrorist? Because the President labeled you as "National Security Risk"? The problem with current policy is that there is no recourse. Once the white house declared you as "Terrorist" you cannot appeal this declaration anywhere. There is no procedure in which you can prove your innocence. You simply get killed. This is a directly opposition to the ideal of not being deprived of life, liberty, or justice without due process.

      March 6, 2012 at 5:21 pm | Reply
      • chimp

        Then don't anything that will label you as a terrorist. Simple as that.

        March 6, 2012 at 5:49 pm |
    • Cobra-212

      The problem with giving the power to declare someone a "terrorist" to one person, is something called abuse of power. What if Mr. O declares his republican opponent in the coming election a "terrorist" and orders him taken out? The way the law is written, there is no challenge to this decision either before or after the fact and any information regarding the rationale and reasoning would be locked up for reasons of national security. What if he did that after losing the election in November and before his opponent took office in January? What if he declared you a terrorist simply because you railed online against a decision of his administration? I can agree that U.S. citizens traveling to and residing in foreign countries, fighting against the U.S. are terrorists. But I would handle this by requiring those who want to travel to and reside in certain countries for non job related personal efforts, to give up their U.S. citizenship. That way they make the choice to be enemies of the U.S. and as non-citizens they have none of the rights of those of us who support and defend our country.

      March 6, 2012 at 6:08 pm | Reply
      • Plt2072

        Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004) establishes the right of U.S. citizens to challenge their designation as enemy combatants, terrorists, whatever(bythe government), through the utilization of a neutral, third party. The killing of an operational planner for an established enemy, in a recognized theater of war, regardless of that individual's citizenship is a legal and justifiable action.

        March 6, 2012 at 10:50 pm |
  59. humberto

    Just because he's Black, doesn't mean Black people are terrorists, does it ?

    March 6, 2012 at 4:51 pm | Reply
  60. Skeptical Always

    Is going to another country to plot a terrorist act against Americans a crime or an act of war? Please enlighten me as to who was supposed to go execute an arrest warrant on Anwar al-Awlaki? It is not the US military's job to go into a hostile & possibly lethal situation for the purpose of extracting traitors. I'm certainly not willing to ask our military (who has sacrificed so much already) to do that. Sorry, but when al-Awlaki left the US and joined al Qaeda he became an enemy combatant.

    March 6, 2012 at 4:47 pm | Reply
    • humberto

      War – a state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations
      Crime -an act or the commission of an act that is forbidden or the omission of a duty that is commanded by a public law and that makes the offender liable to punishment by that law; especially : a gross violation of law.

      March 6, 2012 at 4:58 pm | Reply
    • dakota2000

      This is america. We have a constitution.

      Sure, he *probably* was a traitor and deserved the death penalty, but under our law, he also deserves a trial first. He is presumed INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty.

      It would be happy with a trial without him being there. But bring the evidence. Let a jury decide then nuke him.

      You can give him a chance to surrender and defend himself if he chooses.

      But he is a US citizen and deserved a trial (as did his teenaged son who was killed while looking for him).

      March 6, 2012 at 5:08 pm | Reply
      • humberto

        Whats wrong with the judicial system that forces such people to to seek such relief ?

        March 6, 2012 at 5:15 pm |
      • Mohammad A Dar

        Ya, but do things always in hinduism, criminality in opposition to American constitution.

        March 6, 2012 at 8:45 pm |
      • Meh

        And the hammer meets the nail. An excellent point, but one that flies over most other posters' heads and is completely ignored by this Department of "Justice."

        But while we're here, can anyone explain why it's okay to deny due process to one terrorist because he's planning something, but demand every Constitutional protection be afforded to those who are caught actually carrying out terrorist acts?

        March 6, 2012 at 11:03 pm |
      • humberto

        theater

        March 6, 2012 at 11:23 pm |
      • humberto

        Had the US Constitution been applied, what would be the conflict ?

        March 6, 2012 at 11:38 pm |
      • humberto

        The conflict was the corrupt living and breathing constitution.

        March 6, 2012 at 11:43 pm |
      • jim

        when he waged war against the US he was no longer a "citizen".

        March 17, 2012 at 12:14 am |
    • James

      What about ACTUAL combatants? Pretty sure it is illegal for the U.S. Military to summarily execute soldiers. Even they had to go through court martial for treason before executing anyone who they believe is directly aiding the other side.

      March 6, 2012 at 5:24 pm | Reply
      • humberto

        People have been executed for diobeying an order in combat .

        March 6, 2012 at 5:51 pm |
      • dakota2000

        combat is a whole different thing. This was a well thought out mission. In combat, you can't have a mutiny. This is a different thing.

        March 7, 2012 at 2:57 am |
1 2 3 4 5

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.