Iraq detainee accused of killing U.S. soldiers may go free
November 30th, 2011
07:38 PM ET

Iraq detainee accused of killing U.S. soldiers may go free

By Tim Lister

Ali Mussa Daqduq – a Lebanese militant accused of involvement in the murder of several U.S. soldiers in Iraq – has been in U.S. military detention in Iraq since 2007. But not for much longer. As the last U.S. forces depart Iraq, Daqduq may soon go free, without facing trial.

The Iraqis have given no indication that they will allow Daqduq to be taken out of the country and the case has become a tug-of-war between Iraq and the Obama Administration. The prospect that Daqduq – a veteran operative of the Lebanese Hezbollah militia – may escape U.S. justice altogether has infuriated members of Congress. And even if the Iraqis agree to let him leaves with his captors, just how and where he would face trial is another political minefield for the Justice Department.

Daqduq was accused of organizing a kidnapping in the Iraqi city of Karbala in January 2007 that left five U.S. soldiers dead. After he was captured some months later, according to U.S. intelligence officials, Daqduq pretended to be a deaf-mute. But officials identified him as a 24-year veteran of Hezbollah who had commanded a special operations unit and been sent to Iraq to develop “Special Groups” within Shi’ite militia. They said he admitted working with the Quds Force, a branch of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. U.S. military intelligence contended the Quds force was using Hezbollah as a surrogate in Iraq.

Daqduq has been held by the U.S. military as an “enemy combatant.” Now the withdrawal of U.S. forces is almost complete and he can no longer be held without trial once hostilities are over. But U.S. officials are reluctant to hand over such a high-profile suspect to the Iraqi justice system. Their anxiety is that under pressure from Iran, Iraqi authorities would soon let Daqduq go free.

That concern was shared by 20 U.S. Senators in a letter to U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in July, when they warned that “Iraq’s current legal regime could allow Daqduq to return to the fight as a result of an inability to detain and prosecute him under Iraqi criminal law, ineffective incarceration or other challenges.”

Initial requests by the U.S. to take Daqduq for trial outside the country appear to have fallen on deaf ears in Baghdad. Negotiations are continuing; diplomats say the case was almost certainly raised during U.S. Vice President Joe Biden’s visit to Iraq this week.

But on Sunday, U.S. Ambassador James Jeffrey would say only that “The United States under the provisions of the security agreement is authorized in conjunction and coordination with the Iraqis to hold detainees until the end of the period of our military presence, which will be legally the end of December.” “Beyond that we don’t get into discussion about who we are holding and who were are not holding by name,” Ambassador Jeffrey added.

Even if the Iraqis change their mind, there is the thorny question of how and where Daqduq might be tried. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R.-S.C.) wants Daqduq removed to Guantanamo Bay. He told Attorney General Eric Holder during a hearing of the Judiciary Committee this month: “If you try to bring this guy back to the United States and put him in a civilian court or a military commission inside the United States, holy hell’s going to break out.”

Holder responded that a decision rested with “people higher up the ladder.” But the Obama Administration remains committed to closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay and sending an additional prisoner there would not be palatable.

The idea of a military trial at a U.S. base overseas has been mooted, but Professor Robert Chesney, an expert in national security law at the University of Texas, says these bases are not sovereign U.S. territory and most host governments would not welcome the trial of a senior Hezbollah figure.

According to legal experts trial by a military commission at a base in the continental U.S. would be a viable option. But Chesney notes that option has already run into political thickets. One possible compromise – a part of U.S. territory such as Guam.

But first, the U.S. military has to get Ali Mussa Daqduq out of Iraq.

Mohammed Tawfeeq and Katie Glaeser contributed to this report.


Filed under: Hezbollah • Iraq • Military • Quds Force
soundoff (12 Responses)
  1. wharf0rat

    Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld, war criminals responsible for the murder of over 100,000, are free. What's the problem with letting this guy go too?

    December 16, 2011 at 7:01 pm | Reply
  2. Seb

    http://www.armchairgeneral.com/kill-or-capture-interview-with-interrogator-and-author-matthew-alexander.htm

    December 1, 2011 at 8:38 pm | Reply
  3. Mike

    Why not just try this guy on a navy ship out at sea it counts as US land and if he found guility they can just make him walk the plank

    December 1, 2011 at 6:40 am | Reply
  4. tsogtoo

    HI all no war in the world please.My son is now 4 mounth but he is very pain please some peaple help me.I am from mongolia.

    December 1, 2011 at 2:15 am | Reply
    • DOC

      dont care, its your problem we have enough as is

      December 7, 2011 at 11:14 am | Reply
  5. exterminateallmuslims

    just kill them all, nuke the whole fuckin' country, get rid of all these islamo-fascist cunts

    December 1, 2011 at 1:34 am | Reply
    • reply to wicked filth

      Keep barking your fantasy coward. Just too bad filth like you is allowed to live freely.

      December 17, 2011 at 3:08 pm | Reply
  6. American for Justice

    Let the guy walk and as soon as he is free, shoot him dead, as an enemy cobatant.

    November 30, 2011 at 11:52 pm | Reply
    • reply to wicked filth

      Having you hanged by your eye lids would be more suitable you cowardly maggot.

      December 17, 2011 at 3:07 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.